Power struggle: the real differences between PS4 and Xbox One performance


Recommended Posts

An article just posted on EDGE really drops it hard. Some snippets:
 

Our contacts have told us that memory reads on PS4 are 40-50 per cent quicker than Xbox One, and its ALU (Arithmetic Logic Unit) is around 50 per cent faster. One basic example we were given suggested that without optimisation for either console, a platform-agnostic development build can run at around 30FPS in 1920?1080 on PS4, but it?ll run at ?20-something? FPS in 1600?900 on Xbox One. ?Xbox One is weaker and it?s a pain to use its ESRAM,? concluded one developer.

Even this close to launch, ?the hardware isn?t locked,? said another source. Sony and Microsoft are each still working on the graphics drivers for each console, and Xbox One is lagging behind in this regard ? Microsoft ?has been late on their drivers and that has been hurting them,? said one source. Another described Xbox One?s graphics drivers less charitably as ?horrible?. Both consoles? graphics drivers will continue to improve right up to ? and beyond ? launch, which will even up the difference in performance a little.

One source even suggested that enforcing parity across consoles could become a political issue between platform holders, developers and publishers. They said that it could damage perceptions of a cross platform title, not to mention Xbox One, if the PS4 version shipped with an obviously superior resolution and framerate; better to ?castrate? the PS4 version and release near-identical games to avoid ruffling any feathers.

http://www.edge-online.com/news/power-struggle-the-real-differences-between-ps4-and-xbox-one-performance/
 

This article screams hits and page views to me for several obvious reasons:

  • DirectX has been on the platform since the start, it's not buggy or "poor" it just works due to shared codebase. They also released their mono driver during E3 which is the specially optimised version of DirectX for the platform. So saying they have been late with drivers is wrong.
  • They mention "without optimisation". To me, that means someone is working these numbers out without a real kit, and is literally speculating for EDGE for their page views in this upcoming next-gen war. There is more offloaded inside the X1 to special CPU's than there is in the PS4 also.
  • ESRAM has been in the Xbox since the 360, for developers to say its a pain to use is just absurd since they share a similar memory structure. ESRAM will also be managed by DIrectX, its why the API is there. Ideal for GPU buffering, which DirectX will manage and mainly use it for.
  • Memory reads are 50% faster? From what? I can tell you as a fact that if its the CPU doing the memory read, it would be a heck lot slower. Even if its the GPU doing the read, it the developer doesn't implement the switching of tasks while waiting for GDDR return, then it'll still be slower. It depends how deep the OpenGL wrapper goes.
  • Also, the comments from Albert and many developers which have said: "Ever though the console which seemed less powerful is the one which is the most powerful?"
  • The article clearly states the hardware isn't locked even though both consoles have hit mass-production. 

There's been a similar thread on SonyGAF around this, and its hit 5 pages in 30 minutes. Everyone's ran with this "anonymous source" and not actually thought about it critically. Whereas a similar thread which praised the design of the Xbox SoC got closed in around 10 minutes. Considering the overly biased magazine cover also, this is no surprise.

damage control because once you see the games not looking better than xbox versions, you will remember you read that article that said its because of politics. aren't these the same guys that had on their front page that ps4 is what you should buy? I wont even go into the blatant BS claims in there,because really, its comical.

damage control because once you see the games not looking better than xbox versions, you will remember you read that article that said its because of politics. aren't these the same guys that had on their front page that ps4 is what you should buy? I wont even go into the blatant BS claims in there,because really, its comical.

Yeah, same people. They are clearly in the Sony camp. You don't put a console on your front page as "This is your next console" when opponent is showing better games.

Yeah, same people. They are clearly in the Sony camp. You don't put a console on your front page as "This is your next console" when opponent is showing better games.

 

just looking at the end of the article sets everything up,and tells you everything you need to know

 

The difference between cross platform launch window games will be small, and improved graphics drivers plus the power of the cloud might yet tip the balance in Xbox One?s favour. Nonetheless, at launch, PS4 will be the more capable console.

 

yeah you wont see a difference,and yeah the xbox one might end up looking better, but the ps4 is more powerful.

If the PS4 is better looking... I can live with it.. I will Exchange a slight graphics bump, for everything else I will get for $500 (who am I kidding, I will end up owning both. DO NOT TELL MY WIFE  :woot: )

 

More of these comparison's I've been reading, have come from developers who make smaller games that don't even come close to tapping the power of the  HORSIE'S (Horse Power) of the next gen boxes.

 

If PS4 games look better, then bravo...   :D

So obviously Sony fanboys will use this as a flag to wave around and bash the X1, but for us that are genuinely interested in the differences and impact on development, how trustworthy is the source?

 

I'm not talking about Edge necessarily, but whoever gave them the info they are sharing.

 

The reason I ask is because we have articles that seem to go against each other.  This one paints the X1 as a vastly inferior console hardware wise and difficult to develop for, but then we already have other technical articles recently that would paint the X1 as a close competitor or even make the case that it offers some advantages within the specs.  So who can we believe?  Its hard to ignore the fact that there is a lot of angst and hate thrown the X1s way vs the PS4 for the usual fanboy reasons, but that can't discount this article.  If its proven false, well then that's pretty ridiculous, but if its true, then its something to worry about. 

 

Sure, you can believe the articles that happen to match your opinion of MS and the X1, but that's just foolish.  What happens if another article comes out refuting these claims?  Do we dismiss those because we happen to prefer the idea that the X1 is seriously inferior, or are we stuck wondering. I see MS make claims that are quickly bashed and ignored and then claims against the X1 are quickly held up as the truth and supported.

 

As a console buyer, I'm fairly confused.  This whole spec argument seems to be turning into a witch hunt.  Unfortunately, on the internet, people can say things that are not true and can even right articles about them, so I don't know who is trustworthy in this case.

Hating Microsoft is the "Hottness"... All the kewl kids are doing it (right?...right?). The Xbox One will be fine for this console generation.

Will Sony have a power house gaming console? Well I would hope so for what's under the hood.

But none of that concerns me. I don't think it concerns any true fan of Xbox.

It's everyone else who favors a different console who are going bat nuts over it.

Funny thing is, people have seen the Xbox One, know its awesome, and then refuse to believe its the real deal...

It's like they have this fear of the Xbox One being that good. I believe in my heart it will be that good.

The specs difference isn't something new, everyone should has known by now that the PS4 is the more powerful system.. But from the posts here I didn't really expect the software/drivers to be behind also.

 

Also Microsoft Studios are featured partners for Edge Online so I highly doubt they would be biased against them.

 

The article states good and bad points for both the PS4 and Xbox One, it just says non-optimized games can run better on a system with more 'raw' power and that multi-platform games will likely not look much better on the PS4 because developers don't want their games to seem like they have a preference to one console and also because it costs them more; they will build on the base system and then optimize it for the PS4 and PC and the more optimizations the longer it takes to build = more expenses.

 

Better graphics does sell hardware in gaming, but the difference will be negligible especially on multi-plat games.

I don't think the majority of games will differ in graphical quality for cross-platform launches. Due to the higher graphical fill rate, you may find that over time Sony end up having a higher number of games running @60FPS/1080p+ but I would imagine this would be exclusives only as publishers for cross platform titles would strive for sales rather than optimisation.

 

I would like to know if Microsoft managed to pull off "free" FSAA 2x again this time around with their new ESRAM cache as that could help even things out.

e.g. 1080p / 30FPS / 2xAA vs 1080p / 60FPS / no AA

Sony should penalise any developers that purposefully cripple their games. I don't give a ###### about your politics, I want games to be the best they can be, and I'm sure the people that spend years of hard work creating them do too.

I would like to know if Microsoft managed to pull off "free" FSAA 2x again this time around with their new ESRAM cache as that could help even things out.

e.g. 1080p / 30FPS / 2xAA vs 1080p / 60FPS / no AA

Considering things like FXAA made large strides into eliminating the performance problems with FSAA in general I'm not sure it's necessary anymore.

I just wish the release would hurry up and come. I'm not getting either console to early next year as i want them to be out in public and have a test play/look before i commit to my purchase.

If the PS4 is better looking... I can live with it.. I will Exchange a slight graphics bump, for everything else I will get for $500 (who am I kidding, I will end up owning both. DO NOT TELL MY WIFE  :woot: )

 

Oh she'll find out. You just wait. 

 

However, you do seem like the target market for the Vita TV. Buy an XB1, prominently display it in the living room and tell your wife "I promise, this is the only console I have in here".

 

Meanwhile, you hide a PS4 in another room and hook up the Vita TV and use that to stream your PS4 games to your TV. And when your wife asks if the Vita TV is a console (if she ever sees that small thing... :rofl: ), you can truthfully say no :shiftyninja:. :innocent:  

Sony should penalise any developers that purposefully cripple their games. I don't give a **** about your politics, I want games to be the best they can be, and I'm sure the people that spend years of hard work creating them do too.

Hmmm did anyone say they were going to cripple their games?

 

But I doubt 3rd party titles will look different simply because there will be a target that all teams have to meet - when the game looks *this* good, then devs stop, optimize if necessary, fix bugs, and worry about things other than graphics.

Sony should penalise any developers that purposefully cripple their games. I don't give a **** about your politics, I want games to be the best they can be, and I'm sure the people that spend years of hard work creating them do too.

It'll never happen for any mutli-plat. Its just not how it works. People need to stop believing this article. There's already been quite a few next-gen developers on reddit who've laughed at this article. Personally, I can see how much it lies to pull the hits in, and its succeeded. 

  • Like 1

It'll never happen for any mutli-plat. Its just not how it works. People need to stop believing this article. There's already been quite a few next-gen developers on reddit who've laughed at this article. Personally, I can see how much it lies to pull the hits in, and its succeeded. 

 

Do you have links?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!