Xbox One exclusive Ryse runs at 900p


Recommended Posts

Actually there where other third party games who also increased their resolution and/or FPS this gen on subsequent releases.

 

You need to stop thinking in absolutes all the time, I'm sure there are a few cases of the opposite where the nature of the game benefits from one of the two - or maybe the devs could get away with a cheapo rerelease, maybe making significant progress in terms of features was ruled out by a harder limit like RAM.

 

But ultimately, the majority of console titles put perf budgets towards features ahead of FPS/Resolution. It's a clear trend and it makes sense, native resolution isn't a big deal when you're rolling "TV+Couch", and 60fps isn't as rewarding due to the limitations of interfacing with a controller instead of a keyboard and mouse.

MS and Sony don't pay retail price for the hardware so I think it's feasible to stick something with a retail value of 800-1000$ inside a, let's say 600$ console.

 

What I would have gone for is this. Keep the same basic hardware, but beef up the CPU part of the APU to desktop class and add another dedicated GPU (200-250$ retail value) for crossfire in games that need it.  Maybe the tech is a year away (desktop class steamroller APU), the box will be bigger and it would need more cooling, but I say it would have been worth it.

 

 

I will grant you that you could make an argument that a $600 console with those specs might be worth it, but does that mean it would sell well in the market today?

 

Sony was unable to convince many people to buy a ps3 @ $600.  The X1 is pushing it with $500 but at least they are trying to counter that with a pitch about the value of Kinect.  I'm just not sure if a $600 console has much of a chance beyond niche status.

 

This discussion reminds me of a couple consoles that came out during the snes/genesis era and then the sega saturn/ps1 days that demanded high prices but did in fact offer a higher end performance.  That would be the Neo Geo and 3DO.  Both consoles were clearly superior, offering games that could match arcade level quality, but they commanded a price that simply kept them out of the mass market.

The probable reason it will of been dropped to 900p is simply business requirements towards frame-rate with tightened budget while a lot of the team members may be moved onto different projects internally. We most definitely will see resolution gains based on the public acceptance of these resolution changes online. It's just annoying, but I'm guessing the Combat Vidoc trailer which was in 1080p was actually rendered in 900p and that looks sublime to be honest.

 

Also Athernar, Halo is the best example of a game which goes from Sub-HD to native 720p this generation. 

 

Anyone who bad mouths Forza needs to do more reading up on it considering every Forza game since Forza 3 has had a physics engine which runs at 360FPS. Including Forza 5. For them to push visuals at a locked 60fps also is a big feat. Considering the jump between graphics between Forza 2 and 3, I wouldn't be suprised if we saw something similar in next-gen.

  • 2 weeks later...

Looks like Ryse is back up to 1080p.

 

Javascript is not enabled or refresh the page to view.

Click here to view the Tweet

 

Javascript is not enabled or refresh the page to view.

Click here to view the Tweet

 

Good. None of these games should use sub-1080p graphics. It's just pathetic that these new consoles can't guarantee 1080p60. I thought it was a sure thing a year or two ago considering how cheap it is to do on PC. But instead Microsoft makes a $350 console and forces you to buy a $150 camera and Sony releases a $400 console that can STILL not guarantee 1080p60 but is much more likely to do it than XB1. 

 

Come on!

  • Like 1

Wonder what happened since earlier he said there were downgrades: http://gearnuke.com/ryse-downgrade-officially-confirmed-crytek-ceo/

 

i sure love downgrades

 

iblrbwqLb6QbLW.gif

 

(the bluriness from the 2nd pic is because it was captured from a streamed video, 1st one is a direct screen shot).

Well going by dualshocker's two comparison articles, I'm liking the new version over the older ones.

 

The reduced jaggies looks better and I'm a lot keener on the appearance of the metal armor now - looks less like the chrome plastic that Samsung uses on their phones :P

Well going by dualshocker's two comparison articles, I'm liking the new version over the older ones.

 

The reduced jaggies looks better and I'm a lot keener on the appearance of the metal armor now - looks less like the chrome plastic that Samsung uses on their phones :p

 

The skin and armor both look more real, how some people can say the old version looks better than the new is laughable to me.   People seem to think the higher polygons in a character model the better when that's not how it works in the end, just shows that most gamers have no idea about game development.   You can have a lower poly count but make it looks better with better textures and shaders/lighting and so on.  

ryse1_by_raziel1992-d6odjcy.gif

HNNGGGGG.

 

Kudos to Crytek, dropping the polys and upping the shaders was definitely the best artistic decision. Looks stunning. The full HD tweet is vague, but hopefully it is 1080p! 

The horribly broken english of those tweets doesn't push me to believe in them.

Well it is the CEO of Crytek and they're a German company.

 

He has stated "no downgrades" since E3. 1080p confirmed at E3, would mean still 1080p now.

I think it is 900p native.

 

Javascript is not enabled or refresh the page to view.

Click here to view the Tweet

 

They apply their upscaler for AA, framebuffer, and native 1080p, which is a very confusing way to put things, as that means it uses an upscaler to achieve native 1080p, which is not native right?

I think it is 900p native.

 

Javascript is not enabled or refresh the page to view.

Click here to view the Tweet

 

They apply their upscaler for AA, framebuffer, and native 1080p, which is a very confusing way to put things, as that means it uses an upscaler to achieve native 1080p, which is not native right?

The interesting thing is, is that its been 900p this whole time. No-one has noticed including journalists, media and everyone who's played it. With the framebuffer comment, post-processing effects may be applied after  its upscaled which may create a weird hybrid which causes the 1080p look so to speak.

 

Since its been like this since day 1 and the E3 demo was 900p, not bothered, looks intense.

I would be amazed if many of the launch titles on both XB1 or PS4 run at 60fps/1080. Launch titles are NEVER going to use the full potential of consoles so I don't see this as any surprise.

 

Also, is there any need for the "magical hidden power" part, all you're asking for is yet ANOTHER thread that this forum could do without over who has the biggest e-p***s because they chose the "right console".

Agreed.  These discussions would be much better if they were a bit less juvenile (And posters in general thought through their posts a little before posting...  It's common sense that launch titles aren't optimized to take full advantage of ANY console's feature set or hardware...  This has been the case since the beginning of time.  LOL

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!