max22 Posted September 26, 2013 Share Posted September 26, 2013 Glad to see! Finally a game using our processors fully! It was during the AMD event today is all I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alwaysonacoffebreak Posted September 26, 2013 Share Posted September 26, 2013 Ha. AMD is finally starting to reap benefits from BD/PD thanks to consoles, and everyone were laughing at the single-threaded performance. Your turn Intel. Guess it's safe to say that AMD is coming back with a bang. Consoles, CPU's finally taking advantage, new graphics on the throne. Glad I actually bought a ton of stocks at 2.13 :rofl: Arceles and fusi0n 2 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PGHammer Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Also, don't even think about downloading the BF4 beta unless your OS is x64 (yes - the PC beta is also x64-exclusive). The qualifiers get four days ahead of everyone else (the open beta starts October 5th and *will* require Origin). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crisp Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Ha. AMD is finally starting to reap benefits from BD/PD thanks to consoles, and everyone were laughing at the single-threaded performance. Your turn Intel. Guess it's safe to say that AMD is coming back with a bang. Consoles, CPU's finally taking advantage, new graphics on the throne. Glad I actually bought a ton of stocks at 2.13 :rofl: Arceles, MikeChipshop and Hurmoth 3 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coagulated Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Where's the trolling in this thread? I wanted some entertainment on my lunch break. Fan boys of both sides, you have disappointed me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicane-UK Veteran Posted September 27, 2013 Veteran Share Posted September 27, 2013 With CPU's and GPU's there's really no point in being brand allegiant. Just buy whichever vendor / generation is doing well at any particular point in time :) It's so good to hear AMD are starting to turn things around again, and putting some pressure on Intel again. I remember back in the days of the original Athlon I was religiously buying AMD CPU's - Intel weren't in the running at that point! trag3dy and Lighthalzen 2 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason S. Global Moderator Posted September 27, 2013 Global Moderator Share Posted September 27, 2013 can we have a link or something? i have no idea what's going on here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorganX Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 can we have a link or something? i have no idea what's going on here This. If the game is coded to support up to 8 x64 CPU cores, then it would do so on Intel processors as well. No? Ci7 1 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mando Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 This. If the game is coded to support up to 8 x64 CPU cores, then it would do so on Intel processors as well. No? exactly! Well done AMD for bringing your CPU line up into the 21st century, Intel has kept a seat warm for you right next to their season ticket box theyeve had since C2Q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theyarecomingforyou Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Ha. AMD is finally starting to reap benefits from BD/PD thanks to consoles, and everyone were laughing at the single-threaded performance. Your turn Intel. The problem with AMD's current architecture is that even with more cores and a higher clock speed they are still outperformed by Intel's. I'm a big fan of AMD but their processors just aren't competitive at the moment. nitins60 and The Dark Knight 2 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Fulcrum Subscriber¹ Posted September 27, 2013 Subscriber¹ Share Posted September 27, 2013 Have BF4 Beta requirements specs been announced then I t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManMountain Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 PC 64-bit Beta will be a 1.6GB download and I'd imagine recommended specs would run the beta fine. Minimum System Requirements OS: Windows Vista SP2 32-bit Processor (AMD): Athlon X2 2.8 GHz Processor (Intel): Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz Memory: 4 GB Hard Drive: 30 GB Graphics card (AMD): AMD Radeon HD 3870 Graphics card (NVIDIA): Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT Graphics memory: 512 MB Recommended System Requirements OS: Windows 8 64-bit Processor (AMD): Six-core CPU Processor (Intel): Quad-core CPU Memory: 8 GB Hard Drive: 30 GB Graphics card (AMD): AMD Radeon HD 7870 Graphics card (Nvidia): NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Graphics memory: 3 GB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
game_over Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Graphics card (AMD): AMD Radeon HD 7870 Thats killed my buzz a bit, when will we see better low profile graphics cards? I'm stuck with a 7750.. i do love the card it suit me well but i'd rather be able to run games on full. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fusi0n Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 PC 64-bit Beta will be a 1.6GB download and I'd imagine recommended specs would run the beta fine. Minimum System Requirements OS: Windows Vista SP2 32-bit Processor (AMD): Athlon X2 2.8 GHz Processor (Intel): Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz Memory: 4 GB Hard Drive: 30 GB Graphics card (AMD): AMD Radeon HD 3870 Graphics card (NVIDIA): Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT Graphics memory: 512 MB Recommended System Requirements OS: Windows 8 64-bit Processor (AMD): Six-core CPU Processor (Intel): Quad-core CPU Memory: 8 GB Hard Drive: 30 GB Graphics card (AMD): AMD Radeon HD 7870 Graphics card (Nvidia): NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Graphics memory: 3 GB If AMD is "mighty", then why does it recommend at six core cpu and the intel only 4? 123456789A and n_K 2 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManMountain Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 Not too long a wait :) 64-bit OS required on PC Note that you are required to run a 64-bit OS to join the Battlefield 4 Beta on PC. As a studio, we wanted to focus our efforts on testing the 64-bit version of the game. The full version of the game will also run on 32-bit Windows OS. Keeping the Battlefield fair At DICE, we are always striving to keep the Battlefield fair. We are happy to let you know that we have increased our protection against cheaters to not only use PunkBuster, but we will also work side by side with Gameblocks, who will provide us with their anti-cheat engine FairFight. We believe that the FairFight engine will be a great complement to the anti-cheat measures already in play. During the Beta we will try out both FairFight and PunkBuster to make the experience as good as possible for our players. You will notice information about the two anti-cheat measures on the server browser pages on Battlelog, and you will also potentially see messaging in the chat box in-game when a cheater is caught. We will get back to you later with more detail on how we are improving our anti-cheat measures in Battlefield 4. To our fans: We salute you Finally, I wanted to take the time to personally thank our millions of fans for making Battlefield what it is today. With Battlefield 4, we are making great new strides in the series and I am happy to have you along for the ride. Please let us know if you have any questions on the beta below and we?ll do our best to answer them. Now, all I have to do is to complete my three outstanding Assignments in Battlefield 3 before we launch Battlefield 4! /Karl Magnus TroedssonGeneral Manager, DICE http://blogs.battlefield.com/2013/09/this-is-the-bf4-beta/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draconian Guppy Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 benchmarks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alwaysonacoffebreak Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 The problem with AMD's current architecture is that even with more cores and a higher clock speed they are still outperformed by Intel's. I'm a big fan of AMD but their processors just aren't competitive at the moment. On multi-tasking they are not that behind, even ahead on some things, and that's what matters. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McKay Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Ah man a 7870? I have a 7770 and it begins to struggle sometimes at 2560x1440 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
francescob Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 4 cores >> 8 cores when the overall performance is the same. Lower power consumption, less overhead due to the additional threads, etc. In the end it's only what gives most bang per buck that counts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandor Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Just bought a PC with an FX-4200 (3.3GHz quad core) and it does get its ass handed to it by a good i5 for example. However it's still powerful enough. The difference is that the PC cost me about $300 less than the equivalent i5 machine with similar specs. Also has a GTX760 that does 70-100FPS on BF3 at high/ultra so I don't see it struggling to play BF4. Remember that BF games are generally pretty CPU intensive so you really need to be bringing a quad core to the table. The minimum specs listed are pretty laughable - those sort of specs wouldn't even play BF3 on low/med so it has literally nil chance of doing BF4 with the upgraded engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theyarecomingforyou Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 On multi-tasking they are not that behind, even ahead on some things, and that's what matters. ;) No, what matters is real world performance. I follow the releases of both companies but unfortunately AMD just hasn't been competitive where it matters (gaming, productivity, etc). Only in heavily threaded apps does AMD show any advantage but that is negated by the much higher power usage. It would be great if AMD were competitive with Intel as I'd happily switch back but that simply isn't the case. PS - I've been using AMD processors since the mid-90s, back in the K5 days. However, since the Core 2 Duo days I've been with Intel because they offer better performance. n_K and Dick Montage 2 Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azies Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 lol well I won't be playing Battlefield 4, my PC is getting long in the tooth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arceles Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Meh, I develop and do research, game and emulate, in every single aspect I have been more than happy with my AMD processor. Provided that it's coupled with decent components like high speed RAM and excellent GPU. going intel would result in 300 us dollars more for the performance that I currently have for my applications. Power consumption isn't an issue for me since I actually carry also a laptop, that if I needed to be really conscious about energy I would use it no problem... It's also an AMD one and it rocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Knight Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 I should be able to play on Medium at least if not High settings. Only planning to upgrade my rig sometime next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManMountain Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Been considering a Mobo/CPU and GPU upgrade but performance wouldn't improve much overall more of a sidestep, probably best option would be just to get a GTX 770 or 780. I'll wait and see how things go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts