Purchase advice wanted - new Android phone


Recommended Posts

So the touchscreen on my 3 year old Motorola Atrix has a massive dead zone, and I'm getting a new phone.  I'm with Bell Canada and I have a few hundred $$ in credit, so I'm going to stick with Bell.  I also want to avoid everything but Android.  So my choices are available here:

http://www.bell.ca/Mobility/Android-phones

The price isn't really an issue, but of course keeping the price lower is better.  I love everything about my Atrix, and I'm sad to see it go, and yet I have had the worst imaginable experience with it; Camera won't focus, screen won't auto-rotate, touchscreen has a dead zone, audio jack works intermittently, Motorola froze the device at Android 2.3.2 and refused to release the display drivers so that the community could build their own Android 4 on it, and then Motorola threatened to sue the guy that managed to develop his own display drivers from scratch... But it was my first Android.  And I absolutely love that I can do absolutely anything I want with an Android; I rooted and unlocked the phone, installed a customized version of Cyanogen on it, I made it my phone.  So I'm sticking with Android.

 

My only requirements are that the phone be unlockable and rootable.  I was able to both unlock and root my Atrix by myself, using software and a USB cable, with no difficulty whatsoever, and I would hope my next Android would be the same.

 

Some things that I would like to see, but don't really need are;

  • A gyroscope sensor (the more accurate version of an accelerometer sensor),
  • an AMOLED/OLED screen (I've never even laid my eyes on an OLED screen before),
  • big-format (my atrix is small phone format, but I like the idea of those halfway-between-phone-and-tablet sized phones),
  • hardware buttons (my atrix has 4 touch buttons, and I'd like to keep it that way.  I do not like the idea of relying on the display driver and hardware to update the screen to show me the button to close a program.)

 

Things that make absolutely no difference to me, and I would not pay extra money for:

  • Thinness and weight (I don't care how thick my phone is, and I don't care how much it weighs),
  • fingerprint sensor (seems to be all the rage with the new iPhone, but my Atrix already has a fingerprint sensor!  And I never had any use for it!)
  • Shape, color, material, or any other purely aesthetic qualities.  I do not care how my phone looks.  If I had the money, time, and expertise, I would build my own ugly-ass DIY cell phone and put it in a clear plastic case, because I am a geek, not a walking fashion statement.

 

Thanks for any advice!

 

 

Well me personally after going down to the ATT store here and playing with all the phones I am sold on the LG G2 which i on the fence for either that or galaxy s4 and the note 3 but I am def going LG G2.  Have not checked about unlocking but i know its rooted already just do not know how easy. I would venture to guess its very easy. 

 

If unlocking and modding is the biggest thing to you then the galaxy s4 is for you because it takes a few seconds for that one lol

Not familiar with Bell or their credit system. Are those credits for talking/data usage, or in total for the budget for the phone from the company too?

Do you have the option to import a phone yourself? Because from my recent findings, I'd highly recommend importing one from China.

Not familiar with Bell or their credit system. Are those credits for talking/data usage, or in total for the budget for the phone from the company too?

Do you have the option to import a phone yourself? Because from my recent findings, I'd highly recommend importing one from China.

 

Credit towards the entire phone, not the contract plan, but only towards phones in their stock, because they get sponsored from phone manufacturers.

 

I'm almost definitely going to get the Samsung Galaxy S III at the moment, please let me know if this is a bad idea.  All of their $0 phones are $200 without a contract.  The S III is listed as $50 with contract, or $800 without, so it seems like the best deal.  It's a large format phone, with a dual core, OLED screen, honestly it has everything i asked for, at a sweet price.  I think im gonna get it.

Credit towards the entire phone, not the contract plan, but only towards phones in their stock, because they get sponsored from phone manufacturers.

 

I'm almost definitely going to get the Samsung Galaxy S III at the moment, please let me know if this is a bad idea.  All of their $0 phones are $200 without a contract.  The S III is listed as $50 with contract, or $800 without, so it seems like the best deal.  It's a large format phone, with a dual core, OLED screen, honestly it has everything i asked for, at a sweet price.  I think im gonna get it.

 

Galaxy S3 is at least 1.5 years old now. You really want to be stuck with such an older phone for 2-3 years (not sure what your contract are there).

 

 What's the price for the S4? Canada's prices are always so much damn higher it's annoying. Here (Canadian living in USA) you can get the S4 for $50-$99 easy.

 

Problems with buying older phones:

 

  1. Updates, you might not see the latest version of android come out ever. Specs may limit it or Samsung can just decide its not worth bothering.
  2. Custom ROMs, even though its easy to say, oh well I just get a hacked version of the update for my phone and put it on it. Usually these custom ROMs are based off of manufacturer's ROMs so the older the ROM they are basing it off of the harder to make any new versions of android work onyour phone. Things like drivers, and bugs.
  3. Slow downs, newer apps come out that tax hardware more and more, and older CPUs/GPUs struggle to keep up with the latest apps sometimes.

etc...

 

Many more reasons not to get that phone. Galaxy S4 would be the oldest phone to get IMO. If you don't mind big phones, the LG G2 has a really nice screen and fastest available CPU (on Android), with a nice camera with optical image stabilization.

 

In order of old to new...

 

GS3

Note 2

------ Buy anything below this line....

GS4

LG G2

Note 3

Credit towards the entire phone, not the contract plan, but only towards phones in their stock, because they get sponsored from phone manufacturers.

 

I'm almost definitely going to get the Samsung Galaxy S III at the moment, please let me know if this is a bad idea.  All of their $0 phones are $200 without a contract.  The S III is listed as $50 with contract, or $800 without, so it seems like the best deal.  It's a large format phone, with a dual core, OLED screen, honestly it has everything i asked for, at a sweet price.  I think im gonna get it.

Well, that's too bad. For less than 400 USD (you can find it for as low as $369 online), you could have bought this baby unlocked: http://www.xiaomi.com/en/mi3

 

It sure beats Galaxy S3 (and even S4 (got better battery on it and better cpu)) and there are even cheaper options out there, with nice power to them.

Galaxy S3 is at least 1.5 years old now. You really want to be stuck with such an older phone for 2-3 years (not sure what your contract are there).

 

 What's the price for the S4? Canada's prices are always so much damn higher it's annoying. Here (Canadian living in USA) you can get the S4 for $50-$99 easy.

 

Problems with buying older phones:

 

  1. Updates, you might not see the latest version of android come out ever. Specs may limit it or Samsung can just decide its not worth bothering.
  2. Custom ROMs, even though its easy to say, oh well I just get a hacked version of the update for my phone and put it on it. Usually these custom ROMs are based off of manufacturer's ROMs so the older the ROM they are basing it off of the harder to make any new versions of android work onyour phone. Things like drivers, and bugs.
  3. Slow downs, newer apps come out that tax hardware more and more, and older CPUs/GPUs struggle to keep up with the latest apps sometimes.

etc...

 

Many more reasons not to get that phone. Galaxy S4 would be the oldest phone to get IMO. If you don't mind big phones, the LG G2 has a really nice screen and fastest available CPU (on Android), with a nice camera with optical image stabilization.

 

In order of old to new...

 

GS3

Note 2

------ Buy anything below this line....

GS4

LG G2

Note 3

 

Doesn't matter how old it is.. Samsung phones will get Android 5.0 when it comes out. S3, S4, Note 2 will get Android 5.0 upgrade. Which I can get an quote from the site for you:

 

 

Samsung's Android 5.0 upgrades

Although Samsung is yet to officially confirm its Android 5.0 schedule, a SamMobile source is claiming to know which phones and tablets will be getting the upgrade. According to the source, the devices set to receive the upgrade are the Galaxy S4, Galaxy S3, Galaxy Note 2, Galaxy Note 8.0 and Galaxy Note 10.1. Do note that this claim was made before Google announced Android 4.4, so if it was ever correct, it's probably a lot less correct now.

 

 

Research first before you post anything.

Note 2 is not getting any update ever. The only update they will push out is the region locking one. 1 year has passed and it's still on Android 4.1

Samsung first said it's getting 4.2 then they said they are skipping directly to 4.3 and now there are reports of it directly getting 4.4

In the end they will not release anything as the phone will be more than a year old and most Androids are dead support wise once released.

I will only buy a Google phone if it's gonna be an Android. I had enough of this update shi*.

I might even think of iPhone next year if the screen size is 4.5-5 inches.

Well if the S3 does get the 4.4 update (nevermind 5.0 which I highly doubt) it will be the last on the list, which means you could wait up to a year. Also it only has 1gb ram, it might run pretty sluggish down the road with these updates. 

 

My sister had an Atrix and motorola promised an update to 4.0 yet changed their minds 1 year later... so rumors or press released don't mean much especially if it takes a such a long time to get the update. You are at the manufacturer's mercy, and low on their priority list.

 

So whats the point by the time you get the update your contract is up lol. Doesn't make any sense to buy such old phones, other than financially of course.

 

If you have to pay a $300 to get the S4 instead of the the S3 for $50 thats another story. Did he say how much it would cost for an S4?

Well I ended up getting the Galaxy S3.  Mostly because it was so much cheaper, it really was the best deal in the house, but the guy at the cash at Bell (who was a very smart and upfront guy) said that he owned an S3 and switched to an S4, and personally prefers the S3 because of some performance issues he had with the s4, and not really anything new or better with it to make the performance issues worth it.

 

As for the fact that its an old phone, well so was my Atrix when I got it.  And Motorola locked us all at Android 2.3.2 for the Atrix.  Because they're *******.  But I believe Samsung has had a better track record with updating at least a stretch older than Motorola.  But ultimately all I felt like I was missing was a UI change, a few novelty features, and a handful of apps that I couldn't install that I wanted, because they required Android 4.0 and up.  But it was still a great phone, and I honestly loved it so much that I really just wanted to try and fix it and not get a new one.  But then I found out I had the credit at Bell :D

 

The guy at Bell warned me about unlocking to install a custom ROM that it would void the warranty, and something about "even if you change the number back, they can see that you've changed the number", not quite sure what he was talking about there, but how about rooting?  Is it still like it was with the Atrix, where you just use SuperOneClick, and if you need to send it in for warranty, you use the same program to unroot?  Because I have a 1 year warranty, and I think I'm gonna ride it out before I unlock it.

Note 2 is not getting any update ever. The only update they will push out is the region locking one. 1 year has passed and it's still on Android 4.1

Samsung first said it's getting 4.2 then they said they are skipping directly to 4.3 and now there are reports of it directly getting 4.4

In the end they will not release anything as the phone will be more than a year old and most Androids are dead support wise once released.

 

 

I honestly don't see the fuss over updates. I can run any app I need to and my phone works just fine. What is in an update that will make my phone that much more usable? I may feel differently in a year, but right now I'm with it like it is.

Well I ended up getting the Galaxy S3.  Mostly because it was so much cheaper, it really was the best deal in the house, but the guy at the cash at Bell (who was a very smart and upfront guy) said that he owned an S3 and switched to an S4, and personally prefers the S3 because of some performance issues he had with the s4, and not really anything new or better with it to make the performance issues worth it.

 

As for the fact that its an old phone, well so was my Atrix when I got it.  And Motorola locked us all at Android 2.3.2 for the Atrix.  Because they're *******.  But I believe Samsung has had a better track record with updating at least a stretch older than Motorola.  But ultimately all I felt like I was missing was a UI change, a few novelty features, and a handful of apps that I couldn't install that I wanted, because they required Android 4.0 and up.  But it was still a great phone, and I honestly loved it so much that I really just wanted to try and fix it and not get a new one.  But then I found out I had the credit at Bell :D

 

The guy at Bell warned me about unlocking to install a custom ROM that it would void the warranty, and something about "even if you change the number back, they can see that you've changed the number", not quite sure what he was talking about there, but how about rooting?  Is it still like it was with the Atrix, where you just use SuperOneClick, and if you need to send it in for warranty, you use the same program to unroot?  Because I have a 1 year warranty, and I think I'm gonna ride it out before I unlock it.

 

 

You can root then you can unroot it back to default factory settings before you give the phone to the store for repairs or recycle. So they won't know anything about rooting.

 

 

Not sure about unlock part...  Some providers can unlock your phone at the end of your contract ... not sure about canada...  In USA, you can get your phone unlocked as long as you have good record on your phone account as long as the providers have a way to unlock it. If not, you will have to unlock it by yourself somewhere else.

You can root then you can unroot it back to default factory settings before you give the phone to the store for repairs or recycle. So they won't know anything about rooting.

 

 

Not sure about unlock part...  Some providers can unlock your phone at the end of your contract ... not sure about canada...  In USA, you can get your phone unlocked as long as you have good record on your phone account as long as the providers have a way to unlock it. If not, you will have to unlock it by yourself somewhere else.

 

I unlocked my Atrix with ADB and a usb cable.  Is it still like that?

I have no idea.. I have not unlocked my phone yet...  

 

I have seen people unlocking their phones with codes...  but it could be other way like you mentioned.

 

as I recall you use a special command line program to extract the code from the phone using the ADB protocol, and then you use ADB itself and input that code to unlock the phone

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • No, size is not the only selling point. I did not even remotely say that. Your claim was that "building your own will be faster and cheaper". This is false. You cannot build something close to that form factor with off-the-shelf parts. You can build a Mini-ITX PC and pay more, or something larger and pay less. But these are different market segments. It's apples and oranges.
    • There is a default resolution setting in Settings > Display that can be changed with a click. You can also change the settings on a per-game basis. No CLI needed. Also, Steam has countless games that are not "[perpetual] alpha/beta games", so no need for the straw man. Plus you can use other stores as well. And console games (e.g. PS5) cost a fortune, which itself more than negates the price subsidy on the system, unless you plan on exclusively playing 1 or 2 games. It's true that you shouldn't buy a system that doesn't support the game(s) you want to play, but I think that's kinda obvious, and applies to every console as well as PC. I don't game in the living room and have no need of a Steam Machine, but there is a clear market segment that would find it useful.
    • RSS Guard 5.2.0 by Razvan Serea RSS Guard is a simple (yet powerful) feed reader. It is able to fetch the most known feed formats, including RSS/RDF and ATOM. It's free, it's open-source. RSS Guard currently supports Czech, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian. RSS Guard will never depend on other services - this includes online news aggregators like Feedly, The Old Reader and others. RSS Guard is developed on top of the Qt library and it supports these operating systems: Windows GNU/Linux OS/2 (eComStation) Mac OS X xBSD (possibly) Android (possibly) other platforms supported by Qt The core features of RSS Guard are: support for online feed synchronization via plugins, Tiny Tiny RSS (from RSS Guard 3.0.0). multiplatform, support for all feed formats, simplicity, import/export of feeds to/from OPML 2.0, downloader with own tab and support for up to 6 parallel downloads, message filter with regular expressions, feed metadata fetching including icons, simple Adblock functionality, customized popup notifications, Google-based auto-completion for internal web browser location bar, ability to cleanup internal message database with various options, enhanced feed auto-updating with separate time intervals, multiple data backend support, SQLite (in-memory DBs too), MySQL. is able to specify target database by its name (MySQL backend), “portable” mode support with clever auto-detection, feed categorization, drap-n-drop for feed list, automatic checking for updates, ability to discover existing feeds on websites, full support of podcasts (both RSS & ATOM), ability to backup/restore database or settings, fully-featured recycle bin, printing of messages and any web pages, can be fully controlled via keyboard, feed authentication (Digest-MD5, BASIC, NTLM-2), handles tons of messages & feeds, sweet look & feel, fully adjustable toolbars (changeable buttons and style), ability to check for updates on all platforms + self-updating on Windows, hideable main menu, toolbars and list headers, KFeanza-based default icon theme + ability to create your own icon themes, fully skinnable user interface + ability to create your own skins, “newspaper” view, plenty of skins, support for "feed://" URI scheme, ability to hide list of feeds/categories, open-source development model based on GNU GPL license, version 3, tabbed interface, integrated web browser with adjustable behavior + external browser support, internal web browser mouse gestures support, desktop integration via tray icon, localizations to some languages, Qt library is the only dependency, open-source development model and friendly author waiting for your feedback, no ads, no hidden costs. RSS Guard 5.2.0 changelog: Added: Feed auto-fetch can now also be delayed while Feral GameMode is active on Linux and startup auto-fetch is skipped when GameMode is already active. (#2265) WebEngine builds can now use RSS Guard generated proxy auto-config (PAC) rules so article/web browsing follows per-account and per-feed proxy settings more closely. (#2273) Generated PAC rules now also cover related subdomains and use Public Suffix List data, so feeds such as feeds.bbc.co.uk can also proxy resources from images.bbc.co.uk. (#2273) Standard feeds can now define extra proxy domains, useful when article images, stylesheets or other page resources are loaded from a CDN or another domain that should use the same feed proxy. (#2273) RSS Guard now asks for proxy credentials when a WebEngine page needs proxy authentication and can fill credentials from the current feed proxy when available. (#2273) Network settings again include an option to ignore all cookies, which clears stored cookies and prevents new cookies from being accepted. Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now individually ignore cookies while downloading feed data. Stored cookies can now be deleted from the Tools menu. Custom skin colors can now override the feed list article count color separately from feed titles, including a separate highlighted color. (#2275) Settings dialog can now search across available settings and highlight matching controls. (#1754) Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now optionally be reported as broken when they are valid but contain no articles. (#2039) Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now override the application-wide feed connection timeout per feed. (#1023) Tray icon can now use a custom background color and unread-count text color, with an option to reuse the generated icon as the application icon. (#1973) Support for more benevolent parsing of Gemlog entries (#2295). Article list can now show when an article was received by RSS Guard. (#947) Feed deep discovery now actually scrapes all links found in the website and checks if they are feeds or not. This greatly enhances usability of the deep discovery mode and discovers many more feeds than before. (#2306) Search boxes now show a small dot when the feed or article list is hiding some items because of active filtering. (#873) Articles now have a shortcut-assignable action to open the homepage of the feed they belong to. (#2060) Fixed: Parallel feed updates no longer crash when multiple update results are processed at the same time. (64cf521) Links in WebEngine articles opened from feeds such as Kill the Newsletter now open correctly instead of being swallowed by the embedded page. (#2272) Relative article URLs resolution was kinda broken. (#2282) Clicking article URL did not work when the URL had "fragment" set. (#2293) The default proxy setting now uses Qt/system default proxy behavior instead of forcing no proxy. (e0263ad) WebEngine article loading now keeps the current feed context, so feed-specific proxy credentials remain available while the article page loads. (fdd0f00) Download: RSS Guard 5.2.0 (64-bit) | Portable | ~ 130.0 MB (Open Source) Link: RSS Guard Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This is gonna separate the creeps from the rest of the crowd.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!