Would You Pay $75K for a Cadillac Volt?


Recommended Posts

General Motors is betting you will. It?s put a $75,995 price tag (including the $995 destination charge) on the Cadillac ELR ? what?s essentially a two-door Chevrolet Volt with a handsome exterior and a leather-lined cabin.

The same T-shaped, 16.5 kWh lithium-ion battery pack in the Volt finds its way underneath the creased sheet metal of the ELR, as well as its 1.4-liter gasoline-powered range-extending engine. That allows the Caddy to motor along on electric power alone for up to 35 miles before the gasoline engine kicks in to juice up the pack and keep the ELR going for a claimed range of 300 miles.

Cadillac is touting the ELR?s 8-inch touchscreen powered by its CUE infotainment system ? which two years in is still a buggy mess ? along with a range of safety and convenience features, including lane departure warning, forward collision alert, and a 24-hour concierge service to answer questions. There?s also a ?regen on demand? feature that allows the driver to boost the brake regeneration, slowing the vehicle and recouping energy by pulling on the flappy paddles behind the steering wheel.

GM?s bean counters are quick to point out that depending on what federal and state tax incentives buyers are eligible for, the net pricing could be as low as $68,495, but that?s still a tough sell considering you?re basically getting a Volt with more presence and less practicality.

By comparison, $70k will get you into the entry-level ? but absolutely excellent ? all-electric Tesla Model S, with a 208-mile range from its 60 kWh battery. That makes the ELR almost impossible to justify what Caddy is demanding. Here?s hoping we?re wrong. We?ll find out when sales begin in January.

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2013/10/cadillac-elr-price/#slideid-98711

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2013/01/cadillac-elr-detroit?pid=2603

 

 

So to answer the writer's question...No.  GM can claim they have technology that could potentially be better than what Tesla has, but their execution of the product is their biggest problem as they continue to cut corners. The Volt and ELR both use most of the same design cues from their standard combustion engine cars. When someone buys an electric car, it's not because they want to save money on gas, which doesn't happen due the extra cost of the car. They want to be environmentally conscious while driving something different than the rest of the combustion engine cars so that they can stand out to make a statement. This is why even hybrid cars have failed to catch on except a few select models like the Prius. Until they design a car from ground up that is different from their existing models, it's never going to be as appealing as a Tesla. Even the ELR interior is no where near as sexy as Tesla's 17in touchscreen dashboard.

  • Like 1

Nope, no way in hell. The Tesla Model S is better in every regard: 

- Pure electric

- More electric range

- Tesla Supercharger network

- More practical

 

This is a hideous car - the design doesn't work on the coupe, it looks like they took a big car design and condensed into a coupe format - just does not work. No thank you GM

The problem with electric cars is if you live in mountainous, colder areas where it snows, having an electric car may be impractical because the heat requires a lot of power, and the hills will further drain the battery.


I wouldn't. If GM significantly dropped the price and improved the technology of the Volt / the ELR, I might consider it. Considering there is the Tesla Model S, which is more expensive but the technology is a lot better and it's not UGLY.

So are they saying the gas tank size is only 1.4 litres and it's able to get a 300 mile range out of that due to the fact that it's an electric car with a small gasoline generator to recharge the batteries? 

  • Like 1

I like how they try to make its power look good:

 

 "Nail the throttle and you?ll send 207 horsepower and 295 pound-feet of torque (the same as a BMW M3) to the 20-inch front wheels. "

 

 

Except that, its missing 207 hp to really be compared to an M3.

 

Heck, my car makes almost that much torque, and an M3 would eat me alive.

 

 

"Cadillac isn?t citing performance numbers, but the 4,070-pound ELR should be good for mid-seven second run to 60 mph."

 

 

Yeah, a lot like an M3....

I wouldn't pay that sort of money for anything made in the USA.

/facepalm

 

Do you like music? "Made in USA" products record some of the best music out there.

 

And some of you people need to read about the VOLT a bit more.  That car is fantastic.

 

The problem with electric cars is if you live in mountainous, colder areas where it snows, having an electric car may be impractical because the heat requires a lot of power, and the hills will further drain the battery.

 

 

Yes but lots of extra regen braking on those same said "Hills" that us people that live in the flats don't get

 

/facepalm

 

Do you like music? "Made in USA" products record some of the best music out there.

 

And some of you people need to read about the VOLT a bit more.  That car is fantastic.

 

True, the Volt is a fantastic car, ive test driven several and other than no noise you would not know it was an electric car, it is however far to expensive for what you get, fuel savings or not, base models for a 2013 Volt start at $42,000

 

I would rather spend $75,000 on a Model S than either a Volt or an ELR

Yes but lots of extra regen braking on those same said "Hills" that us people that live in the flats don't get

 

 

True, the Volt is a fantastic car, ive test driven several and other than no noise you would not know it was an electric car, it is however far to expensive for what you get, fuel savings or not, base models for a 2013 Volt start at $42,000

 

I would rather spend $75,000 on a Model S than either a Volt or an ELR

I wasn't comparing the 2 cars.  But I will, I guess. :p  They are both great cars in their own class.  With the Volt, you do not have that range anxiety like you do with the Model S.  The Volt, you'll never get stuck with no juice.  And it doesn't cost 42,000 after tax credit.  The Model S is great if you live in warm conditions, as a full electric, it needs warmer weather.   But the Model S cannot make long trips.  Its a very expensive town car.

Do you like music? "Made in USA" products record some of the best music out there.

 

If you say so......

 

Anyway, the car is not that bad looking, but I have always found Cadillac's over-sized front grille to be rather ugly.

No way I would consider this over a Tesla, though.

If you say so......

 

Anyway, the car is not that bad looking, but I have always found Cadillac's over-sized front grille to be rather ugly.

No way I would consider this over a Tesla, though.

It always comes down to what type of driving you need the car for(or to show off).  For a trip to San Diego to LA and back to SD, is not possible with the Tesla without waiting for a recharge.  Also, with traffic, maybe not even a one way trip is possible.  The the Model S is sexy, would love to own one.

/facepalm

 

Do you like music? "Made in USA" products record some of the best music out there.

 

And some of you people need to read about the VOLT a bit more.  That car is fantastic.

 

God dammit I hate the Internet.

I'm talking about cars, not music.  It's  car thread, stop being silly.

 

There is nothing fantastic about the Volt.  I look at prices for repair too, I work in the industry, ###### Yank cars are heaps of ######.

  • Like 1

God dammit I hate the Internet.

I'm talking about cars, not music.  It's  car thread, stop being silly.

 

There is nothing fantastic about the Volt.  I look at prices for repair too, I work in the industry, **** Yank cars are heaps of ****.

Well, I'm sorry, but you did say "anything" ...  Anyways, I can't afford any of them, but would love to have both of them.

What?  we aren't talking about a movie... we are talking about battery operated car here...

Well Technically, as Robocop is battery operated, and uses cars..... I see the connection

 

Actually, no I don't nevermind, carry on

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!