Windows 8.1- Desktop lovers rejoice (brief review)


Recommended Posts

Metro in many ways work better with a keyboard and mouse, especially the start screen, and it works better than the old start menu. so...

 

For you it might.  I assure you, it made my experience using my computer absolute hell.  To the point where I requested a refund.

The marketshare is merely saying that computers for the last 5 years have been powerful enough that people don't need to buy new laptop annually or bi.annually anymore. it says nothing about whether people like Win8 or not. 

 

Now you're being ridiculous.

The trend changed a lot.

 

At-least most daily routine tasks are being done from phones and tablets.

The PC thing is decreasing rapidly. Certainly these can't replace PC at the same time and you don't need hammer for fixing small screw.

 

So you need to maintain the same in all the devices, which might feel awkward for few people, it's the best for most people.

 

 

Anyway, as usual this debate never ends. So it's much better to post reviews of your own rather than fighting/debating again. It's not debating thread, It's review thread I guess.

Now you're being ridiculous.

 

No, that's called truth. what you're spouting is called a modified truth, a truth colored by your desire for it to be so. so without any evidence you draw conclusions that don't exist, not understanding that correlation don't prove causation, especially not when there are other much bigger and more important causes. 

Metro is ideal for touch, and I think it's **** with my KB and mouse.  That's what I think. 

And that's your argument?

 

I don't think it works better than the start menu, it's a giant window of unrelated items that takes focus away from what I'm doing.

It's great on a small screen device that can't show multiple windows at a time (either due to limited resources or simply screen size), but when you have a PC with a good screen there's no reason to completely hide your web browser/word process/etc. to show a grid of 100 random icons.

Edit: Well, probably not 100, because it's designed for tablets everything is huge.

You can organize the Start Screen...

  • Like 2

I don't think it works better than the start menu, it's a giant window of unrelated items that takes focus away from what I'm doing.

 

 

For the way I work it certainly does not. In Windows 7 I can hit the Super key, type a few letters, hit enter for the program I want, and be working away. I like doing it that way. I don't want to learn a new way.

In that case, no one can help you.

 

 

^ I wonder, how people always complains this. I have laptop and desktop neither one is touch. I haven't felt oh this is ridiculous or not good with KB and mouse/touchpad.

Except for one case, where few games in Store doesn't work or not smooth with KB and mouse

 

Point and click is hard.  :rofl:

For the way I work it certainly does not. In Windows 7 I can hit the Super key, type a few letters, hit enter for the program I want, and be working away. I like doing it that way. I don't want to learn a new way.

 

You can still do this in Win 8.0/8.1

No need to learn a new way

  • 2 weeks later...

Excellent review so far. Looking forward to see what you think after a week. I cant see myself personally using it but if it can turn a Neowinian to using it, I may give it a shot although I too would be using a start menu third party app.

I tried to get used to the Start Screen again, but in the end I reinstalled StartIsBack. Lack of a list of most recently used programs, lack of hierarchy in the programs list, the fact that it hides all windows and the taskbar, the uselessly huge tiles that are just uninformative uniform color blocks... I just don't see what's the advantage supposed to be to offset all the disadvantages. I still feel much more productive with a Start Menu.

I tried to get used to the Start Screen again, but in the end I reinstalled StartIsBack. Lack of a list of most recently used programs, lack of hierarchy in the programs list, the fact that it hides all windows and the taskbar, the uselessly huge tiles that are just uninformative uniform color blocks... I just don't see what's the advantage supposed to be to offset all the disadvantages. I still feel much more productive with a Start Menu.

After reading you stuck with it (although installed StartisBack) I decided to give it go. Mind you, this is 8.1 - not 8. 

Here is a quick run-down for day 1.

Positive:

* Fast install. Was at the horrible start screen 13 minutes after clicking 'install' from Windows 7. That was impressive I must say.

* Drivers *semi* installed on first go. Nvidia drivers didnt install as it didnt detect my card (GeForce 670Ti) so for the fact it detected and installed everything else, thats pretty good. 

* My 3D applications still work with 8.1.

* Games work still, although slower.

* Disabled Metro, hot corners, charms, everything that could bring me back to my most hated part of Windows 8.1- that start screen. Uninstalled ALL start screen apps so I literally have 'desktop' tile left. 

* Have one store app installed, that monitors my data allowance.

* Love and I mean LOVE how Start8 puts a link to the start screen in the top of the programs list. Its a spot where no one would ever click it. Thank you for that Stardock <3

*Negative:

* That start button was killing me, taking me back all the time to the start screen. Fixed it by downloading Start8 - solved that problem. Have a nice Start MENU in place now.

* Uninstalling all the crap apps default with Windows 8.1 for the start screen meant I had to choose default programs for my stuff. Pictures now open Windowed as they should, and not in a ###### full screen Metro app.

* Deleted Skype that came with 8.1, installed the desktop version. So much happier now.

* Only took 2 minutes to activate using what I like to call 'Give us a ban for a week Neobond' methods :P Also as far as I know, the way I done is a indefinite method and does not require any 'rearming' every 180 days. No I wont say how it was done. 

* Cant fully remove windows.old - Ive tried and tried but 3 directories still there, and require 'system' to delete em.

* So much of a rigmarol to get Media Center. Just to play dvds and bluray.

* Sound defaulted to headset and not speakers.

* Sydney time defaulted to something like 11am, even thou when it was installed it was 5pm.

With everything Metro disabled so far its not a bad OS. But the first 2 minutes before disabling Metro/Charms/Hot Corners drove me to the point where I was about to punch the monitor of the PC. 

For those of you on Windows 7 who are unsure bout upgrading/downgrading to Windows 8.1, check this thread in a week, I will be giving honest feedback and hopefully mods wont delete my posts from the cursing :)

I normally use a Win7 laptop but updated my Win8 to 8.1 on the newer one even though I dont use it much as yet.One thing that bugs me now is before when I wanted to find a list of applications installed I just opened the search and a list of apps opened on a screen behind it for me to search through but not any more.So the question is how do I see and select from a list now the start menu is gone just using whats built in to win 8.1?

I normally use a Win7 laptop but updated my Win8 to 8.1 on the newer one even though I dont use it much as yet.One thing that bugs me now is before when I wanted to find a list of applications installed I just opened the search and a list of apps opened on a screen behind it for me to search through but not any more.So the question is how do I see and select from a list now the start menu is gone just using whats built in to win 8.1?

 

Open search the same way as in Windows 7 (press the Windows key)

 

Then do one of the following:

 

1) Press the down arrow in the lower left for the all apps categorized view, if you can't find the app in this view you can type it in the upper left to search.

 

2) Just start typing the name of the app at the Start Screen just like on the Start Menu in Windows 7

 

I think that's what you're looking for if I understand what you're asking for ...

post-59115-0-46306500-1383420428.png

You've just described the Start Menu for many PC users. By default, it is completely randomized, showing only the most commonly used programs (or the ones Microsoft puts there on a clean install), and only several of them. If the app a user wants falls off the MRU list after not having used it in a while (Which can scare a user when they realized it disappeared on them), or if users wanted to find something else, they had to dig through needless folders and subfolders, try and figure out which file is the executable they're after, then pin it to either the taskbar, desktop, the start menu, or all three (sound familiar? "Redundant"?)! If they're pinning to the Start Menu, they then needed to know how to increase the number of icons shown, that way your list isn't cut short. Also, the Start Menu is limited by vertical screen space, you can only pin apps to the Start Menu as long as your resolution allows. This is why the Start Menu has been highly problematic the last couple of years. It's become very limiting in regards to today's user needs.

 

All Apps still retains hierarchy, however, they are open for people to see without guessing where the apps are that they want. Metro apps are alphabetized, while legacy Windows options are still included under the "folders" they've always have been.

 

Also, if you're still thinking Metro is touch only, please stop. You're not doing anyone or yourself any favors. My mouse and keyboard still work with Metro, and just the same as they do on the desktop.

 

Would you, for once just kindly cut the crap? I think you know damn well what the poster actually meant. Click "all programs" and magically, that well sorted option exists, like magic I say! The start screen however only has one default: Cluttered and disorganised mess, it cannot be organised any better.#

 

 

The marketshare is merely saying that computers for the last 5 years have been powerful enough that people don't need to buy new laptop annually or bi.annually anymore. it says nothing about whether people like Win8 or not.

 

And the fact that in the last quarter Windows 8 grew by pretty much the same amount XP fell, while Windows 7 usage remained pretty static is just a giant coincidence? Somehow I think not. The numbers indicate to me that most people using 7 are very happy with it, and that almost all Windows 8 growth since the promotional sale has been from XP users getting rid of their old computers.

Would you, for once just kindly cut the crap? I think you know damn well what the poster actually meant. Click "all programs" and magically, that well sorted option exists, like magic I say! The start screen however only has one default: Cluttered and disorganised mess, it cannot be organised any better.#

 

 
 

 

And the fact that in the last quarter Windows 8 grew by pretty much the same amount XP fell, while Windows 7 usage remained pretty static is just a giant coincidence? Somehow I think not. The numbers indicate to me that most people using 7 are very happy with it, and that almost all Windows 8 growth since the promotional sale has been from XP users getting rid of their old computers.

 

You are wrong though. You can sort the all apps view in a  variety of ways, Last installed, most used, by name,...

You are wrong though. You can sort the all apps view in a  variety of ways, Last installed, most used, by name,...

 

It's still sloppy compared to the way the proper start menu sorts things. Whichever way you do it, it's still just a bunch of icons slapped across a screen.

It's still sloppy compared to the way the proper start menu sorts things. Whichever way you do it, it's still just a bunch of icons slapped across a screen.

 

You can always use semantic zoom, that way you only have the headings which looks a lot like the folder structure in the start menu.

Thanks for the smug condescension but I'm fully aware of how to use it, but it doesn't change my argument. The original complaint DM responded wrongly to was basically a complaint I know about because it's the same complaint I have... the lack of folder support in the start screen turns it into a disorganised mess. Arranging the row of icons in a different manner is irrelevant to my argument because arranging icons by name is really not the same thing as the organisation the person making the complaints actually wants. What's with you arrogant folks that assume that anyone that doesn't like it can't work out how to use it. We can, we just think it's complete s***

You can always use semantic zoom, that way you only have the headings which looks a lot like the folder structure in the start menu.

 

I just had a look at semantic zoom. It allows you to re-locate blocks of tiles and icons but it still doesn't really offer the same thing as the old start menu structure.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!