Windows 8.1- Desktop lovers rejoice (brief review)


Recommended Posts

I just had a look at semantic zoom. It allows you to re-locate blocks of tiles and icons but it still doesn't really offer the same thing as the old start menu structure.

 

 

Hey look, folders! you click on them to show the **** inside of them!  Just like the old start menu. 

 

And I don't have to scroll through a tiny menu and click through a dozen subfolders to find crap.  Did anyone actually do that? 

post-440646-0-95390400-1383434078.jpg

I just had a look at semantic zoom. It allows you to re-locate blocks of tiles and icons but it still doesn't really offer the same thing as the old start menu structure.

 

Are you using Win 8.0 or 8.1?

 

If I go to the all apps screen and zoom out I get a nice overview with all the headings, basically all the menu items collapsed

Still not folders. Once you zoom out of that menu and select the category you want it still displays them as icons, at least in Windows 8 anyway, I haven't bothered with 8.1 yet.

Also, horribly unintuitive if you do it with KB and mouse I might add.

 

I'm trying to understand why you feel so strongly on this particular point Javik and I just can't get there. When you're looking for an app, you're looking for one specific app. The easiest way is to hit the windows key and start typing the name of the app. That process is exactly the same.

 

If you choose to scroll through all the apps for some reason, I'm not sure it's not more intuitive and faster in Windows 8.1. And trust me, I loved the Start Menu. I do miss hierarchical folders, but not so much anymore really. One thing, ModernUI definitely encourages you to organize the things you work with, eliminate unnecessary clutter, and focus on things you "actually" use regularly. I don't know if MS intended that on the desktop, but it is a positive benefit I'm noticing.

 

I'm also noticing while I do keep many windows open, I rarely am active in more than one. Having apps snapped I actually multitask better (assuming I'm using the mail app, and modern ui IE).

 

It took years and much R&D to get the Start Menu as optimized and usable as it is, I think given the same investment, the Start Page and Modern UI can surpass it. Still waiting on AAA apps though.

When you're looking for an app, you're looking for one specific apps. The easiest way is to hit the windows key and start typing the name of the app. That process is exactly the same.

 

That's one of the problems, it's not. For that workflow the start menu achieves what the start screen does with far more efficiency of screen real-estate and isn't jarring when you switch to it.

 

Granted the change to allow the desktop background on the start screen somewhat reduces the jarring impact of the transition, but the fact remains the implementation in 8.1 is still inferior to what is offered by the start menu in terms of spatial efficiency and flow.

That's one of the problems, it's not. For that workflow the start menu achieves what the start screen does with far more efficiency of screen real-estate and isn't jarring when you switch to it.

 

Granted the change to allow the desktop background on the start screen somewhat reduces the jarring impact of the transition, but the fact remains the implementation in 8.1 is still inferior to what is offered by the start menu in terms of spatial efficiency and flow.

 

That's all just personal opinion, no?

That's one of the problems, it's not. For that workflow the start menu achieves what the start screen does with far more efficiency of screen real-estate and isn't jarring when you switch to it.

 

Granted the change to allow the desktop background on the start screen somewhat reduces the jarring impact of the transition, but the fact remains the implementation in 8.1 is still inferior to what is offered by the start menu in terms of spatial efficiency and flow.

 

I get your point, and I do use my desktop as my background and thing the transition is pretty slick and cool. But as for workflow, if you're looking for an app down in the lower left, your ENTIRE focus is there. Once you find it, you're back where you started in either case.

 

I do agree if you want to cancel, you can just click away and that transition is more efficient the old way, though you can just press ESC or Win+D, but still the old way wins. But how often do you even do that? If you say a lot, then I'll say yeah, Win 7 is for you. I have no problem with that. And there are many issues and learning on the client and admin end before we can rollout 8.1 Enterprise. And I feel sorry for anyone that rolled out 8 Enterprise that will now upgrade to 8.1 Enterprise. OMG, the horror, lol.

That's all just personal opinion, no?

 

No, it's an easily observable fact that for the workflow laid out in the quote, the start screen uses more screen space than the start menu. There is no opinion there.

 

I get your point, and I do use my desktop as my background and thing the transition is pretty slick and cool. But as for workflow, if you're looking for an app down in the lower left, your ENTIRE focus is there. Once you find it, you're back where you started in either case.

 

I do agree if you want to cancel, you can just click away and that transition is more efficient the old way, though you can just press ESC or Win+D, but still the old way wins. But how often do you even do that? If you say a lot, then I'll say yeah, Win 7 is for you. I have no problem with that. And there are many issues and learning on the client and admin end before we can rollout 8.1 Enterprise. And I feel sorry for anyone that rolled out 8 Enterprise that will now upgrade to 8.1 Enterprise. OMG, the horror, lol.

 

My focus is on whatever I'm doing, not the start menu. If you know what you want and you're using the search function as a launcher - you can just mash start, type the minimum string to match your target and hit enter.

 

You can't do that in 8 or 8.1 because it captures the entire screen.

Hey look, folders! you click on them to show the **** inside of them!  Just like the old start menu. 

 

And I don't have to scroll through a tiny menu and click through a dozen subfolders to find crap.  Did anyone actually do that? 

 

I have to admit, I never use All Apps view and only went there to respond in this thread. I searched for an app in Win 7,  but it was rare. And I have to say, the All apps, zoomed heading view is pretty cool and definitely more efficient than scrolling through the old Start Menu. It just is. Clearly, someone out there looks for apps a lot because they put a lot of effort into this, lol.

No, it's an easily observable fact that for the workflow laid out in the quote, the start screen uses more screen space than the start menu. There is no opinion there.

 

 

My focus is on whatever I'm doing, not the start menu. If you know what you want and you're using the search function as a launcher - you can just mash start, type the minimum string to match your target and hit enter.

 

You can't do that in 8 or 8.1 because it captures the entire screen.

 

Huh? You can do that in 8/8.1. In both cases you're assuming the first result is the one you want, but mash start, type the minimum strings and hit enter. That process is exactly the same.

 

I give you, you won't be able to keep watching a video in Win 8 as the Start Page will take the screen, but if you're watching something that hard, are you really interested in searching for anything? And you probably have dual screens so you only lose one for a split second.

 

I have dual monitors and it's for multitasking (And Windows 8 is better with dual monitors, or should I say Modern UI). In one I have Modern UI snapped or full screen Netflix or WMC, and Desktop Environment in main screen. Of course with RDP, second monitor is the Full Screen RDP monitors (and the Modern UI RDP app is awesome I tell ya).

Do I really like the start screen?  Not really.  If the Desktop were non-existent then I would think it was great, but the Desktop does exist, most of us still spend most of our time on it, and the Start Screen isn't just a new application launcher, it's an entirely different environment.  So much so that the Desktop now, instead of being the core of the OS, is treated as an app.

 

That said, if you are opening the start menu to launch an app then you are not using any other app, you are browsing a menu looking to run something else.  If you are opening the start screen you are doing exactly the same thing.  The difference is that you can see a hell of a lot more apps in a full screen display, even with the larger tiles as opposed to the tiny icons, than you can in a small box in the corner of the screen.  You can organize the contents of the start screen just as you can in the start menu, as well, if you are willing to put in the work, and the methodology isn't even any different, it's the exact same process.  I'm not at my home desktop at the moment, but I plan on posting a screenshot to illustrate what I mean if I can remember when I get home from work.

 

Honestly, I rarely used the start menu because most of my apps were pinned to the taskbar.  In Windows 8 that has not changed one bit.  The only difference is that the new layout makes it a tad more work to find the apps to pin them in the initial setup.  I use the both the menu and the screen.  I have Start8 installed and configured so that if I click the button it brings up the screen, but if I press the windows key it brings up the Start8 menu.

 

The reason I did it this way is because I have never been in the habit of pressing the key to bring up the menu, so if I want the menu I very intentionally have to press a key I am not used to pressing.  This cuts down on accidentally bringing up the menu when I don't mean to.  That also means when I click the bottom left corner I am by default taken to the start screen.  And guess what?  The longer I use the new start screen the less often I am inclined to bring up the menu.  Usually I only bring up the Start8 menu to navigate the control panel, which I have configured to expand as a menu.  I call it the Start8 menu because I'm running Start8, obviously, but the same concept and methodology could be applied to any of the other various start menu resurrection programs available.

 

This doesn't mean I like the start screen, I just don't hate it, and even though I am used to having a simple menu I cannot argue that it IS more efficient.  What's going on here, though, is that I am using (and liking) some of the new "metro" apps.  I especially like mail, news and music apps (and yes, I used to abhor the music app, so even though I still don't think it is perfect it is now in a state that I find usable and even enjoyable).  If you do not like using any "metro" apps it is still entirely possible to do 100% of your computing on the Desktop and never look at the Start Screen at all.  It just takes a little bit of effort, and if you are not willing to expend the effort then it obviously doesn't bother you very much.

 

My stance on the Start Screen has not changed since Windows 8 was in beta.  If you like it, use it.  If you don't, take 2 minutes and install one of the (now many) Start Menu replacements and quit whining about it.

 

@Javik: If your start screen is a disorganized mess, your start menu would be a disorganized mess as well.  Manually clean up your start folders and your start screen will look a lot better.  Again, I will post a screenshot in the morning to illustrate what I mean.

Huh? You can do that in 8/8.1. In both cases you're assuming the first result is the one you want, but mash start, type the minimum strings and hit enter. That process is exactly the same.

 

I give you, you won't be able to keep watching a video in Win 8 as the Start Page will take the screen, but if you're watching something that hard, are you really interested in searching for anything? And you probably have dual screens so you only lose one for a split second.

 

I have dual monitors and it's for multitasking (And Windows 8 is better with dual monitors, or should I say Modern UI). In one I have Modern UI snapped or full screen Netflix or WMC, and Desktop Environment in main screen. Of course with RDP, second monitor is the Full Screen RDP monitors (and the Modern UI RDP app is awesome I tell ya).

 

No no no no no. You've lost the context.

 

Being able to do the start->search->launch procedure is not what is being disputed here, it's the fact you can do the exact same thing in 7 without the need for the fullscreen GUI AND that it takes a fraction of the space to achieve the same task.

 

This is a question of efficiency, not possibility.

I would think efficiency would be defined as how many keystrokes and/or time it takes to complete a task, not how much real estate is taken up by it, at least in this context.  We're talking about launching an app here, not editing a document or writing billions of lines of code.  Since the procedure is exactly the same and takes the exact same amount of time one could argue that they are equally efficient.  But again, if you don't like the start screen popping up and taking up your entire monitor, install Start8 or ClassicShell or one of the many start menu replacements.  You don't need to boycott 8 and miss out on all the other improvements just because you don't like the start screen.

No no no no no. You've lost the context.

 

Being able to do the start->search->launch procedure is not what is being disputed here, it's the fact you can do the exact same thing in 7 without the need for the fullscreen GUI AND that it takes a fraction of the space to achieve the same task.

 

This is a question of efficiency, not possibility.

 

I get it. And I made the same argument against Modern UI Start Page initially, then with Start8, I upgraded. After a while, I found myself holding down the Win Key for 2 seconds to get to the start page because what I wanted was right there. Yes, I could pin to the Start Menu but only so much before it became inefficient. With 8.1, I've been able to remove Start8 and I just find it doesn't bother me as much as it did when I first started with 8. In fact it really doesn't bother me at all. The biggest bother was the upper left hot corner and you can turn that one off. I'm a happy camper. If after using it for a few weeks it still bothers you, I'm not going to tell you it doesn't, lol. Use Win 7 or a Start Menu replacement. But I can tell you, it probably doesn't bother more people that it bothers. The majority of end user types benefit (in the end) from the Modern UI, and to my surprise no one has rejected it in that class of user.

 

When there are more Modern UI AAA apps, it's not even going to be close. Unfortunately, there's no indication that's going to happen any time soon.

I get it. And I made the same argument against Modern UI Start Page initially, then with Start8, I upgraded. After a while, I found myself holding down the Win Key for 2 seconds to get to the start page because what I wanted was right there. Yes, I could pin to the Start Menu but only so much before it became inefficient. With 8.1, I've been able to remove Start8 and I just find it doesn't bother me as much as it did when I first started with 8. In fact it really doesn't bother me at all. The biggest bother was the upper left hot corner and you can turn that one off. I'm a happy camper. If after using it for a few weeks it still bothers you, I'm not going to tell you it doesn't, lol. Use Win 7 or a Start Menu replacement. But I can tell you, it probably doesn't bother more people that it bothers. The majority of end user types benefit (in the end) from the Modern UI, and to my surprise no one has rejected it in that class of user.

 

When there are more Modern UI AAA apps, it's not even going to be close. Unfortunately, there's no indication that's going to happen any time soon.

 

I don't care for installing 3rd-party apps to do what the OS should be offering in the first place, thankfully Win+S offers the discussed workflow at the cost of a keystroke. It's still not ideal but it works.

 

However, that doesn't really accommodate people that also wanted the MRU functionality.

I don't care for installing 3rd-party apps to do what the OS should be offering in the first place, thankfully Win+S offers the discussed workflow at the cost of a keystroke. It's still not ideal but it works.

 

However, that doesn't really accommodate people that also wanted the MRU functionality.

 

I'm with you on 3rd party apps for OS functionality, including icon replacers :). And yes, 8.1 fixed one of the MAJOR FLAWS in Windows 8 RTM which was the horrendous search.

Just because you want the start menu doesn't mean that Microsoft should be offering it in the first place.  They have an OS that has a start menu built in: Windows 7.  Windows 7 is a very good OS.  Windows 7 is not as good as Windows 8.  So you have a few choices: stick with Windows 7 until it is so outdated you can no longer tolerate it, upgrade to Windows 8 and beyond and get onboard with the future of computing as Microsoft sees it, upgrade to Windows 8 and beyond and install a 3rd party app to restore some legacy UI functionality and fight the "modern UI", or switch to another operating system like OS X or Linux.  It is little trouble to install a start menu, though, so it sounds incredibly petty and entitled to demand that Microsoft regress simply so you don't have to take a couple minutes out of your day to install a program that will easily and seamlessly restore functionality that you prefer.

  • Like 3

It's still sloppy compared to the way the proper start menu sorts things. Whichever way you do it, it's still just a bunch of icons slapped across a screen.

Compared to a bunch of icons (that you can barely see) compacted together in a box less than 1/4 the size of your screen?

 

How is operating the Start Screen different from operating the Start Menu? How is it unintuitive with a mouse? All Apps is always going to be a big list of things. Why do you need to drag yourself through that when it's easier to A) Search for the thing you're looking for, or B) pinning it to the main Start Screen? 

No, it's an easily observable fact that for the workflow laid out in the quote, the start screen uses more screen space than the start menu. There is no opinion there.

 

 

My focus is on whatever I'm doing, not the start menu. If you know what you want and you're using the search function as a launcher - you can just mash start, type the minimum string to match your target and hit enter.

 

You can't do that in 8 or 8.1 because it captures the entire screen.

Windows 8.1, hit Winkey + S, bam, stop complaining. 

 

I have to admit, I never use All Apps view and only went there to respond in this thread. I searched for an app in Win 7,  but it was rare. And I have to say, the All apps, zoomed heading view is pretty cool and definitely more efficient than scrolling through the old Start Menu. It just is. Clearly, someone out there looks for apps a lot because they put a lot of effort into this, lol.

Yeah I never use it either, I'll just type in the search bar til I find it.

I'm with you on 3rd party apps for OS functionality, including icon replacers :). And yes, 8.1 fixed one of the MAJOR FLAWS in Windows 8 RTM which was the horrendous search.

 

Indeed, the search fix makes 8.1 tolerable for my workflow with the usage of Win+S, but I do also acknowledge others are not quite so lucky.

 

Really there is/was nothing stopping Microsoft from accommodating everyone with 8, while also including Metro and it's related components. But between the clueless executives and sychophantic fanboys, the opportunity for positive change was lost.

 

It's a shame really, because if they had been accommodating it would of even helped their Metro initiatives too.

 

Windows 8.1, hit Winkey + S, bam, stop complaining.

 

Neowin forums, view latest posts, bam, stop making useless posts.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • That is the natural course for regulations. First to protect the consumer. Then to protect the business/industry from upstart competition. There are countless examples across history.
    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
    • Clearly that feature isn't for us. It's for the ad spam marketers so they can more directly target us about going to places we might want to go again...but without understanding context clues. Like for the flight someone took for a friend's funeral. We want to be reminded of that every time we open an app, a browser, or email, right? Right, Siri?
    • Is your Apple Watch supported? Check the watchOS 27 compatibility list by Aditya Tiwari Apple kicked off WWDC 2026 with a ton of announcements, mostly centered around Apple Intelligence improvements, the Siri AI, and Liquid Glass updates. However, there is a lot of other stuff that couldn't catch the limelight. Let's talk about watchOS 27 and which models are supported by the newest operating system. According to the Cupertino giant, watchOS 27 will be supported on the following Apple Watch models when it arrives later this year: Apple Watch Ultra 3 Apple Watch Series 11 Apple Watch SE 3 Apple Watch Series 10 Apple Watch Ultra 2 It's a stark contrast with last year's watchOS 26 update, which had almost a dozen Apple Watch models in its list of supported devices. Apple supported models all the way back to Apple Watch Series 6. That said, if you own one of the five models, you'll need an iPhone 11 (or later) with iOS 27 to install the latest update. Yes, Apple has shown some extra love to the iPhone 11, and it old horse supports the iOS 27 update. watchOS 27 beta 1 is now available for developers and interested power users through the Apple Developer Program. So, if you're among those who like to play with fire, you can download it to your supported Apple Watch. Otherwise, the public beta for watchOS 27 will be available next month. The freshly baked Apple Watch update comes with Siri AI - an advanced, fully conversational version of Siri powered by Apple Intelligence due for later this year. A new dynamic app grid features icons for five Siri-suggested apps. You can use a new tap gesture to open a widget in the Smart Stack, and a new Find My app finally clears the mess of Find Devices, Find Items, and Find People on Apple Watch. Workout Buddy can run without an iPhone nearby and offers new insights based on data, including your progress for pace, distance, and workout duration. Apple improved its motion tracking algorithms to measure the distance of indoor treadmill runs and walks more precisely. Speaking of other changes, the music playback on watchOS 27 starts faster and you can create custom passes for any membership or card that uses a QR code or barcode, then easily access them in the Wallet app or pin in the Smart Stack.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      85
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!