Windows 8.1- Desktop lovers rejoice (brief review)


Recommended Posts

I just think I live a simpler life, granted I don't rely on technology for my job anymore like I used to, but I upgrade, notice some differences, learn how it works and move on with my life. 

I might get annoyed about some things once and a while but I just don't go yelling that these changes are hostile, MS made the biggest mistake in their life, yadayadayada

 

If they change everything again when it comes to Win 9, i'll do the same thing again.

 

So basically you're just willing to let Microsoft roll over you, accepting whatever change they throw out.

 

That's great that you're willing to put up with mediocrity, but some of us would actually prefer that Microsoft take the optimal route. Ironically I guess that actually makes us the Microsoft fans, since at the end of the day they stand to lose the most.

I think you mistake my intent, I have no opposition to Microsoft pursuing those segments nor do I oppose the existence of Metro in general. What I do however oppose is the forced mixing of the two from both directions.

 

Microsoft could of taken a cleanly segregated approach that would of benefitted both platforms, but they didn't because most likely the usual idiot execs thought forcing Metro on the desktop would boost it's adoption in general. In the end it harmed both.

 

Heck, this isn't totally without precedent. Look at the slow adoption of DirectX 10, again arguably not helped by the original tying to NT6.x.

 

 

No, it's simple fact. You just don't want to admit Microsoft did something wrong/poorly.

 

The decisions made were bad, but again, I don't know if they had a choice. Look how tough it is even now, if they didn't try to leverage their desktop dominance where would their tablets be? Most of the sales are to enterprises ...

 

Also, they had to provide a significant desktop OS upgrade to encourage Enterprise Agreement renewals for operating systems. With Enterprises looking and how much useful life XP had, why wouldn't we expect the same from 7? These sentiments were openly expressed by many organizations to Microsoft. Trust me, there will be a major desktop OS release every 1-3 years someway, somehow.

 

I don't think the idea is bad, more or less a single code base across devices. It's a touch task and RTM was a failure, 8.1 pretty good. I'm more disappointed in the phone/desktop/tablet ecosystem and lack of easy syncing of media across them. The whole Xbox for Windows initiative has been a failure to this point IMO. The decision not to sync the Phones and Tablet to the desktop for media was/is a boneheaded decision IMO.

Why do you see this as rolling over?

I made a conscious decision to buy a Windows 8, because I like to play around with new things.

Like I said, I don't rely heavily on technology anymore for my job, it's all for pleasure now.

 

But it's still just your opinion, not fact, that Win8.1 is mediocre, could they improve things, sure, and I hope they do

But I don't find it bad at all. It might help that I now have a Lenovo Yoga with touch, I think that combination is great

I just think I live a simpler life, granted I don't rely on technology for my job anymore like I used to, but I upgrade, notice some differences, learn how it works and move on with my life. 

I might get annoyed about some things once and a while but I just don't go yelling that these changes are hostile, MS made the biggest mistake in their life, yadayadayada

 

If they change everything again when it comes to Win 9, i'll do the same thing again.

 

You can actually enjoy and play with technology now! :D

Why do you see this as rolling over?

I made a conscious decision to buy a Windows 8, because I like to play around with new things.

Like I said, I don't rely heavily on technology anymore for my job, it's all for pleasure now.

 

But it's still just your opinion, not fact, that Win8.1 is mediocre, could they improve things, sure, and I hope they do

But I don't find it bad at all. It might help that I now have a Lenovo Yoga with touch, I think that combination is great

 

One thing that IMO is hurting Windows 8.1 and touch ... Surface. It's not the best tablet, really. Many of the others are lighter, and better. I love the allow and the kickstand, but it really has overshadowed some tablets that could probably have made bigger inroads. We've really backed off and aren't necessarily recommending Surface 2's. We are pushing anything as long as it's not RT, which I personally like.

You can actually enjoy and play with technology now! :D

 

As long as my laptop can show pdf files and I can open some powerpoint presentations, I'm sorted for work now

All the rest is just play indeed. I still play around with Visual studio when I have some time of, but that's about it

One thing that IMO is hurting Windows 8.1 and touch ... Surface. It's not the best tablet, really. Many of the others are lighter, and better. I love the allow and the kickstand, but it really has overshadowed some tablets that could probably have made bigger inroads. We've really backed off and aren't necessarily recommending Surface 2's. We are pushing anything as long as it's not RT, which I personally like.

 

When I was up for buying a new pc I looked at the surface pro, surface was a no starter for me since I still want to play around with some desktop apps, but I went with the yoga in the end because I use my laptop a lot in the couch. It just seemed a lot easier to use then the surface with the KB cover.

 

Still no regrets about my choice, but I would love for my gf to get a RT device, that's all she needs and they get great battery life.

No idea which one yet though. Surface 2 gets good reviews, minus the ecosystem, but the Nokia one looks really nice too.

The decisions made were bad, but again, I don't know if they had a choice. Look how tough it is even now, if they didn't try to leverage their desktop dominance where would their tablets be? Most of the sales are to enterprises ...

 

Also, they had to provide a significant desktop OS upgrade to encourage Enterprise Agreement renewals for operating systems. With Enterprises looking and how much useful life XP had, why wouldn't we expect the same from 7? These sentiments were openly expressed by many organizations to Microsoft. Trust me, there will be a major desktop OS release every 1-3 years someway, somehow.

 

I don't think the idea is bad, more or less a single code base across devices. It's a touch task and RTM was a failure, 8.1 pretty good. I'm more disappointed in the phone/desktop/tablet ecosystem and lack of easy syncing of media across them. The whole Xbox for Windows initiative has been a failure to this point IMO. The decision not to sync the Phones and Tablet to the desktop for media was/is a boneheaded decision IMO.

 

They had a choice (to offer choice), but as is the case with big corporations some exec or manager was absolutely convinced that choice had to be removed as it would somehow impede the Metro ecosystem.

 

Again, if they want to pursue tablets and etc that's great. But I still don't see why that decision should have to impact the desktop, or why they couldn't offer the choice.

 

Why do you see this as rolling over?

I made a conscious decision to buy a Windows 8, because I like to play around with new things.

Like I said, I don't rely heavily on technology anymore for my job, it's all for pleasure now.

 

But it's still just your opinion, not fact, that Win8.1 is mediocre, could they improve things, sure, and I hope they do

But I don't find it bad at all. It might help that I now have a Lenovo Yoga with touch, I think that combination is great

 

I don't see it as rolling over, you stated it outright youself. You stated you're quite happy to go and buy whatever the newest version of Windows is and accept the changes verbatim.

 

That's rolling over and being a bad consumer.

They had a choice (to offer choice), but as is the case with big corporations some exec or manager was absolutely convinced that choice had to be removed as it would somehow impede the Metro ecosystem.

 

Again, if they want to pursue tablets and etc that's great. But I still don't see why that decision should have to impact the desktop, or why they couldn't offer the choice.

There's no choice because Windows 8 IS Metro, and Metro IS Windows 8. Simple. Metro is to Windows 8 as UAC is to Windows Vista - It's part of the OS, and there's no way around it. Without it, you simply have Windows 7, and that wouldn't be fair to users to ask them to pay up again for the same thing.

When you make changes, you don't make them optional, otherwise you'd never get anywhere.

There's no choice because Windows 8 IS Metro, and Metro IS Windows 8. Simple. Metro is to Windows 8 as UAC is to Windows Vista - It's part of the OS, and there's no way around it. Without it, you simply have Windows 7, and that wouldn't be fair to users to ask them to pay up again for the same thing.

When you make changes, you don't make them optional, otherwise you'd never get anywhere.

 

Nope, Metro is just a generic UI built ontop of the existing Windows infrastructure. Metro is no more Windows 8 than MCE was Windows 7. If you also think Windows 8.x sans Metro is identical to Windows 7, that's rather insulting to the backend engineers at Microsoft, don't you think?

 

You're also wrong yet again, even Microsoft seems to think so as they decided to offer to choice of boot to desktop in 8.1.

 

Ugh, your sycophantry is tiring.

  • Like 3

I don't think there has been any version of windows in history that has divided the windows community like this.

 

I love the start screen the most on a tablet, but the love stops there. I don't like the start screen as much as the start menu on laptops or desktops and I feel the start screen is a step down in windows ui evolution also. The start screen takes the entire screen, it takes longer to move your mouse to open a program, the search is not visible unless you start typing, your library folders are not there unless you pin them,  and the start screen makes working on the desktop less productive. The start menu is smaller, opening programs takes less time, you have all your library folders on the side unlike the start screen, the search is visible unlike the start screen, you can launch programs in the search and the start menu opens faster than the start screen .

 

Overall I think the start screen caters to touch displays more and the start menu is caters better for desktop users.

 

 

I remember Vista being pretty hated for no real reason too

My hope is.. that with news of Bill Gates spending considerable time with the new CEO that, maybe MS will listen and we modern UI fans and desktop fans can get a product that we can all be happy with.

Nope, Metro is just a generic UI built ontop of the existing Windows infrastructure. Metro is no more Windows 8 than MCE was Windows 7. If you also think Windows 8.x sans Metro is identical to Windows 7, that's rather insulting to the backend engineers at Microsoft, don't you think?

 

You're also wrong yet again, even Microsoft seems to think so as they decided to offer to choice of boot to desktop in 8.1.

 

Ugh, your sycophantry is tiring.

Metro is more than just a "generic UI". It's a whole new system, with it's own code. This is why Metro Apps do not interact with the desktop.

Booting to the desktop is hardly admittance that Microsoft is wrong, they're still developing Metro, and have no plans to reverse course.

Metro is more than just a "generic UI". It's a whole new system, with it's own code. This is why Metro Apps do not interact with the desktop.

Booting to the desktop is hardly admittance that Microsoft is wrong, they're still developing Metro, and have no plans to reverse course.

 

It's an new ecosystem built on top of the existing Windows ecosystem (Win32).

 

*Snip*

Edited by Caleo
Pacification

It's an new ecosystem built on top of the existing Windows ecosystem (Win32).

There you go. "New ecosystem" is a far cry from "generic UI".

But in the end Microsoft is still changing course and unifying their platforms. And in that regard, there is only few choices they can allow users that doesn't break what they want to do. They want to unify Windows into the greater picture, and that's the biggest part Metro plays.

There you go. "New ecosystem" is a far cry from "generic UI".

But in the end Microsoft is still changing course and unifying their platforms. And in that regard, there is only few choices they can allow users that doesn't break what they want to do. They want to unify Windows into the greater picture, and that's the biggest part Metro plays.

 

Wrong yet again, it's a new ecosystem that is also a generic UI. You know how it works (albeit sub-optimally) on both touch and mouse/keyboard? That's called being general purpose, hence "generic".

 

And again, wrong. There is/was nothing stopping Microsoft from offering choice, and doing so does nothing to impede that growth. To reiterate a past point, not offering said choice has done more harm as more people have just stuck with 7, rather than moving to 8 - further ruling out the possibility they might dabble.

 

*snip*

Edited by Caleo
Pacification

And again, wrong. There is/was nothing stopping Microsoft from offering choice, and doing so does nothing to impede that growth.

I'm done bickering. We've been telling you why there was no "choice", but maybe a developer can convince you of the technical reason why there is little choice. Windows isn't an open system. It's not meant for users to pick apart piece by piece.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1081755-do-you-like-or-hate-windows-8/page-30#entry595048551

I'm done bickering. We've been telling you why there was no "choice", but maybe a developer can convince you of the technical reason why there is little choice. Windows isn't an open system. It's not meant for users to pick apart piece by piece.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1081755-do-you-like-or-hate-windows-8/page-30#entry595048551

 

*snip*

 

Every time one of your points is challenged or disproven you move onto the next without the slightest acknowlegement.

 

And your link only really goes to prove that Microsoft were lazy, not to mention his conclusion is flawed.

 

Really now, they could invest the effort to port Windows to ARM and develop WinRT + Metro, yet they couldn't put a little effort in to preserve or provide an equivalent alternative to the start menu? Sorry, I'm not gullible enough to buy that.

 

It certainly wasn't that hard for all those 3rd-party devs to achieve now was it?

Edited by Caleo
Pacification
  • Like 2

Omg it never stops.  Yes, removing the start menu completely was a dick move.  The start menu was part of the desktop, and the desktop is now an app, so if you're running the desktop there is no reason there can't be a start menu when you're on the desktop and a start screen when you are not using the desktop.  That just isn't the way they went with it.  Many other developers stepped in to fix that "problem."  I went with Start8 because it was the first and it works really, really well, so IMO it deserves my loyalty, but there are many others to choose from.  Some of them even have their own vision of what the start menu should have been and are interesting to check out.  My point?  Install a start menu or go back to windows 7, but if you're going to run windows 8 then accept that you are running windows 8 and that is what windows 8 is, how it functions, how windows is going to function until they redesign the UI again at some unknown point in the future.  There is no point in arguing about it.  God knows there was a very vocal group when 8 first came out that practically begged Microsoft to put back the start menu and Microsoft said "**** you," giving them back their start button... that launches the start screen.  Microsoft is not going to budge on this and all the crying in the world isn't going to make them change their mind.  Get over it already.  Whining about the start menu, especially when there is a solution that you are intentionally not using, is like spending 3 hours to make enchiladas, even though you don't like enchiladas, and then complaining about how much you don't like enchiladas after every bite that you force down your own throat; except maybe you like them with a certain type of salsa poured on top, so you have a jar of it on the table in front of you, but instead of using it you are sitting there saying to yourself "man, this would taste so much better if I put some of that salsa on it" but you continue to let the jar sit there.

 

Guess what?  Microsoft removed sidebar gadgets, too, and I miss them a hell of a lot more than I miss the start menu.  Luckily somebody found a way to take the components from the RC and install them on the RTM, and it still works on 8.1.

Anarkii, just wondered why your clock shows 3:57 PM on the 4/11/2013 (also the 0 seems to be missing from infront of the 4), i wasn`t aware it was that time anywhere in the world yet ;)

Maybe that`s something to do with the 'Evaluation Copy' deal...

Australian dating system I think

Today it shows up as 5/11/2013 for example - which is normal for us as we dont see it as 05/11/2013

 

Guess what?  Microsoft removed sidebar gadgets, too, and I miss them a hell of a lot more than I miss the start menu.  Luckily somebody found a way to take the components from the RC and install them on the RTM, and it still works on 8.1.

 

As I recall those were removed because they were a security vulnerability and not as an arbitrary design choice.

As I recall those were removed because they were a security vulnerability and not as an arbitrary design choice.

Plus, no one used them. The gadget gallery was an embarrassment.

  • 2 weeks later...

So I have been using Windows 8.1 for well over a week now and im going to give you my thoughts on it, from someone who was really against it.

My time with Windows 8.1 Pro was spent 98% of the time in the desktop. While yes I did go into the start screen for a hour to play around with it, the default apps are all completely useless, and most of all, annoying. Having every app open in full screen is just a nightmare, it makes multi-tasking impossible for me. (yes i know bout the left corner hovering thing but that is useless too). I did download a couple of games from the Windows store, namely Halo the top down one and some Diablo clone which is pretty good. So to this day, I have 3 tiles on my start-screen - Desktop, and those two games. 

Now those two games ran excellent on Windows 8.1, but in saying that, they would also run fine on Windows 7 too, if they ported it to a exe. Games didnt feel snappier or anything, but they did run flawlessly.

So like I said I spent most of my time in the desktop. 

Now... by default, the installed desktop sucks balls. Yeah, its got the bells and whistles, but the fact of the matter is, the charms bar and hot corners destroys the desktop experience. 
First thing I did was disable everything metro like that I could. Charm bar, gone, hot corners, gone. Boot to desktop checked. Things were sweet again.
Then I clicked the start button. OH GOD METRO IS BACK. Okay that has to go. Metro and the Start screen is the devils spawn incarnate and many many of you feel the same.
Sooo straight to stardock to download Start8. Start menu restored to former glory (and feels better and looks better than the one in Windows 7! well done guys!) 
The best thing? The only way I could go to Metro now is the link at the top of the apps in that menu. No more accidentally clicking anything to bring it up. It's gone. 
Next thing was activating Windows 8 without a legal key. Well im not going to get into that, but lets just say it was an easy process. I don't condone piracy, if its good - buy it! I wanted to test Windows 8.1 Pro with all its features and that required it to be activated, but I did only yesterday buy a legit key :) **** Like installing Windows Media Edition thingie*****
Anyway, love the new windows explorer. Copying things and deleting things and showing the speeds at which it's doing it in real time is just awesome. The new task manager - awesome.
Then seeing Neobonds desktop with gadgets was the selling point for me. I needed one particular gadget to see my download allowance and to have gadgets running again was just awesome. 

So for you Windows 8 haters im going to say this. 
Get Windows 8.1. If you really love Windows 7, follow what I did above and it will feel exactly like 7, but faster, snappier, and just, I dunno it just feels better. Its hard to explain it. Just disable everything Metro. Uninstall EVERYTHING except the desktop tile from the start screen. You wont look back. 

Anyway theres my rant. Hope it may sway some of you to give it a go. 

Below is my Windows 8.1 Pro desktop :)

mF93F84.jpg

I should know better than to wade into these types of debates.  But here I am typing this.  I'm new to the forum so I'll try to tread somewhat lightly.

 

Let me start off by saying that while I am on the "pro-Windows 8" side, the points made by the other side are absolutely valid:  Windows 8 suffers for a poor app ecosystem, for now. You can't do everything in the Modern UI (/Metro) that you can on desktop, for now.  Windows 7 works beautifully for most of your day-to-day activities, and the mouse/keyboard interface is refined to perfection. 

 

I will even concede that there are benefits to staying on the desktop, whether it's on Windows 8 or Windows 7.  But the point is this:  Microsoft is trying to pry you away from the desktop for a reason.  The desktop has failings that they want to address, and those failings are getting fixed now. 

 

Part of the problem for many anti-Windows 8 people is that you've learned to live with the failings of the desktop:  your computer bogging down or starting up slowly because you have too many applications running, having to reboot on a reasonably frequent basis, worrying about malware infections or keystroke loggers, and managing your files and folders in some non-standard hierarchy that you may have created -- or that an app may have created for you. 

 

All of these are impossible in Windows 8, and for good reason.

 

Windows 8 suspends background apps to keep your computer running smoothly.  It sandboxes apps to prevent malware.  It automatically updates your apps so you always have the newest version.  It has a new file picker to ensure you can't save stuff in some absurd place that made sense when you made that hasty 5 second decision.  But Microsoft can't market any of this:  it's too boring.  So instead they encourage you to "click in" with a fun new keyboard because it's sexier.

 

As for your beloved start menu:  think about how many times a software vendor put something somewhere unexpected in a place that made it hard to find.  That's why it's gone, along with all the custom installers, and worse, the uninstallers that didn't always work.

 

There are a million other improvements under the hood.  But everyone's focusing only on what they see:  the UI.  The "ugly" start screen, the lack of a start menu, and full screen apps.  But Windows 8 is far more than just a new UI.

 

Microsoft didnt' take a perfectly good operating system and slap a new, touch based UI onto their desktop and gasp! take away your precious start menu out of spite. They are trying to fix things that are genuine problems that we all deal with, and they're doing that with what is effectively a whole new operating system. 

 

You are being transitioned to Windows 8 slowly, and developers are being given time to catch up and build apps for the new operating system.  Eventually you will want to play a game or run an app that is made only for the Modern OS.  And that's when you'll be forced to make the switch.

 

You can stay on the desktop if you choose to, but Windows 8 and its sandboxing/new file picker/app suspension is here to stay. 

 

Microsoft has had more than a decade to perfect mouse and keyboard.  In time, they will perfect mouse, keyboard, touch, Kinect, voice and whatever else the future throws at us too .  It will take time before they can perfect all of these input systems the way they have mouse.

 

All of this is not to say that I think everyone should switch tomorrow:  a bookkeeper can't do his job without QuickBooks -- Windows 8/Metro is a non-starter for him.  Windows 8 has lots of bugs in the OS itself, and you have to ask yourself whether that tradeoff is worth it to you.  Those bugs will be squashed, Quickbooks will come out for the Modern UI, and just like transitioning from DOS to Windows eventually made sense, so will the transition to the Modern OS.

 

All of this is just my two cents.  I have no doubt that many will disagree.  But for me, I like Windows 8 and I think it's a step in the right direction.  More importantly, I think it is both necessary and evolutionary.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!