Reviewers Are Reporting Frame Rate Problems With 'Call Of Duty: Ghosts' On PS4


Recommended Posts

http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2013/11/05/reviewers-are-reporting-frame-rate-problems-with-call-of-duty-ghosts-on-ps4/

Call of Duty: Ghosts is the latest iteration in one of the most popular game franchises in the world, so it?s only fitting that Activision?s shooter has become the center of a big discussion of how Microsoft's MSFT +1.94% Xbox One stacks up to Sony's SNE -1.35% PS4. The PS4 version runs at a native 1080p, and the Xbox One version runs at 720p upsacled to 1080, which may point to real differences in the power of these two consoles.

Polygon: ?Much has been said about the fact that the PlayStation 4 version of the game runs at a native 1080p, and while that may be true, the game did struggle to maintain a steady frame rate, especially in hectic multiplayer matches. The PS3 version of the game ran into similar problems, whereas the Xbox 360 version maintained a steady 60 frames per second.?

IGN: ?On the current-gen versions Ghosts looks nearly identical, though I did encounter occasional framerate issues during the single-player campaign on PS3 and PS4.?

Joystiq: ?A key pillar of the Call of Duty experience has always been rock-solid 60 frames per seconds gameplay. On Xbox 360, Ghosts maintains this mandate. The PlayStation 4 version, however, has noticeable technical issues, sometimes slowing to a crawl, particularly during set-piece moments with multiple effects. One specific moment I was able to replicate multiple times on PS4 was a campaign scene that ran smoothly on Xbox 360 and PS3, while the game chugged On PlayStation 4. These frame rate hitches happen throughout the campaign on PS4 and, in a series known for its Hollywood-inspired bombast, it detracted from the experience.?

Just to make sure, are these reviewers playing a final copy of COD on a retail console?

Maybe its an issue that can be patched day one when the console is released.

Still, its not the next gen first impressions anyone would want to have.

  • Like 1

There's no NDA under effect ? i'm surprised.

 

There's an NDA on the X1, which is why there's no review.

 

EDGE is saying that there are drops at checkpoints, but never in gunplay.

 

I won't bring up the interview with the IW dev.

There's an NDA on the X1, which is why there's no review.

 

EDGE is saying that there are drops at checkpoints, but never in gunplay.

 

I won't bring up the interview with the IW dev.

Here's what Gamespot has to say about the PS4 version in their official review.

 

Ghosts is even more impressive on the next-gen hardware of the PlayStation 4. While the current-gen versions are just as competent as ever, rendering the chaotic shootouts at a smooth 60 frames per second, the PS4's next-gen artistry creates a much more immersive battleground. Those effects are most noticeable in the levels that emphasize lighting: the soft bokeh effects of floating embers on a burning oil refinery, or the way moonlight refracts and ripples while underwater. It's essentially the difference between a PC game running on high versus low settings. Each version is functionally the same, but all those extra effects add up to a more engrossing experience. (Note: Our review of the Xbox One version remains under embargo until a later date. Activision did not provide access to the PC and Wii U versions.)

http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/call-of-duty-ghosts-review/1900-6415523/

From Giant Bomb review

The PlayStation 4 version of the game looks very sharp and feels very effects-laden, with a lot of good-looking lighting and reflections. It has a long draw distance, while the current consoles occasionally fog things up a bit to reduce the amount of geometry on-screen at a given time. The campaign has an early moment where you come up and see the state of the world by looking at a shot of the Hollywood Sign, which is way off in the distance.

[...]

Additionally, the PlayStation 4 version has a handful of noticeable dips in its frame rate. This usually seemed to happen when a lot of smoke or other effects were on-screen, but occasionally it occurred in multiplayer for reasons I couldn't even guess at. Judging graphics on a brand-new platform can be tough, since we don't have a lot to compare it with at this point, but I will say that I had hoped that it would look a little better across the board. Whether that says more about my expectations or the quality of the game will have to wait until we see more next-generation games in action.

http://www.giantbomb.com/reviews/call-of-duty-ghosts-review/1900-603/

From what I'm seeing the pc version has some pretty serious issues as well. I don't think it's exactly a problem with the PS4. Seems to just be an overall poorly optimized game. Who'd have thought..

 

And a 40gb install..what were they thinking with that.

  • Like 1

The issue seems to be less with the console, more with the fact that the game isn't very good.

And a 40gb install..what were they thinking with that.

 

I've been wondering how they've managed to bloat CoD up to that kind of size when a game like CoD has no business being that big.

From what I'm seeing the pc version has some pretty serious issues as well. I don't think it's exactly a problem with the PS4. Seems to just be an overall poorly optimized game. Who'd have thought..

 

And a 40gb install..what were they thinking with that.

40GB?

 

And I thought BF3 + all extra maps was big.

 

What the heck have they put into the game? Super-amazing dog and fish textures?  

I've been wondering how they've managed to bloat CoD up to that kind of size when a game like CoD has no business being that big.

 

My working theory is 75% of it is fluff stuffed in there to deter piracy. Who in their right mind is going to download a game that requires 40gb? It sure as hell isn't textures because the textures look like they belong in a 5 year old game.

I've seen a lot of youtube reviews of this game on pc and people seem to really be panning it from many angles. Some are bored with the gameplay, some are turned off by the low res textures, etc, etc.

Most seem to agree that BF4 is the more visually demanding (i.e. higher quality) game easily.

If that is true, it might explain why neither the PS4 or X1 could hit 1080p/60 for BF4.

My working theory is 75% of it is fluff stuffed in there to deter piracy. Who in their right mind is going to download a game that requires 40gb? It sure as hell isn't textures because the textures look like they belong in a 5 year old game.

 

40gb won't deter piracy

 

I've seen a lot of youtube reviews of this game on pc and people seem to really be panning it from many angles. Some are bored with the gameplay, some are turned off by the low res textures, etc, etc.

Most seem to agree that BF4 is the more visually demanding (i.e. higher quality) game easily.

If that is true, it might explain why neither the PS4 or X1 could hit 1080p/60 for BF4.

 

For that matter, a lot of PC's are struggling 1080p/60 for BF4 high settings

 

In order to achieve an average frame rate above 60 fps you need an I7 4770 and a Geforce 770 at an estimated cost of 700 bucks for CPU +  GPU alone.. 

40gb won't deter piracy

 

 

For that matter, a lot of PC's are struggling 1080p/60 for BF4 high settings

 

In order to achieve an average frame rate above 60 fps you need an I7 4770 and a Geforce 770 at an estimated cost of 700 bucks for CPU +  GPU alone.. 

 

I'm aware of that. But considering devs and publishers keep insisting on all kinds of stupid DRM that never works I'm sure bloating up the download size of the game to deter people from pirating is something that has been discussed at one point in time or another.

 

Though I honestly don't think that's what's going on with this game I still wonder what is included in that 40gb. Much better looking games have had smaller install requirements by a large margine so it can't be textures or meshes.

 

Though I honestly don't think that's what's going on with this game I still wonder what is included in that 40gb. Much better looking games have had smaller install requirements by a large margine so it can't be textures or meshes.

 

 

yeah, no idea why its as large as it is for how mediocre it looks compared to other games with much smaller installs

Curious though if the mantle support coming in a later patch is going to be pushed to X1 / PS4 as well

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-mantle-api-xbox-one-directx-11.2,24691.html

 

Nope.  

I'm aware of that. But considering devs and publishers keep insisting on all kinds of stupid DRM that never works I'm sure bloating up the download size of the game to deter people from pirating is something that has been discussed at one point in time or another.

 

Though I honestly don't think that's what's going on with this game I still wonder what is included in that 40gb. Much better looking games have had smaller install requirements by a large margine so it can't be textures or meshes.

 

Probably just lack of compression. The developer now has blu-ray and hard drives on all the next gen consoles. So they don't really need to invest in compressing textures, audio etc.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
    • OK so SearXNG is a meta search engine that you can install locally or use via a public instance. It scrapes other search engines which you choose and then sorts the results. Not as complicated as multiple relays
    • The only difference here is that you think you came up with these reasons. You didn't. These age old fearmongering lies (that were NEVER true) were funded by and the anger stoked by Putin through proxies like Farage (and later in the USA, Trump) and filtered down through the skinheads, Neonazis, etc. until it reached the uninformed, ignorant, and gullible -- never realizing they were being played for fools against their own best interests. Even now, despite all of the EVIDENCE proving that Brexit was a terrible mistake for ALL citizens of the UK and that its supporters were tricked by Putin's proxies into sabotaging their own nation, you're still here defending these well-known lies as if they were ever true. Not only are they not true. They NEVER were. So, when are you going to realize that you were lied to and actually get angry at the liars and charlatans who lied to you, instead of blaming the innocent people they lied to you about?
    • Dupe of "Microsoft further improving Windows 11 Taskbar with latest builds", published <20 minutes apart
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!