• 0

Mathematical Table Using Squared, Cubed, Square-root, and Cubed Root


Question

I have to create a table exactly like the one in the attachment using squared, cubed, square-root, and cube root. I am having a hard time creating the code and been struggling for hours, can anyone point me towards the right direction or have the code do this? thanks

 

post-507579-0-23039300-1383783580.png

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I am pretty new at this but this is all I got so far:

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double x = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> x;
    cout << endl;

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;

    cout << " x sqrt(x) x^2\n\n x^3\n";

    squared = x*x;
    cubed = x*x*x;
    squareRoot = sqrt (x);
    cubeRoot = pow(x), 1/3;


    return 0;
}

  • 0

here is my updated one, I can't get it to stop looping. I want it to stop at the number of rows when the user enters it

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;
        

    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    do
    {
    cout << number << "  " << squared << "  " << cubed << "  " << squareRoot << "  " << cubeRoot << "  " << ceiling << "  " << floor << "  " << endl;
    number++, squared++, cubed++, squareRoot++, cubeRoot++, ceiling++, floor++;
    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

Well obviously it isn't going to stop since you increment 'number' inside the loop and have 'while (number < 0)' as your condition. The instructions say use a for-loop, so use a for-loop.

 

http://code.wikia.com/wiki/For_loop

  • 0

okay I stopped it from looping but is there any suggestions you would suggest for me to revise my code to make it look like the table in the attachment?

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;
        

    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    do
    {
    cout << number << "  " << squared << "  " << cubed << "  " << squareRoot << "  " << cubeRoot << "  " << ceiling << "  " << floor << "  " << endl;
    ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;
    break;
    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

do
     {
     cout << number << "  " << squared << "  " << cubed << "  " << squareRoot << "  " << cubeRoot << "  " << ceiling << "  " << floor << "  " << endl;
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;
     [b]break;[/b]
     }
     while (number > 0);
You don't want that (the break) there. It will exit the do...while loop immediately after the first line of output.

Also, the way you've written it you should be decrementing "number" rather than incrementing it, or you could create a second count variable and increment it until it reaches the target number. As it stands it will fail because "number" your starting calculation number so you *should* be using "rows" in the do loop test instead of "number". :)

EDIT: Ugh, sorry, misread. You want to test against rows, but obviously will want to continue incrementing number.

  • 0

okay I just revised this and removed the break, so do you got any suggestions how to revise my code from looping and make my table to look exactly like the one in the attachment?

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    while (number <= 0)
    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    do
    {
    cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
    ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;
    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

You could use tabs instead of spaces. I think it's "\t" in C?

You still need to fix your while statement, too. Unless you enter a negative starting number it will always be greater than zero. Plus, you're outputting your rows in the loop so you need to be testing against that variable.

for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)

{

...code...

}

  • 0

is that the correct place where I place the " (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++) " ? I placed it before the "do", but it still loops

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;


    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)

    do
    {
    cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
    ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

No, it should replace the do...while construct. The assignment you posted said to use a for... loop.

     for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)
     {
     cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

     }
  

     return 0;
 }
  • 0

thank you for helping to make the program to stop the loop but my values still display diagonally and not evenly line up like a regular table should. it looks really random and values are located everywhere:

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;


    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = pow(number, 3.0);
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow(number, 1/3);

    for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)
     {
     cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

     }
 

     return 0;
 }
 

  • 0

I tried adding the the titles for my table but they still look very uneven looking:

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;


    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = pow(number, 3.0);
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow(number, 1/3);

    cout << "Number" << setw(6) << "Squared" << setw(6) << "Cubed" << setw(6) << "SquareRoot" << setw(6) << "CubeRoot" << setw(6) << "Ceiling" << setw(6) << "Floor" << setw(6);

    for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)
    {
     cout << number << setw(6) << squared << setw(6) << cubed << setw(6) << squareRoot << setw(6) << cubeRoot << setw(6) << ceiling << setw(6) << floor << setw(6);
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

     }
 

     return 0;
 }
 

  • 0

How about you worry about logic first.

 

You need a for loop, right?

You don't even need to be storing them into variables.

This whole thing could be real simple.

 

Your only inputs come from the user, and there are only 2.

So.... the pseudocode logic then becomes:

 

// Get starting point n (double)

// Get number of rows (integer)

// Print header

// For each row, print the set of values for the row of data, incrementing n by 0.1 in the process

 

Your for-loop would then look like:

    for (int intRow = 0; intRow < intRows; intRow++)
    {

         // Output formatted n

         cout << n

 

         // Output formatted squared

         cout << n*n

 

         // Output formatted cubed

         cout << n*n*n

 

         // etc...

 

         // increment n by 0.1

         n += 0.1

     }

 

The point of the exercise is to understand the LOGIC, not to worry a ton about the formatting.

Does the LOGIC make more sense to you?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • RapidRAW 1.5.7 by Razvan Serea RapidRAW is a beautiful, non-destructive, GPU‑accelerated RAW image editor designed for speed and simplicity. It uses a lightweight (~30 MB), efficient code base built with Rust, React and Tauri. Ideal for Lightroom workflows, it offers rich editing tools—exposure, contrast, highlights, shadows, whites/blacks, tone curves, HSL mixer, dehaze, vignetting, film grain, sharpening, clarity and noise reduction—processed in real-time on the GPU. Features include intuitive masking (brush, linear, radial, AI-powered subject and foreground detection), generative edit layers (via ComfyUI), 32‑bit precision, and full RAW format support through rawler. RapidRAW also provides library management (folder navigation, ratings, metadata, EXIF viewer), batch operations, export presets (JPEG/PNG/TIFF), sidecar editing (.rrdata), undo/redo history, customizable UI themes, smooth animations, resizable panels, and preset copy/paste. A modern high-performance Lightroom alternative with polished UX and creative tools, RapidRAW brings powerful photo editing to photographers seeking speed, responsive GPU feedback, and streamlined workflows. RapidRAW v1.5.7 release notes: This update serves as a direct follow-up to the core architectural migration introduced in v1.5.6. While the transition to a more modular state management system marked a significant step forward for RapidRAW's stability and long-term maintainability, it also introduced several edge cases and regressions within the library and editing workflows. This release focuses on addressing those issues, with a particular emphasis on a complete overhaul of library performance to ensure smooth and responsive browsing following the refactoring. It also resolves inconsistencies in the copy-and-paste workflow and expands RapidRAW's accessibility by adding support for eight additional languages. [full changelog] Download: RapidRAW 1.5.7 | ARM64 | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) View: RapidRAW Home Page | Screenshot | Other operating systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Thank god they got rid of the disgusting looking sidebars, and the corner radius looks much better, too. Two things I hated on day one, and never got used to.
    • JetBrains launches Rider 2026.2 EAP 5, bringing several AI improvements by David Uzondu JetBrains has released the fifth EAP version of Rider 2026.2, bringing a faster startup flow with the new non-modal startup screen and quality-check hooks for Claude Code and Codex. In the latest EAP release, Rider now has newly bundled "quality-check" hooks that run background tests on code edits before the external agent proceeds. For example, after Claude Code rewrites a class, Rider immediately triggers a PostToolUse hook that analyzes the code for syntax errors and formatting warnings. It then passes those findings back to the model as feedback, allowing the agent to fix its own output before finalizing the task. If Rider detects compilation errors, the IDE prevents the agent from treating the task as complete, while minor formatting warnings simply help guide the model toward better output. The "Explain with AI" feature can now tackle tricky build errors directly from the console, helping .NET developers who frequently wrestle with multi-targeting failures and MSBuild errors. JetBrains introduced Explain with AI back in the 2024.1 release cycle. With this feature, instead of forcing developers to copy long diagnostics into a separate chat window, Rider now lets you trigger these explanations directly from the error source. In similar EAP news, JetBrains recently opened the first EAP for IntelliJ IDEA 2026.2, with features that appeal to both those who are into AI-assisted coding and those who prefer "classic" manual development. For manual developers, the release adds revamped dependency completion for Maven and Gradle build scripts, which pulls data directly from the local cache to suggest relevant versions. It also brings the Spring Debugger update, displaying security indicators next to endpoints to visualize secured routes during runtime. In addition to database migration tools for Flyway and Liquibase, this build introduces a Hibernate debugger that shows the exact SQL or HQL queries that the framework plans to execute, letting developers jump directly to the Java code that triggered them.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      223
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      80
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!