• 0

Mathematical Table Using Squared, Cubed, Square-root, and Cubed Root


Question

I have to create a table exactly like the one in the attachment using squared, cubed, square-root, and cube root. I am having a hard time creating the code and been struggling for hours, can anyone point me towards the right direction or have the code do this? thanks

 

post-507579-0-23039300-1383783580.png

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I am pretty new at this but this is all I got so far:

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double x = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> x;
    cout << endl;

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;

    cout << " x sqrt(x) x^2\n\n x^3\n";

    squared = x*x;
    cubed = x*x*x;
    squareRoot = sqrt (x);
    cubeRoot = pow(x), 1/3;


    return 0;
}

  • 0

here is my updated one, I can't get it to stop looping. I want it to stop at the number of rows when the user enters it

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;
        

    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    do
    {
    cout << number << "  " << squared << "  " << cubed << "  " << squareRoot << "  " << cubeRoot << "  " << ceiling << "  " << floor << "  " << endl;
    number++, squared++, cubed++, squareRoot++, cubeRoot++, ceiling++, floor++;
    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

Well obviously it isn't going to stop since you increment 'number' inside the loop and have 'while (number < 0)' as your condition. The instructions say use a for-loop, so use a for-loop.

 

http://code.wikia.com/wiki/For_loop

  • 0

okay I stopped it from looping but is there any suggestions you would suggest for me to revise my code to make it look like the table in the attachment?

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;
        

    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    do
    {
    cout << number << "  " << squared << "  " << cubed << "  " << squareRoot << "  " << cubeRoot << "  " << ceiling << "  " << floor << "  " << endl;
    ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;
    break;
    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

do
     {
     cout << number << "  " << squared << "  " << cubed << "  " << squareRoot << "  " << cubeRoot << "  " << ceiling << "  " << floor << "  " << endl;
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;
     [b]break;[/b]
     }
     while (number > 0);
You don't want that (the break) there. It will exit the do...while loop immediately after the first line of output.

Also, the way you've written it you should be decrementing "number" rather than incrementing it, or you could create a second count variable and increment it until it reaches the target number. As it stands it will fail because "number" your starting calculation number so you *should* be using "rows" in the do loop test instead of "number". :)

EDIT: Ugh, sorry, misread. You want to test against rows, but obviously will want to continue incrementing number.

  • 0

okay I just revised this and removed the break, so do you got any suggestions how to revise my code from looping and make my table to look exactly like the one in the attachment?

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    while (number <= 0)
    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    do
    {
    cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
    ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;
    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

You could use tabs instead of spaces. I think it's "\t" in C?

You still need to fix your while statement, too. Unless you enter a negative starting number it will always be greater than zero. Plus, you're outputting your rows in the loop so you need to be testing against that variable.

for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)

{

...code...

}

  • 0

is that the correct place where I place the " (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++) " ? I placed it before the "do", but it still loops

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;


    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)

    do
    {
    cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
    ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

No, it should replace the do...while construct. The assignment you posted said to use a for... loop.

     for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)
     {
     cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

     }
  

     return 0;
 }
  • 0

thank you for helping to make the program to stop the loop but my values still display diagonally and not evenly line up like a regular table should. it looks really random and values are located everywhere:

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;


    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = pow(number, 3.0);
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow(number, 1/3);

    for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)
     {
     cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

     }
 

     return 0;
 }
 

  • 0

I tried adding the the titles for my table but they still look very uneven looking:

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;


    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = pow(number, 3.0);
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow(number, 1/3);

    cout << "Number" << setw(6) << "Squared" << setw(6) << "Cubed" << setw(6) << "SquareRoot" << setw(6) << "CubeRoot" << setw(6) << "Ceiling" << setw(6) << "Floor" << setw(6);

    for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)
    {
     cout << number << setw(6) << squared << setw(6) << cubed << setw(6) << squareRoot << setw(6) << cubeRoot << setw(6) << ceiling << setw(6) << floor << setw(6);
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

     }
 

     return 0;
 }
 

  • 0

How about you worry about logic first.

 

You need a for loop, right?

You don't even need to be storing them into variables.

This whole thing could be real simple.

 

Your only inputs come from the user, and there are only 2.

So.... the pseudocode logic then becomes:

 

// Get starting point n (double)

// Get number of rows (integer)

// Print header

// For each row, print the set of values for the row of data, incrementing n by 0.1 in the process

 

Your for-loop would then look like:

    for (int intRow = 0; intRow < intRows; intRow++)
    {

         // Output formatted n

         cout << n

 

         // Output formatted squared

         cout << n*n

 

         // Output formatted cubed

         cout << n*n*n

 

         // etc...

 

         // increment n by 0.1

         n += 0.1

     }

 

The point of the exercise is to understand the LOGIC, not to worry a ton about the formatting.

Does the LOGIC make more sense to you?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This site is just old men ranting at clouds. Neowin knows its audience.
    • That's nice and all. but I generally just stick with Lutris paired with 'ge-proton' (which gets updated fairly often (June 1st was last update) as the 'ge-proton' entry in Lutris uses stuff here... https://github.com/GloriousEggroll/proton-ge-custom/releases ) and the like to play my games. p.s. if a person wants to stick with a specific version from that link you can download a specific version and extract it to "~/.local/share/lutris/runners/proton/". then select it in Lutris options on game shortcut is the basic idea. because by default the standard 'ge-proton' entry will automatically get updated which can occasionally cause issues even though it's usually fine. but manually setting it on a specific version will prevent the standard updates on 'ge-proton' from messing with it on a particular game you may have issues with if that gets updated etc. one good example of the 'ge-proton' updates messing with a game in particular is the offline version of RDR2 1491.50 as I setup a specific version there and after removing the 'vulkan-1 (native)' entry in 'Wine configuration' on 'RDR2.exe' entry (if you don't remove this the game won't start up) is when the 'ge-proton' updates, it will restore that 'vulkan-1 (native)' entry and prevent the game from working. you can always remove the entry on the RDR2.exe in Wine configuration specifically after updates, but doing that everytime that updates will get old quickly. hence, keeping it on a specific GE Proton version stops me from having to mess with it as then you just adjust it once and you are done with it. also, when using 'bat' files to start a game (like Hitman: WoA for example using Peacock etc) I had some issues with GE Proton after '9-27', so I got the game locked to '9-27' (April 1st) instead of the newer ones (10-1 etc).
    • Sam Altman says AI could soon help with discovering new knowledge by Hamid Ganji OpenAI is currently at the forefront of developing powerful AI models, while its ChatGPT product is rewriting our traditional way of looking for new information. The company's CEO, Sam Altman, now says AI could even help humans discover new knowledge. He also described AI agents as junior employees. Speaking at the Snowflake Summit 2025, Altman boasted that AI agents can act like junior employees, saying, "You hear people that talk about their job now is to assign work to a bunch of agents, look at the quality, figure out how it fits together, give feedback, and it sounds a lot like how they work with a team of still relatively junior employees." OpenAI CEO also added AI agents could help humans discover new knowledge in "limited cases" or "figure out solutions to business problems that are kind of very non-trivial." While the use of AI for scientific discovery is still viewed with skepticism, the technology has proven its capabilities for new discoveries in several cases. For example, the Microsoft Discovery platform, designed for accelerating scientific research and development by AI agents, was recently able to discover a new chemical for cooling data centers in just 200 hours, a process that normally takes years to research and complete by humans. AI firms are also shifting their focus toward developing AI agents capable of performing various tasks. OpenAI recently unveiled Codex, which contains AI agents for helping programmers write and debug code. According to Altman, OpenAI engineers are already using Codex. As AI agents become more intelligent, more employees should be concerned about losing their jobs. Companies have already started replacing some specific roles with AI. For example, Duolingo has replaced its contract workers with AI, while Shopify managers need to provide reasons why AI cannot handle a job before seeking approval for new hires. Via: Business Insider
    • I personally don't think there will be many survivors past the ESU date, but I can be wrong🙂 >Firefox still supports Windows 7 (until the end of August), which will be just over 16 years since release. Well, yes, but it's an ESR version, which kind of doesn't count as fresh for me. So the last mainline version of Firefox with W7 support was 115, which was released in 2023, exactly around the W7 ESU expiration.
    • Hey, sounds like it’s definitely time for an upgrade. The R7000 had an excellent run! If you want lots of wired ports and future-proofing, the Asus RT-BE88U is a killer choice. It’s got 2x 10GbE, 4x 2.5GbE, and handles WiFi 7 like a champ. Super fast, stable, and the ASUS firmware is solid with loads of features. The TP-Link BE900 is also great, sleek design, strong performance, and a combo 10G port (RJ45/SFP+), but it has fewer wired ports than the Asus. Netgear RS700S is powerful too, but the firmware isn’t as flexible and only has one 10G port. It might feel familiar from your R7000. If wired ports are a big deal, maybe adding a 2.5G or 10G switch later gives you more options. My vote is RT-BE88U all the way.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      nothin earned a badge
      First Post
    • Enthusiast
      Epaminombas went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Posting Machine
      Fiza Ali earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • One Year In
      WaynesWorld earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      chriskinney317 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      186
    2. 2
      snowy owl
      130
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      120
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      96
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!