• 0

Mathematical Table Using Squared, Cubed, Square-root, and Cubed Root


Question

I have to create a table exactly like the one in the attachment using squared, cubed, square-root, and cube root. I am having a hard time creating the code and been struggling for hours, can anyone point me towards the right direction or have the code do this? thanks

 

post-507579-0-23039300-1383783580.png

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I am pretty new at this but this is all I got so far:

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double x = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> x;
    cout << endl;

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;

    cout << " x sqrt(x) x^2\n\n x^3\n";

    squared = x*x;
    cubed = x*x*x;
    squareRoot = sqrt (x);
    cubeRoot = pow(x), 1/3;


    return 0;
}

  • 0

here is my updated one, I can't get it to stop looping. I want it to stop at the number of rows when the user enters it

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;
        

    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    do
    {
    cout << number << "  " << squared << "  " << cubed << "  " << squareRoot << "  " << cubeRoot << "  " << ceiling << "  " << floor << "  " << endl;
    number++, squared++, cubed++, squareRoot++, cubeRoot++, ceiling++, floor++;
    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

Well obviously it isn't going to stop since you increment 'number' inside the loop and have 'while (number < 0)' as your condition. The instructions say use a for-loop, so use a for-loop.

 

http://code.wikia.com/wiki/For_loop

  • 0

okay I stopped it from looping but is there any suggestions you would suggest for me to revise my code to make it look like the table in the attachment?

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;
        

    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    do
    {
    cout << number << "  " << squared << "  " << cubed << "  " << squareRoot << "  " << cubeRoot << "  " << ceiling << "  " << floor << "  " << endl;
    ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;
    break;
    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

do
     {
     cout << number << "  " << squared << "  " << cubed << "  " << squareRoot << "  " << cubeRoot << "  " << ceiling << "  " << floor << "  " << endl;
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;
     [b]break;[/b]
     }
     while (number > 0);
You don't want that (the break) there. It will exit the do...while loop immediately after the first line of output.

Also, the way you've written it you should be decrementing "number" rather than incrementing it, or you could create a second count variable and increment it until it reaches the target number. As it stands it will fail because "number" your starting calculation number so you *should* be using "rows" in the do loop test instead of "number". :)

EDIT: Ugh, sorry, misread. You want to test against rows, but obviously will want to continue incrementing number.

  • 0

okay I just revised this and removed the break, so do you got any suggestions how to revise my code from looping and make my table to look exactly like the one in the attachment?

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    while (number <= 0)
    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    do
    {
    cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
    ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;
    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

You could use tabs instead of spaces. I think it's "\t" in C?

You still need to fix your while statement, too. Unless you enter a negative starting number it will always be greater than zero. Plus, you're outputting your rows in the loop so you need to be testing against that variable.

for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)

{

...code...

}

  • 0

is that the correct place where I place the " (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++) " ? I placed it before the "do", but it still loops

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;


    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)

    do
    {
    cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
    ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

No, it should replace the do...while construct. The assignment you posted said to use a for... loop.

     for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)
     {
     cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

     }
  

     return 0;
 }
  • 0

thank you for helping to make the program to stop the loop but my values still display diagonally and not evenly line up like a regular table should. it looks really random and values are located everywhere:

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;


    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = pow(number, 3.0);
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow(number, 1/3);

    for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)
     {
     cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

     }
 

     return 0;
 }
 

  • 0

I tried adding the the titles for my table but they still look very uneven looking:

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;


    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = pow(number, 3.0);
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow(number, 1/3);

    cout << "Number" << setw(6) << "Squared" << setw(6) << "Cubed" << setw(6) << "SquareRoot" << setw(6) << "CubeRoot" << setw(6) << "Ceiling" << setw(6) << "Floor" << setw(6);

    for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)
    {
     cout << number << setw(6) << squared << setw(6) << cubed << setw(6) << squareRoot << setw(6) << cubeRoot << setw(6) << ceiling << setw(6) << floor << setw(6);
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

     }
 

     return 0;
 }
 

  • 0

How about you worry about logic first.

 

You need a for loop, right?

You don't even need to be storing them into variables.

This whole thing could be real simple.

 

Your only inputs come from the user, and there are only 2.

So.... the pseudocode logic then becomes:

 

// Get starting point n (double)

// Get number of rows (integer)

// Print header

// For each row, print the set of values for the row of data, incrementing n by 0.1 in the process

 

Your for-loop would then look like:

    for (int intRow = 0; intRow < intRows; intRow++)
    {

         // Output formatted n

         cout << n

 

         // Output formatted squared

         cout << n*n

 

         // Output formatted cubed

         cout << n*n*n

 

         // etc...

 

         // increment n by 0.1

         n += 0.1

     }

 

The point of the exercise is to understand the LOGIC, not to worry a ton about the formatting.

Does the LOGIC make more sense to you?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just WHY... I wonder if some executive really pushed for this to come up because of SOME REASON that bothered the dude... Or maybe so that it doesn't overlap with the OCD in some handheld, something like that?
    • OneDrive search is currently broken for many users by Taras Buria If you are trying to find a certain file in your OneDrive storage, but the service just won't give you the stuff you need, you are likely experiencing an issue that Microsoft has just confirmed. The company updated the official OneDrive documentation with a list of known bugs to clarify that the service currently exhibits problems with the search functionality. According to Microsoft, the bug affects four platforms: Windows, iOS, Android, and Web (macOS users are spared). The company says that affected users see black search results, and the storage does not return files that certainly exist (do not blame Microsoft if OneDrive cannot find the file you accidentally deleted or renamed). Fortunately, files are intact—it is just the search that cannot find them and present them to you. Another good thing is that the issue does not appear to affect 100% of users. Microsoft says only "a subset of users" experience the bug. Neowin checked a bunch of systems with personal and work OneDrive accounts, and all of them found the requested files without any issues. Unfortunately, if you are affected, there is nothing you can do at this point. Microsoft made it clear that there are no workarounds. Therefore, you will have to manually scavenge your OneDrive folders (they can now be colored!) to search for the needed file. Microsoft added that it understands how disruptive this bug could be, and it is "working with urgency" to resolve the bug as quickly as possible. You can check out the list of known OneDrive bugs and their possible workarounds in the official support document. In other news about OneDrive frustration, Microsoft recently locked out a user who was attempting to move a bunch of important data from old hard drives to OneDrive. Eighteen attempts to resolve the issue led to nothing but automated replies from Microsoft. You can read more about that wild story here.
    • If anyone thinks bringing manufacturing back will result in a bazillion jobs should heed this information. They will be plants full of robots with human supervisors. It’s the only way the products have a chance to be affordable.
    • You can’t sell BS unless you have autonomy as a sales gimmick. They don’t have the technology, I’ve been in several Tesla Swasticars, they are not safe and self driving barely works - their implementation is incredibly dangerous and still very error prone. They are selling this as a feature to assure safety, the reality is they know their technology isn’t safe and have humans there when it’s not fully able to do what you want it to. If they hired drivers and didn’t have any self driving they are then basically competing with uber and they don’t have the numbers of cars to compete so they sell fake self driving with humans and hope they fix their problems in the meantime. Felon skum has always been a snake oil salesman and people fall for it.
    • Exactly, this defeats the point entirely.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      BlakeBringer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Helen Shafer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      emptyother earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Crunchy6 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      KynanSEIT earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      669
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      271
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      229
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      166
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      161
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!