• 0

Mathematical Table Using Squared, Cubed, Square-root, and Cubed Root


Question

I have to create a table exactly like the one in the attachment using squared, cubed, square-root, and cube root. I am having a hard time creating the code and been struggling for hours, can anyone point me towards the right direction or have the code do this? thanks

 

post-507579-0-23039300-1383783580.png

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I am pretty new at this but this is all I got so far:

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double x = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> x;
    cout << endl;

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;

    cout << " x sqrt(x) x^2\n\n x^3\n";

    squared = x*x;
    cubed = x*x*x;
    squareRoot = sqrt (x);
    cubeRoot = pow(x), 1/3;


    return 0;
}

  • 0

here is my updated one, I can't get it to stop looping. I want it to stop at the number of rows when the user enters it

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;
        

    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    do
    {
    cout << number << "  " << squared << "  " << cubed << "  " << squareRoot << "  " << cubeRoot << "  " << ceiling << "  " << floor << "  " << endl;
    number++, squared++, cubed++, squareRoot++, cubeRoot++, ceiling++, floor++;
    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

Well obviously it isn't going to stop since you increment 'number' inside the loop and have 'while (number < 0)' as your condition. The instructions say use a for-loop, so use a for-loop.

 

http://code.wikia.com/wiki/For_loop

  • 0

okay I stopped it from looping but is there any suggestions you would suggest for me to revise my code to make it look like the table in the attachment?

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;
        

    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    do
    {
    cout << number << "  " << squared << "  " << cubed << "  " << squareRoot << "  " << cubeRoot << "  " << ceiling << "  " << floor << "  " << endl;
    ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;
    break;
    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

do
     {
     cout << number << "  " << squared << "  " << cubed << "  " << squareRoot << "  " << cubeRoot << "  " << ceiling << "  " << floor << "  " << endl;
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;
     [b]break;[/b]
     }
     while (number > 0);
You don't want that (the break) there. It will exit the do...while loop immediately after the first line of output.

Also, the way you've written it you should be decrementing "number" rather than incrementing it, or you could create a second count variable and increment it until it reaches the target number. As it stands it will fail because "number" your starting calculation number so you *should* be using "rows" in the do loop test instead of "number". :)

EDIT: Ugh, sorry, misread. You want to test against rows, but obviously will want to continue incrementing number.

  • 0

okay I just revised this and removed the break, so do you got any suggestions how to revise my code from looping and make my table to look exactly like the one in the attachment?

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;

    while (number <= 0)
    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    do
    {
    cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
    ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;
    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

You could use tabs instead of spaces. I think it's "\t" in C?

You still need to fix your while statement, too. Unless you enter a negative starting number it will always be greater than zero. Plus, you're outputting your rows in the loop so you need to be testing against that variable.

for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)

{

...code...

}

  • 0

is that the correct place where I place the " (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++) " ? I placed it before the "do", but it still loops

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;


    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = number*number*number;
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow((double)(number),(double)1/3);

    for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)

    do
    {
    cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
    ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

    }
    while (number > 0);


    return 0;
}

  • 0

No, it should replace the do...while construct. The assignment you posted said to use a for... loop.

     for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)
     {
     cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

     }
  

     return 0;
 }
  • 0

thank you for helping to make the program to stop the loop but my values still display diagonally and not evenly line up like a regular table should. it looks really random and values are located everywhere:

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;


    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = pow(number, 3.0);
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow(number, 1/3);

    for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)
     {
     cout << number << setw(5) << squared << setw(5) << cubed << setw(5) << squareRoot << setw(5) << cubeRoot << setw(5) << ceiling << setw(5) << floor << setw(5);
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

     }
 

     return 0;
 }
 

  • 0

I tried adding the the titles for my table but they still look very uneven looking:

 

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;

int main()
{

    double number = 0;
    double rows = 0;
    double squared = 0;
    double cubed = 0;
    double squareRoot = 0;
    double cubeRoot = 0;
    int ceiling = 0;
    int floor = 0;


    {

    cout << "Where would you like to start? ";
    cin >> number;
    cout << endl;
    }

    cout << "And how many rows? ";
    cin >> rows;
    cout << endl;


    squared = number*number;
    cubed = pow(number, 3.0);
    squareRoot = sqrt (number);
    cubeRoot = pow(number, 1/3);

    cout << "Number" << setw(6) << "Squared" << setw(6) << "Cubed" << setw(6) << "SquareRoot" << setw(6) << "CubeRoot" << setw(6) << "Ceiling" << setw(6) << "Floor" << setw(6);

    for (int rowCount = 0; rowCount < rows; rowCount++)
    {
     cout << number << setw(6) << squared << setw(6) << cubed << setw(6) << squareRoot << setw(6) << cubeRoot << setw(6) << ceiling << setw(6) << floor << setw(6);
     ++number, ++squared, ++cubed, ++squareRoot, ++cubeRoot, ++ceiling, ++floor;

     }
 

     return 0;
 }
 

  • 0

How about you worry about logic first.

 

You need a for loop, right?

You don't even need to be storing them into variables.

This whole thing could be real simple.

 

Your only inputs come from the user, and there are only 2.

So.... the pseudocode logic then becomes:

 

// Get starting point n (double)

// Get number of rows (integer)

// Print header

// For each row, print the set of values for the row of data, incrementing n by 0.1 in the process

 

Your for-loop would then look like:

    for (int intRow = 0; intRow < intRows; intRow++)
    {

         // Output formatted n

         cout << n

 

         // Output formatted squared

         cout << n*n

 

         // Output formatted cubed

         cout << n*n*n

 

         // etc...

 

         // increment n by 0.1

         n += 0.1

     }

 

The point of the exercise is to understand the LOGIC, not to worry a ton about the formatting.

Does the LOGIC make more sense to you?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bad Wolf Theory
    • That sharp cold toothache you dread? Its origins trace back to ancient, unexpected purpose by Sayan Sen Image by Pavel Danilyuk via Pexels Scientists at the University of Chicago have discovered that the sensitive tissue inside our teeth first evolved as part of the armored skin of ancient fish. Their new study, published in Nature, confirms that dentine—a key part of teeth—was originally used by early vertebrates to sense their surroundings. This research supports the idea that dentine wasn’t always used for chewing. Instead, millions of years ago, it helped fish detect changes in the water. The study also clears up confusion about Anatolepis heintzi, a fossil once thought to be the earliest known vertebrate because of its dentine-like structures. For years, scientists debated whether Anatolepis was really an early vertebrate. The fossil had tiny tubules that some researchers believed were odontodes—small structures considered to be the ancestors of teeth. However, there wasn’t enough evidence to be sure. To settle the debate, scientists used synchrotron scanning, a powerful imaging technique, to study different fossils and modern creatures. The scans revealed that Anatolepis didn’t have dentine. Instead, its tubules were sensory structures similar to those found in arthropods like crabs and shrimp. These structures, called sensilla, help animals detect their surroundings. “This shows us that ‘teeth’ can also be sensory even when they’re not in the mouth,” said lead researcher Yara Haridy, PhD. “There’s sensitive armor in these fish. There’s sensitive armor in these arthropods. This explains the confusion with these early Cambrian animals.” Although Anatolepis turned out to be an arthropod, researchers did find real dentine in another ancient fish. The Ordovician vertebrate Eriptychius, which lived about 465 million years ago, had large dentine-filled tubules in its armor. This confirms that dentine first evolved in vertebrates as a sensory tissue. Further tests showed that modern fish, such as sharks and teleosts, still have nerve connections in their external dentine structures. This means early vertebrates may have used dentine to sense their environment before it became part of teeth. Scientists have two main ideas about how teeth came to be. The “inside-out” theory suggests teeth evolved first and were later adapted for exoskeletons. The new research supports the “outside-in” theory, which argues that sensory structures appeared first in exoskeletons and later evolved into teeth. While the team didn’t find the oldest vertebrate fish, study co-author Neil Shubin, PhD, believes the discovery is still important. “We didn’t find the earliest one, but in some ways, we found something way cooler,” he said. Source: University of Chicago, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "How dare you profit off our user's data without compensating them. That's our job!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      James courage Tabla earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Apprentice
      DarkShrunken went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Dedicated
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      DarkShrunken earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rookie
      Pat-Garrett went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      346
    2. 2
      snowy owl
      167
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      163
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      161
    5. 5
      Xenon
      128
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!