• 0

Most Compression format


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I always enjoy flogging a dead horse!

Depends on the content of the file you're compressing... I'd say uharc for media files, and 7-zip for general stuff. but they aren't too common, so your overall best bet is probably rar files, like coroner said.

  • 0

Archiver Compressed size Ratio

7-Zip (7z format) 5445402 100%

WinRAR 3.10 6004155 110%

WinAce 2.3 6242424 115%

CABARC 1.0 6455327 119%

7-Zip (zip format) 9461621 174%

PKZIP 2.50 9842800 181%

FILE SET: The GIMP 1.2.4 for Windows after full installation (127 subfolders, 1304 files totaling 27,128,826 bytes). The GIMP is the GNU Image Manipulation Program. It can be downloaded from www.gimp.org.

  • 0

It depends on the files you are compressing. Try them out yourself with some files and see for yourself.

The best format in my opinion is RAR, there are other formats out there that can compress better (albeit only a tiny bit better) but RAR has so many powerful options such as spliting archices into multiple files, built in recovery records (similar to PAR files), compression profiles, archive authenticity verification and excellent SFX modules (GUI and DOS based for example). Also RAR is the most used format on the web these days.

  • 0

What saint dark said.. 7-zip is really good but its slow. The version of the client I have seems to forget to release memory too, so after compressing a few files I find I need a restart.

Rar is nice though. Fairly quick and decent compression. Ace also seems nice, though I've not done anything with that myself.

  • 0
  [saint dark said:
,Nov 26 2003, 23:02] the 7-zip format compress better, but only 10% better than rar so that doesnt matter considering that 7-zip is extremely slow at compressing and de-compressing

Very true :yes:

I recently looked at using 7-Zip at work instead of WinZip however everyone agreed it is cheaper to use winzip because of the time saved vs. compressed size. Employee time is A LOT more expensive than a few KB (or MB in extreme situations).

In the end they went for WinRAR because of the 100% ZIP compression (so customers that still use WinZip are not affected) and because of the SFX being built in (something that doesnt come with WinZip for commercial use!).

WinRAR is easily the best because it gets excellent compression levels and is very quick. Also I think the RAR Vs 7Zip levels are actually about 3-7% not 10% (well maybe with some examples). However I have compressed loads of things that RAR gets smaller than 7Zip and the WinRAR UI is excellent (7Zip's is awful at the moment!)

  • 0
  deadmonkey said:
Just a quick example...

I had 5 txt files which are 47.9KB in total.

in 7-Zip they are compressed to 16.5KB

in RAR they are compresse dto 13.5KB

in 7-Zip SFX they are compressed to 85.0KB

in RAR SFX they are compressed to 64.5KB

WinRAR wins :D

woohoo, try compressing your entire drive's contents and see which is smaller (Y) text files compress really well anyway, and two tests is hardly enough to declare a winner...

  • 0

God, I can't stand it when people jump on the "yeah, me too" bandwagon when they hear some propaganda about new software supposedly being the be all / end all for one certain thing.

Do your own testing before jumping in and saying "x" is better than "y"...

For example, here's a test text file compression test using "Maximum" values for WinRar, WinZip, and 7-zip ...

post-12-1069923584.gif

  • 0
  gameguy said:
woohoo, try compressing your entire drive's contents and see which is smaller (Y) text files compress really well anyway, and two tests is hardly enough to declare a winner...

i know it is not an excellent test but it is just a quick example. It is just like the test they show as an example on the &-Zip website when compressing the GiMP. They obviously only used it because 7-Zip compressed it better than WinRAR. They wouldnt use something where RAR got better compression would they?!

  • 0
  sryo said:
Archiver Compressed size Ratio

7-Zip (7z format) 5445402 100%

WinRAR 3.10 6004155 110%

WinAce 2.3 6242424 115%

CABARC 1.0 6455327 119%

7-Zip (zip format) 9461621 174%

PKZIP 2.50 9842800 181%

Doesn't this just tell you to go out and get WinRAR?

Come on, only a 10% compression penalty from 7-Zip yet it's widely supported, easy to use and quick.

Why waste your time with anything else?

  • 0

seriously i believe popularity is as important as compression ratio.

if u are compressing for ur own usage than ofcourse compression comes first.

my experience:

WinAce

WinRar

WinZip

(I am naming the applications)

I had liked to try out 7Zip but dont think many people in my circle use it.

  • 0

I would go for WinZip. Even though it is much limited to the file formats compared to WinRar, it has much faster compression. You can extract and compress much faster and effiecient than other programs. I have a friend that works at Symantec and he says that they also use WinZip. WinRar is most likely to be built for home users while WinZip is more of a professional line of compression.

  • 0

home users/professional users

now this is weird. i dont think winrar is not secure or good enough to be used by organisation.

Zip just happen to be the most widely used format. That's it. That does not make WinZip the software of choice when it cant handle the alternative technologies.

WinAce and WinRar on the other hand accepts other formats too. :)

  • 0
  LiLViEtDuDe917 said:
I would go for WinZip. Even though it is much limited to the file formats compared to WinRar, it has much faster compression. You can extract and compress much faster and effiecient than other programs. I have a friend that works at Symantec and he says that they also use WinZip. WinRar is most likely to be built for home users while WinZip is more of a professional line of compression.

How is it more effiecent? I suppose it depends on how you define efficiency with compression, but with WinRAR and 7zip clearly able to pack a lot more into a smaller file than Winzip, I fail to see how you may be interpreting Winzip's superior efficiency over the competition.

With WinRAR able to function within a console for scripting purposes, being able to support archives up to 8 terabytes (with Winzip maxed at 4GB), and lastly, having 128-bit encryption (where Winzip's encryption is very weak), WinRAR is far more suited to a professional enviroment than Winzip is.

My 2 cents.

  Quote
i dont think winrar is not secure or good enough to be used by organisation.

See post above regarding encrpytion.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy S25+ 512GB is $220 off for powerful AI and a pro-grade camera by Paul Hill Are you in the market for a premium Samsung phone? If so, check out the Samsung Galaxy S25+ with 512GB of storage. It’s on Amazon right now for just $899, down 20% from its $1,199.99 list price, representing a significant $220.99 saving. This unlocked device is marked as the number 1 new release by Amazon in the Cell Phones category. If you’re interested, act fast as it’s a limited-time deal. The Galaxy S25+ comes packed with AI features under the umbrella of Galaxy AI. Capabilities include Multiple Tasks with One Ask which brings Google Gemini integration for multi-app commands, Now Brief which proactively gives you information you need to start the day, Audio Eraser to remove distracting sounds from your videos, and advanced portrait features. Powering these features is the Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) processor which handles all sorts of tasks efficiently including gaming, translation, and photo editing. Alongside the processor is 512GB of storage and 12GB of RAM. The S25+ uses a 6.7-inch QHD+ ProScaler Display which delivers vibrant visuals thanks to its use of Dynamic AMOLED 2X with 3,120 x 1,440 resolution and 120Hz refresh rate. Regarding camera setup, the S25+ has an AI camera with 50MP main sensor, 12MP ultrawide, and 10MP telephoto with OIS. There is also a 12MP front camera. This camera setup is capable of 8K video recording, which is impressive. Finally, you get long battery life with the 4,900 mAh and 45W fast charging support so you don’t need to wait long for it to recharge. If you’re an Android user looking to upgrade to a flagship phone without paying the full price, this deal is for you. If you have an eligible phone to trade in, there is an option to do so to claim up to $725 on the upgrade with Amazon.com Gift Card credit. If you’re excited by AI, but your current phone doesn’t support many AI features, this phone could also be a smart choice. Its display is also great for media consumption, and the processor is robust. Finally, if you have a lot of files to store, the 512GB of storage should be ample. Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Icyblue): $899 (Amazon US) / MSRP $1,199.99 This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Sniffnet 1.4.0 by Razvan Serea Sniffnet is a network monitoring tool to help you easily keep track of your Internet traffic. Whether you want to gather statistics, or you need to inspect more in depth what's going on in your network, this app will get you covered. Sniffnet is a technical tool, but at the same time it strongly focuses on the overall user experience: most of the network analyzers out there are cumbersome to use, while one of Sniffnet's cornerstones is to be usable with ease by everyone. Furthermore, Sniffnet is completely free and open-source, dual-licensed under MIT or Apache-2.0: if you are interested you can find the full source code on GitHub. Last but not least, this application is totally developed in Rust: a modern programming language to build efficient and reliable software, emphasizing performance and safety. Sniffnet key features choose a network adapter of your PC to inspect select a set of filters to apply to the observed traffic view overall statistics about your Internet traffic view real-time charts about traffic intensity keep an eye on your network even when the application is minimized export comprehensive capture reports as PCAP files identify 6000+ upper layer services, protocols, trojans, and worms find out domain name and ASN of the hosts you are exchanging traffic with identify connections in your local network discover the geographical location of the remote hosts save your favorite network hosts inspect each of your network connections in real time set custom notifications to inform you when defined network events occur choose the style that fits you the most, including custom themes support ... and more! Sniffnet 1.4.0 changelog: New features Import PCAP files (#795 — fixes #283) Enhanced notifications (#830 — fixes #637) Donut chart reporting overall traffic statistics (#756 — fixes #687) Added support for ARP protocol (#759 — fixes #680) Identify and tag unassigned/reserved "bogon" IP addresses (#678 — fixes #209) Show data agglomerates in Inspect page table (#684 — fixes #601) Added Traditional Chinese (Taiwan) translation 🇹🇼 (#774) Added Indonesian translation 🇮🇩 (#611) A Docker image of Sniffnet is now available (#735) Improvements Added new themes A11y (Night) and A11y (Day) based on palettes optimized for Accessibility (#785 — fixes #786) Do not apply new notification thresholds while user is typing them (#777 — fixes #658) Show more information when domain name is short (#720 — fixes #696) Avoid directory traversal when selecting file name for PCAP exports (#776 — fixes #767) Add icon to window title bar (#719 — fixes #715) Update footer buttons and links (#755 — fixes #553) Handle errors to reduce the number of possible crash occurrences (#784) Updated some of the existing translations to v1.3: Portuguese (#690) Ukrainian (#692) Spanish (#805) Fixes Fix crates.io package for Windows (#718 — fixes #681) Fix crash when inserting characters longer than one byte in the text input for byte threshold notification setting (#747 — fixes #744) Remove pre-uninstall script on Linux (fixes #644) Fix typo in Russian translation (fixes #730) Minor fix to service determination algorithm in case of multicast and broadcast traffic Download: Sniffnet 64-bit | Sniffnet 32-bit ~15.0 MB (Open Source) Link: Sniffnet Home Page | Other operating systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Anker announces global recall of five power bank models over fire safety risks by Aditya Tiwari The Chinese electronics brand, Anker Innovations, known for its mobile accessories and power banks has announced a voluntary global recall of five power bank models. The decision comes after the company spotted a potential fire hazard issue with lithium-ion battery cells from a particular vendor. Anker said that it put up a series of quality checks to detect manufacturing issues early in the production cycle, which include component level-audits and supplier testing. The company assured that "while the likelihood of malfunction is considered minimal, out of an abundance of caution, we have decided to initiate a voluntary global recall of several Anker power bank models." Here's the list of the Anker Power Bank models chosen for the global recall: Model A1257 - Anker Power Bank (10K, 22.5W) Model A1647 - Anker Power Bank (20,000mAh, 22.5W, Built-In USB-C Cable) Model A1652 - Anker MagGo Power Bank (10,000mAh, 7.5W) Model A1681 - Anker Zolo Power Bank (20K, 30W, Built-In USB-C and Lightning Cable) Model A1689 - Anker Zolo Power Bank (20K, 30W, Built-In USB-C Cable) If you think you own one of the affected power banks, you can check the model number located on the back or side of your power bank. After that, you can fill out the recall form to start the process and verify the serial number of your affected device. If your power bank is eligible for the recall, you can either get a replacement or receive a gift card for use on the Anker website. It's not offering any refunds in the US at the moment. Anker advises that you should stop using an impacted power bank immediately even if the device functions normally right now. A unit confirmed for the recall could pose the risk of overheating, melting, smoke, or fire. This is the second major recall from Anker in the same month after more than a dozen reports of fires and explosions. The company previously recalled over one million Anker PowerCore 10000 (A1263) power bank units, citing fire safety risks due to a potential issue with the Lithium-ion battery. These power banks were sold in the US from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2022.
    • What learning curve !!?? Govt office employees never learn anything !! they're just there to not work !!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Mighty Pen went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      emptyother earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      DarkWun earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      valkyr09 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      566
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      189
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      176
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      112
    5. 5
      Xenon
      110
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!