Help finding out AMD A10 CPU temperature


Recommended Posts

I am trying to find out my CPU temperature, I have a quad core AMD A10 5700, I installed a free product called HWMonitor for this and it shows lots of data but not the four cores temperatures, instead it shows me a single core called "package".

 

Anybody can tell me if this is because the CPU has a graphics card integrated or how to find out each core temperature?

 

Thank you

 

PS: Screenshot attached, see where it says "Temperatures">Packages

post-416658-0-61236000-1385771941.png

  On 30/11/2013 at 00:43, Hum said:

Not all motherboards have temperature sensors, so you might not be able to tell.

 

I'm guessing 'package' is the core temps -- the highest figures.

 

127 F, being the average.

Temp sensor of the motherboard has nothing to do with the temp sensor of the CPU.. And yes OP.. See AMD A10-5700, then see "temperatures" under that? That is your Current, Min and Max CPU temps.

OP Asked.
 

  On 30/11/2013 at 00:39, fastcat said:

I am trying to find out my CPU temperature

You said:
 

  On 30/11/2013 at 00:43, Hum said:

Not all motherboards have temperature sensors, so you might not be able to tell.

 
Then I said, this, because you clearly implied that the motherboard temp sensor had something to do with the CPU temp sensor: 
 

  Quote

Temp sensor of the motherboard has nothing to do with the temp sensor of the CPU


So don't try to play it off as though you knew what you were talking about with:
 

  On 30/11/2013 at 01:00, Hum said:

DUH :laugh:


Not trying to be a jerk here, I just don't like it when people give clearly misleading information.

Based on what was said here: http://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp/howitworks.html; I checked the AMD programmer manuals and I think there is only one package sensor for APUs (either that or the documentation is really horrible... it actually is pretty bad tbh). 

 

See: 

http://developer.amd.com/wordpress/media/2012/10/254811.pdf

http://developer.amd.com/wordpress/media/2012/10/42301_15h_Mod_00h-0Fh_BKDG1.pdf (Your processor supposedly falls under this category).

Thank you everyone for the advice.

 

Do I deduct it correctly that because AMD A10 is an APU and not a stand alone CPU I will never see temperature for each separate core?

 

I was confused because I used to have an Intel quad core before and temperatures using the same program were dispalying each separate core, I had not taken into account that the A10 is a APU with graphics.

  On 30/11/2013 at 17:00, snaphat (Myles Landwehr) said:

I forgot to answer the other part of the question -- A10-5700 is an APU and that GPU listed is integrated on die.

 

that is odd. I'm running a AMD combo A8 3520M with a 6620HD APU... they down graded your APU for basically a superior CPU to mine. :huh:

  On 30/11/2013 at 21:10, chrisj1968 said:

that is odd. I'm running a AMD combo A8 3520M with a 6620HD APU... they down graded your APU for basically a superior CPU to mine. :huh:

 

Not mine :-), but the OPs. I imagine it has something to do with catering to different segments of the market.

  On 30/11/2013 at 21:05, fastcat said:

Thank you everyone for the advice.

 

Do I deduct it correctly that because AMD A10 is an APU and not a stand alone CPU I will never see temperature for each separate core?

 

I was confused because I used to have an Intel quad core before and temperatures using the same program were dispalying each separate core, I had not taken into account that the A10 is a APU with graphics.

 

Even the older series AMDs (non-APUs) didn't have per-core temperature sensors from what I've been reading (disclaimer: I haven't owned an AMD processor in ages). If they had decided to they could have provided sensors for each core and the on-die GPU. It may well have to do with the on-die transistor area. It might not have distinct regions used for core or for the gpu; in which case it doesn't really make sense to have more than 1 sensor for the entire package.

  On 30/11/2013 at 21:32, snaphat (Myles Landwehr) said:

Not mine :-), but the OPs. I imagine it has something to do with catering to different segments of the market.

 

ugh... sorry. jumping from putting up the christmas tree and here

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft changes hit Teams Android devices: Disable Entra ID policy to restore sign-in by Paul Hill As part of its Secure Future Initiative, Microsoft has deployed a new Entra ID Conditional Access policy targeting Device Code Flow authentication. Unfortunately, it has led some Microsoft Teams-certified Android devices (Teams Rooms on Android, Teams Phones, Teams Panels, and Teams Displays) to be logged out and signing back in can be a bit fiddly so guidance has been shared. Microsoft said that it shared previous guidance which explained how to exclude Android devices, but it seems some admins didn’t catch this as many devices were not excluded and have been signed out. It’s important to realize that this is not a bug, it’s a security feature. However, the move could have been better communicated. To sign the devices back in, you can do so manually. However, if the devices are remote you’ll need to follow these steps: By disabling the “Block device code flow” policy in step 1, it will change everything back to how it was before Microsoft decided to enable it to boost security. This will allow you to get those affected Android devices logged back in again. Also pay special attention to step 2 which says you might need to reboot your device three times. Once you have your Android devices logged in again, it’s probably a good idea to follow Microsoft’s previous guidance and add these to an exclusion list before re-enabling the “Block device code flow” policy. Microsoft recommends only allowing DCF where it’s absolutely necessary and then blocking it elsewhere. The best thing to do is to add your Teams Android device to the exclusion list - this will allow these devices to operate normally, while boosting overall security. If you’re an admin and have been impacted by this, be sure to take proactive measures to avoid disruptions in the future.
    • Can someone help me with writing a batchfile using notepad to tell me to start a vpn plz? I would greatly appreciate any help  
    • Yeah define not catching up then to see the next part of this then
    • RoboForm 9.7.7 by Razvan Serea RoboForm is the top-rated Password Manager and Web Form Filler that completely automates password entering and form filling. RoboForm makes logging into Web sites and filling forms faster, easier, and more secure. RoboForm memorizes and securely stores each user name and password the first time you log into a site, then automatically supplies them when you return. RoboForm's powerful Logins feature eliminates the manual steps of logging into any online account. With just one click RoboForm will navigate to a Web site, enter your username and password and click the submit button for you. Completing long registration or checkout forms is also a breeze. Simply click on your RoboForm Identity and RoboForm fills-in the entire form for you. You no longer need to remember all your passwords. You remember one Master Password, and RoboForm remembers the rest. This allows you to use stronger passwords, making your online experience more secure. RoboForm uses strong AES encryption for complete data security. The all new RoboForm comes with Chrome and Safari browser support, iPhone/iPad and Android support, as well a brand new RoboForm Everywhere license for use on unlimited computers and mobile devices. RoboForm 9.7.7 changelog: Show RF Desktop unlock UI when user selects "Unlock" in RF Desktop UI. Fixed blank icon appeared in the Windows taskbar for RF Editor. Miscellaneous bug fixes. Download: RoboForm 9.7.7 | 42.2 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) View: RoboForm Website Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      SteveJaye earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Uranus_enjoyer earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Philsl earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Jaclidio hoy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      438
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      158
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      149
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      65
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!