• 0

Shared Mailbox Calendar Replies


Question

Hi,

I need some advice on how to receive calendar replies to primary mailboxes that were sent from a shared mailbox (could have worded this better)

Currently users at two different sites (7000 miles apart) have access to a primary mailbox and a secondary shared mailbox that users can create calendar invites. The mailbox is located at site 1 and the trouble we're having is that users at site are having performance issues when trying to open the shared mailbox.

I tried to rectify the issue by removing the mailbox at site 2 and only giving calendar access but i later found that users weren't being updated if invites had been declined (as declined invites will be sent back to the shared mailbox)

So if you understood the above please advise on a possible solution or if you need more then please let me know.

If there isn't a solution i'm going to have the move the mailbox to site 2 as we have more users there than we do here (which i really don't want to do)

Thanks for your help!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1191799-shared-mailbox-calendar-replies/
Share on other sites

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Why are users opening that calendar mailbox?  Users should not open the calendar mailbox at all unless you, the administrator, are giving users access to be able to create meeting with the use of that mailbox. 

 

I will give an example. 

 

We have a conference room, lets call it conference room A.  We give sally access to be able to schedule meetings in that conference room.  Sally creates a schedule with the conference room as a member and any other person she wants to include.  That conference room accepts the meeting invite automatically and everyone else will get it added to their own schedule.  The conference room holds the meeting in its own calendar, and everyone else has a meeting invite in their own calendar, the person scheduling the meeting has the ability to view all meetings in that conference room to be able to schedule around other meetings going on that other people have access to.  No one is opening the entire mailbox at all.  You should be running cached exchange mode as well within outlook, this will help with speed and will only cause your mail clients to download new data, not the entire thing everytime they open mail.

  • 0

I see what you're saying but that'll mean we will need to have a dedicated person that manages the mailbox which doesn't fit our requirements. We have many users that will create invites from the shared mailbox and will require notification whether an invite has been accepted or declined. I will however verify that the shared mailbox is cached as that would make sense (quick google search tells me Outlook 2010/13 cache secondary mailboxes by default but we're on 2007).

 

Thanks for your suggestion and I will update you on how this goes.

  • 0

The way we use it is that Sups and managers have access to the account and schedule meetings and users get the invites, accept and it gets added to their calendar, I've received invites from our location in CT, from RI, and MN without needing to open any extra mailbox, I do know we use Cached Exchange mode and we have have people using Office 2003/ 2007, and 2010, 

  • 0

Unless this community calendar involves reserving a conference room (to avoid double-booking), there is no need to use it at all. 

 

A person wishing to host a meeting merely opens THEIR calendar, creates a new meeting and adds the desired people.  Everyone invited can see who accepted, who declined.  If the appointment is updated or adjusted, everyone is notified and their calendars adjust.

 

For conference rooms, each location has a single conference room email.  The receptionist monitors this account and accepts appointments (oldest to newest) and declines or proposes a room change upon conflicting appointments.  It takes her all of 15 minutes to do this and our conference rooms are used a lot. All employees have view rights to the conference room calendars so if they need a room they can check for availability before sending the invite to the people + the conference room email.

  • 0

Unless this community calendar involves reserving a conference room (to avoid double-booking), there is no need to use it at all. 

 

A person wishing to host a meeting merely opens THEIR calendar, creates a new meeting and adds the desired people.  Everyone invited can see who accepted, who declined.  If the appointment is updated or adjusted, everyone is notified and their calendars adjust.

 

For conference rooms, each location has a single conference room email.  The receptionist monitors this account and accepts appointments (oldest to newest) and declines or proposes a room change upon conflicting appointments.  It takes her all of 15 minutes to do this and our conference rooms are used a lot. All employees have view rights to the conference room calendars so if they need a room they can check for availability before sending the invite to the people + the conference room email.

 

The way we have it set is that users will schedule meetings with other users that are offsite, once they are booked in everyone that has access to the calendar can have visibility of the offsite users' whereabouts. Again all I need is a way to receive to a notification to the person who has raised the invite via the shared mailbox informing them (primary mailbox) of an invitation being accepted or declined.

  • 0

The way we have it set is that users will schedule meetings with other users that are offsite, once they are booked in everyone that has access to the calendar can have visibility of the offsite users' whereabouts. Again all I need is a way to receive to a notification to the person who has raised the invite via the shared mailbox informing them (primary mailbox) of an invitation being accepted or declined.

That's just it, you don't need to do it this way.  By setting up proper delegation to calendars you can see everyone else's personal calendar.  People can set who can see their calendar and the amount of detail.

 

For example, I am invited to an appointment.  I can click on the appointment in my calendar, see everyone who was invited, how they responded to the invite and their availability.  I can then select view other calendar, choose that person and see as much detail as they delegated.  Some I  see just bars marking appointments, others I can read what those appointments are (and where the appointment is at).

  • 0

That's just it, you don't need to do it this way.  By setting up proper delegation to calendars you can see everyone else's personal calendar.  People can set who can see their calendar and the amount of detail.

 

For example, I am invited to an appointment.  I can click on the appointment in my calendar, see everyone who was invited, how they responded to the invite and their availability.  I can then select view other calendar, choose that person and see as much detail as they delegated.  Some I  see just bars marking appointments, others I can read what those appointments are (and where the appointment is at).

 

I see what your saying but it's not how I want it, this way we'll end up with users that have too many calendars open and would cause a minor inconvenience to users.

 

I'm going to go with sc302 suggestion and try cached mode (performance), if that doesn't then I'll move the mailbox to site 2.

 

Thanks for your help. 

  • 0

I see what your saying but it's not how I want it, this way we'll end up with users that have too many calendars open and would cause a minor inconvenience to users.

 

I'm going to go with sc302 suggestion and try cached mode (performance), if that doesn't then I'll move the mailbox to site 2.

 

Thanks for your help. 

 

Users can only see calendars they have been delegated access to, like for me all I can see is mine, my team's, and my division's, as those are all the ones I need to see, I cannot see a coworker's calendar unless they grant me access, and the way Outlook syncs your meetings there really is no need for me to open more than just mine, everything I need to see and know about is already listed there 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • YouTube has finally brought back its DMs feature, but only in these countries by David Uzondu Late last year, YouTube started testing a "new" way to share videos directly with friends, without having to leave the app. Now, the video giant has announced that is now rolling out a revamped direct messaging inbox, which lets you share videos, Shorts, and live streams and have conversations about them, directly on YouTube. The platform limits this feature to 18+ users who are signed in to a verified channel and use the latest mobile app version. Direct messaging on YouTube first became a thing back in 2017 inside the mobile app (later renamed to "Messages"), where users could chat one-on-one and share clips directly, but all that came to an end on September 18, 2019, when Google decided to shut it down after giving users a month to download a .zip file archive of their past chats. No one really knows why YouTube killed the feature, but users were encouraged to migrate to the public Comments section, on Community tab posts, and via YouTube Stories. The previous incarnation suffered from moderation challenges, prompting Google to implement stricter safety guidelines and age verifications for this new iteration. Here's a list of the countries where the re-launched feature is currently available, though note that Brand Accounts do not have access to it, at least for now: Countries American Samoa Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Guam Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Northern Mariana Islands Norway Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Romania Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland U.S. Virgin Islands United Kingdom United States Before you can use the feature, you first have to send an invite link to your contact. Invite links expire exactly seven days after you create them. If the person on the other end accepts the invite, you can exchange videos directly and text back and forth inside the app. To delete a message, just long-press on the message and tap unsend to remove it for both users. You can also delete entire conversations by long-pressing the thread and selecting delete, but the other person will continue to see the chat history on their end. To make sure everything remains safe, YouTube monitors these messages to ensure they follow Community Guidelines.
    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • Is it still super slow or has it improved on that area?
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      214
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!