External GPU for laptops. Supercharge your graphics.


Recommended Posts

I move around quite a lot for my job, so I use a 12" ultraportable Windows 8.1 tablet PC. However I also enjoy gaming and sadly the tablet's integrated Intel HD4000 graphics only provide a 3dMark2011 score of:

 

integrated3d11.png

 

To resolve this performance issue I have an external Nvidia 670GTX desktop card that connects to the tablet like a docking station so that when plugged in the very same little 12" tablet provides a 3dMark2011 score of:

 

egpued11.png

 

This setup is approaching 2 years old now so if we compare this to a top 17" gaming laptop purchasable at the same period we come up with 3dMark2011 scores of around 5,900 mark (Alienware M17x R4, using a Nvidia GTX 680M GPU. http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Graphics-Cards-Benchmark-List.844.0.html). So my highly portable, small, light, tablet machine just bested a 17" behemoth "gaming laptop" that is about 3x heavier? and this is how it looks on my desk:

 

desk.png

 

So lets recap:

  • Small and light 12" Windows 8.1 tablet for portability
  • Powerful external graphics card to play games on when docked that can beat top gaming laptops
  • Cheaper to buy.
  • Upgrading to play the latest games in two years' time can be done by upgrading the graphics card only - not the entire setup.
  • External Monitor optional, can power the internal laptop screen.

 

Interested? I thought so  :).  I'm writing this because it seems that the industry just isn't making it accessible to the masses, so we need to help them along a little.

 

Background

 

Once upon a time I was young and frivolous with my money. I didn't have a wife to answer to and I didn't have a mortgage or children to support - so naturally I threw my money at the most powerful laptops I could find so I could play the most demanding games I could find while retaining my portability and still be able to attend LAN parties. Why have two machines, a desktop and a laptop when you can have a single machine with everything on and take it everywhere?

 

However time inevitably catches up and soon dropping ?2k+ every year on a shiny new laptop just to get the latest graphics is no longer practical, a combination of wedding, wife, mortgage, wife, kids and wife have seen to that. So in early 2012 I decided a change of tactic was required. At the time I saw a number of valid options:

  1. Buy a new laptop every 3 years instead of every year? Not ideal, this would mean around 18months of dissatisfaction with the laptop being unable to play the latest games at full detail with top frame rates - yet still weighing the same as a small car.
  2. Buy a desktop machine for gaming and keep my laptop for portable computing? Not ideal, this means I would then have to purchase two machines, then maintain and sync files between them. I just want one machine.
  3. Stop gaming on my PC and buy an ultraportable. Erm - no!!

 

It started while I was looking at a Sony Z Series (LINK) laptop that utilised an external graphics card solution. It wasn't very good and despite being extremely expensive the graphics card was very low specification, but the possibility of an external graphics card sparked my interest. After all - desktop graphics cards are much faster than laptop graphics cards and being external to the laptop it would mean upgrading it to play the latest games could be done at the cost of a graphics card instead of the major outlay of an entire gaming specification laptop, especially when the CPU, RAM and SSD of any decent laptop from the past 2 years really don't need upgrades.

A few web searches later and I came across an entire community of people with the same idea along with a wealth of technical information about how to do it, what works, what doesn't, etc.

 

eGPU Research

 

I'm a technical user, IT is what I do for a living and I have spent years building computers and taking laptops apart so the idea of getting my hands dirty doesn't scare me. However what I came across was a frightening amount of technical information and conditions that even to some technical users would be enough to put them off given the financial outlay required to test anything. Fortunately I soon found a spectacular technical summary:

 

http://forum.techinferno.com/diy-e-gpu-projects/2109-diy-egpu-experiences-%5Bversion-2-0%5D.html#post27126

 

IMPORTANT - At this point I want to recognise the work of Nando (and the rest of the community) for his work on creating, maintaining the thread and being an all-round awesome chap for answering the questions of people that arrive on the thread seeking assistance. The amount of time it must have taken to research and put together this summary deserves our thanks. I have been a regular reader of this thread for close to two years now?

 

I'm going to try and stay away from the technical side of it here (that is what the above linked thread is for - plus the community there will be able to answer questions much better than I can anyway!) but after doing a lot of reading it became clear that a "working solution" was fairly cheap as all you really need is one of the PE4L boards, a desktop graphics card and a desktop power supply to power the graphics card.

If you already have a power supply and graphics card lying around you only need to pay about $90 for the PE4L board, so you can see this is a pretty cheap way of supercharging an old laptop's graphic power - however it is not a tidy solution and you need to accept a bunch of open cables on your desk ;)

 

pe4l.png

(image from - http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/202/8m54.jpg/)

 

To avoid this and have a tidy setup it is necessary to build or purchase an enclosure for the hardware. As I had the money available I opted to purchase a complete solution from Village Instruments called "ViDock 4 Plus" (http://www.villageinstruments.com/tiki-index.php?page=ViDock), this included a decent looking chassis along with a standard looking power supply brick that would sit under my desk along with all the other power supply bricks.

 

Laptop Selection

 

There are a few conditions but in general if you have either an ExpressCard, mPCIe or more recently a Thunderbolt port on your laptop - chances are you can successfully implement an eGPU without much issue.

 

IMPORTANT - Make sure to read the thread to establish what speed graphics bus you will have access to on your laptop and what features will be supported by your combination of laptop/graphics/PE4L.

 

I wanted to have an ultraportable that I could easily carry around for work, it needed the latest Ivy Bridge CPU (just released at the time), a touchscreen for Windows 8, minimum of 16GB RAM to allow for Virtual Machines, a Solid State Disk, a cellular option for internet connectivity on the move and of course (as Thunderbolt wasn't available on Windows machines back then) a "1.2Opt" capable ExpressCard slot for the eGPU. My weapon of choice ended up as a 12" Thinkpad X230T (http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Lenovo-ThinkPad-X230t-N2C2AGE-Convertible.92193.0.html).

 

Experience

 

Having run this setup for almost 2 years I can honestly say that it is *very* stable. In fact I would go as far to say I've had fewer problems from it than I have from *any* of my previous "gaming laptops". After getting it all setup I can't think of a single eGPU related crash that hasn't been attributed to me uttering the immortal words "watch this" ;) One possible reason for this could be as simple as that all the heat generated is not inside the laptop chassis, so unlike "gaming laptops" that get ridiculously hot my little tablet runs pretty much cold as all the heat is generated in the eGPU chassis away from my hands and the palm-rest. The eGPU runs pretty cool as it isn't inside a hot PC case, the ViDock case is solid metal and acts much like a heatsink, plus one entire side has ventilation holes so the fans have ideal cooling capability.

 

It uses the standard Nvidia drivers (no modding required, so you can download the latest drivers from Nvidia as they are released) and as long as you are running Windows 7 or later can be both hot-plugged and hot-removed while the system is running without requiring a reboot.

 

eGPU. It works, B*%$!* :D

 

The only real issue I have had with it has been when I was hit by a power cut. While Windows can hot-unplug the eGPU,  it needs to be done gracefully and simply ripping it out from underneath Windows (like a powercut) will cause the machine to bluescreen as although the laptop has a battery, the eGPU does not. Fortunately this really isn't a big problem and if you are really concerned just stick a cheap UPS on the eGPU PSU plug so you have time in the event of a power cut. Hopefully better drivers will arrive soon to get around this limitation.

 

Why are more people not doing this?

 

A lack of public knowledge and a lack of available complete solution packages. For example, I had to imported mine from Singapore (where Village Instruments are based). The future should be bright for eGPU options, desktops sales are declining at a fast pace and this option allows people to have the flexibility of a small laptop/tablet with the graphical power of a desktop, but sadly if anything options seem to have got worse over the past two years and it seems like the PC industry simply doesn't want you to do it.

 

It doesn't take much to realise that people will upgrade their machines less frequently because the CPU/RAM/SSD that they bought 2 years ago really doesn't need changing. The GPU is the main reason people upgrade so they can play the latest games. Perhaps vendors are worried that if people can simply buy the latest GPU for a fraction of the price and plug in via an eGPU solution then their already declining sales will take another loss?

 

In the eGPU technical thread listed above, Nando has listed some of the issues/sabotage he has encountered while pursuing the project. It is found near the top in a section entitled:

 


"Project saboteurs - how corporate/businesses self-interest has negatively interposed themselves in this community-driven project. Intel especially halting the creative opportunities[/u[ that pluggable, affordable eGPU graphics/processing would create:"

 

Again, this can be found at http://forum.techinferno.com/diy-e-gpu-projects/2109-diy-egpu-experiences-%5Bversion-2-0%5D.html#post27126

 

From reading things such as this, I conclude that the tech/drivers to get full speed Thunderbolt eGPUs are largely ready, but Intel and/or other vendors are refusing to licence it and make it available. The one company that defied them and sold it anyway appears to have been shut down by Intel and product recall notices issues to everyone that purchased it. Read the thread, check the sources and make your own conclusions.

 

There have been a number of Thunderbolt eGPU devices in the works, many from as long as two years ago (such as the MSI GUS 2 - http://www.pcworld.com/article/248427/msi_gus_ii_provides_external_graphics_to_laptops_via_thunderbolt.html) and were suggested as being market ready in mere months - yet 2 years later are still no-where to be seen, reportedly due to Intel refusing to licence the technology?

 

Over the past 2 years Ultrabooks have become smaller, thinner and lighter. While this is a good thing there is not a single Ultrabook that is suitable for eGPU usage according to my ideal specifications. There is *ALWAYS* something missing. My requirements are not that unreasonable:

  • Small/light laptop, ideally a tablet
  • Thunderbolt or ExpressCard port (ideally Thunderbolt)
  • Touchscreen for Windows 8

When I bought my Thinkpad X230T and ExpressCard ViDock eGPU I did so fully aware that in the following couple of years Thunderbolt would rightly so take the place of ExpressCard due to the size of the port being tiny compared to an ExpressCard (making it much more suitable for Ultrabooks) and because of the obvious speed/bandwidth advantages allowing bigger and faster graphics cards to be connected.

 

In mid 2012 this seemed to be happening, Lenovo issued the S430, Acer issued the Aspire S5 (both had a single Thunderbolt port) and a few others offered token gestures as well. However both have now dropped the Thunderbolt ports in their latest models????!!

 

Now both HP and Lenovo have issued their latest models and the only laptops to have Thunderbolt are the "workstation" models that are 15" minimum, have no touchscreen and are definitely not thin/light. Nearly two years on and there is still nothing better than my 2 year old X230T to encorage me to spend my money on - and yet vendors are complaining of low sales? Go figure. If we look at what is currently available (some are not actually available yet):

 

machines.png

 

Clearly some of the above are suitable for eGPU usage, but in my opinion they are still a big let-down. Maybe you don't feel as strongly as I do about the need for a touchscreen? If so then you have a couple of options available in the above list. But I'm forced to ask, where is the Ultrabook device with TouchScreen and Thunderbolt? Is it really that hard? Are Intel preventing people from building them in the same way they appear to be shutting out Thunderbolt development for third parties? Acer got as far as demo'ing a Windows 8 tablet with Thunderbolt in mid-2012, but the Thunderbolt port was removed before the device hit production?

 

What needs to happen?

 

Thunderbolt needs to be included in more laptops. It is clear that ExpressCard is not viable for an Ultrabook due to size/speed, but not including Thunderbolt ports on the new generation Ultrabooks/Tablets appearing right now is just unforgivable. Especially when they have been on Apple devices like the MacBook Air for years now. Once the ports are available people realise they can get desktop level graphics from a tiny device I expect Thunderbolt eGPUs to start popping up everywhere.

 

For me, the dream is currently a Surface Pro type device with a Thunderbolt connection and eGPU connected. I want to be able to have a powerful machine when at my desk that is able to play hardcore games, then walk away and use it as a tablet to browse websites and play Cut the Rope while sat on the Sofa. I don't want to have THREE devices (Desktop, Laptop and Tablet). Put a Thunderbolt port in a Surface Pro type device and we have something that can do all three roles.

 

In the meantime, these vendors can keep complaining of low sales? make something worth my money and I'll hand it over :)

 

Final Example:

 

The latest and greatest Alienware M18x gaming laptop with the fastest mobile graphics solution money can buy right now (2x Nvidia 780GTX in SLI) is advertised on Dell's website for just under ?3,000 incVAT - this achieves 14k on 3dMark2011 according to http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Graphics-Cards-Benchmark-List.844.0.html

 

In contrast, a single Desktop 780GTX can be bought for ?400 incVAT, this gets also gets a graphics score around 14k on 3dMark2011. Put this into a ViDock 4 Plus for under ?200 incVAT and buy a half decent laptop of your choice with the connection port and enjoy similar performance for about half the cost.

To demonstrate this, consider the following link on the eGPU thread to a benchmark done by someone with a 13" IvyBridge Sony Vaio laptop and a Desktop Nvidia 780GTX using a PE4L card showing 3DMark2011 graphics score of 14k - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/7080536.

 

Just saying?

also dropping a few videos in showing the following:

 

Hot-plug and hot-unplug video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pp2CADKLgXA&feature=youtu.be

 

Playing TombRaider on the internal graphics, then plugging in the eGPU and playing on that instead, no reboot. Just works: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_R6u7PjAwY

The reason people haven't really heard about this is because it's expensive.

 

To use a GTX 670, you have to buy the highest model (ViDock 4 Plus), which runs $279 plus $30 shipping (USD).

Then you buy the GPU for ~$300.

So you're looking at over a $600 investment.

 

Granted, yes it's probably the cheapest way to do something like this, but for $600, you can darn near build a complete desktop PC with that same GPU.

  • Like 3

Wow. Awesome thread! Impressive stuff.

 

Good work, sir. Thanks for sharing.

 

 

While impressive, and yes you can plug and unpug it depending on when you need it. But why not just get a desktop at that point.

Granted, yes it's probably the cheapest way to do something like this, but for $600, you can darn near build a complete desktop PC with that same GPU.

I move around quite a lot for my job, so I use a 12" ultraportable Windows 8.1 tablet PC.

So lets recap: Small and light 12" Windows 8.1 tablet for portability

My requirements are not that unreasonable: Small/light laptop, ideally a tablet

Sorry but thats just too ghetto for me, I would rather just buy the gaming laptop than to rig something up like this. Maybe in the future if someone implements something that does not take so much to build I might consider this as a viable option.

An exquisite experiment. While you'd still have to remove my true desktop PC from my cold, dead hands just because it's plain fun to have that sort of thing, I'd want to see actual gaming benchmarks based on one curious statement which is as follows: Thunderbolt - 10/20 Gbit/s, PCI-Express 2.0 x16 - 64 Gbit/s. While 670 does not saturate 2.0. 690 already does, so that's one to ponder on, perhaps.

 

Props for going there and writing up all about it, though (Y)

While impressive, and yes you can plug and unpug it depending on when you need it. But why not just get a desktop at that point.

 

A fair question, hopefully I have answered it above but let me take another stab at it. Basically I would turn it around and ask why *would* you get a desktop? Desktop sales are declining at the fastest rate of all hardware form factors for a reason, they are the least flexible. If you have a desktop then it generally stays in one location. If you have no need for a laptop and the portability/flexibility that it provides then ok, however given the choice (and it is a choice - I'm not suggesting people boycott desktops!) why wouldn't you choose to have a laptop that can play the same games as a desktop while also offering the possibility to just close the lid and walk away?

 

Some people, like me, certainly prefer this kind of freedom and I think it is important to make as many people as possible away that this is an option when making a decision based on their needs. Either way - information is good :)

Oh no, desktop people have the freedom. Freedom of movement is nothing compared to freedom of choice. Philosophically speaking, this is exactly the thing. Vendors do *not* want you to have that freedom. Which is why mobile computing is having such a hurrah. It's even why this very technology is not finding any support from them. It will destroy their pitiful attempts at advancing their own, albeit in a controlled manner of planned obsolescence. It will destroy all expensive top gaming laptop lines first and then it will come for your midrange. You admit it yourself, by the way.

 

I've seen some laptops that will still refuse to boot from USB and only options one can change in UEFI settings is time and date. Even worse, tablets are basically tied to their OS, relying on vendor update cycle, if there is one. Everything is so dumbed down it isn't funny anymore.

 

I may hardly be willing to admit that desktop PC is dying (but it is), but much less I'm going to give it a soap and a rope. These are the best days to be a desktop PC fanatic still.

An exquisite experiment. While you'd still have to remove my true desktop PC from my cold, dead hands just because it's plain fun to have that sort of thing, I'd want to see actual gaming benchmarks based on one curious statement which is as follows: Thunderbolt - 10/20 Gbit/s, PCI-Express 2.0 x16 - 64 Gbit/s. While 670 does not saturate 2.0. 690 already does, so that's one to ponder on, perhaps.

 

Props for going there and writing up all about it, though (Y)

 

Any particular gaming benchmarks you would like to see? If I can get hold of the games or already own them I'll see what I can do.

 

On the saturation issue, yes. The 670GTX is realistically as high a card as I would like to put on my current ExpressCard bus (5Gbit/s) and the card runs at PCI-E 2.0 x1 (normal desktop slot is generally PCI-E 2.0 x16) however I have card monitoring software that shows the GPU hitting 100% utilisation so while I wouldn't put anything higher on an ExpressCard slot personally it doesn't seem to be seriously throttled - check my video of TombRaider running on it.

 

This is why Thunderbolt and the upcoming Thunderbolt2 ports are so important. HP is putting Thunderbolt2 on their ZBook15/17 models in Jan2014 so hopefully it will start to filter down - but it should already be here to be honest. Also worth considering is that according to the eGPU technical thread I posted people smarter than me have done the math to say that Thunderbolt1 provides 86% of the maximum bandwidth of PCI-E 2.0 x16, with Thunderbolt2 going up to 94%...

Need to bear in mind that my setup is almost 2 years old and part of my thread was linking to details on how Intel are supposedly intentionally hindering the development of this technology.

Sorry but thats just too ghetto for me, I would rather just buy the gaming laptop than to rig something up like this. Maybe in the future if someone implements something that does not take so much to build I might consider this as a viable option.

 

Things have improved a lot over the past few years and the promise of what is to come looks even better. Consider the following:

 

http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2013/06/06/silverstone-external-graphics-card-case-deb/1

 

Its a complete package, has the GPU, PSU, etc all in one with Thunderbolt. Things will get better, but we need interest and uptake to help push it.

Vendors do *not* want you to have that freedom. Which is why mobile computing is having such a hurrah. It's even why this very technology is not finding any support from them. It will destroy their pitiful attempts at advancing their own, albeit in a controlled manner of planned obsolescence. It will destroy all expensive top gaming laptop lines first and then it will come for your midrange. You admit it yourself, by the way.

....

 

These are the best days to be a desktop PC fanatic still.

 

Absolutely! They are seemingly terrified of it, but I genuinely don't understand why they don't capitalise on it.

 

You say that these are the best days to be a desktop fanatic, I disagree and think the best days are ahead - you just won't call it a desktop anymore. All your desktop consists of is a series of plug/play components that you don't have the real options to plug/unplug as required. Once appropriate bandwidth arrives such as thunderbolt2 it will make it possible to connecting components on the fly without the case necessarily enclosing those components.

 

Sure thats a while off, but the componentised view of plugging a graphics card when needed, a storage array when needed, a fancy sound card when needed is where we should be thinking. best of both worlds.

Any particular gaming benchmarks you would like to see? If I can get hold of the games or already own them I'll see what I can do.

 

Pretty much any you will. However, with FPS statistics and complex scenes. It's one thing for a game to be playable and another - that it's smooth sailing all the way, with no sudden drops when intensive scenes appear. You'll notice I'm rather sceptical, but at the same time I'm looking for an answer to an old question that bugs me anyway - is PCI-Express bandwidth really that important. Perhaps it really isn't and I believe in snakeoil myself.

 

The thing I'm going to be decisively stubborn about, though, is that locking down devices to "improve end user experience" will continue unabated.

I just think desktop PCs have achieved a fairly good balance between being able to make it just work, to tweak and tinker with it and, the third side of the coin, performance of either. That's partly why they're also dying - there's really no need to have them replaced anymore (athough I'll always want more, just to keep it idle and low gear most of the time, but that's a die hard and limited audience, true enough). Heavyweight gaming is the major thing that drives what's left of the market.

well the more people that I can help make aware of its sheer existence at this point is a bonus. Its a shame that hardly anyone knows it is possible... when I first took it to my regular LAN party there was a definite amount of "oooo" over it. But that was nearly two years ago now so its long past an experiment. We need Thunderbolt (and Thunderbolt2!) and we need vendor buy in so that more people get to hear of it.

 

Front page Neowin tbh ;) lol

Great experiment. It would work perfectly for me because I take my laptop to work, but otherwise keep it on the desk with an external monitor and use it as a normal computer... Except that I don't play games so I don't need it.

 

Again, great stuff.

  • 2 weeks later...

"I wanted to have an ultraportable that I could easily carry around for work, it needed the latest Ivy Bridge CPU (just released at the time), a touchscreen for Windows 8, minimum of 16GB RAM to allow for Virtual Machines, a Solid State Disk, a cellular option for internet connectivity on the move and of course (as Thunderbolt wasn't available on Windows machines back then) a "1.2Opt" capable ExpressCard slot for the eGPU. My weapon of choice ended up as a 12" Thinkpad X230T (http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Lenovo-ThinkPad-X230t-N2C2AGE-Convertible.92193.0.html)."

 

Can you confirm that you were able to use your egpu setup with 16GB of ram installed? I've seen several forums and videos where people get errors or 100% cpu spike, if they use more than 8GB ram with the X230t. Those were from awhile back and I haven't seen any follow ups or work around to the issue. This is the only thing keeping me from trying an egpu setup because I already upgraded the ram and didn't want to downgrade to single channel or get two 4GB chips. 

  • 3 weeks later...

I remember that I learned this from Arceles:

 

Yes in theory you will be able to plug another card in there, try to look for an intel one though, to avoid any possible whitelisting.

As for the bold part, if you look for some external videocard mods for laptops you will realize that all of them connect to the laptop using mini PCIe ports, the more the merrier, mini PCIe ports have one PCI express port plus a USB, so there are some adapters that take as much mini PCIe ports you have turning it into a Desktop PCI Express 1x (slow for graphic cards) 2x (the bare limit, desktop GPUs can work up to 95% of their power like this) 8x (Nice but requires 3 ports) 16x (I don't know any laptop with 4 mini PCIe ports in it...) 

 

 

 

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1146310-is-it-possible-to-upgrade-my-intel-wifi-agn-4965/?view=findpost&p=595628932

 

I'd like to thank the OP for making such an useful and informative post. I totally forgot about this option and went ahead and purchase a Lenovo Y510p (which I feel no regret) without checking for future upgrades in that section ;). 

 

Now, I know that the graphical solution is cheaper than grabbing a new lappy on the next 2 - 3 years :p

  • 2 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!