SteamOS offically released


Recommended Posts

So it is a Debian based distro. All kinds of good can come from this. Once Valve gets its Intel and AMD drivers up that should be minimal work for Base Debian, Ubuntu, Elementry etc to get optimized support. Even if Steam OS isn't a hit with the masses, having Valve coerce other companies to invest in Linux will only benefit the consumer in the end. Regular driver updates and the Steam touch controller to be for  Linux as the Xbox 360 controller is for Windows. This will be exciting.

AMD may decide to release updated official Linux video drivers for graphics cards other than their top of the line ones.  Been running open source drivers for years now on this desktop because the ATI Radeon HD 4200 on-board graphics card, while decent for all the gaming I do, isn't supported by ATI in the Linux version of their driver package.

Running SteamOS in a VM defeats the point, if you just want to see what the UI is like you can just load Big Picture on your current Steam install.

Not really - some of us don't have Steam in our Linux installs (and almost certainly not if we also run any version of Windows).

 

And there IS a way to install it into any VM software that supports UEFI or EFI - there's a post in the Steam Universe SteamOS topic (Steam Community) about doing so in VMware (I followed similar steps for Oracle Virtual Box, which also has an EFI/UEFI emulation mode, where it is installing as I type this) - I'll be posting the steps both here on Neowin and there when I have finished my run-throughs (to make sure that the same ISO works in any UEFI emulation - not just that of Oracle VB, which works a treat).  I may also try Hyper-V, if there is a UEFI option.

Thanks, I'll check it out.  Since it was not enabled by default, maybe that means its mostly there for developers.

 

It's more idiot-proofing for the eventuality of when less competent users start using it. As I understand it, it's just a simple tickbox in the settings.

 

im keen to look and underline code. keen to seen what i can do with it. 

 

All the Steam stuff is still proprietary, beyond that it's just standard Debian 7.1 with some newer package releases / kernel version+patches for performance - which are all meaningless if you're running it in a VM.

 

Not really - some of us don't have Steam in our Linux installs (and almost certainly not if we also run any version of Windows).

 

Yes really. Grabbing the Steam package in your Linux distro of choice or installing it in Windows is far easier, currently more compatible, and gives you access to the same UI. (Big Picture)

It's more idiot-proofing for the eventuality of when less competent users start using it. As I understand it, it's just a simple tickbox in the settings.

 

 

Oh I agree that its buried in the settings so that the general gamer/user doesn't somehow do something stupid :laugh:

 

It is just one check box, so anyone wanting it can get to it.  I wonder what happens when you check the box.  do you have to restart and it boots you to the desktop instead of Steam maybe?

Oh I agree that its buried in the settings so that the general gamer/user doesn't somehow do something stupid :laugh:

 

It is just one check box, so anyone wanting it can get to it.  I wonder what happens when you check the box.  do you have to restart and it boots you to the desktop instead of Steam maybe?

 

Nah, at most it'll just start/stop the relevant daemons. I'm not entirely sure how everything works, but it's probably all running within the default DE (GNOME).

 

 

All the Steam stuff is still proprietary, beyond that it's just standard Debian 7.1 with some newer package releases / kernel version+patches for performance - which are all meaningless if you're running it in a VM.

 

 

 

 

Who cares if this on a VM, i would like to install and see it up and running. Yes i will not do much with once i have it loaded, but i get to look at it myself and see for myself. Your comments are very pointless and not very helpful at all. 

Just saw a quick walkthrough of SteamOS on Youtube.  It was more or less big picture mode with some extra options.  The video didn't show the desktop but I expect more videos over the next couple of days that will show that.

 

 

Our little Steam is all grown up :wub:

 

Exciting times ahead.

I think once this is as feature packed as something like Xbox live on 360 or PSN. Then this has a chance.

Tho Id say mainly as I really love the idea of being able to build my own console.

Also lets get the ability to stream from our main pc`s to these smaller steam machines. So as we dont go from the Windows library to the Linux library on steam with a loss of 90% of our games.

I think once this is as feature packed as something like Xbox live on 360 or PSN. Then this has a chance.

Tho Id say mainly as I really love the idea of being able to build my own console.

Also lets get the ability to stream from our main pc`s to these smaller steam machines. So as we dont go from the Windows library to the Linux library on steam with a loss of 90% of our games.

 

 

For me, its just a novelty right now.

 

I still can't find a reason to build or buy a steambox or to say dual boot this with windows.  I can get the same Steam experience on my pc that I use for gaming.  If I wanted a dedicated gaming console, well there is the X1 and PS4.

 

That's just my personal usage, but I realize this could appeal to a lot of gamers that do not have a pc for gaming already.

 

Regardless, I'm excited to see where this goes and how quickly they can get it up to snuff feature wise.

Who cares if this on a VM, i would like to install and see it up and running. Yes i will not do much with once i have it loaded, but i get to look at it myself and see for myself. Your comments are very pointless and not very helpful at all. 

 

Your entire endeavour is very pointless and not very helpful either, yet you're still going ahead with it. But I apologise for trying to save you from wasting vast amounts of time trying to shoehorn SteamOS into an unsupported configuration, for reasons that amount to "ooh it's new and shiny".

 

You'll be rather disappointed when you find out it's just Debian with Big Picture running. (And when you could have just loaded BPM on your current OS)

How to convert Steam OS ZIP into ISO:

 

Download this: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30652

 

You only need to install this component: 

G03PweB.png

 

Use Windows search for term: "Deployment" and run as Administrator Deployment termed Command Prompt.

 

and follow this tutorial: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/steamuniverse/discussions/1/648814395813782335/

 

 

0. Get a freakin' UEFI computer and trash this PC from the 80's

1. Get a blank DVD media, duh!
2. Get a copy of Microsoft's oscdimg.exe tool. It is part of the Windows Automated Installation Kit (or Windows AIK for short). It is a ~1Gb file, but Google around and you shall find the single 120Kb file you need
3. Think twice about what the heck you are doing
4. Download ANY of the SteamOS zip files
5. Extract the file to a folder, let's say C:\Users\Public\SteamOS\
6. Open a Command Prompt
7. Go to the folder you saved the oscdimg.exe at step 1 (probably your downloads folder) on that command prompt (tip: "cd \users\joeuser\downloads")
8. Type in the following command - should be EXACTLY AS IS, but I may allow you to change the path to the one you extracted on step #5:
 
oscdimg.exe -m -o -j2 -h -pEF -bC:\SteamOS\boot\grub\efi.img -lSteamOS C:\SteamOS\ SteamOS.iso
Its space between last S\ and SteamOS.iso and is small L.
 
9. Use your favorite ISO burner to record the just created SteamOS.iso file to a DVD
10. From this point on, get ready to lose your data if you are too lazy to not understand Valve's instructions
11. Boot with the DVD and again follow ALL the instructions as if you were using an USB drive
12. Send me a beer
13. Enjoy your SteamOS

is it just for games or will there be a way to watch movies over a nas drive for instance...

 

looking for an alternative media centre os

 

Precisely.  That will be at least a possible target market for Steam Machines (either OEM or build-your-own), the HTPC/media center market.

 

THAT is why I'm doing VM-based evaluation (just as I do any other Linux DE) - to look at what the distribution can do outside of gaming (specifically, the differences compared to standard Debian, and especially Debian wheezy).  This is NOT Debian wheezy exactly - there ARE differences, and ignoring them could come back and bite me in the butt.  (Remember, assumptions are the mother of all muckups.)

I can't believe that even while basing their "OS" on basic Debian they can't to what every other home cooker can do, make a regular installable OS, and on top of that it requires UEFI... The OS that's supposed to let you build your own steam boxes or use existing computers to stream from a powerful gaming computer somewhere else...

Quality... I've seen 12 year old home cookers do better. Heck the guy making his fantasy Linux distro on this forum before he got predictably tired of it did better.

For me, its just a novelty right now.

 

I still can't find a reason to build or buy a steambox or to say dual boot this with windows.  I can get the same Steam experience on my pc that I use for gaming.  If I wanted a dedicated gaming console, well there is the X1 and PS4.

 

That's just my personal usage, but I realize this could appeal to a lot of gamers that do not have a pc for gaming already.

 

Regardless, I'm excited to see where this goes and how quickly they can get it up to snuff feature wise.

The X1 and PS4 (not to mention the older and now-discounted XB360 and PS3) are some of the targets for the SteamMachine - that means they HAVE to at least come close to matching even the older consoles feature-for-feature outside of gaming.

Further, among those same targets (especially if you're an OEM or would-be OEM) are more plebian HTPCs/SFF PCs running other Linux DEs, if not Windows - a SteamMachine MUST offer "value-add" if it is going to knock out any of those already-existing choices, especially given the price premium.

 

Lastly, as much as Gabe Newell has disparaged Windows 8.1, a Windows 8.1 PC (of nearly any vintage) can outpace a SteamMachine at this stage of things *just by adding Steam* - remember, Big Picture Mode is ALREADY a feature of the Steam client for Windows.  In fact, my current PC (which is below the minimum requirements due to lacking UEFI support) could outpace a Steam Machine - and it's composed entirely of no-longer-manufactured (dead) hardware.  That isn't just a big problem - it's a monstrous problem (at least for prebuilt SteamMachines, if not the SteamOS itself); how does Valve face that issue?

I can't believe that even while basing their "OS" on basic Debian they can't to what every other home cooker can do, make a regular installable OS, and on top of that it requires UEFI... The OS that's supposed to let you build your own steam boxes or use existing computers to stream from a powerful gaming computer somewhere else...

Quality... I've seen 12 year old home cookers do better. Heck the guy making his fantasy Linux distro on this forum before he got predictably tired of it did better.

HawkMan - the UEFI issue can be worked around - depending on how you want to do the evaluation process.  (Both Oracle VirtualBox and vmWare have EFI support; there's a post in the SteamOS SteamCommunity forums on how to create a bootable ISO for vmWare in EFI mode - it also works for Oracle VB, vmWare Player 5, or vmWare Workstation 10; that is something I have tested personally.)

Still, I think the UEFI "requirement" is simply a screen-out factor - it eliminates older hardware (basically, anything older than LGA1366 or the AMD equivalent) from consideration by OEMs.

 

Here are the settings I used for vmWare Workstation 10:

 

Guest RAM: 1536K (I have 4096K total on the host - this setting is just under half the total RAM available, and leaves room for running other software on the host while the VM is running.)

Guest HDD: 32 GB (This figure is actually high for vmWare Debian guests - vmWare recommends less than a quarter of this figure.  SteamOS did NOT use it all.)

Guest OS setting:  Debian 7 (64-bit) (Directly from the SteamOS FAQ.)

 

Other than enabling EFI support in the VM via an edit (vmWare requires it, in Oracle VB, it's a switch in the VM settings), the same settings work in Oracle VB.  (Naturally, you can, and likely should, increase the amount of RAM if you can, as my own settings are less than half what Valve specifies - however, it will still work, despite being under-spec.)

The X1 and PS4 (not to mention the older and now-discounted XB360 and PS3) are some of the targets for the SteamMachine - that means they HAVE to at least come close to matching even the older consoles feature-for-feature outside of gaming.

Further, among those same targets (especially if you're an OEM or would-be OEM) are more plebian HTPCs/SFF PCs running other Linux DEs, if not Windows - a SteamMachine MUST offer "value-add" if it is going to knock out any of those already-existing choices, especially given the price premium.

 

Lastly, as much as Gabe Newell has disparaged Windows 8.1, a Windows 8.1 PC (of nearly any vintage) can outpace a SteamMachine at this stage of things *just by adding Steam* - remember, Big Picture Mode is ALREADY a feature of the Steam client for Windows.  In fact, my current PC (which is below the minimum requirements due to lacking UEFI support) could outpace a Steam Machine - and it's composed entirely of no-longer-manufactured (dead) hardware.  That isn't just a big problem - it's a monstrous problem (at least for prebuilt SteamMachines, if not the SteamOS itself); how does Valve face that issue?

 

 

Oh I agree, its going to be an uphill climb for Valve. 

 

I have a pc made especially for htpc duties and I have leveraged Win 8 for a great 10ft UI via the start screen.  I pin everything I want to access there, which happens to include Steam, which launches itself into Big Picture mode and I can use a remote control to do it all.  Right now, I already feel like I have the best of both worlds as far as an OS that can handle any app I want, any game I want, plus all the media stuff I could want.

 

SteamOS and Steamboxes are kind of in the middle of everything right now.  But hey, its very early and until we see production machines being sold and the OS being out of beta, I'm not going to judge the platform.  It needs time to mature and then maybe I will find where it fits into my own device needs. 

I can't believe that even while basing their "OS" on basic Debian they can't to what every other home cooker can do, make a regular installable OS, and on top of that it requires UEFI... The OS that's supposed to let you build your own steam boxes or use existing computers to stream from a powerful gaming computer somewhere else...

Quality... I've seen 12 year old home cookers do better. Heck the guy making his fantasy Linux distro on this forum before he got predictably tired of it did better.

Most of the work is focused on Big Picture mode (which is crossplatform) and getting developers to support Linux. The reason it has been released so early is to give OEMs a chance to work with it and to allow enthusiasts to help test it out. It's not consumer ready, nor is Valve claiming it to be. In fact at the moment it doesn't even support AMD or Intel GPUs yet. Your criticism is misguided.

Early or not, there is NO excuse for such a shoddy build. The install and setup is already there, it's the base of every Linux distro and it comes packaged ready for them to use. Not being consumer ready would mean the used a dirty non customized and easy steps OS installer, not not installer at all.

And this isn't going to get any developers to start supporting Linux, if anything, this early release will make some rethink actually doing it or delaying any Linux support.

Most of the work is focused on Big Picture mode (which is crossplatform) and getting developers to support Linux. The reason it has been released so early is to give OEMs a chance to work with it and to allow enthusiasts to help test it out. It's not consumer ready, nor is Valve claiming it to be. In fact at the moment it doesn't even support AMD or Intel GPUs yet. Your criticism is misguided.

 

Pretty much this. SteamOS was released mainly because of the hardware prototypes that are shipping. It's for early testing, not for people cram onto VMs for "ooohs and ahhs".

 

Early or not, there is NO excuse for such a shoddy build. The install and setup is already there, it's the base of every Linux distro and it comes packaged ready for them to use. Not being consumer ready would mean the used a dirty non customized and easy steps OS installer, not not installer at all.

And this isn't going to get any developers to start supporting Linux, if anything, this early release will make some rethink actually doing it or delaying any Linux support.

 

You obviously have never used Arch Linux.

Edited by Andrew G.

Most of the work is focused on Big Picture mode (which is crossplatform) and getting developers to support Linux. The reason it has been released so early is to give OEMs a chance to work with it and to allow enthusiasts to help test it out. It's not consumer ready, nor is Valve claiming it to be. In fact at the moment it doesn't even support AMD or Intel GPUs yet. Your criticism is misguided.

Besides, it's not like it's that HARD to add support for the missing GPUs, as support for both is in the Debian wheezy repos right now.  UEFI was a higher hurdle, and even that is clearable, if you want to do VM-based testing.  Right now, it's basically a quibble.

Other than it being a locked-down version of Debian's existing install (if you've installed any version of Debian 5 or later, other than the lack of options, the installer is, quite literally, basic Debian), once you get over the UEFI requirement, it is, literally, no different from a typical non-custom Debian installation.  (Quibble, quibble.)

 

Athernar - the jury is merely at the start of deliberations;  SteamOS could STILL fail.  There are so many trip-over points (compared merely to other Linux distributions, let alone consoles and Windows), it's definitely far from funny.  However, Valve and the SteamOS community has to recognize those trip-over points - and clear them.

Early or not, there is NO excuse for such a shoddy build. The install and setup is already there, it's the base of every Linux distro and it comes packaged ready for them to use. Not being consumer ready would mean the used a dirty non customized and easy steps OS installer, not not installer at all.

It's for experienced users, making a simplified installer unimportant for the beta. I'm sure things will change for when it's released.

 

And this isn't going to get any developers to start supporting Linux, if anything, this early release will make some rethink actually doing it or delaying any Linux support.

Developers will go where the money is and if Valve is putting its full weight behind Linux then that's where they'll go. This is a long term commitment by Valve and a slightly unpolished initial release won't make any difference in the long run. Don't forget that Steam was pretty terrible when it first launched and it's now the definitive digital distribution platform.

 

I just don't see any merit in your claims.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!