SteamOS offically released


Recommended Posts

Indeed. Valve is working with media services behind the scenes, so we'll see movies, TV and music services being rolled out at a later date. Valve has also incorporated family controls into Steam, allowing parents to manage which games children are allowed to play and which services they can access (this is available in the Steam beta client on Windows). The company is definitely trying to expand its target audience.

well Valve reached a point where they felt it was time to try and make Steam its own platform, something that is not just about selling games and game services. They want to try and join the ranks of MS, Google, and Apple in offering a complete ecosystem. They see the potential success that those other guys are also pursuing when you can get customers locked into your ecosystem for everything.

It is starting out small and with baby steps, but they are clearly going to try and get there.

 

 

I don't think Steam OS will ever have any advantage over a gaming PC running windows. What advantage could it have over Windows ?

Performance ? I don't see that happening.

Functionality ? big picture running on windows will always have the same functionality as Steam OS.

Exclusive titles ? Valve would be dumb to release their first party titles exclusive to Steam OS.

Personally i see Steam OS more like a fire and forget OS for htpc/gaming pc. Anyway this is what Valve should be aiming at. It should be easy to install, manage, update and also control using a controller and a media bluetooth kb.

If they can achieve that i think they might have a chance to compete in the living room. It would definately be an interesting alternative at the very least. I personally really like big picture ui.

I agree that SteamOS might never be a real alternative to pc gaming, but as you said, it could offer a very nice option as an htpc/gaming OS. If they build up the media support, I could see myself building an htpc with SteamOS. Big Picture mode is pretty good, I agree UI wise, but I have to say that I have seen better ones, such as what the MediaBrowser team are doing for Windows 8. That is currently my favorite UI for gaming and media in a '10ft ui' or TV setup.

But its early and if Valve really wants to compete in the htpc gaming area, I expect Big Picture mode to improve. As more and more content is offered on Steam, especially the non gaming apps, Big Picture mode will need to be tweaked.

Early or not, there is NO excuse for such a shoddy build. The install and setup is already there, it's the base of every Linux distro and it comes packaged ready for them to use. Not being consumer ready would mean the used a dirty non customized and easy steps OS installer, not not installer at all.

And this isn't going to get any developers to start supporting Linux, if anything, this early release will make some rethink actually doing it or delaying any Linux support.

But its shoddy because its not a consumer build, this is merely Steam letting people get in and have open access from the word go. The OS they have up at mo is literally meant for 300 or so testers and ofc the no doubt few thousand enthusiasts who want to tinker. The installer etc can all be seen as a deliberate hurdle at present to keep the majority out, as they know its a shoddy half baked release thats, like I say only being released as an alpha version thats not meant to be taken seriously outside of testing it within one of there own steam machines.

Dial it back and lower your expectations a bit. We all remember the 1st actual release of steam and how god awful that was. No one expects Rome in a day.

That's not how it works, even with an installer, regular people wouldn't install this. The only thing they're accomplishing with this is making developers have second thoughts, if they even considered it in the first place.

I don't think Steam OS will ever have any advantage over a gaming PC running windows. What advantage could it have over Windows ?

Performance ? I don't see that happening.

Functionality ? big picture running on windows will always have the same functionality as Steam OS.

Exclusive titles ? Valve would be dumb to release their first party titles exclusive to Steam OS.

Personally i see Steam OS more like a fire and forget OS for htpc/gaming pc. Anyway this is what Valve should be aiming at. It should be easy to install, manage, update and also control using a controller and a media bluetooth kb.

If they can achieve that i think they might have a chance to compete in the living room. It would definately be an interesting alternative at the very least. I personally really like big picture ui.

Given a wireless keyboard, it can even run alongside Windows on an HTPC (separate HDD).

 

My current testing box (my desktop) uses a wireless keyboard by default - to avoid wire clutter in front of the PC.  My mouse is wireless for the same reason.  Both wireless keyboards and wireless mice are not just for portables (my wireless keyboard is bigger than most notebooks all by itself - it's not something I'd lug in my carry-on).  SteamOS supports both - and without issues - today.  In addition to two VM installs, I have a native install on a third HDD (completely separate from Windows 8.1, Windows Server, and OS X).  If you can build/configure an HTPC, having a side-by-side of SteamOS and Windows is easily plannable - same applies to the Hackintosh crowd - it's no harder.

 

Other than the UEFI issue (which can be end-run), the requirements for SteamOS on the hardware side are really no taller than those of (believe it or not) Windows 7.  The "desktop" side of SteamOS takes getting used to - entirely because it's too close to ModernUI for the typical Linux crowd to accept - such is the reality of GNOME 3.x, as opposed to GNOME Classic.  (That is something that Valve realizes - Big Picture is a "ten foot UX" by design; GNOME Classic - in fact, any pointing-device-centric UI would be a poor fit.  Because I'm used to ModernUI, I had a small (very small) learning curve with GNOME 3.x (I'm normally more into KDE in terms of Linux DEs), and adjusted to it painlessly.

 

Next up is changing HDDs - in this case, I'm moving to my 80 GB SATA HDD that had been hosting Mavericks.  (No loss - I have the USB stick to reinstall it, and I should be purchasing more USB sticks this week.)

Indeed it looks quite odd to use. Feedback so far appears to be positive though, so I'm keeping an open mind.

 

It does look odd but they are trying something different at least. It may be a winner or they may have to tweak it some more.

I couldn't really play with it like I wanted to due to the UEFI requirement and the workaround for said requirement not working for me (black screen after progress bar, woo!). I hope they remove that restriction.

 

Glad to see positive feedback. Hopefully I can play with it sometime in the near future. :p

Given a wireless keyboard, it can even run alongside Windows on an HTPC (separate HDD).

 

My current testing box (my desktop) uses a wireless keyboard by default - to avoid wire clutter in front of the PC.  My mouse is wireless for the same reason.  Both wireless keyboards and wireless mice are not just for portables (my wireless keyboard is bigger than most notebooks all by itself - it's not something I'd lug in my carry-on).  SteamOS supports both - and without issues - today.  In addition to two VM installs, I have a native install on a third HDD (completely separate from Windows 8.1, Windows Server, and OS X).  If you can build/configure an HTPC, having a side-by-side of SteamOS and Windows is easily plannable - same applies to the Hackintosh crowd - it's no harder.

 

Other than the UEFI issue (which can be end-run), the requirements for SteamOS on the hardware side are really no taller than those of (believe it or not) Windows 7.  The "desktop" side of SteamOS takes getting used to - entirely because it's too close to ModernUI for the typical Linux crowd to accept - such is the reality of GNOME 3.x, as opposed to GNOME Classic.  (That is something that Valve realizes - Big Picture is a "ten foot UX" by design; GNOME Classic - in fact, any pointing-device-centric UI would be a poor fit.  Because I'm used to ModernUI, I had a small (very small) learning curve with GNOME 3.x (I'm normally more into KDE in terms of Linux DEs), and adjusted to it painlessly.

 

Next up is changing HDDs - in this case, I'm moving to my 80 GB SATA HDD that had been hosting Mavericks.  (No loss - I have the USB stick to reinstall it, and I should be purchasing more USB sticks this week.)

Dual booting on a HTPC kinda defeats the purpose, but then dual booting never made sense to me, even when that was the only option back in the early 2000 and I dual booted some Linux distros while studying, I never ended up using them because I does was what I needed and it simply worked better in general and that made it pointless for me to reboot all the time to play around.

That's not how it works, even with an installer, regular people wouldn't install this. The only thing they're accomplishing with this is making developers have second thoughts, if they even considered it in the first place.

How is it not how it works? Neither of us has an idea why no basic installer. But at a guess Id easily say its to add an extra hoop to jump thru, maybe to ensure that people with knowledge further than an installer are using it, or maybe to deliberatly deter folks away from a pre-consumer almost alpha piece of software?

Your far too cynical and defeatist Hawk. Give it time, as I said above Rome was not built in a day and generally speaking any service or OS on its first release (even more so pre-alpha) is generally utter nonsense.

At present this is nothing more than big picture mode embedded in a grubby distro that.

A. Ati users cant run

B. Has no easy installer

C. Is meant as nothing more than a basic OS for alpha testers. (not consumers).

Reviewable, final product this does not make.....

It's not how it works because enthusiasts don't care and regular people wouldn't install it anyway as I said. Furthermore adding that this preview is far more for the developers than the users and therefore the developers will see this and simply think that this isn't worth developing for, assuming any AAA debs actually had plans to to start with.

Dual booting on a HTPC kinda defeats the purpose, but then dual booting never made sense to me, even when that was the only option back in the early 2000 and I dual booted some Linux distros while studying, I never ended up using them because I does was what I needed and it simply worked better in general and that made it pointless for me to reboot all the time to play around.

The dual-booting is a needful because not even all Steam games play on SteamOS - in my current collection (one of the smaller ones), fewer than a half-dozen games from over two dozen are SteamOS-ready.  (That has, in fact, been used in this very thread as a hammer to bash SteamOS.)

I'm not saying that the compatibility issue isn't a problem - it is, in fact, a rather large problem.  However, it can be solved.

The bigger problem is the audio support - it defaults to HDMI.  While HDMI support is mostly bog-standard (and that is true for nVidia GPUs as well as the not-supported-yet AMD GPUs), there are some odd ducks that don't.  That means they will be requiring support for onboard sound or sound cards - even of the PCI Express sort.  While even Debian wheezy supports (or can support) quite a few, SteamOS isn't quite up to Debian wheezy levels of audio support.  (While both Debian and SteamOS detect my Creative Recon3D as an Intel High Definition Audio device (that is proper - it's detected in Windows as the same thing by default) - it cannot configure it as the HDMI-only support designed into PulseAudio by default gets in the way - and I haven't seen how to fix that yet.

Then dual booting isn't necessary.

You can do everything you can do in SteamOS on your other OS and more and probably at better performance to, so why would you even waste the time to boot into SteamOS...

If you just want to test the OS, then use a WM, if you need to dual boot, then the OS simply isn't ready for use or testing that deeply.

Then dual booting isn't necessary.

You can do everything you can do in SteamOS on your other OS and more and probably at better performance to, so why would you even waste the time to boot into SteamOS...

If you just want to test the OS, then use a WM, if you need to dual boot, then the OS simply isn't ready for use or testing that deeply.

I have two VMs with SteamOS installed - however, it has issues in both compared to native installs that have nothing to do with performance.

 

I'm actually USED to this method of dual-boot - I did it with OS X on the same HDD that SteamOS is on.  I use the BIOS - not GRUB - as each OS is on a physically-separate drive. (Before Wubi and UNetBootin came along, I bare-metal-tested Linux distributions the same way.)

I'm actually looking at creating a third-VM in Hyper-V, now that i have an ISO that doesn't require UEFI.  (And I got the audio in desktop mode sorted - it's big-picture mode that I have issues with at present.)

I'm actually evaluating SteamOS no differently than I would any other Linux distribution - including Debian; still, I AM keeping Valve's focus on the ten-foot UX in mind, as opposed to looking at SteamOS as a desktop-focussed distribution.  Portal is my primary test game, as it is both Linux-ready and supports BPM; further, it's in my Steam library already.  I've not had a single performance issue with Portal in SteamOS - even compared to Steam on Windows.  The desktop side of SteamOS is as solid as any distribution of Debian wheezy, despite the tweakage Valve did - that says a LOT about Debian's stability.  (Point to Debian, and a half-point to Valve itself for choosing wheezy vs. Ubuntu.)

What stability issues I'm having with SteamOS are, in fact, entirely in Big-Picture Mode - it happens both in VMs, and in bare-metal.  (Because it happens in VMs and in bare-metal, I have zero idea whether it's OS-related of a hardware-configuration issue; while the bare-metal side is, naturally, closer to optimum than a VM, it's not as optimal as it should be - even I get that.)

  • 1 month later...

What a piece of junk is SteamOS, I just try to install the new release for BIOS PC and is not able to create the username and password. After installation, it boots me directly to logon without account creation. I am ****ed.

The accounts are created automatically. "steam" and "desktop". It's in the installation instructions. Or do you mean it didn't create those?

I don't believe it does.

 

Personally, I don't see the point in using SteamOS at this point in time when I can just use Ubuntu, Mint or Debian Testing with Steam instead. However, as it matures I'll reevaluate my decision to avoid it and perhaps install it to a spare SSD for the sake of game streaming on my HTPC.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!