The Neowin Digital Photo Gallery


Recommended Posts

i rarely ever use auto mode on my S400 :happy:

i haven't used auto mode on my s400 in a while. it's strangely liberating even though i keep messing with the settings to see how stuff comes out....i forget what i have stuff set at though :(

i'm learning, i'm learning....

Billthy, from looking at your pictures it seem your S400 have a hot-pixel(dead-pixel) in the CCD, red dot(top middle) in both picture. If it's still in the warranty, you should send it to the Canon to get it fixed.

For those who just bought a digital camera, an easy way to test hot-pixel(dead pixel) is to take a photo of all white and all black object(wall, paper,...) and see if there is any miss colour dot appear in the picture or not.

A picture of the Oakland University campus while snowing. We got about a foot of snow. I took photos of me and my friends sledding later that day but they turned out barely visible. I forgot how much of a difference there is between a digital camera and the human eye. This photo was taken with a Sony DSC-U30 on VGA mode.

1.JPG

Billthy, from looking at your pictures it seem your S400 have a hot-pixel(dead-pixel) in the CCD, red dot(top middle) in both picture. If it's still in the warranty, you should send it to the Canon to get it fixed.

For those who just bought a digital camera, an easy way to test hot-pixel(dead pixel) is to take a photo of all white and all black object(wall, paper,...) and see if there is any miss colour dot appear in the picture or not.

WOW....i'm gonna check....thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!

I've had my camera since Christmas and noticed a small blue dot on pictures, more noticable on dark ones. It comes out best if you set the exposure time to 1 second (on Canons) before the noise reduction is activated at 1.3s.

Didn't think you'd be able to get a replacement; imagined it would be like LCD screens where they say if there are x amount of dead pixels then, well, tough.

1/14/04 Dave Matthews and Friends @ Cox Arena, San Diego.

Canon G3, ISO 200, Tv @ 1/100, AWB

no way i was gonna get my 300d in, so i had my gf bring the g3. it was tough shooting because the security people kept hassling me and threatening to take my stuff. not the best shots, i had to be really sneaky about everything, and i wasn't using the lcd, so i couldn't see any of the exposure information.

i didn't touch these up in PS yet, so they may be a bit rusty. ran them through neatimage really quick, but i didn't fine tune anything.

post-55-1074214898.jpg

I've had my camera since Christmas and noticed a small blue dot on pictures, more noticable on dark ones. It comes out best if you set the exposure time to 1 second (on Canons) before the noise reduction is activated at 1.3s.

Didn't think you'd be able to get a replacement; imagined it would be like LCD screens where they say if there are x amount of dead pixels then, well, tough.

Actually if it's still in shop warranty you can exchange it for a new one. I bought my A80 from Circuit City and found 3 dead-pixels, I exchanged it for a new one.

If you bought them from online shop, you still can get Canon to fix it under the 1 year warranty. They won't exchange it for a new one, but they will map out the dead-pixels. That's mean your camera will still have the dead-pixel, but you won't see it in a picture.

1/14/04 Dave Matthews and Friends @ Cox Arena, San Diego.

Canon G3, ISO 200, Tv @ 1/100, AWB

no way i was gonna get my 300d in, so i had my gf bring the g3. it was tough shooting because the security people kept hassling me and threatening to take my stuff. not the best shots, i had to be really sneaky about everything, and i wasn't using the lcd, so i couldn't see any of the exposure information.

i didn't touch these up in PS yet, so they may be a bit rusty. ran them through neatimage really quick, but i didn't fine tune anything.

you luckey #($(*#&$ #$&*$$(&$($(# :angry: :angry: i wanted to go to a d&f concert sooo bad but never came to michigan AWESOME PICTURES if you have the originals in full detail send them to me on AIM, ICQ, or MSN

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!