Which Linux distribution do you prefer? (2014 edition)


Which Linux distribution do you prefer?  

288 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Linux distribution do you prefer?

    • Debian GNU/Linux
    • Red Hat Enterprise Linux
      0
    • CentOS
    • Fedora
    • Arch Linux
    • (K|X|L)-Ubuntu
    • Mint
    • Gentoo
    • Slackware
    • Mandrake
      0
    • Mageia
    • openSUSE
    • Other (specify in reply).
    • I roll my own distribution.
    • Elementary OS


Recommended Posts

I don't use Linux much, but I think Debian is the distribution to go for if you've got a choice. It seems the most stable and the most straightforward one to start tinkering with.

I ran straight Debian for years, but I started having problems with things like Steam where it didn't work properly because Debian was using older versions of certain libraries.  I switched to Ubuntu because it seems like it gets updated more often, so there's less of a possibility of something not working because you're stuck with old software.

 

I'm still a big fan of Debian though, it's rock solid and "just works", but I've gotten so used to the Unity interface now that I'm pretty well an Ubuntu guy, at least on the desktop.

I ran straight Debian for years, but I started having problems with things like Steam where it didn't work properly because Debian was using older versions of certain libraries.  I switched to Ubuntu because it seems like it gets updated more often, so there's less of a possibility of something not working because you're stuck with old software.

 

I'm still a big fan of Debian though, it's rock solid and "just works", but I've gotten so used to the Unity interface now that I'm pretty well an Ubuntu guy, at least on the desktop.

 

There are workarounds :) But as long as Ubuntu works, what am I to say? :)

SUSE in my opinion is by far the most stable, feature filled Linux distro!

Not sure why, that one tends to get overlooked sometimes, it is rather good. Last time I tried it I think my only annoyance was YaST, lots of polish/etc otherwise. I'd assume/hope it's in better shape by now.

Still use Debian on my servers for stability, but still prefer Arch overall.   Mostly because I don't have to rely on it, if it were my main OS I'd probably pick Debian there as well.  Fun to work with though.  (When it works.)

 

If you are having stability issues with Arch, or hate the thought of installing it, I would highly recommend Chakra. It is quite literally the "Ubuntu of the Arch world". I have to say it is very stable, very fast, on my secondary "Linux only" workstation. I have however, never been able to successfully install it in VMware/Virtualbox so try it out on a spare HDD. :)

 

http://www.chakra-project.org/

If you are having stability issues with Arch, or hate the thought of installing it, I would highly recommend Chakra. It is quite literally the "Ubuntu of the Arch world". I have to say it is very stable, very fast, on my secondary "Linux only" workstation. I have however, never been able to successfully install it in VMware/Virtualbox so try it out on a spare HDD. :)

I agree, Chakra is quite good -- my reason for Arch is purely "for the fun of it", I know it can occasionally implode or cause keyboard/forehead collisions when the maintainers go on a tangent sometimes. I don't use it for anything where reliability is a factor (that'll be my Windows desktop), it's my playground. Chakra looked really nice the times I've tried it in a VM, I think my only complaint with that one is that it (at the time anyway) was very QT-centric, went as far as treating GTK based apps as second rate.. it can be difficult to do without GTK apps depending on your needs, but at least they have their "bundles" for the common stuff. That said, their "half rolling" release model is a nice sweet spot as far as I'm concerned.

 

don't really know. i really hate the new interface (unity and gnome). It's even more confused and out of place than the Start Screen in windows 8.0

I agree with Gnome, it went into WTF-ville with 3.0, makes Windows 8's modern stuff look good. (Opinion of course.) Unity on the other hand is growing on me, as it's maturing it's getting rather nice, although I'd really prefer them dropping Gnome 3's Nautilus for something a tad less brain-dead... my worry with them is what they have planned in the near future. Either work out great or seriously backfire.

I primarily use Arch. I have installed Gentoo once or twice in the last year, but I am waiting for their systemd implementation to mature a bit before I keep it around. Why Arch? Well, because I agree 100% with their philosophy. I remember when Arch was still a young guy and the AUR was not very populated. Look at it now. There are so many packages available. The community is a bit elitist at times but overall they are great, especially in terms of package maintenance. Years ago, I would use Gentoo solely for the speeds. I enjoyed the fact that I could open an application faster than most other distributions could. While it still may have a few speed increases over Arch (not many that I can notice here), they are not worth the hassle of compiling. It is not difficult, but time consuming. The greatest part of Arch is the wiki. It does not matter what distribution you are on because if you are trying to find some instructions for various topics, the chances are you will come across the Arch Wiki.

 

For servers (which I have none of currently, but I have set plenty of them up) I would recommend the latest stable Debian or CentOS. It depends which you are more familiar with. Both have proven themselves over the years. I prefer managing .deb over .rpm, but they both work well.

 

I agree with Gnome, it went into WTF-ville with 3.0, makes Windows 8's modern stuff look good. (Opinion of course.) Unity on the other hand is growing on me, as it's maturing it's getting rather nice, although I'd really prefer them dropping Gnome 3's Nautilus for something a tad less brain-dead... my worry with them is what they have planned in the near future. Either work out great or seriously backfire.

 

I think unity would be a lot better off if they were to remove the ugly black bar completely and put the menus back where they belong on the application windows. They should make the system tray a tile and have everything in one menu like Gnome 3.  I think this would make the desktop a lot less cludgie and overall more atheistic. It would also make the system tray easier to use on touch screen devices, which after all, is unity's goal. 

With me working towards my RHCE and looking to possibly get a job at Red Hat this year, I'm going to go with Fedora this year, even though I've been an Ubuntu/Mint fan for a while now. As I try to familiarize myself with Red Hat technologies, I think Fedora will be more fitting for me.

Really depends... for my daily workstation at work I use openSuse... yast makes it really easy to join an Active Directory domain. Servers are a mix of openSuse, SLES, and Debian, depending on what it does. Suse/SLES seems to have more support from OEMs and software publishers than Debian. Home use is a different matter.  I recently switch a PC at home to Ubuntu (from XP 64bit) and I'm liking it so far. I went that route as for consumer desktop use it seems to have gained the most traction, and is the OS valve recommends for Steam.

Elementary OS for me, have it dual booting with Win7 on my laptop.  I like the clean/sleek look of the OS compared to Ubuntu, also it looks similar to OSX which I also enjoy.  Tried Mint 15 for a short while but had a few performance issues with it which put me off using it.

To ask a totally noob question

How many OS's are there? I always thought there were 3

Is this one OS with different bells and whistles or 15?

 

There are 3 main OS's, Windows (DOS) , OSX (Unix), and Linux.

 

Distrobutions all run on the same Linux kernel, but they have millions of different software. Different software per distrobution.

  • Like 1

To ask a totally noob question

How many OS's are there? I always thought there were 3

Is this one OS with different bells and whistles or 15?

 

As mindovermaster said, they're just "distributions"; operating systems based on the Linux kernel.  Software between them is largely cross compatible because at their core, they're all very similar.  Companies adopt the Linux kernel and build things the way they think would be best, use their own philosophies, add their own custom bits here and there, and release it as a "distribution".  Debian is a separate distribution from Redhat, however they are both Linux, run mostly the same software and are both based on the Linux kernel, they're just managed by different teams with different goals and different philosophies.  However, if you write code on one Linux computer and compile it, it should run on every other Linux computer, regardless of distribution, unless you make your program dependent on something specific to a particular distro.

 

On one hand, it's a good thing because you can tinker around and find the one that works best for you.  You have lots of options.  On the other hand, it's a bad thing.  Until Ubuntu really became mainstream, a lot of people were afraid to develop for Linux because of the immense number of different distros.  What if you wrote something that worked on one distribution, but it didn't work on another distribution because of some slight difference in available software versions or some difference in default behavior?  Some people dislike Ubuntu, but I think Ubuntu is what kind of broke the mold by making things easy for newbs, which made it popular, and because most people who use Linux either run Ubuntu currently or have at one point, it gave developers one single platform upon which to build their products.

  • Like 1

As mindovermaster said, they're just "distributions"; operating systems based on the Linux kernel.  Software between them is largely cross compatible because at their core, they're all very similar.  Companies adopt the Linux kernel and build things the way they think would be best, use their own philosophies, add their own custom bits here and there, and release it as a "distribution".  Debian is a separate distribution from Redhat, however they are both Linux, run mostly the same software and are both based on the Linux kernel, they're just managed by different teams with different goals and different philosophies.  However, if you write code on one Linux computer and compile it, it should run on every other Linux computer, regardless of distribution, unless you make your program dependent on something specific to a particular distro.

 

On one hand, it's a good thing because you can tinker around and find the one that works best for you.  You have lots of options.  On the other hand, it's a bad thing.  Until Ubuntu really became mainstream, a lot of people were afraid to develop for Linux because of the immense number of different distros.  What if you wrote something that worked on one distribution, but it didn't work on another distribution because of some slight difference in available software versions or some difference in default behavior?  Some people dislike Ubuntu, but I think Ubuntu is what kind of broke the mold by making things easy for newbs, which made it popular, and because most people who use Linux either run Ubuntu currently or have at one point, it gave developers one single platform upon which to build their products.

I've been curious about it for a while, and had a spare pc lying around, I was thinking of trying aversion of Ubuntu I had waiting for it, but seeing as my spare machine is now in my son's room, as he needed for homework (and probably other things he's not supposed to do on it at his age) I lost my chance until another one comes along :)

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!