Which Linux distribution do you prefer? (2014 edition)


Which Linux distribution do you prefer?  

288 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Linux distribution do you prefer?

    • Debian GNU/Linux
    • Red Hat Enterprise Linux
      0
    • CentOS
    • Fedora
    • Arch Linux
    • (K|X|L)-Ubuntu
    • Mint
    • Gentoo
    • Slackware
    • Mandrake
      0
    • Mageia
    • openSUSE
    • Other (specify in reply).
    • I roll my own distribution.
    • Elementary OS


Recommended Posts

My Dell XPS L702X laptop died (motherboard fault, coming up to it's 3rd year) so I'm on Xubuntu 14.04.1 full-time now on the HP laptop (7 years old and still going).

Haven't had a good "It's not Linux, it's GNU/Linux" speech in a while, thankfully at least skipped the "recursive acronym" explanation, usually goes hand in hand, especially to those of us who prefer Unix.  I'm sure everybody reading this forum knows that.. it's just shorter and easier to type.  Not going to go to a store and ask for an "Android Plus Linux" device either.  

Do you want that on an ARM or x86 architecture? With proprietary non-free software, or with free software only?

 

I'll have a FOSS GNU-Linux-Android OpenRISC ethical non-gender-identifying transfriendly biological vegan CO2-neutral conflict-metal-free phone please.

  • Like 2

Do you want that on an ARM or x86 architecture? With proprietary non-free software, or with free software only?

 

When we call software ?free,? we mean that it respects the users' essential freedoms: the freedom to run it, to study and change it, and to redistribute copies with or without changes. This is a matter of freedom, not price, so think of ?free speech,? not ?free beer.?
 
These freedoms are vitally important. They are essential, not just for the individual users' sake, but for society as a whole because they promote social solidarity?that is, sharing and cooperation. They become even more important as our culture and life activities are increasingly digitized. In a world of digital sounds, images, and words, free software becomes increasingly essential for freedom in general.

 

When we call software ?free,? we mean that it respects the users' essential freedoms: the freedom to run it, to study and change it, and to redistribute copies with or without changes. This is a matter of freedom, not price, so think of ?free speech,? not ?free beer.?
 
These freedoms are vitally important. They are essential, not just for the individual users' sake, but for society as a whole because they promote social solidarity?that is, sharing and cooperation. They become even more important as our culture and life activities are increasingly digitized. In a world of digital sounds, images, and words, free software becomes increasingly essential for freedom in general.

 

 

Wow. Okay. :laugh:

Arch all the way. I've tried virtually every distro under the sun, but I always come back to it. Gentoo is a close second though.

As far as reasons go:

1. Highly customisable.

2. A blank slate. I love nothing better than building a system from scratch just as I like it.

3. Pacman / Yaourt / AUR. Gentoo and Arch have the best repositories and package management tools hands down.

4. Rolling release.

5. Net install (tiny download).

6. Simple installation & great documentation.

7. I can run it on my Raspberry PI.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.[/size]

I agree. That's an important distinction that's often lost. The GNU programs and libraries are a core part of what makes a distro.

Arch all the way. I've tried virtually every distro under the sun, but I always come back to it. Gentoo is a close second though.

As far as reasons go:

1. Highly customisable.

2. A blank slate. I love nothing better than building a system from scratch just as I like it.

3. Pacman / Yaourt / AUR. Gentoo and Arch have the best repositories and package management tools hands down.

4. Rolling release.

5. Net install (tiny download).

6. Simple installation & great documentation.

7. I can run it on my Raspberry PI.

 

You can do all that with Debian, just saying...

Arch all the way. I've tried virtually every distro under the sun, but I always come back to it. Gentoo is a close second though.

Another plus, in my opinion, is the Arch Build System. I've been partial to Unix and later BSD as long as I can remember, just another thing that Arch does that makes it feel more "proper" to me. And yea, Gentoo for the same reason.

Arch all the way. I've tried virtually every distro under the sun, but I always come back to it. Gentoo is a close second though.

As far as reasons go:

1. Highly customisable.

2. A blank slate. I love nothing better than building a system from scratch just as I like it.

3. Pacman / Yaourt / AUR. Gentoo and Arch have the best repositories and package management tools hands down.

4. Rolling release.

5. Net install (tiny download).

6. Simple installation & great documentation.

7. I can run it on my Raspberry PI.

I use Arch but every single package is compiled on my machine. Most package maintainers on ArchLinux these days compile the packages on their own computers instead of clean chroots. I don't like that habit as it may on very rare occasions cause unexpected results. I don't blame them as Arch Linux has no build server.

One of my friends who works at a company that makes multimedia servers had that issue with Arch Linux.

Pacman itself is great.

So my system is fully compiled from source on my own computer without the need to dwell into the complexity of Gentoo.

 

As I already stated earlier in this thread, systemd did wonders for Arch Linux.

You can do all that with Debian, just saying...

 

 

exactly

 

I always start with a network install with nothing but ssh, i then go in and start building from there

 

I mean ok they are deb packages and not compiled directly on my machine 

 

but

 

1. Highly customisable. Yes

2. A blank slate. I love nothing better than building a system from scratch just as I like it. Yes

3. Pacman / Yaourt / AUR. Gentoo and Arch have the best repositories and package management tools hands down.

4. Rolling release.

5. Net install (tiny download). Yes

6. Simple installation & great documentation. Yes

7. I can run it on my Raspberry PI. Yes

Don't ask me why exactly, but I've always been fond of Fedora. I'm not doing much with Linux these days, but if I want to play around with it, I always go back to Fedora. Tried several, like Mint, Ubuntu and Suse. I'm a Linux noob :P

ElementaryOS all the way for me, I love the look and feel, it doesn't look amateurish at all like so many distros, it's really a joy to use.

 

 

 

Thanks for that.

  • 3 weeks later...

ubuntu ease of installation and friendliness 

 

ubuntu is really a great distro for beginners, also for advanced users, as you can do all the stuff, but also don't really need to go into the konsole thanks to amazing package manager and .deb files.

also: for ubuntu there are some excellent wikis out there i would have killed for when i started to first use a comp with windows 95 and had to lear all by myself and buy expensive literature about it. yes it was that bad.

  • Like 1

I am very very excited to try Linux.  I have not used Linux ever since I am out of Uni.  Need to get back to it.  I can't wait to use Linux again.  Right now, there's a few things that is stopping me from using Linux.

 

1) Waiting for "Scientific Linux 7" to be compiled.

2) VirtualBox is still not stable.  Version 4.3.14 break many VM.  The bug is still being ironed out.

3) 128GB SSD is not enough to install many applications.  I am currently waiting till I can get the 1TB SSD so I can install any apps to my heart's contend.

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I've recently Dockerized one of my client's web service applications, and I'm sold on the technology. I've got the current iteration of the service running on EC2/Ubuntu/Docker. It follows naturally that CoreOS is the next distro that I'm going to investigate. I think that this is the future folks.

  • 2 weeks later...

Arch for me. I was put off trying it as I kept reading it was not for newcomers to linux and was too cutting edge etc. I am glad I tried it anyway as I find it the easiest to use and keep updated. The main reason I like it is I get up to date software not the ancient stuff I had to put up with when I tried Debain distros. That's the worst thing about Debian. You go to the web site of program x and the author tells you to use the latest  version as it has a lot of bug fixes and is better by far, but if you want to use it you have to build it yourself and hope that it builds fine for you because you cant find a recent version in the debian repos.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • With how far Tim Apple's head has been up Trump's ass, there's no way this was done reluctantly.
    • Like the article stated, it's written completely from scratch, unlike the umpteen Chromium clones. It got its start as the browser built-in to the also written-from-scratch SerenityOS.
    • Hello, From looking at the screen shots in your motherboard's manual at https://endownload.colorful.cn/EnDownload/MotherBroard/2022/Intel 600/Manual/Intel 600 Series BIOS English/Intel 600 Series BIOS User Guide.pdf, you go to the ADVANCED option at the top of the BIOS (UEFI) menu, then select SECURITY in the list of options on the left.  From there  you can enable and set the Secure Boot mode. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • Final Fantasy VII Remake Part 3 is getting a simultaneous release across PC and all consoles by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Square Enix showed up to the Summer Game Fest presentation today with multiple trailers showing off its next chapter in the Final Fantasy VII Remake saga. The final chapter of this trilogy now has an official name too, with it being dubbed Final Fantasy VII Revelation, following up Final Fantasy VII Remake and Final Fantasy VII Rebirth from recent years. Vincent Valentine, Cid, Cloud, Barret, Tifa, and more showed up in the trailers as they battle against enemies, or 'Weapons,' from the final chapter. "As the world teeters on the brink of annihilation, the final battle against Sephiroth begins," says the trailer description. "A meteor mars the sky, monstrous planetary guardians wreak havoc across the globe, and the fires of war rage. Now, Cloud and his companions must stand against this chaos to not only decide the planet's fate, but bring a legendary conflict to its conclusion." Following the reveal trailer, the show also dropped some gameplay footage that shows off a new way to travel across the open world using the Highwind airship. Players will be able to swap characters on during battles, use tactical mode to synchronize with allies, and summon their entities. Cid Highwind and Vincent Valentine are joining the party this time too. “FINAL FANTASY VII, first released in 1997, has been beloved by fans for many years and has since become a “legend” in its own right," added producer Yoshinori Kitase. "The FINAL FANTASY VII Remake Series that began in 2020 with everyone’s passionate support is finally reaching its climactic finale with FINAL FANTASY VII REVELATION. The story’s final destination represents my emotions spanning thirty years working on this title" One of the biggest revelations of this announcement, however, was the multiplatform release confirmation from the get-go. Square Enix will be releasing Final Fantasy VII Revelation across PC, Xbox Series X|S, Nintendo Switch 2, and PlayStation 5 in Spring 2027 without any timed exclusivity programs.
    • Hello, Having a simple utility to allow Microsoft's customers to configure the context menu, with a few options like showing the current menu, showing a proposed menu/alternate configurations, loading and saving the settings, and a "reset to default" option would have solved this. Let Microsoft provide a recommended default look-and-feel, maybe a couple alternative configurations, like a basic/simplified version of that, and a more advanced version for that, and that would have been very well-received, I think. Microsoft could even had offered a library of different configurations, similar to what they have done in the past for Windows Media Player skins, Themes, and desktop wallpaper. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
  • Recent Achievements

    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      482
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      269
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      78
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!