• 0

Definitive Best *Paid* Antivirus 2014


Poll: Definitive Best *Paid* Antivirus 2014  

144 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Avast! Pro/Internet Security
    • AVG Antivirus PRO/Internet Security
    • Avira Antivirus Premium/Pro/Endpoint
    • BitDefender Anti Virus/Internet Security/Total Security
    • Comodo Endpoint Security/Internet Security Pro
    • Emsisoft Anti-Malware/Internet Security
      0
    • ESET NOD32/Smart Security/Endpoint Security
    • Kaspersky Anti Virus
    • MalwareBytes Anti Malware PRO
    • McAfee Anti Virus
      0
    • Panda Anti Virus/Internet Security
      0
    • Sophos Endpoint
    • Symantec/PC Tools/Norton
    • Trend Micro Anti Virus/Internet Security
      0
    • Vipre Anti Virus
    • Webroot
    • Other (please specify below)


Question

It's a new year, and a new poll for Definitive Best Antivirus. The 2013 thread can be found here.

This is a poll for best Paid antivirus, there is a separate thread for free antiviruses here.

 

If your choice of Paid Antivirus is not listed, please choose Other and specify in the comments.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1194851-definitive-best-paid-antivirus-2014/
Share on other sites

25 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

This should be renamed to Definitive Most Popular *Paid* Antivirus 2014. No user actually tests all the options in the poll. It's mostly a case of "this works for me so it's the best".

 

This goes for other "Definitive" topics as well.

  • Like 3
  • 0

NOD32 by a long shot. I've tried most last year and found that NOD32 gives you very good protection at a minimal system impact.

 

In addition to that it's just nice to use. You get a ton of configuration options and when it detects something it's discrete about it and it still lets you take the action you want. I especially love the PUP-detection, takes out some toolbars and adware in installers that other antivirus software never picked up for me.

  • Like 3
  • 0

This should be renamed to Definitive Most Popular *Paid* Antivirus 2014. No user actually tests all the options in the poll. It's mostly a case of "this works for me so it's the best".

 

This goes for other "Definitive" topics as well.

Agreed. While I've used paid versions of Avast, Kaspersky, BitDefender, Panda, and ESET, that is over many years and I would never be able to compare current versions to one another.

  • 0

Since Microsoft announced not to simply use MSE any longer I have been using Avast and it always worked out well for me in the past. I have a copy of the Eset Endpoint security I just have not installed it as it is just too large of a package.

  • 0

I bought a computer and it came with 2 years of Norton. It's really not bad. Better then years ago.

On my old PC I used KAV which seemed like it slowed down everything. I ran ESET. it was fantastic. Whenever my norton expires I'll go with ESET. Fantastic software.

  • 0

I have a copy of the Eset Endpoint security I just have not installed it as it is just too large of a package.

You can install and use a copy of just the Antivirus package using the full license (but not the other way around).

 

 

And this is my recommendation. (Y)

  • 0

Didn't think I needed one since I use OSX.

Don't be fooled by old marketing hype. OSX does not have perfect security and is susceptible to viruses. The problem with OSX is that because so many people have been fooled by this security "golden egg" that when virus outbreaks happen, they happen big. Do yourself and everyone else a favor and run something like ESET Cyber Security Pro or Kaspersky. They will offer you a very high level of protection with minimal impact on system performance. I have been doing computer repairs (specializing in virus removal) for over 10 years on PC and Mac and always cringed at the thought of one of my customers being without antivirus or even worse, having the false sense of security that the free products give.

  • 0

Glad someone else besides me looks at independent lab tests of AV products. Make sure you aren't making a decision off of just one test though. Often a product will look great in one round of testing but when you dig further, there is no consistancy. What might have protected you well at the moment the test was performed could leave you hanging high and dry when you need it most.

  • Like 2
  • 0

I would use NOD if I had to, but dont. Atm, I'm using the default program on both Win7 and 8.1. Used to use MSE in Win7 but it doubled the boot time, so bye bye to that. Avast, Mcafee, AVG, Symantec/Norton, Bitdender, Kaspersky. Doesnt matter what version you get they're known to crash. Most of the PC's I fixed (that were crashing), had one of these programs on it

 

I wouldn't call Malwarebytes an AV program

  • 0

Don't be fooled by old marketing hype. OSX does not have perfect security and is susceptible to viruses. The problem with OSX is that because so many people have been fooled by this security "golden egg" that when virus outbreaks happen, they happen big. Do yourself and everyone else a favor and run something like ESET Cyber Security Pro or Kaspersky. They will offer you a very high level of protection with minimal impact on system performance. I have been doing computer repairs (specializing in virus removal) for over 10 years on PC and Mac and always cringed at the thought of one of my customers being without antivirus or even worse, having the false sense of security that the free products give.

 

Thanks, luckily I'm pretty safe about what I download or visit.

  • 0

Thanks, luckily I'm pretty safe about what I download or visit.

Anymore, it has little to do with how "safe" your online activities are. Just because you don't go to warez or pron sites doesn't mean you aren't open to exposure. Many of the virus infections occurring today are due to OS/browser vulnerabilities being exploited through malformed media files such as jpg, mpg, mov, mp3, etc. Heck, Apple systems have for years given Quicktime either system level or admin access and I have seen easily reproduced exploits involving tricking Quicktime into believing that an Apple Script file is a video, just to name a specific example. Think of the internet as a crowded room of people where most of them are carrying a disease. Stepping into that room without taking preventative measures is asking to get sick. It might not happen right away, and some people have been reported (although very doubtfully) to go for years without AV and 0 infections, eventually it will catch up to you. I have people come into my store on a daily basis with what they believe to be a minor issue where some websites won't open properly and they insist that they don't have a virus but when we check the computer, what do you know, they have quite a few. Many infections show little or no sign, running in the background without your knowledge, harvesting information, perpetrating DDOS attacks, sending spam, etc. These sorts of viruses are designed to be stealthy as to not raise any red flags to an unsuspecting user. While others are so blatant that only complete morons would fall for their tricks such as the ones claiming to be the FBI investigating child porn and if the user doesn't pay a few hundred dollars using a prepaid card (to make it harder to track) that they will be arrested. Its just foolhardy to run any computer without a decent AV program anymore.

  • 0

This poll definitely has value. As Luc2k pointed out https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1194851-definitive-best-paid-antivirus-2014/#entry596201271,

it probably should be reanamed "Most Popular (Paid) (Free) Antivirus." It also isn't really "definitive." That doesn't mean it's worthless.

  • 0

I would use NOD if I had to, but dont. Atm, I'm using the default program on both Win7 and 8.1. Used to use MSE in Win7 but it doubled the boot time, so bye bye to that. Avast, Mcafee, AVG, Symantec/Norton, Bitdender, Kaspersky. Doesnt matter what version you get they're known to crash. Most of the PC's I fixed (that were crashing), had one of these programs on it

 

I wouldn't call Malwarebytes an AV program

And in the event viewer displayed it was always (100%of the time) the AV that caused the crash? The 5 crashes I've had in the last year, according to windows event viewer was caused by Battlefield 4 not the AV.

 

I have used them all (free) and landed on Bitdefender for the paid one. Bitdefender needs major work on their UI. I switched back to Norton Internet Security simply because it's free with Comcast. (I used norton for years and it's always worked well for me.

  • 0

Yup or a file belong to an AV program. You could usually tell if Mcafee was the cause. It usually crashes network related files, and one stop error that usually comes up is 0x000000d1

 

Previously Kaspersky was known to block webcams from working. Dont know if they've fixed this prob yet. I've never used it myself. The only thing I've used from Kaspersky is tdsskiller

 

I didnt say EVERY crash is caused by AV programs. But I do know that MOST of these do cause bsod's

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!