• 0

Definitive Best *Paid* Antivirus 2014


Poll: Definitive Best *Paid* Antivirus 2014  

144 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Avast! Pro/Internet Security
    • AVG Antivirus PRO/Internet Security
    • Avira Antivirus Premium/Pro/Endpoint
    • BitDefender Anti Virus/Internet Security/Total Security
    • Comodo Endpoint Security/Internet Security Pro
    • Emsisoft Anti-Malware/Internet Security
      0
    • ESET NOD32/Smart Security/Endpoint Security
    • Kaspersky Anti Virus
    • MalwareBytes Anti Malware PRO
    • McAfee Anti Virus
      0
    • Panda Anti Virus/Internet Security
      0
    • Sophos Endpoint
    • Symantec/PC Tools/Norton
    • Trend Micro Anti Virus/Internet Security
      0
    • Vipre Anti Virus
    • Webroot
    • Other (please specify below)


Question

It's a new year, and a new poll for Definitive Best Antivirus. The 2013 thread can be found here.

This is a poll for best Paid antivirus, there is a separate thread for free antiviruses here.

 

If your choice of Paid Antivirus is not listed, please choose Other and specify in the comments.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1194851-definitive-best-paid-antivirus-2014/
Share on other sites

25 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

This should be renamed to Definitive Most Popular *Paid* Antivirus 2014. No user actually tests all the options in the poll. It's mostly a case of "this works for me so it's the best".

 

This goes for other "Definitive" topics as well.

  • Like 3
  • 0

NOD32 by a long shot. I've tried most last year and found that NOD32 gives you very good protection at a minimal system impact.

 

In addition to that it's just nice to use. You get a ton of configuration options and when it detects something it's discrete about it and it still lets you take the action you want. I especially love the PUP-detection, takes out some toolbars and adware in installers that other antivirus software never picked up for me.

  • Like 3
  • 0

This should be renamed to Definitive Most Popular *Paid* Antivirus 2014. No user actually tests all the options in the poll. It's mostly a case of "this works for me so it's the best".

 

This goes for other "Definitive" topics as well.

Agreed. While I've used paid versions of Avast, Kaspersky, BitDefender, Panda, and ESET, that is over many years and I would never be able to compare current versions to one another.

  • 0

Since Microsoft announced not to simply use MSE any longer I have been using Avast and it always worked out well for me in the past. I have a copy of the Eset Endpoint security I just have not installed it as it is just too large of a package.

  • 0

I bought a computer and it came with 2 years of Norton. It's really not bad. Better then years ago.

On my old PC I used KAV which seemed like it slowed down everything. I ran ESET. it was fantastic. Whenever my norton expires I'll go with ESET. Fantastic software.

  • 0

I have a copy of the Eset Endpoint security I just have not installed it as it is just too large of a package.

You can install and use a copy of just the Antivirus package using the full license (but not the other way around).

 

 

And this is my recommendation. (Y)

  • 0

Didn't think I needed one since I use OSX.

Don't be fooled by old marketing hype. OSX does not have perfect security and is susceptible to viruses. The problem with OSX is that because so many people have been fooled by this security "golden egg" that when virus outbreaks happen, they happen big. Do yourself and everyone else a favor and run something like ESET Cyber Security Pro or Kaspersky. They will offer you a very high level of protection with minimal impact on system performance. I have been doing computer repairs (specializing in virus removal) for over 10 years on PC and Mac and always cringed at the thought of one of my customers being without antivirus or even worse, having the false sense of security that the free products give.

  • 0

Glad someone else besides me looks at independent lab tests of AV products. Make sure you aren't making a decision off of just one test though. Often a product will look great in one round of testing but when you dig further, there is no consistancy. What might have protected you well at the moment the test was performed could leave you hanging high and dry when you need it most.

  • Like 2
  • 0

I would use NOD if I had to, but dont. Atm, I'm using the default program on both Win7 and 8.1. Used to use MSE in Win7 but it doubled the boot time, so bye bye to that. Avast, Mcafee, AVG, Symantec/Norton, Bitdender, Kaspersky. Doesnt matter what version you get they're known to crash. Most of the PC's I fixed (that were crashing), had one of these programs on it

 

I wouldn't call Malwarebytes an AV program

  • 0

Don't be fooled by old marketing hype. OSX does not have perfect security and is susceptible to viruses. The problem with OSX is that because so many people have been fooled by this security "golden egg" that when virus outbreaks happen, they happen big. Do yourself and everyone else a favor and run something like ESET Cyber Security Pro or Kaspersky. They will offer you a very high level of protection with minimal impact on system performance. I have been doing computer repairs (specializing in virus removal) for over 10 years on PC and Mac and always cringed at the thought of one of my customers being without antivirus or even worse, having the false sense of security that the free products give.

 

Thanks, luckily I'm pretty safe about what I download or visit.

  • 0

Thanks, luckily I'm pretty safe about what I download or visit.

Anymore, it has little to do with how "safe" your online activities are. Just because you don't go to warez or pron sites doesn't mean you aren't open to exposure. Many of the virus infections occurring today are due to OS/browser vulnerabilities being exploited through malformed media files such as jpg, mpg, mov, mp3, etc. Heck, Apple systems have for years given Quicktime either system level or admin access and I have seen easily reproduced exploits involving tricking Quicktime into believing that an Apple Script file is a video, just to name a specific example. Think of the internet as a crowded room of people where most of them are carrying a disease. Stepping into that room without taking preventative measures is asking to get sick. It might not happen right away, and some people have been reported (although very doubtfully) to go for years without AV and 0 infections, eventually it will catch up to you. I have people come into my store on a daily basis with what they believe to be a minor issue where some websites won't open properly and they insist that they don't have a virus but when we check the computer, what do you know, they have quite a few. Many infections show little or no sign, running in the background without your knowledge, harvesting information, perpetrating DDOS attacks, sending spam, etc. These sorts of viruses are designed to be stealthy as to not raise any red flags to an unsuspecting user. While others are so blatant that only complete morons would fall for their tricks such as the ones claiming to be the FBI investigating child porn and if the user doesn't pay a few hundred dollars using a prepaid card (to make it harder to track) that they will be arrested. Its just foolhardy to run any computer without a decent AV program anymore.

  • 0

This poll definitely has value. As Luc2k pointed out https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1194851-definitive-best-paid-antivirus-2014/#entry596201271,

it probably should be reanamed "Most Popular (Paid) (Free) Antivirus." It also isn't really "definitive." That doesn't mean it's worthless.

  • 0

I would use NOD if I had to, but dont. Atm, I'm using the default program on both Win7 and 8.1. Used to use MSE in Win7 but it doubled the boot time, so bye bye to that. Avast, Mcafee, AVG, Symantec/Norton, Bitdender, Kaspersky. Doesnt matter what version you get they're known to crash. Most of the PC's I fixed (that were crashing), had one of these programs on it

 

I wouldn't call Malwarebytes an AV program

And in the event viewer displayed it was always (100%of the time) the AV that caused the crash? The 5 crashes I've had in the last year, according to windows event viewer was caused by Battlefield 4 not the AV.

 

I have used them all (free) and landed on Bitdefender for the paid one. Bitdefender needs major work on their UI. I switched back to Norton Internet Security simply because it's free with Comcast. (I used norton for years and it's always worked well for me.

  • 0

Yup or a file belong to an AV program. You could usually tell if Mcafee was the cause. It usually crashes network related files, and one stop error that usually comes up is 0x000000d1

 

Previously Kaspersky was known to block webcams from working. Dont know if they've fixed this prob yet. I've never used it myself. The only thing I've used from Kaspersky is tdsskiller

 

I didnt say EVERY crash is caused by AV programs. But I do know that MOST of these do cause bsod's

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • No its not, there are ton of Youtube videos to get you started, what do you think people did before AI existed?
    • Read this in Humor Simpson 's voice, "Out of my way Moe".
    • You still can, its just under the Transform flyout for WordArt now
    • Likely nothing will be done in corporate America, there have been countless Tesla self-driving incidents. Then again, there have also been countless human operated incidents. It's literally daily news here in Canada, to the extent that it's now odd if we get a day where a collision doesn't get announced on the radio throughout the day...
    • SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500 hands on by Steven Parker I was offered the chance to test out the SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500, and full disclosure, they let me keep it regardless of my findings. Anyway, I jumped at the chance due to my long hours sitting at my desk, mousing around. Apologies for the knife cut across the top of the box; that was my doing, being a bit too heavy-handed with opening up the outer packaging. First up, what's in the box: SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500 1x Type-C charging cable User Manual 1-Year Warranty (card) In short, everything you need to get started. According to the official Amazon listing, here are the key features: Full-Hand Air Compression: OS500 wraps your fingers, palm, and wrist with multi-chamber air compression for a complete hand relaxation experience. The extended massage chamber helps cover more of the hand and wrist area than standard palm-only hand massagers Palm Kneading with 6 Modes & 6 Intensities: Built-in palm kneading rollers add a hands-on massage feel, while 6 preset modes and 6 pressure levels let you choose the comfort level that fits your day—from gentle relaxation to a firmer full-hand massage 3 Heat Levels with Cooling Fan: Choose from 104°F, 113°F or 122°F warmth to suit different seasons and comfort preferences. The built-in cooling fan helps reduce stuffiness during heated sessions, keeping your hand feeling fresh and comfortable Easy Visual Display & Smart Timer: The digital image display clearly shows massage area, mode, intensity, heat level, and remaining time at a glance. Select 10, 15, or 20-minute sessions for quick office breaks, evening relaxation, or everyday hand care Rechargeable, Cordless & Comfortable: A 3000mAh battery supports over 90 minutes of full-function use on a full charge, with convenient USB-C charging. The soft inner lining, smooth ABS/PU finish, and premium black-gold design make OS500 ideal for home, office, or gifting With all that out of the way, here are my own findings. I gave it a try on both left and right hands, and as you can maybe see from the above YouTube Short, (sorry for the shaky video), my whole hand fits in, but my wrist barely enters the Hand Massager. I was able to push through a bit more with my fingertips extending out the other end to get a bit of massaging on the start of my wrist. Usage For some reason, there is a strap that is very difficult to fasten to my wrist with one hand. I am not sure what function it has, and it isn't mentioned in the user manual. The only thing I could find was in the product images that claimed "wrist precision". Unlike the Bob and Brad Hand Massager, this device does not massage the wrist anyway, even though a "wrist mode" is mentioned, which must be for smaller hands than I have, as it is mainly intended for the hand and fingers. In addition, for its steeper price, there are no disposable gloves provided in the box, which is a bit of an issue considering the internal cover (which appears to be elasticated nylon) cannot be removed for washing; so you are left with only one choice: always thoroughly wash your hands before using it. I can imagine this thing getting a bit grimy after a period of use, and that is a bit of a shame. With that said, the buttons on the device, from left to right, do the following: Heat button: 3-level heat control at 104°F, 113°F, or 122°F Mode button: Auto mode Circular mode Soothing mode Relax mode Palm and fingers mode Palm and wrist mode Intensity button: from (First-time users) 15Ka, 25Ka, 35Ka, 45Ka, 55Ka, 60Ka (Intensive relief) Knead button: on or off (6 pressure levels) Power button: Long-press to turn on or off Cooling button: turn on or off the cooling fan Also, in the product imagery, it states there are 36 "custom modes," but nowhere is it listed what these modes are. I can only imagine that they mean a combination of all of the above settings in different intensity levels. The device itself seems to rely on a single "kneading" mechanism located at the palm area of the hand, which spins when in use, and the other massage features are mainly utilized through the air sacs, increasing and decreasing at various levels on the hand and fingers. I am not sure it offered too much relief for someone who is typing and operating a mouse for hours at a time; further testing may be required. It does feel nice, though. Finally, you may be wondering how this fits into the scope of a tech website? Well, let me tell you something: sometimes I sit for up to 15 hours working on Neowin, and although I take breaks in between, it takes a toll on my body. I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief, a good massager like this Hand Massager can shed the strains of the day in just a couple of 15-minute bursts. On the official website, this has an MSRP of $99.99, but luckily for our readers, it is selling at $10 off for just $89.99 right now on Amazon. SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500 for $89.99 (with $10 off coupon), $99.99 MSRP For me, this gets a thumbs hands(?) down. However, it could be improved by making it so that the protective covering could be removed and thrown into the washing machine, or get yourself some disposable gloves to use with it. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!