• 0

Definitive Best *Paid* Antivirus 2014


Poll: Definitive Best *Paid* Antivirus 2014  

144 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • Avast! Pro/Internet Security
    • AVG Antivirus PRO/Internet Security
    • Avira Antivirus Premium/Pro/Endpoint
    • BitDefender Anti Virus/Internet Security/Total Security
    • Comodo Endpoint Security/Internet Security Pro
    • Emsisoft Anti-Malware/Internet Security
      0
    • ESET NOD32/Smart Security/Endpoint Security
    • Kaspersky Anti Virus
    • MalwareBytes Anti Malware PRO
    • McAfee Anti Virus
      0
    • Panda Anti Virus/Internet Security
      0
    • Sophos Endpoint
    • Symantec/PC Tools/Norton
    • Trend Micro Anti Virus/Internet Security
      0
    • Vipre Anti Virus
    • Webroot
    • Other (please specify below)


Question

It's a new year, and a new poll for Definitive Best Antivirus. The 2013 thread can be found here.

This is a poll for best Paid antivirus, there is a separate thread for free antiviruses here.

 

If your choice of Paid Antivirus is not listed, please choose Other and specify in the comments.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1194851-definitive-best-paid-antivirus-2014/
Share on other sites

25 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

This should be renamed to Definitive Most Popular *Paid* Antivirus 2014. No user actually tests all the options in the poll. It's mostly a case of "this works for me so it's the best".

 

This goes for other "Definitive" topics as well.

  • Like 3
  • 0

NOD32 by a long shot. I've tried most last year and found that NOD32 gives you very good protection at a minimal system impact.

 

In addition to that it's just nice to use. You get a ton of configuration options and when it detects something it's discrete about it and it still lets you take the action you want. I especially love the PUP-detection, takes out some toolbars and adware in installers that other antivirus software never picked up for me.

  • Like 3
  • 0

This should be renamed to Definitive Most Popular *Paid* Antivirus 2014. No user actually tests all the options in the poll. It's mostly a case of "this works for me so it's the best".

 

This goes for other "Definitive" topics as well.

Agreed. While I've used paid versions of Avast, Kaspersky, BitDefender, Panda, and ESET, that is over many years and I would never be able to compare current versions to one another.

  • 0

Since Microsoft announced not to simply use MSE any longer I have been using Avast and it always worked out well for me in the past. I have a copy of the Eset Endpoint security I just have not installed it as it is just too large of a package.

  • 0

I bought a computer and it came with 2 years of Norton. It's really not bad. Better then years ago.

On my old PC I used KAV which seemed like it slowed down everything. I ran ESET. it was fantastic. Whenever my norton expires I'll go with ESET. Fantastic software.

  • 0

I have a copy of the Eset Endpoint security I just have not installed it as it is just too large of a package.

You can install and use a copy of just the Antivirus package using the full license (but not the other way around).

 

 

And this is my recommendation. (Y)

  • 0

Didn't think I needed one since I use OSX.

Don't be fooled by old marketing hype. OSX does not have perfect security and is susceptible to viruses. The problem with OSX is that because so many people have been fooled by this security "golden egg" that when virus outbreaks happen, they happen big. Do yourself and everyone else a favor and run something like ESET Cyber Security Pro or Kaspersky. They will offer you a very high level of protection with minimal impact on system performance. I have been doing computer repairs (specializing in virus removal) for over 10 years on PC and Mac and always cringed at the thought of one of my customers being without antivirus or even worse, having the false sense of security that the free products give.

  • 0

Glad someone else besides me looks at independent lab tests of AV products. Make sure you aren't making a decision off of just one test though. Often a product will look great in one round of testing but when you dig further, there is no consistancy. What might have protected you well at the moment the test was performed could leave you hanging high and dry when you need it most.

  • Like 2
  • 0

I would use NOD if I had to, but dont. Atm, I'm using the default program on both Win7 and 8.1. Used to use MSE in Win7 but it doubled the boot time, so bye bye to that. Avast, Mcafee, AVG, Symantec/Norton, Bitdender, Kaspersky. Doesnt matter what version you get they're known to crash. Most of the PC's I fixed (that were crashing), had one of these programs on it

 

I wouldn't call Malwarebytes an AV program

  • 0

Don't be fooled by old marketing hype. OSX does not have perfect security and is susceptible to viruses. The problem with OSX is that because so many people have been fooled by this security "golden egg" that when virus outbreaks happen, they happen big. Do yourself and everyone else a favor and run something like ESET Cyber Security Pro or Kaspersky. They will offer you a very high level of protection with minimal impact on system performance. I have been doing computer repairs (specializing in virus removal) for over 10 years on PC and Mac and always cringed at the thought of one of my customers being without antivirus or even worse, having the false sense of security that the free products give.

 

Thanks, luckily I'm pretty safe about what I download or visit.

  • 0

Thanks, luckily I'm pretty safe about what I download or visit.

Anymore, it has little to do with how "safe" your online activities are. Just because you don't go to warez or pron sites doesn't mean you aren't open to exposure. Many of the virus infections occurring today are due to OS/browser vulnerabilities being exploited through malformed media files such as jpg, mpg, mov, mp3, etc. Heck, Apple systems have for years given Quicktime either system level or admin access and I have seen easily reproduced exploits involving tricking Quicktime into believing that an Apple Script file is a video, just to name a specific example. Think of the internet as a crowded room of people where most of them are carrying a disease. Stepping into that room without taking preventative measures is asking to get sick. It might not happen right away, and some people have been reported (although very doubtfully) to go for years without AV and 0 infections, eventually it will catch up to you. I have people come into my store on a daily basis with what they believe to be a minor issue where some websites won't open properly and they insist that they don't have a virus but when we check the computer, what do you know, they have quite a few. Many infections show little or no sign, running in the background without your knowledge, harvesting information, perpetrating DDOS attacks, sending spam, etc. These sorts of viruses are designed to be stealthy as to not raise any red flags to an unsuspecting user. While others are so blatant that only complete morons would fall for their tricks such as the ones claiming to be the FBI investigating child porn and if the user doesn't pay a few hundred dollars using a prepaid card (to make it harder to track) that they will be arrested. Its just foolhardy to run any computer without a decent AV program anymore.

  • 0

This poll definitely has value. As Luc2k pointed out https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1194851-definitive-best-paid-antivirus-2014/#entry596201271,

it probably should be reanamed "Most Popular (Paid) (Free) Antivirus." It also isn't really "definitive." That doesn't mean it's worthless.

  • 0

I would use NOD if I had to, but dont. Atm, I'm using the default program on both Win7 and 8.1. Used to use MSE in Win7 but it doubled the boot time, so bye bye to that. Avast, Mcafee, AVG, Symantec/Norton, Bitdender, Kaspersky. Doesnt matter what version you get they're known to crash. Most of the PC's I fixed (that were crashing), had one of these programs on it

 

I wouldn't call Malwarebytes an AV program

And in the event viewer displayed it was always (100%of the time) the AV that caused the crash? The 5 crashes I've had in the last year, according to windows event viewer was caused by Battlefield 4 not the AV.

 

I have used them all (free) and landed on Bitdefender for the paid one. Bitdefender needs major work on their UI. I switched back to Norton Internet Security simply because it's free with Comcast. (I used norton for years and it's always worked well for me.

  • 0

Yup or a file belong to an AV program. You could usually tell if Mcafee was the cause. It usually crashes network related files, and one stop error that usually comes up is 0x000000d1

 

Previously Kaspersky was known to block webcams from working. Dont know if they've fixed this prob yet. I've never used it myself. The only thing I've used from Kaspersky is tdsskiller

 

I didnt say EVERY crash is caused by AV programs. But I do know that MOST of these do cause bsod's

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!