• 0

Definitive Best *Free* Antivirus 2014


Poll: Favorite *Free* Antivirus  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • 360 Total Security
    • Ad-Aware
    • Avast! Free
    • AVG AntiVirus Free
    • Avira Free
    • Baidu Antivirus
    • BitDefender (Free Edition)
    • ClamWin/ClamAV
      0
    • Comodo Anti Virus/Internet Security
    • Emsisoft Anti-Malware (free edition)
    • Panda Cloud Antivirus
    • Microsoft Security Essentials
    • Other (please specify below)
      0


Question

It's a new year, and a new poll for Definitive Free Best Antivirus. The 2013 thread can be found here.

This is a poll for best Free antivirus, there is a separate thread for paid antiviruses here.

If your choice of Best Free Antivirus is not listed, please choose Other and specify in the comments.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1194853-definitive-best-free-antivirus-2014/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Worthless without EMET 4.0 it now gets the lowest rate for finding viri on the avtest.org site

ROFl you know you can turn off those annoying msgs right I chose avast free last year when MSE started to really go down hill ( I used to use and recommend MSE to everyone) but seems the Avira free is now one of the best free AV solutions you can get according to www.avtest.org so may give that another go when my Avast license is up

I went back to zonealarm :)
  • 0

I still use MSE. It may not have the best detection rates but I've never had an issue. I tried some other anti-viruses but found the UI's either too gimmicky and childish or very buggy. MSE has a clean interface, very simple and it has worked well for me. The biggest mode of protection will always be yourself so bare that in mind. Also, installing click to enable flash plugins will help immensely with protecting yourself. 

  • 0

I think 360 Total Security should be added to that list. I think that AV would wipe the floor with MSE

definitely gonna give it a try myself when i get home tonight after hearing you talk about it in a few threads today. looks like the free antivirus plain has a new contender :)

  • 0

definitely gonna give it a try myself when i get home tonight after hearing you talk about it in a few threads today. looks like the free antivirus plain has a new contender :)

 

Report back!

 

I've been running it on my couch computer for months. Now i'm putting it on all my other computers and will run them with it for 6 months too, before I start recommending this to my clients on a large scale.

  • 0

I would say MSE for a free anti virus since it's easy to install and use for people who ask me for a antivirus.

 

Personally I like eset, but it's not free. But the recovery disk is now available for free.

 

Edit: didn't knew 360 was also available on the desktop, sounds interesting.

  • 0

I would say MSE for a free anti virus since it's easy to install and use for people who ask me for a antivirus.

 

Personally I like eset, but it's not free. But the recovery disk is now available for free.

 

Edit: didn't knew 360 was also available on the desktop, sounds interesting.

 

Oh it's very interesting.

  • 0

Oh it's very interesting.

 

Just this morning i finally got to go ahead with the usual test. took a fresh laptop with windows 8, and for about 1 hour went around and loaded it up with as much crap and infections i could find. installed 360, removed some, but malwarebytes still had to go behind and clean up after it. 360 was better then the usual crop of AVAST, EST, AVG, NORTON, and the like. With all the PC's you have, you should try it. Take a spare PC, infect the hell out it, image it, then do your tests. After each test rewind back to infected state, rince and repeat with each major AV. See if you come up with the same results.

  • 0

Just this morning i finally got to go ahead with the usual test. took a fresh laptop with windows 8, and for about 1 hour went around and loaded it up with as much crap and infections i could find. installed 360, removed some, but malwarebytes still had to go behind and clean up after it. 360 was better then the usual crop of AVAST, EST, AVG, NORTON, and the like. With all the PC's you have, you should try it. Take a spare PC, infect the hell out it, image it, then do your tests. After each test rewind back to infected state, rince and repeat with each major AV. See if you come up with the same results.

 

When you said crap and infections ... did it have the biggest problem removing pups?

  • 0

yes

 

in all honesty I really don't knock an AV for that. I mean it would be great for them to block the installation of the pups, but once they are installed all the AV tends to do is break the ###### out of them so you can't do a proper uninstall. I've had to turn avast off before, when uninstalling the pups, because it would try to remove part of the uninstall which in turn left the program on the PC but broke the uninstaller.

 

The only thing I care about an AV being able to remove are things that don't have uninstallers.

 

How did 360 do cleaning up actual trojans / malware (which I don't consider pups)

  • 0

in all honesty I really don't knock an AV for that. I mean it would be great for them to block the installation of the pups, but once they are installed all the AV tends to do is break the ###### out of the pups so you can't do a proper uninstall. I've had to turn avast off before, when uninstalling the pups, because it would try to remove part of the install which allowed it to be uninstalled.

 

The only thing I care about an AV being able to remove are things that don't have uninstallers.

 

 

I will be putting 360 on the machines I sell, service with the free MB scanner. I like the other features things 360 has also, I wonder how they do it for free... I don't see anything they "sell"... a company can't live on love alone for very long, i wonder what their plans are.

  • 0

in all honesty I really don't knock an AV for that. I mean it would be great for them to block the installation of the pups, but once they are installed all the AV tends to do is break the ###### out of them so you can't do a proper uninstall. I've had to turn avast off before, when uninstalling the pups, because it would try to remove part of the uninstall which in turn left the program on the PC but broke the uninstaller.

 

The only thing I care about an AV being able to remove are things that don't have uninstallers.

 

How did 360 do cleaning up actual trojans / malware (which I don't consider pups)

erased with ease... no returns

  • 0

Tried 360 Total Security a few days ago and while I might put on someone's PC and just leaves it in the background, I would hesitate in other situations. First problem was the "do everything" button on the home tab which removed various stuff (e.g. Ad Muncher) from start-up, stuff I want there. When I couldn't restore everything back to what it was, it became a problem since I like to have control. The second problem is that it interferes with some software like Process Explorer which replaces Task Manager. As long as 360 is running it can't replace Task Manager and selecting the option in Process Explorer gives an error.

 

As for infections, it didn't find anything unexpected. It detects some legitimate python files that Flash Player installs which I suspect is due to BitDefender's engine.

  • 0

Ya, so that's what I would base the score off of.

 

i prefer one that does it all in one swoop. But will still have it on my machine for 2nd opinion and the other features. BUT if someone is looking for a 100% FREE solution, its perfect, free 360 + free MB = perfect combo now

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!