• 0

Definitive Best *Free* Antivirus 2014


Poll: Favorite *Free* Antivirus  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Choice?

    • 360 Total Security
    • Ad-Aware
    • Avast! Free
    • AVG AntiVirus Free
    • Avira Free
    • Baidu Antivirus
    • BitDefender (Free Edition)
    • ClamWin/ClamAV
      0
    • Comodo Anti Virus/Internet Security
    • Emsisoft Anti-Malware (free edition)
    • Panda Cloud Antivirus
    • Microsoft Security Essentials
    • Other (please specify below)
      0


Question

It's a new year, and a new poll for Definitive Free Best Antivirus. The 2013 thread can be found here.

This is a poll for best Free antivirus, there is a separate thread for paid antiviruses here.

If your choice of Best Free Antivirus is not listed, please choose Other and specify in the comments.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1194853-definitive-best-free-antivirus-2014/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

For cleaning up after the fact yes.

 

uhmmm, what?... if "after the fact" then it would be only malwarebytes... why would you use 2 solutions when 1 solution did the job perfectly? (not suggesting you only rely on one opinion, only commenting on the claim of "after the fact")

  • 0

uhmmm, what?... if "after the fact" then it would be only malwarebytes... why would you use 2 solutions when 1 solution did the job perfectly? (not suggesting you only rely on one opinion, only commenting on the claim of "after the fact")

 

You said 100% free solution. Malwarebytes isn't free for active protection.

  • 0

You said 100% free solution. Malwarebytes isn't free for active protection.

 

oh yes, i know, but if its "after the fact" you can just use their free scanner which picks up what 360 finds AND what it doesn't find... but more opinions are always better for sure. 

  • 0

the way i see it... Microsoft Security Essentials is good enough for me as it's simple and quiet and my chances of infection should be at a bare minimum in general because i am careful on what i install on the PC. so i figure if something does slip by hopefully MSE will catch it as i imagine it's protection is good enough even if other alternatives are a bit better but it seems like the ones that are better might have issues with false positives.

  • 0

the way i see it... Microsoft Security Essentials is good enough for me as it's simple and quiet and my chances of infection should be at a bare minimum in general because i am careful on what i install on the PC.

 

Lets not forget about website exploits and Zero day's people :)

  • 0
Please add:

Qihoo 360 Internet Security

Baidu Antivirus (Baidu Cloud Security Engine + Avira Antivirus)

Currently using 360 Internet Security and liking it pretty much except for the fact it takes WAY to long to actually be able to use the computer when first starting it up! Dang thing takes forever to do that intitial update.

  • 0

Lets not forget about website exploits and Zero day's people :)

 

true, but i figure if i stick to mostly known sites that should keep risk at a minimum.

 

plus, i got NoScript in use which i imagine helps a bit there since a lot of the side stuff on plenty of websites don't load when that's running as i only allow what i need to allow for a site to function well enough.

  • 0

true, but i figure if i stick to mostly known sites that should keep risk at a minimum.

 

plus, i got NoScript in use which i imagine helps a bit there since a lot of the side stuff on plenty of websites don't load when that's running as i only allow what i need to allow for a site to function well enough.

 

That's were most of the exploits come from. Hacked "Known" sites. Even TWIT.TV was serving out malware at one point.

  • 0

Hello,

 

One thing to keep in mind is that in many anti-malware programs, detection of potentially unwanted and potentially unsafe applications is optional.  It needs to be explicitly turned on if you want that functionality.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

  • 0

Yes I was kind of surprised. I tried Avast and it was OK but gave me some problems with system speed. I am now using Panda Cloud and I like it so that is my vote for Panda Cloud.

It does not use too much memory although I recall Webroot (Paid) used very little memory. I have a customer on Comodo and just left it. Never really gave her a problem but I used CIS in the past and 3 times it would self destruct you can say which was annoying.

  • 0

I put Ad-Aware on a Windows 8.1 machine and the protection stopped working. Weird..

  • 0

Comodo has the most votes BY FAR, but nobody is explaining why.  Tell me why I should switch to using it.

I counted 9 posts stating the person used MSE but only 4 votes? 75 votes for comodo but no comments.

  • 0
xrobwx, on 19 Aug 2014 - 16:26, said:

I counted 9 posts stating the person used MSE but only 4 votes? 75 votes for comodo but no comments.

 

Well I gave it a try and have spent the last 3 hours fixing my computer.  It kept blocking my touchpad and keyboard and I couldn't do anything.  Had to do a system restore even! 

 

I'm going to try Avast! instead. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Your favorite clickbait gets a clickbait feature? Shame on you!
    • Try asking people. They are using it, even the non tech ones.
    • Report: iPhone Air isn't dead, and a second-generation model is planned for 2027 by Hamid Ganji Image via Apple Since the launch of the iPhone Air, we’ve heard conflicting rumors and speculation about the fate of Apple's ultra-thin iPhone. As it turns out, Apple is not going to ditch the Air model from its lineup, and a second generation is already planned for next year. As reported by Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, citing people familiar with the matter, the second-generation iPhone Air is planned for spring 2027 and is poised to receive notable upgrades. The upgraded model, codenamed V62, will reportedly feature an additional rear camera for ultrawide photography. The new camera system is said to be in advanced testing within Apple. Gurman also says the second-generation iPhone Air could offer better battery life, either through a larger battery or software improvements. The overall design of the device is expected to remain unchanged. A single rear camera and below-average battery life were among the biggest drawbacks of the first-generation iPhone Air despite its $999 price tag. Hopefully, the next iPhone Air will fare better. Gurman also added that the device will be powered by the A20 Pro processor. The release of the second-generation iPhone Air in spring 2027 aligns with previous reports that Apple is shaking up the iPhone release cycle. Accordingly, the iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max, and the company’s first foldable iPhone are expected to launch in September 2026, followed by the iPhone 18 and the new iPhone Air roughly six months later. The 20th-anniversary iPhone is also reportedly planned for fall 2027. Meanwhile, if you’re planning to buy the refreshed iPhone Air, Apple might surprise you with a new price tag. As we reported today, CEO Tim Cook confirmed that price increases are on the way due to rising memory chip costs and a severe shortage. With that in mind, analysts estimate that the base iPhone 18 Pro could cost as much as $1,399 this year. The current $999 iPhone Air may not be immune to those price hikes.
    • I thought you could sign up using alt email?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      546
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      64
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!