Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

 

I have been working on a port of PuTTY to the Windows Store for quite some time and I finally have it to the point where I can release it. Many of the options of PuTTY are supported and I hope to add many more features in the next few weeks. I'd appreciate any feedback and feature requests so I know what features to prioritize. There is a trial version so you do not have to buy it.

 

Thanks!

Matt

 

http://apps.microsoft.com/windows/en-us/app/metro-putty/29c3210d-11c2-4348-83d3-79d2f414cc98

 

Supported features include:

- Save session settings that sync with MS account

- Copy and Paste

- UTF-8

- Private key authentication with PuTTY keys

 

Screenshots attached.

post-373322-0-21331400-1388811912.png

post-373322-0-03443700-1388811913.png

  • Like 4

You need to add the following license information somewhere, otherwise you are in violation of the license even though you state that it's a port and link to the documentation: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/licence.html

You need to add the following license information somewhere, otherwise you are in violation of the license even though you state that it's a port and link to the documentation: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/licence.html

 

I have it in the about page inside the app. In the first screenshot you can see the about button at the bottom of the page. Clicking that will show the copyright information and show another button labeled license. Clicking the license button will then show that license. This is mimicking PuTTY's behavior exactly. Do you think I should also put it in the app description somewhere?

post-373322-0-21916100-1388875994.png

I have it in the about page inside the app. In the first screenshot you can see the about button at the bottom of the page. Clicking that will show the copyright information and show another button labeled license. Clicking the license button will then show that license. This is mimicking PuTTY's behavior exactly. Do you think I should also put it in the app description somewhere?

 

I somehow missed that when I was looking. Just add the information on your additional terms page.

Well, I just tried it to simply SSH into my server at work, and it was pretty fantastic. I'm testing this on my Surface next, but I'll probably buy it today or next week sometime.

 

Awesome! I am trying to get an update out by the end of today or tomorrow to fix a private key issue and then some font size/type customizing. If you have any feature requests please let me know!

I somehow missed that when I was looking. Just add the information on your additional terms page.

 

Ok, that's fair. The next update (which is as soon as I fix a crashing bug) will include that. Thanks for making sure I'm following all the licenses!

Ok, that's fair. The next update (which is as soon as I fix a crashing bug) will include that. Thanks for making sure I'm following all the licenses!

 

you should be glad it's a BSD/MIT license since that isn't copy-left and makes it easy to incorporate into apps (and make derivative products) and make monies ;-)

you should be glad it's a BSD/MIT license since that isn't copy-left and makes it easy to incorporate into apps (and make derivative products) and make monies ;-)

 

:) Yes. When I was first joking with my friend about porting it to the Windows Store I wasn't expecting such a lenient license. That's when it stopped being a joke and I began to dig through the code to see if I could seriously port it.

Hello,

you should be glad it's a BSD/MIT license since that isn't copy-left and makes it easy to incorporate into apps (and make derivative products) and make monies ;-)

Personally, I find it disgusting that the license allows you to copy the code, close source it, then sell it if you wish (like OP). Easy money.

Hello,

Personally, I find it disgusting that the license allows you to copy the code, close source it, then sell it if you wish (like OP). Easy money.

 

To each his own, the author didn't want a copy-left license for whatever reason, the same as the *BSDs. I've released code under similar licenses in the past.

 

The OP put more effort into it than simply copying the code anyway. There's a ton of software that incorporates PUTTY code similar to the OPs code. 

 

LLVM has the the same license. Without a permissive license like that, LLVM would not be the research platform it is today. People generally dislike the restrictions that come with GPL code for research for the very reason that distribution requires distributing ones code. Moreover, in many cases it can be incompatible with the terms of research grants.

 

In my opinion, building upon an existing code base is perfectly acceptable if you are offering something that wasn't available before. It's one thing to just compile the code and then pretend you did something, and quite another to use it to make a product that wasn't available before.

Hello,

Personally, I find it disgusting that the license allows you to copy the code, close source it, then sell it if you wish (like OP). Easy money.

While I can understand that, I wouldn't be so quick to judge. Sometimes, it's nice to be able to use components in this manner.

 

For example, I worked on a project last month where we needed to be able to use an Android tablet in a non-standard way. I had code from Google, that did exactly what I wanted it to do, but because of the GPL license, couldn't use it as even a component of a much larger project for my company.

 

Why did Google choose to give it a GPL license? Because their project used a component that had a GPL component in it.

  • 1 month later...

Hello,

Personally, I find it disgusting that the license allows you to copy the code, close source it, then sell it if you wish (like OP). Easy money.

 

Like all the open source components of VMWare ESXi, Mac OS X, Google Chrome etc?

Hey guys,

 

I have been working on a port of PuTTY to the Windows Store for quite some time and I finally have it to the point where I can release it. Many of the options of PuTTY are supported and I hope to add many more features in the next few weeks. I'd appreciate any feedback and feature requests so I know what features to prioritize. There is a trial version so you do not have to buy it.

 

Thanks!

Matt

 

http://apps.microsoft.com/windows/en-us/app/metro-putty/29c3210d-11c2-4348-83d3-79d2f414cc98

 

Supported features include:

- Save session settings that sync with MS account

- Copy and Paste

- UTF-8

- Private key authentication with PuTTY keys

 

Screenshots attached.

 

How does it deal with application suspension and maintaining connectivity? Am I going to have to log in every time I want to switch to the app?

 

How does it deal with application suspension and maintaining connectivity? Am I going to have to log in every time I want to switch to the app?

 

It currently does not do anything. However, Windows does not close your socket right away, so the connection will stay open for some time while it is minimized (or even suspended). I think the best route is to do some kind of background task to keep the connection alive but I haven't had much time to look into this. Once I finish the current release (it's in testing now so shouldn't be long) this is one of the next major issues I want to tackle.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!