Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

 

I have been working on a port of PuTTY to the Windows Store for quite some time and I finally have it to the point where I can release it. Many of the options of PuTTY are supported and I hope to add many more features in the next few weeks. I'd appreciate any feedback and feature requests so I know what features to prioritize. There is a trial version so you do not have to buy it.

 

Thanks!

Matt

 

http://apps.microsoft.com/windows/en-us/app/metro-putty/29c3210d-11c2-4348-83d3-79d2f414cc98

 

Supported features include:

- Save session settings that sync with MS account

- Copy and Paste

- UTF-8

- Private key authentication with PuTTY keys

 

Screenshots attached.

post-373322-0-21331400-1388811912.png

post-373322-0-03443700-1388811913.png

  • Like 4

You need to add the following license information somewhere, otherwise you are in violation of the license even though you state that it's a port and link to the documentation: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/licence.html

You need to add the following license information somewhere, otherwise you are in violation of the license even though you state that it's a port and link to the documentation: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/licence.html

 

I have it in the about page inside the app. In the first screenshot you can see the about button at the bottom of the page. Clicking that will show the copyright information and show another button labeled license. Clicking the license button will then show that license. This is mimicking PuTTY's behavior exactly. Do you think I should also put it in the app description somewhere?

post-373322-0-21916100-1388875994.png

I have it in the about page inside the app. In the first screenshot you can see the about button at the bottom of the page. Clicking that will show the copyright information and show another button labeled license. Clicking the license button will then show that license. This is mimicking PuTTY's behavior exactly. Do you think I should also put it in the app description somewhere?

 

I somehow missed that when I was looking. Just add the information on your additional terms page.

Well, I just tried it to simply SSH into my server at work, and it was pretty fantastic. I'm testing this on my Surface next, but I'll probably buy it today or next week sometime.

 

Awesome! I am trying to get an update out by the end of today or tomorrow to fix a private key issue and then some font size/type customizing. If you have any feature requests please let me know!

I somehow missed that when I was looking. Just add the information on your additional terms page.

 

Ok, that's fair. The next update (which is as soon as I fix a crashing bug) will include that. Thanks for making sure I'm following all the licenses!

Ok, that's fair. The next update (which is as soon as I fix a crashing bug) will include that. Thanks for making sure I'm following all the licenses!

 

you should be glad it's a BSD/MIT license since that isn't copy-left and makes it easy to incorporate into apps (and make derivative products) and make monies ;-)

you should be glad it's a BSD/MIT license since that isn't copy-left and makes it easy to incorporate into apps (and make derivative products) and make monies ;-)

 

:) Yes. When I was first joking with my friend about porting it to the Windows Store I wasn't expecting such a lenient license. That's when it stopped being a joke and I began to dig through the code to see if I could seriously port it.

Hello,

you should be glad it's a BSD/MIT license since that isn't copy-left and makes it easy to incorporate into apps (and make derivative products) and make monies ;-)

Personally, I find it disgusting that the license allows you to copy the code, close source it, then sell it if you wish (like OP). Easy money.

Hello,

Personally, I find it disgusting that the license allows you to copy the code, close source it, then sell it if you wish (like OP). Easy money.

 

To each his own, the author didn't want a copy-left license for whatever reason, the same as the *BSDs. I've released code under similar licenses in the past.

 

The OP put more effort into it than simply copying the code anyway. There's a ton of software that incorporates PUTTY code similar to the OPs code. 

 

LLVM has the the same license. Without a permissive license like that, LLVM would not be the research platform it is today. People generally dislike the restrictions that come with GPL code for research for the very reason that distribution requires distributing ones code. Moreover, in many cases it can be incompatible with the terms of research grants.

 

In my opinion, building upon an existing code base is perfectly acceptable if you are offering something that wasn't available before. It's one thing to just compile the code and then pretend you did something, and quite another to use it to make a product that wasn't available before.

Hello,

Personally, I find it disgusting that the license allows you to copy the code, close source it, then sell it if you wish (like OP). Easy money.

While I can understand that, I wouldn't be so quick to judge. Sometimes, it's nice to be able to use components in this manner.

 

For example, I worked on a project last month where we needed to be able to use an Android tablet in a non-standard way. I had code from Google, that did exactly what I wanted it to do, but because of the GPL license, couldn't use it as even a component of a much larger project for my company.

 

Why did Google choose to give it a GPL license? Because their project used a component that had a GPL component in it.

  • 1 month later...

Hello,

Personally, I find it disgusting that the license allows you to copy the code, close source it, then sell it if you wish (like OP). Easy money.

 

Like all the open source components of VMWare ESXi, Mac OS X, Google Chrome etc?

Hey guys,

 

I have been working on a port of PuTTY to the Windows Store for quite some time and I finally have it to the point where I can release it. Many of the options of PuTTY are supported and I hope to add many more features in the next few weeks. I'd appreciate any feedback and feature requests so I know what features to prioritize. There is a trial version so you do not have to buy it.

 

Thanks!

Matt

 

http://apps.microsoft.com/windows/en-us/app/metro-putty/29c3210d-11c2-4348-83d3-79d2f414cc98

 

Supported features include:

- Save session settings that sync with MS account

- Copy and Paste

- UTF-8

- Private key authentication with PuTTY keys

 

Screenshots attached.

 

How does it deal with application suspension and maintaining connectivity? Am I going to have to log in every time I want to switch to the app?

 

How does it deal with application suspension and maintaining connectivity? Am I going to have to log in every time I want to switch to the app?

 

It currently does not do anything. However, Windows does not close your socket right away, so the connection will stay open for some time while it is minimized (or even suspended). I think the best route is to do some kind of background task to keep the connection alive but I haven't had much time to look into this. Once I finish the current release (it's in testing now so shouldn't be long) this is one of the next major issues I want to tackle.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!