Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

 

I have been working on a port of PuTTY to the Windows Store for quite some time and I finally have it to the point where I can release it. Many of the options of PuTTY are supported and I hope to add many more features in the next few weeks. I'd appreciate any feedback and feature requests so I know what features to prioritize. There is a trial version so you do not have to buy it.

 

Thanks!

Matt

 

http://apps.microsoft.com/windows/en-us/app/metro-putty/29c3210d-11c2-4348-83d3-79d2f414cc98

 

Supported features include:

- Save session settings that sync with MS account

- Copy and Paste

- UTF-8

- Private key authentication with PuTTY keys

 

Screenshots attached.

post-373322-0-21331400-1388811912.png

post-373322-0-03443700-1388811913.png

You need to add the following license information somewhere, otherwise you are in violation of the license even though you state that it's a port and link to the documentation: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/licence.html

You need to add the following license information somewhere, otherwise you are in violation of the license even though you state that it's a port and link to the documentation: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/licence.html

 

I have it in the about page inside the app. In the first screenshot you can see the about button at the bottom of the page. Clicking that will show the copyright information and show another button labeled license. Clicking the license button will then show that license. This is mimicking PuTTY's behavior exactly. Do you think I should also put it in the app description somewhere?

post-373322-0-21916100-1388875994.png

I have it in the about page inside the app. In the first screenshot you can see the about button at the bottom of the page. Clicking that will show the copyright information and show another button labeled license. Clicking the license button will then show that license. This is mimicking PuTTY's behavior exactly. Do you think I should also put it in the app description somewhere?

 

I somehow missed that when I was looking. Just add the information on your additional terms page.

Well, I just tried it to simply SSH into my server at work, and it was pretty fantastic. I'm testing this on my Surface next, but I'll probably buy it today or next week sometime.

 

Awesome! I am trying to get an update out by the end of today or tomorrow to fix a private key issue and then some font size/type customizing. If you have any feature requests please let me know!

I somehow missed that when I was looking. Just add the information on your additional terms page.

 

Ok, that's fair. The next update (which is as soon as I fix a crashing bug) will include that. Thanks for making sure I'm following all the licenses!

Ok, that's fair. The next update (which is as soon as I fix a crashing bug) will include that. Thanks for making sure I'm following all the licenses!

 

you should be glad it's a BSD/MIT license since that isn't copy-left and makes it easy to incorporate into apps (and make derivative products) and make monies ;-)

you should be glad it's a BSD/MIT license since that isn't copy-left and makes it easy to incorporate into apps (and make derivative products) and make monies ;-)

 

:) Yes. When I was first joking with my friend about porting it to the Windows Store I wasn't expecting such a lenient license. That's when it stopped being a joke and I began to dig through the code to see if I could seriously port it.

Hello,

you should be glad it's a BSD/MIT license since that isn't copy-left and makes it easy to incorporate into apps (and make derivative products) and make monies ;-)

Personally, I find it disgusting that the license allows you to copy the code, close source it, then sell it if you wish (like OP). Easy money.

Hello,

Personally, I find it disgusting that the license allows you to copy the code, close source it, then sell it if you wish (like OP). Easy money.

 

To each his own, the author didn't want a copy-left license for whatever reason, the same as the *BSDs. I've released code under similar licenses in the past.

 

The OP put more effort into it than simply copying the code anyway. There's a ton of software that incorporates PUTTY code similar to the OPs code. 

 

LLVM has the the same license. Without a permissive license like that, LLVM would not be the research platform it is today. People generally dislike the restrictions that come with GPL code for research for the very reason that distribution requires distributing ones code. Moreover, in many cases it can be incompatible with the terms of research grants.

 

In my opinion, building upon an existing code base is perfectly acceptable if you are offering something that wasn't available before. It's one thing to just compile the code and then pretend you did something, and quite another to use it to make a product that wasn't available before.

Hello,

Personally, I find it disgusting that the license allows you to copy the code, close source it, then sell it if you wish (like OP). Easy money.

While I can understand that, I wouldn't be so quick to judge. Sometimes, it's nice to be able to use components in this manner.

 

For example, I worked on a project last month where we needed to be able to use an Android tablet in a non-standard way. I had code from Google, that did exactly what I wanted it to do, but because of the GPL license, couldn't use it as even a component of a much larger project for my company.

 

Why did Google choose to give it a GPL license? Because their project used a component that had a GPL component in it.

  • 1 month later...

Hello,

Personally, I find it disgusting that the license allows you to copy the code, close source it, then sell it if you wish (like OP). Easy money.

 

Like all the open source components of VMWare ESXi, Mac OS X, Google Chrome etc?

Hey guys,

 

I have been working on a port of PuTTY to the Windows Store for quite some time and I finally have it to the point where I can release it. Many of the options of PuTTY are supported and I hope to add many more features in the next few weeks. I'd appreciate any feedback and feature requests so I know what features to prioritize. There is a trial version so you do not have to buy it.

 

Thanks!

Matt

 

http://apps.microsoft.com/windows/en-us/app/metro-putty/29c3210d-11c2-4348-83d3-79d2f414cc98

 

Supported features include:

- Save session settings that sync with MS account

- Copy and Paste

- UTF-8

- Private key authentication with PuTTY keys

 

Screenshots attached.

 

How does it deal with application suspension and maintaining connectivity? Am I going to have to log in every time I want to switch to the app?

 

How does it deal with application suspension and maintaining connectivity? Am I going to have to log in every time I want to switch to the app?

 

It currently does not do anything. However, Windows does not close your socket right away, so the connection will stay open for some time while it is minimized (or even suspended). I think the best route is to do some kind of background task to keep the connection alive but I haven't had much time to look into this. Once I finish the current release (it's in testing now so shouldn't be long) this is one of the next major issues I want to tackle.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • If I could, I would commemorate it the best way possible: Replacing old machines that are still running Windows XP with something more modern, stable and better.     Noone and nothing should be running Windows XP in 2026.
    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
    • 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "to fund healthcare and tuition" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who do you think you are talking about, some COMMUNIST? We are better than them, doG bless Murica!!! p.s. I'm from a country where government does exactly that, i.e. not form US.
    • Apparently not. I know it is on Edge for business at the moment, but how long will it be before it become on the home version of Edge?
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      494
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      255
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      90
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!