Recommended Posts

Sign ups live here

 

5 MBPS+ recommended

 

 
Sony recommends a 5MBPS+ connection to use PlayStation Now, information sign-ups live

Sony?s PlayStation Now will require a minimum 5Mb per second connection, according to a response posted on the PS Blog.

 

ps-now-logo1.jpg

 

Answering a question posed by a PS Blog user, the community management team?s Matthew Harper said: ?In our internal tests, users with this bandwidth or greater have been enjoying a low latency, high-quality gaming experience.?

 

?PS Now tests your connection of each game and optimizes for quality if you are above the minimum requirements,? Harper continued. ?We strive to make the gameplay experience feel as if the game is being played locally on their device ? fast and responsive (including for FPS and games with twitch mechanics).

 

?The Closed Beta will definitely provide a great opportunity to test the experience with gamers with varying connection speeds and our developers will, of course, be working diligently to optimize the service based upon the feedback we receive from the community.?

 

PS Now will not only allow users to purchase titles through the service, but rent them as well. Should a user decide to purchase the full version later, they can do so easily as all files are stores to the cloud. This means all saved game progress will be available as well.

 

Those interested in more information on PS Now can sign up through here.

 

Meanwhile, the PS Blog has also posted a hands-on with the service and how it handled playing The Last of Us.

 

http://www.vg247.com/2014/01/08/sony-recommends-a-5mbps-connection-to-use-playstation-now-information-sign-ups-live/

Well if a 5mbps connection means a smooth experience, not bad. Now we just need to see if their internal testing matches the real world. Also they mention that image quality will scale with the connection speed, so I wonder if that means you need a connection much faster than 5 in order to get say ps3 games in native quality.

I'm signed up for more info!

Its strange they say you can 'purchase' games vs renting them. Surely that means purchase a subscription to access the games.

...

A question for the more technically advanced crowd.  Would this be overkill for Sony (using USA as an example): 3 Data Centers in the West Coast, 3 Data Centers in the Mid West, and 3 Data Centers in the East Coast.

This should give users an decent rout to the closest server available, and a decent ping.  This would also be very expensive for Sony as well

That's nowhere near enough, and remember that this doesn't function like a multiplayer game (Where it can do lag compensation), not only do you need a really low ping (Like closer to <20ms), you also need the server side to be able to output frames extremely quickly at a good quality (OnLive was using very powerful hardware encoders and claimed to have something like 4ms of encoding latency)

As an example, assume you have a latency of 20ms (So a RTT of 40ms, fairly normal) and a frame rendering latency of 4ms (So 24ms in total), during a game the content displayed on your screen will be 24ms behind the server state, and any input you make (For that frame) will take another 20ms to reach the server, meaning your input is received 44ms after the frame was rendered (And assuming a 30fps game, that means that the AI has had another chance to fire before you, etc.). There's 2 factors to reduce that time, the distance between you and the server and the time taken to encode a frame of video, and the only thing they can realistically improve is frame rendering time.

Edit: Look at the existing solutions that work (The Sony Vita thing and Nvidia Shield), they're both local network.

Edit: Look at the existing solutions that work (The Sony Vita thing and Nvidia Shield), they're both local network.

 

 

Sony Vita can do remote play over the internet. (Not just local network)

 

http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/171382-ps4-remote-play-works-like-a-charm-over-lte-but-not-with-slower-connections

 

Extreme Tech reviewer tested it on a mobile phone LTE network and apparently it "offered shockingly playable results after automatically connecting to my PS4 over the internet" according to the reviewer.

That said, the lag introduced by the streaming technology is definitely noticable. If you?re going to play a competitive action game like this, you?ll definitely find yourself at a disadvantage. Single-player experiences like Contrast or Flower will work just fine if your internet connection can handle it, but don?t push your luck with games like Call of Duty or Battlefield.

So games that aren't time sensitive or need quick reflexes don't work well.

so a DS3 is required,even on smartphones and tablets. no touchscreen support

http://www.theverge.com/2014/1/9/5289988/playstation-now-will-require-a-dualshock-controller-for-tvs-tablets

This is a positive, how the heck would you play TLoU or GoW with on screen touch controls? lol

By positive I mean that the controller is going to be compatible with all these options, leaving us with touch controls on mobile devices would of been a joke. On a phone I can imagine the wow factor of hey guys check out God of War on my phone, dead 1 minute later, controlling this sucks, never play again.

Access has done a 10 things you need to know video (link won't post from my phone for some reason, YouTube PSAccess).

This is a positive, how the heck would you play TLoU or GoW with on screen touch controls? lol

By positive I mean that the controller is going to be compatible with all these options, leaving us with touch controls on mobile devices would of been a joke. On a phone I can imagine the wow factor of hey guys check out God of War on my phone, dead 1 minute later, controlling this sucks, never play again.

Is it limited to just a ds3 or can any USB controller be used? I'd prefer to use another controller honestly.

This is a positive, how the heck would you play TLoU or GoW with on screen touch controls? lol

By positive I mean that the controller is going to be compatible with all these options, leaving us with touch controls on mobile devices would of been a joke. On a phone I can imagine the wow factor of hey guys check out God of War on my phone, dead 1 minute later, controlling this sucks, never play again.

Access has done a 10 things you need to know video (link won't post from my phone for some reason, YouTube PSAccess).

 

I agree, touch screen for console games is bunk. im merely posting the info

 

There are other Bluetooth controllers out there though.

I was hoping that Sony would offer access to this service on pcs or win tablets, maybe as a win 8 app, which then could open it up to USB controllers

who says they aren't. sony sells vaio win 8 pcs, I could see them preloading the app with their devices. There is also a rumor they are making win phones, I could see how they would also preload it there as well, to counter the integrated xbox stuff.

There are other Bluetooth controllers out there though.

I was hoping that Sony would offer access to this service on pcs or win tablets, maybe as a win 8 app, which then could open it up to USB controllers

Good points!

The PS3 supports USB compliant controllers as it is.

Something I always wandered is why Sony or Microsoft dont have some kind of digital renting system.  Where I can pay like gamefly 15 a month or something and download any game i want and play it but can only have 1 game downloaded at a time or something and just require online checks every so often while playing downloaded rentals. Or even allow gamefly to do digital rentals like that some how.

 

I realize though this is for ps3 and such and is mainly for backwards compatibility but i would pay for a current digital renting system all day. Since I game so much theres not many older games I really care to play again.  I use to like go back and play some but these days i stay current.

Something I always wandered is why Sony or Microsoft dont have some kind of digital renting system.  Where I can pay like gamefly 15 a month or something and download any game i want and play it but can only have 1 game downloaded at a time or something and just require online checks every so often while playing downloaded rentals. Or even allow gamefly to do digital rentals like that some how.

 

I realize though this is for ps3 and such and is mainly for backwards compatibility but i would pay for a current digital renting system all day. Since I game so much theres not many older games I really care to play again.  I use to like go back and play some but these days i stay current.

 

I'm pretty sure that's the main plan with PlayStation Now an all you can eat subscription service or buy/rent individual titles if you don't want the subscription service.

I'm pretty sure that's the main plan with PlayStation Now an all you can eat subscription service or buy/rent individual titles if you don't want the subscription service.

Yeah except my problem with it is that it is a streaming service like onlive and the quality and latency is going to be a big issue for a lot of people like me that live in a crap internet location. I doubt my 6mb is going to work.  It would be much better imo if they had a rental service where the game was actually downloaded on to your console and played from there.

Yeah except my problem with it is that it is a streaming service like onlive and the quality and latency is going to be a big issue for a lot of people like me that live in a crap internet location. I doubt my 6mb is going to work.  It would be much better imo if they had a rental service where the game was actually downloaded on to your console and played from there.

Sony recommend a 5mb/s connection for a good time on PSNow.

Maybe they'll expand PS+ subscriptions to different types. You can keep the current style sub or you can choose a rental system sub?

 

 

Just a thought.

 

I like that idea. Have different tiers that include more services. Give us the choice.

 

I'm pretty sure that's the main plan with PlayStation Now an all you can eat subscription service or buy/rent individual titles if you don't want the subscription service.

I'm not sure how 'buying' a title that is streamed to you would work, but they did hint at that, so we will see.

 

 

Sony recommend a 5mb/s connection for a good time on PSNow.

They did indeed say that, but then they followed that up with the point that the system will dynamically raise and lower the graphical quality of the game to work better with your connection.

If that is the case, then what does 5mb/s get you. Are they saying that gets you native quality for any ps3 game or is that the bottom level that offers 'acceptable' quality in their estimation and that a higher speed is needed for native quality.

I can't wait to try this out myself.

 

If that is the case, then what does 5mb/s get you. Are they saying that gets you native quality for any ps3 game or is that the bottom level that offers 'acceptable' quality in their estimation and that a higher speed is needed for native quality.

I can't wait to try this out myself.

 

 

There is no native quality, there is compression loss on all of them, relatively much as well, native would eat up 40-50MB, and they wouldn't pay that for their own upstream either, not worth it. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Python programmers in a nutshell. Now, guess what lang most AI programmers use... :-)
    • There was nothing whatsoever wrong with Vista as an OS after the SP1 update. People who claim it wasn't were using ancient machines for some silly reason. Not kidding, no hyperbole/exaggeration. Vista was good.
    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!