Recommended Posts

Starting a game in under a minute is a good sign in my opinion. 

 

But I have to wonder how it works in the background.  Obviously there is not much data traveling to the console in under a minute, so you would think that data size would increase as you actually play the game. 

 

Still, it sounds good so far. 

I think I've asked this before.  But are these games a straight stream (a-la Netflix) or is there a caching station somewhere in there?

 

Us here in the USofA are going through some net neutrality issue's right now :angry:, which won't help out a lot at all.

 

So if someone has a 150GB data cap and goes on a weekend gaming binge, they may not be in good standing with their isp, come 30days later

I think I've asked this before.  But are these games a straight stream (a-la Netflix) or is there a caching station somewhere in there?

 

Us here in the USofA are going through some net neutrality issue's right now :angry:, which won't help out a lot at all.

 

So if someone has a 150GB data cap and goes on a weekend gaming binge, they may not be in good standing with their isp, come 30days later

That's a good question, but I dont think anyone knows the exact details of Sony's service yet. If that info is out there, I'd love to hear it as well.

My first thought was that they are streaming data to you constantly as you play the game, with a small amount of data being cached, but there could be more to it.

The games are streamed to you, there is no download/install (at least in its current form).

 

The streaming doesn't start for 1-2 mins depending on the game, GAF has the numbers in the Playstation Now-ish :laugh: thread.

But there is caching of some sort.

 

Well that goes without saying really. Would be an absolute nightmare for games with heavy backtracking / MP maps. Plus a lot of games reuse textures throughout the SP and MP components. It would be nice to see them add a download option and use the timebomb they do on PS+ to prevent people playing indefinitely.

Well that goes without saying really. Would be an absolute nightmare for games with heavy backtracking / MP maps. Plus a lot of games reuse textures throughout the SP and MP components. It would be nice to see them add a download option and use the timebomb they do on PS+ to prevent people playing indefinitely.

Certain parts could be downloaded, that would be a good idea. It just depends how they're running things at their end though, probably PC dev builds or something? They're not going to have PS3 clusters.

Well that goes without saying really. Would be an absolute nightmare for games with heavy backtracking / MP maps. Plus a lot of games reuse textures throughout the SP and MP components. It would be nice to see them add a download option and use the timebomb they do on PS+ to prevent people playing indefinitely.

I guess that is only feasbile for games that the console can play locally though. Anything else must be rendered and streamed ondemand to the console.

A 2hr hi-def movie streamed from Netflix is about 4.5 - 5GB... Now imagine a high demanding game game being streamed.

Unless I'm crazy, the end user is going to need at least 12dwn/10up so that the game can look as close to a physical copy being played as it can...

I saw the requirements that Sony posted, for being able to play with little to no lag. But it's just not equating in my head.

If I were Sony, I would go with a PS+ (Galaxy Edition)... Charge $100-$150 a year and let people go nuts. Let them download to a physical box.

A 2hr hi-def movie streamed from Netflix is about 4.5 - 5GB... Now imagine a high demanding game game being streamed.

Unless I'm crazy, the end user is going to need at least 12dwn/10up so that the game can look as close to a physical copy being played as it can...

I saw the requirements that Sony posted, for being able to play with little to no lag. But it's just not equating in my head.

If I were Sony, I would go with a PS+ (Galaxy Edition)... Charge $100-$150 a year and let people go nuts. Let them download to a physical box.

Well remember that even Sony admitted that if you only meet the minimum requirements, the graphic fidelilty will vary. It seems clear that you will not get a 1:1 experience when streaming ps3 games if your hitting the minimums. They have not spelled out what it would take to be 1:!, but maybe the beta testing will give them the info they need to make recommendations.

Also, there is no option for Sony allowing you to download to another box like say a ps4 since the box does not have the hardware to play a ps3 (later to include ps1 and ps2) game. The game still has to be processed via a server and the data streamed to you.

Well that goes without saying really. Would be an absolute nightmare for games with heavy backtracking / MP maps. Plus a lot of games reuse textures throughout the SP and MP components. It would be nice to see them add a download option and use the timebomb they do on PS+ to prevent people playing indefinitely.

You mean like 24hr online check? HMMMMMmmmmmmm.

 

 

 

 

sorry, couldn't resist :p

Well remember that even Sony admitted that if you only meet the minimum requirements, the graphic fidelilty will vary. It seems clear that you will not get a 1:1 experience when streaming ps3 games if your hitting the minimums. They have not spelled out what it would take to be 1:!, but maybe the beta testing will give them the info they need to make recommendations.

Also, there is no option for Sony allowing you to download to another box like say a ps4 since the box does not have the hardware to play a ps3 (later to include ps1 and ps2) game. The game still has to be processed via a server and the data streamed to you.

 

 

Thanks for the info.  I think Sony should release a Roku sized box (priced at $20 or so) to be used as a Cache station to help with this.

A peer to peer solution would be quite nice IMO. Make the service free to those who opt in, and allow other PS4 consoles nearby with the game installed to handle the streaming etc whilst they're in standby.

 

It would take some effort, but would be a nice solution. Caching servers don't work. Anybody who regularly uses Netflix on Virgin Media will attest to that!

  • 3 weeks later...

Only rumour for now:

 

Gaikai site redesign reveals potential PS Now game prices

Monday, 10th March 2014 09:17 GMT By Dave Cook

 

PlayStation Now developers Gaikai has updated its official site, which now contains a UI concept for the service, along with some price-points for games such as Far Cry 3, Uncharted 3 and The Last of Us.

 

It follows Wedbush Morgan analyst Michael Pachter calling PlayStation Now ?a joke.?

 

We?ve also got a full report on what PlayStation Now is and how it works here.

 

These are possibly place-holder RRPs, but here?s the concept image, as found in GaiKai?s history section.

PS_now.jpg

As you can see; there are options to stream Far Cry 3 and Uncharted 3 in their entirety using PS Now in for $5.99 and $4.99 each, while The Last of Us is priced $49.99 to buy outright. They each say ?Full Game? next to them.

 

Over on Gaikai?s About section, the company writes

 

?At Gaikai, we believe in solving difficult problems to create exceptional experiences. People said it was impossible to stream video games at high quality with low latency. We did it anyway. They said there was no way for a small company to build the world?s fastest interactive entertainment network. So we did that too. We even won a Guinness World Record for it.

 

?It isn?t easy. It requires custom hardware. Dozens of software systems. And a world-class team to put it all together. But you know what? It?s worth it. Because, when you find yourself playing a PlayStation game within seconds of pressing a button, without downloading or installing anything, on a device that was never designed to do that, it?s nothing short of magical.?

 

We?ve contacted Sony to see if these prices are in the right ballpark, and our local rep replied, ?we don?t comment on rumour speculation. ?

 

http://www.vg247.com/2014/03/10/ps-now-gaikai-site-redesign-reveals-potential-game-prices-report/

Hmm, so I wonder what the details are on what 'buy' and 'stream' mean.

Does paying $5-$6 mean I must stream the game within 24hrs, several days?

Does buying mean that I own a digital copy that I download to my device, or is that just owning the rights to stream the game indefinitely?

I too would want to see a service that I could just pay a monthly fee and get access to it all. A nice bonus would be a way to 'match' games I already own to the cloud for streaming as I would with music.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!