Recommended Posts

Hello,

His games are the only ones crashing; if a PSU can't power a whole system (because it's asking more then it can deliver) then it won't be just those same games that were crashing but the whole system. A PSU or even Windows won't kill a process because of lack of power.

His games arent the only thing crashing. Watch him load a 4GB BMP in Photoshop (or something else RAM instensive) and it will crash too. I am supposing that indeed it is a memory issue...

OK, so it surely is the RAM. Try each stick individually and memtest. If one gives errors then RMA it.

If you only get errors with both sticks installed then look to back off the timings a bit. I had to go from 9-9-9-24 to 9-10-9-24 to get mine stable.

The other question I have along with a possible ram issue is which Nvidia driver is currently installed, there has been a slew of bad drivers recently that have caused similar issues I have had across my desk. The last stable driver for a lot of cards was 314.22, after that a bunch of drivers bricked many systems due to timing issues and heat issues that happened out of nowhere (caused by crappy drivers). 

Interesting thing is, all these errors occurred on 4162MB or higher; But I've only got a 4040MB of RAM.

Any ideas, or should I just get some new RAM?

It's outside of range because it is showing the virtual memory address and not the physical memory address of the failures.

Hello,

The other question I have along with a possible ram issue is which Nvidia driver is currently installed, there has been a slew of bad drivers recently that have caused similar issues I have had across my desk. The last stable driver for a lot of cards was 314.22, after that a bunch of drivers bricked many systems due to timing issues and heat issues that happened out of nowhere (caused by crappy drivers).

I dont understand how this could be a video card's driver issue; memtest fails and AFAIK it loads NO drivers (much less a third party like from nVidia)

So why are we still debating this when he's getting tons of errors in Memtest?

The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence -- it's "theoretically" possible that he also driver issues causing his game to crash on top of his memory errors causing his games to crash ;-) 

There's no point trying to investigate potential driver issues when you have memory errors. Figure out which stick is causing errors, fix the problem, and then if you still run into issues you can start investigating other kinds of errors. Don't go in every direction at once.

 

Hello,
These kind of replies dont add anything to the thread and IMO shouldnt be allowed :( Its obvious its a typo.

And the post pointed out the typo, which allowed the OP to clarify.

  • Like 1

Hello,

And the post pointed out the typo, which allowed the OP to clarify.

I just felt that post (only saying that) adds nothing.

snaphat, it is possible but its far fetched. Its obvious his main problem is the RAM.........maybe later he has driver issues but we may never know.

snaphat, it is possible but its far fetched. Its obvious his main problem is the RAM.........maybe later he has driver issues but we may never know.

I was kidding :-) Obviously, he should be systematic and just replace the ram before assuming other things are also issues

(if) He bought it together, its problable they are all from the same bad batch.

 

I had a pair of G.Skill RAM, only one was bad. So it's not uncommon.

Wow, thank you each an everyone of you for your well thought-out, knowledgeable replies.

I will test one of the sticks tonight and see what the output is.

As to PSU issues, I do not think it is that. It cost me a fair bit when I got it and think it had a good rating.

 

To driver issues, I've tried most nVidia drivers (including beta) under the sun.

 

My reckoning is that it's RAM issues.

  • Like 1

Hello,

I was kidding :-) Obviously, he should be systematic and just replace the ram before assuming other things are also issues

:laugh: Sorry, I missed the sarcasim :laugh: Either way, you are right ;)

I had a pair of G.Skill RAM, only one was bad. So it's not uncommon.

Well bad RAM batches problably have a 1 and 5 (again, pulling a number out of my ass) so maybe you got lucky. But I would return the entire kit so they give me new sticks fomr a new batch...

Well bad RAM batches problably have a 1 and 5 (again, pulling a number out of my ass) so maybe you got lucky. But I would return the entire kit so they give me new sticks fomr a new batch...

 

RAM is RAM, The "batches" are the same if you bought two separate sticks. They are the exact same thing. They have no difference. 

  • 2 weeks later...

So after testing both pairs of sticks, they were both dodgy. I've now purchased a new RAM stick.. After suffering from a few BSODs yesterday. I'll let you guys know it goes.

For the mean time, I need to fix an issue with my wireless card interfering with my speakers..

Regarding the claims about whether the PSU is enough, although the RAM sticks were found to be faulty, may I point out that its the railings of the PSU which are much more important that the actually wattage number quoted. I don't know the exact technical details, I'm sure a google search would suffice, but when I was looking for a PSU a while back, that was the common consensus, check the railings, not just the quoted wattage.

Regarding the claims about whether the PSU is enough, although the RAM sticks were found to be faulty, may I point out that its the railings of the PSU which are much more important that the actually wattage number quoted. I don't know the exact technical details, I'm sure a google search would suffice, but when I was looking for a PSU a while back, that was the common consensus, check the railings, not just the quoted wattage.

Multiple rails really just means one thing: individual current limiters for individual lines instead of a collective current limiter for all lines together. In both cases you most likely just have a single current source so it isn't as if a multiple rail PSU can sustain more power draw per line or overall more power draw than a single rail PSU.

 

For example, say you have 12 Volt current source that fans out into 3 lines that ultimately fan out into N power connectors. If you have all 3 lines controlled by a single limiter circuit then you have a single rail. If each line has its own limiter circuit than you have three rails. In practice, the only difference is how the limiter works. You still have to provide the required amperage per line without burning out as per the spec. You could over-shoot or under-shoot the amount of amperage you are suppose to provide per line in either case (thicken up or thin the traces).

 

It'd be a different story if you were really getting a power supply with individual current sources per rail (I'm not sure if they make those but I would imagine so at very high wattage rated PSUs, though they may just thicken the traces). One reason you might want multiple rails is in the case of a defective power supply - it could damage less equipment if there are individual safety shutoffs per line. Basically, it might only fry the equipment on only a single line if shorted instead of all lines.

 

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_supply_unit_(computer)#Multiple_.2B12_V_rails

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!