Mac or Hack


Recommended Posts

Currenty I have windows 7 64bit, 7 32bit, 8, ubuntu & hackintosh on my pc ... mainly for testing purposes, hardly us any of em except 7 64bit , but just curious... isn't hackintosh illegal? and if it is how is that guy selling them?...

It's not illegal from a criminal sense. It goes against the EULA, but that's a civil matter, not criminal.

It only becomes illegal if you don't legally purchase OS X, which, given there is no real way to purchase it any more, is a bit of a moot point.

I will say get a hackintosh. You can beat the price almost half by using hardware which are compatible with Mac. Mainly get intel based PC. I have installed Maverick on almost 6 year old desktop on quadcore intel processor and it works flawlessly. I had to get TP-link wireless card though for compatibility. I even upgraded it to SSD and everything working flawlessly. There are many online forum where you can get all the required program to make your own hackintosh. It is very simple and straightforward. I have HP m8120n desktop and everything works without any hitch.

 

The best thing will be you will have much flexibility for future hardware updates with custom built PC rather than getting mini where everything is propriety.

The "Hack" side is not as expensive as you would think.  My current setup does a triple (OS Number Three is Mavericks, in fact), and my upgrade will do the same.  For wired networking, both Realtek and even Intel-based Ethernet are supported (those are the two most common wired LAN solutions on the motherboard side), and most GPU solutions work out of the box (nVidia's case is the strongest, as everything from GTX5xx up is pretty much plug-and-play - I have a GTX550Ti).

 

Hardware specs:

 

Motherboard - current: ASUS P5G41-M LX2/GB  Target: ASUS Z-87A (choice #1) or ASRock Z87 Extreme6 (choice #2)

CPU - current: Intel Core2Quad Q6600 (Kentsfield) Target: Intel i5-4670K (Haswell)

RAM -  current: 4 GB DDR2-800 Target: 8 GB DDR3-1333 (already purchased)

GPU -  current: nVidia GTX550Ti  Target: ASUS GTX760 DirectCU II (choice #1) or EVGA GTX760 Superclocked (choice #2) or PNY GTX760 (choice #3)

 

And there are problems (specifically, issues with drive corruption) that occur with surprising frequency on real Macs that Hack users can fix far easier than real Mac users.  (I mentioned elsewhere that fixing drive corruption - which even OS X is not immune to - requires dropping all the way to the command line.  There is no GUI-based fix for this issue - which all versions of OS X are vulnerable to.  Worse, it's not the only problem that OS X has that requires CLI experience to fix.  If you have any experience at all with a command-line (such as Linux or Windows, or especially BSD), there's surprisingly little different in the OS X CLI/terminal environment compared to BSD; however, despite that, it's something that Apple discourages.)

I boot Mac OS X alongside Windows and Ubuntu, and I can't say I've had many problems, mainly incompatible hardware. For example my sound card won't work in Mac so I purchased a USB DAC. Another example is the 780 Ti I have crashes when opening any program that requires OpenCL (Safari, Adobe programs, etc. There's a hack that disables OpenCL for cards, which isn't preferred.

 

Other than that, I do recommend hackintoshes if your hardware's compatible.

Sound is, in fact, the biggest bugbear on the "Hack" side - and it's also where Apple is the most closed.  The easiest non-Apple workaround for audio (VoodooHDA) supports a wide variety of both onboard audio on motherboard and HDMI on GPUs; however, it does have issues with third-party audio cards (Creative SoundCore - from the current Sound Blaster Z back to the first-generation PCI-E cards, such as Recon3D and X-Fi Titanium) despite the USB headphones with the same DSP working just fine.

 

And there are problems (specifically, issues with drive corruption) that occur with surprising frequency on real Macs that Hack users can fix far easier than real Mac users.  (I mentioned elsewhere that fixing drive corruption - which even OS X is not immune to - requires dropping all the way to the command line.  There is no GUI-based fix for this issue - which all versions of OS X are vulnerable to.  Worse, it's not the only problem that OS X has that requires CLI experience to fix.  If you have any experience at all with a command-line (such as Linux or Windows, or especially BSD), there's surprisingly little different in the OS X CLI/terminal environment compared to BSD; however, despite that, it's something that Apple discourages.)

 

I'd love to know more about this.  I have never had this issue nor have I heard about this.  Is there a thread on the apple forums about this?

As a hackintosh user for .. dear god, 3 years now!!!  I would recommend you stick to a golden stable build.  Research a site with Tony in the name and build off a system they have established is compatible.  I love my hackintosh, built it as a side project then when a need came for it at my work place I brought it in and it's been my daily system over a year now.  Before it I had 2 generations of hackitoshes for home use.  

 

If you do decided to go with Apple, why not the mac pro... even the first generation intel models are decently fast and easy to upgrade.  

I'd love to know more about this.  I have never had this issue nor have I heard about this.  Is there a thread on the apple forums about this?

Yes, there is.  There are threads on most Mac fora about drive corruption on OS X.

 Let's be honest - every OS has drive corruption issues - without exception.  There are methods in each OS to lessen the impact of corruption - however, no operating system has any method of blocking corruption.

Even OS X third-party utilities can only go so far at reducing the impact (to be fair, the same goes for first-thru-third-party utilities for any OS) -- however, only the BSDs and their derivatives - including OS X - utterly lack non-CLI utilities for dealing with it when it happens.

Yes, there is.  There are threads on most Mac fora about drive corruption on OS X.

 Let's be honest - every OS has drive corruption issues - without exception.  There are methods in each OS to lessen the impact of corruption - however, no operating system has any method of blocking corruption.

Even OS X third-party utilities can only go so far at reducing the impact (to be fair, the same goes for first-thru-third-party utilities for any OS) -- however, only the BSDs and their derivatives - including OS X - utterly lack non-CLI utilities for dealing with it when it happens.

 

It happens, sure, but I've never seen one a verify and repair permissions couldn't fix. 

 

Also, there's no way a Hackintosh would have less problems in this department.

Yes, there is.  There are threads on most Mac fora about drive corruption on OS X.

 Let's be honest - every OS has drive corruption issues - without exception.  There are methods in each OS to lessen the impact of corruption - however, no operating system has any method of blocking corruption.

Even OS X third-party utilities can only go so far at reducing the impact (to be fair, the same goes for first-thru-third-party utilities for any OS) -- however, only the BSDs and their derivatives - including OS X - utterly lack non-CLI utilities for dealing with it when it happens.

 

If you're referring to bit rot, then there's no reason why a Hackintosh would be any more immune to this than a first party Mac.

Yes, there is.  There are threads on most Mac fora about drive corruption on OS X.

 Let's be honest - every OS has drive corruption issues - without exception.  There are methods in each OS to lessen the impact of corruption - however, no operating system has any method of blocking corruption.

Even OS X third-party utilities can only go so far at reducing the impact (to be fair, the same goes for first-thru-third-party utilities for any OS) -- however, only the BSDs and their derivatives - including OS X - utterly lack non-CLI utilities for dealing with it when it happens.

In the *BSDs defense, they lack a non-CLI per default.

I'll just chuck my 2 cents in here..

 

I ran a hackintosh for about 6 months, before actually going and buying a real Mac (Macbook Air). I decided to go this route when Windows 8 launched and I was just so disillusioned and irritated by it, I decided to vote with my feet. I've never got on with Linux day to day, but figured OSX would be the next best thing. 

 

The Hackintosh ran great - I deliberately chose a well supported motherboard, and it was mostly good. I got weird problems with occasional lockups and every time I installed an update I had to cross my fingers it'd keep working. I did occasionally have to re-run the MultiBeast package to replace drivers that were upgraded when patches were installed.

 

After that I decided that I not only wanted to switch to a laptop anyway (to save space, and to give me some options when I was on the road) but also decided I wanted to buy an Apple machine. I figured that my ethos has always been if you like something, pay for it. I like OSX and I like Apple hardware generally, and even though it's not like Apple needs my money, I thought it only fair.

 

I've not regretted it a bit. I bought an 11" Air with the Core i7, 512GB SSD and 8GB RAM. It was the most expensive computer I've ever bought but I've been thrilled with how good it is. And it's nice to know, problems aside, that OSX will "just work" on it when I install it. 

  • Like 2

It happens, sure, but I've never seen one a verify and repair permissions couldn't fix. 

 

Also, there's no way a Hackintosh would have less problems in this department.

 

I've had it happen twice this year.  1 macbook pro being used to watch movies that suddenly stopped.  The other was a imac that locked up during photo editiing.  

 

both had to be wiped and reloaded, drive couldn't be repaired in my hackintosh or another macintosh.

If you are willing to spend a lot of time setting it up and trying to fix things if they go wrong and don't mind downtime or such things go Hackintosh. If you want it to just work and be able to update it with support go with the Mac Mini.

I've had it happen twice this year.  1 macbook pro being used to watch movies that suddenly stopped.  The other was a imac that locked up during photo editiing.  

 

both had to be wiped and reloaded, drive couldn't be repaired in my hackintosh or another macintosh.

I'd say the chances are it's something you're doing over it being an OSX issue. Two completely different drives in one year is either just random plain coincidence or something wrong you're doing.

My H/D in this macbook died whilst I was using it (click of death) and was pretty outraged that a 4.5 year old drive had died already, but you can only blame the hardware company for that (and as apple don't make hard drives the blame doesn't lie with them)

Oh and also if you want to upgrade the RAM or SSD in the Mac Mini check this Video out, he shows you how to do a dual drive Upgrade but you can clearly see the RAM is visible and accessible.

 

 

If I was buying a Mac Mini this is definitely what I would do, Max out the RAM and Install a 256GB SSD and a 1TB Storage Drive. But this is what I would say you do, Just buy the Mac Mini with the CPU you want and then do this. Heck it's what I would do simply because when you buy a Mac you get the support and I Don't like not having a working machine.

If I was going to buy a Mac desktop I'd go for a Mini too. For the size they're great and with a cheap RAM upgrade (does ANYONE actually buy RAM from Apple?) it'll fly.

 

I have a MacBook here and two desktop hacks. Hackintoshing has gotten easier as time goes on. People who run into trouble almost always got there by relying on hacked-up distros or installation tools like the ones from phoneymac. I haven't had an update break my installs.

 

At the high end, I think a Hack makes more sense. Especially with the new MacPro using external TB expansions. I built a hack from scratch last year (for the first time, usually I just hacked my existing PC) because it made more sense than buying a 3 or 4 year old Mac Pro for the same price with lower performance and no warranties.

Yes, there is.  There are threads on most Mac fora about drive corruption on OS X.

 Let's be honest - every OS has drive corruption issues - without exception.  There are methods in each OS to lessen the impact of corruption - however, no operating system has any method of blocking corruption.

Even OS X third-party utilities can only go so far at reducing the impact (to be fair, the same goes for first-thru-third-party utilities for any OS) -- however, only the BSDs and their derivatives - including OS X - utterly lack non-CLI utilities for dealing with it when it happens.

 

There are utilities out there for dealing with drive issues.  Disk utilities and onyx are first on my list.  Neither require any use of terminal. 

I'd say the chances are it's something you're doing over it being an OSX issue. Two completely different drives in one year is either just random plain coincidence or something wrong you're doing.

My H/D in this macbook died whilst I was using it (click of death) and was pretty outraged that a 4.5 year old drive had died already, but you can only blame the hardware company for that (and as apple don't make hard drives the blame doesn't lie with them)

Neither was mine. The dealership I work for is owned by a pretty large family and besides working on the business equipment, they have me working on their personal equipment.  Both were however from the same set of users.  

Neither was mine. The dealership I work for is owned by a pretty large family and besides working on the business equipment, they have me working on their personal equipment.  Both were however from the same set of users.  

 

Yeah... I've heard of Macs locking up on reboot with permission errors, and Macs dying while being used due to hardware issues, but just dropping dead while running due to some weird software / OS conflict I've never heard of. 

It wouldn't be my first, but the others I bought hardware that was specified in a tutorial and followed it.  Never applied updates etc - and to be fair, it wasn't the best experience (dual monitor never worked, for example, had to use an external soundcard)...

 

I don't want to use this for "learning" or "tinkering" - it is to be my daily computer I use for tasks.  When a software update comes out, I want to be able to apply it and carry on working - not worry about "Oh damn, my soundcard no longer works" and so on.

 

Then get the real deal.  Hackintosh setups can work reliably for months but (in my experience) some issues can crop up and you have to be ready to take the gloves off (i.e., spend some time researching the issue, asking for advice on forums, etc.).  My experience is from years ago, so it *IS* probably better today (and if you follow a hardware guide so that drivers are well supported).

 

I'm considering going with a Hackintosh setup to replace my OLD 1st generation PowerPC Mac Mini, but I'm also OK with spending time on the tinkering of the setup if an update comes out or w/e.

 

That's not to say that having an Apple product will be bullet proof.  Obviously, there can always be technical issues that might crop up and need to be addressed.  Components can disfunction and fail and software installs may become corrupted.  Difference is: size of community and install base.  Hackintosh users are an extreme minority compared to Macintosh users (and even Linux users, probably).  That's not to say that there isn't help available out there, if you are willing to take the time and ask.

 

If uptime is important to you, just go with the official Apple product (whatever it might end up being).  They are pretty consistent with their customer service.  If you have an Apple Store in your town you can likely get an issue resolved relatively quickly.  Some people think that their out-of-warranty-service fees are high, and they do have a markup beyond the cost of a part.  But they also seem to support services for older Macintosh hardware for a pretty decent span of time IMO.  I've seen them helping people out with really old iBooks, for example.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
    • Bluestacks has been emulating Android on Windows for fifteen years. It's janky and riddled with ads though, so WSA looked like it was going to be a huge improvement over the emulator experience. Too bad Microsoft dropped the ball on that.
    • Classic. China would be nothing without Western, Japanese, and South Korean technology.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!