Upcoming AAA Ubisoft Title: 1080p on PS4 / Sub 1080p on Xbox One


Recommended Posts

My suggestion would be:

[Rumor] Upcoming AAA Ubisoft Title: 1080p on PS4/Sub 1080p XB1

Since neither the name watch dogs or the sub res was mentioned directly from the source, that title seems more legit.

 

In all likelihood I think it's going to be Watch_Dogs. I don't think they have anything else close to release anyway. Will remove the name for now until it's confirmed either way (Y)

If you believe, as I do, that software optimization is the key to the XB1 then first things first MS can improve a number of areas that will boost game performance without developers needing to do anything. Better hardware drivers is a start, that can give games a frame rate boost on it's own. Improved or better optimized APIs and the overall DX11 bits, yet another thing that can improve a games performance without developers needing to do anything. Third would be the whole tweaking of the reserved system resources bit that's come up, let more of the GPU and CPU work on the game instead of sitting idle, automatic boost to performance yet again.

 

There's other little things like overall OS performance boosts and so on that they can do as well but the big thing is better optimized tools and SDK that takes advantage of the custom nature of the hardware mostly on it's own so developers have less optimization work to do on their own for it.  All of this can happen, we'll see what the rumored big March system update brings with it and if any games get updates after to improve them.

Television sets are moving towards 4K and one of the Next Gen consoles that just came out can't do 1080p?  If this is true it's not good news for Microsoft.

 

4k might be relevant by the next generation of consoles, but this one will be just fine.

I heard another rumor that Ubisoft unlocked the magic of SNES and to everyone's surprise it outputs 4k at 60fps flawlessly.

 

Just a rumor though.

 

Gradius 3 on Super Nintendo suffers from lots of slowdown and is completely outclassed by Thunder Force on Sega Genesis with its blast processing.

 

PS4 must have blast processing too.

 

Gradius 3 224p 20-30fps

Thunder Force 3 256p 60fps

4k might be relevant by the next generation of consoles, but this one will be just fine.

 

4k on these two consoles is a pipe dream.  But the resolution push is moving forward with or without them.  And that's always a good thing.

From what I can tell the xbox approach is more software optimisation as opposed to the PS4's hardware grunt, so it makes absolute sense that devs need to learn these optimisation tricks whereas the grunt on the PS4 is just there.

 

The thing is when the devs do start to use the tricks properly they should open up more options for getting games running better, faster etc, whereas on the PS4 that power cant really be enhanced upon.

 

And I'm not talking about your standard optimisations here, there is some clever **** going on with the xbox that needs to be used for it to be a benefit. Both systems will see optimisations but the xbox has more potential in this respect.

 

Just the way I understand things folks.

The PS4's power cannot be improved upon? Really?

So developers have already reached the full potential of the PS4, but they have not reached the full potential of the XBox One yet?

Is this seriously what you are trying to say is the truth of the situation?

That somehow one system is an open book and the other is a complete mystery? I ask again, is this truly what you are saying?

If this was how game development worked, the PS3 should have been capable of some of the most amazing graphics ever known to man, as it was definitely much harder to develop for than the 360 was and was much more complex.

Yet that was not the case.

So let me offer a bit more plausible scenario...

We are already seeing what is going to be the dominant trend throughout the entire duration of this generation.

Does this mean that the XBox One will not be capable of better performance as time goes on? Absolutely not. I am positive as time goes on some more tricks and optimizations will be found.

However, the exact same can also be said of PS4 development. Developers will continue to discover better and more efficient ways to develop on it, so it too will continue to improve.

As an owner of both systems I sure hope they do eventually hit 1080p and 60 fps on the One, however I am not holding my breath on this fact based on what we are already seeing. And I am vary confident in saying as I already have that the trend we are seeing now will continue, and the PS4 will be the dominant platform from a technical specifications perspective. This seems to be pretty clear by this point in time. 

By all means feel free to quote this reply if and when I am proven wrong and a multiplatform title is in fact better in all regards on the One. I just never see it happen. Hopefully they one day become equal to their PS4 offerings, but even that I am not holding my breath on, however I do not have any vested interest if they never do, as I have the option of playing those titles on the PS4, so I tend to view things how they are, not how I hope they will be.

Television sets are moving towards 4K and one of the Next Gen consoles that just came out can't do 1080p?  If this is true it's not good news for Microsoft.

Television manufacturers are trying to push 4k. I personally think it's going to fail even worse then 3D did though. There is no content for 4k. Broadcast TV isn't even 1080p, it's either 720p or 1080i and shows no signs of changing anytime soon. As you say the latest consoles can barely do 1080p they certainly aren't going to be doing 4k. 1080p streamed from Netflix while good is noticeably worse then 1080p off a Blu-Ray disc due to compression. Streaming 4k is going to be even worse. Even with new compression (which there is little hardware to support) it would make more sense to use that new compression to transfer 1080p in better quality to rival Blu-Ray then to use heavy lossy compression on even higher resolutions. As for hardware people are slow enough to adopt Blu-Ray they aren't going to run out and buy BDXL players with HEVC compression and new HDMI 2.0 cables. Again consoles don't support any of this new tech so odds are thing are going to stay 1080p or worse for a while now despite what TV manufacturers might want. If it was up to them we'd all be buying new TVs every year.

Television manufacturers are trying to push 4k. I personally think it's going to fail even worse then 3D did though. There is no content for 4k. Broadcast TV isn't even 1080p, it's either 720p or 1080i and shows no signs of changing anytime soon. As you say the latest consoles can barely do 1080p they certainly aren't going to be doing 4k. 1080p streamed from Netflix while good is noticeably worse then 1080p off a Blu-Ray disc due to compression. Streaming 4k is going to be even worse. Even with new compression (which there is little hardware to support) it would make more sense to use that new compression to transfer 1080p in better quality to rival Blu-Ray then to use heavy lossy compression on even higher resolutions. As for hardware people are slow enough to adopt Blu-Ray they aren't going to run out and buy BDXL players with HEVC compression and new HDMI 2.0 cables. Again consoles don't support any of this new tech so odds are thing are going to stay 1080p or worse for a while now despite what TV manufacturers might want. If it was up to them we'd all be buying new TVs every year.

 

Mainstream 4K is still at least 4 years off.

 

The early adopters are hardly there yet. As you said, there's no content yet (1080p had the same problem for years) and even with a $2000 PC you're probably not going to get 60fps ultra quality in a 4K game today.

Television manufacturers are trying to push 4k. I personally think it's going to fail even worse then 3D did though. There is no content for 4k. Broadcast TV isn't even 1080p, it's either 720p or 1080i and shows no signs of changing anytime soon. As you say the latest consoles can barely do 1080p they certainly aren't going to be doing 4k. 1080p streamed from Netflix while good is noticeably worse then 1080p off a Blu-Ray disc due to compression. Streaming 4k is going to be even worse. Even with new compression (which there is little hardware to support) it would make more sense to use that new compression to transfer 1080p in better quality to rival Blu-Ray then to use heavy lossy compression on even higher resolutions. As for hardware people are slow enough to adopt Blu-Ray they aren't going to run out and buy BDXL players with HEVC compression and new HDMI 2.0 cables. Again consoles don't support any of this new tech so odds are thing are going to stay 1080p or worse for a while now despite what TV manufacturers might want. If it was up to them we'd all be buying new TVs every year.

 

4K and even 8K are not some gimmick like 3D is, they are both just natural progression of resolution. It might not happen any time soon, but there is no doubt it will become a widespread standard one day, just as 720/1080 did. If broadcasting hardware were capable, do you not think we'd all be watching in 1080p right now? Of course we would. The content will follow when it's time. Plus, there is no harm in introducing the TVs now to fund the roll out. It's just like "HD Ready" TVs in 2004/5. You might not have the final spec, but it's all connected and progresses the tech.

 

Streaming will take even longer because that infrastructure is even more of a mess than TV, but it will arrive one day.

So, now, where are the folks defending that the Xbox One so trounced the PS4 in CPU optimizations that it made up for a 50% deficit in shaders? How many games running at a lower resolution or framerate on Xbox One will it take to close the debate? http://ca.ign.com/wikis/xbox-one/PS4_vs._Xbox_One_Native_Resolutions_and_Framerates

 

Some quick statistics from that table, for games for which we have data:

 

90% of games on PS4 are 1080p, versus 50% on Xbox One

67% of games on PS4 are 60fps, versus 46% on Xbox One

Television manufacturers are trying to push 4k. I personally think it's going to fail even worse then 3D did though. There is no content for 4k. Broadcast TV isn't even 1080p, it's either 720p or 1080i and shows no signs of changing anytime soon. As you say the latest consoles can barely do 1080p they certainly aren't going to be doing 4k. 1080p streamed from Netflix while good is noticeably worse then 1080p off a Blu-Ray disc due to compression. Streaming 4k is going to be even worse. Even with new compression (which there is little hardware to support) it would make more sense to use that new compression to transfer 1080p in better quality to rival Blu-Ray then to use heavy lossy compression on even higher resolutions. As for hardware people are slow enough to adopt Blu-Ray they aren't going to run out and buy BDXL players with HEVC compression and new HDMI 2.0 cables. Again consoles don't support any of this new tech so odds are thing are going to stay 1080p or worse for a while now despite what TV manufacturers might want. If it was up to them we'd all be buying new TVs every year.

 

3D was an addition to a currently used resolution.  4K is a new resolution.  There are compression technologies capable of delivering 4K to consumers.  It will take some time but it's going to be sooner than you might think.

So, now, where are the folks defending that the Xbox One so trounced the PS4 in CPU optimizations that it made up for a 50% deficit in shaders? How many games running at a lower resolution or framerate on Xbox One will it take to close the debate? http://ca.ign.com/wikis/xbox-one/PS4_vs._Xbox_One_Native_Resolutions_and_Framerates

I just wish they could be right about the systems being on par and not making a difference. Everything we've seen so far has proven otherwise... :/

Mainstream 4K is still at least 4 years off.

 

The early adopters are hardly there yet. As you said, there's no content yet (1080p had the same problem for years) and even with a $2000 PC you're probably not going to get 60fps ultra quality in a 4K game today.

This is much worse than the move to 1080p. 1080p had the DVD->Blu-Ray move, right now there is no shift in the movie industry to a new disc based media format, heck they move to Blu-Ray isn't even done yet it's too soon for another one. Blu-Ray had a console supporting it, the PS3. Sure it may have really hurt Sony in the console war to put a Blu-ray drive in the PS3 but it did help establish Blu-Ray as the 1080p format standard. I don't believe the PS4 or Xbone has a new disc format beyond blu-Ray, they don't have HDMI 2.0, they don't have full hardware support for HEVC decoding (like they do for H.264). People are still upgrading old 720p or even tube TVs to 1080p, some are just now buying their first Blu-Ray player (maybe it's even the xbone) they aren't going to move to another setup anytime soon. 1080p is going to be the standard for a long time, way more than 4 years IMHO, 4k is a pipe dream by manufacturers. 4k will become mainstream on computers before it hits TVs and as you said you have to throw a ton of money into a PC today to be able to drive 4k graphics at 60fps on Ultra... 4k is a LONG way off.
  • Like 1

This is much worse than the move to 1080p. 1080p had the DVD->Blu-Ray move, right now there is no shift in the movie industry to a new disc based media format, heck they move to Blu-Ray isn't even done yet it's too soon for another one. Blu-Ray had a console supporting it, the PS3. Sure it may have really hurt Sony in the console war to put a Blu-ray drive in the PS3 but it did help establish Blu-Ray as the 1080p format standard. I don't believe the PS4 or Xbone has a new disc format beyond blu-Ray, they don't have HDMI 2.0, they don't have full hardware support for HEVC decoding (like they do for H.264). People are still upgrading old 720p or even tube TVs to 1080p, some are just now buying their first Blu-Ray player (maybe it's even the xbone) they aren't going to move to another setup anytime soon. 1080p is going to be the standard for a long time, way more than 4 years IMHO, 4k is a pipe dream by manufacturers. 4k will become mainstream on computers before it hits TVs and as you said you have to throw a ton of money into a PC today to be able to drive 4k graphics at 60fps on Ultra... 4k is a LONG way off.

 

Yes there is? In fact there are several. None of them final or agreed upon yet, but there has been talks of BRs successor since before BR even rolled out.

4K and even 8K are not some gimmick like 3D is, they are both just natural progression of resolution. It might not happen any time soon, but there is no doubt it will become a widespread standard one day, just as 720/1080 did. If broadcasting hardware were capable, do you not think we'd all be watching in 1080p right now? Of course we would. The content will follow when it's time. Plus, there is no harm in introducing the TVs now to fund the roll out. It's just like "HD Ready" TVs in 2004/5. You might not have the final spec, but it's all connected and progresses the tech.

 

Streaming will take even longer because that infrastructure is even more of a mess than TV, but it will arrive one day.

4K NOW is totally a gimmick, that's my point. It's not going to happen anytime soon. I'm not saying there will NEVER be another resolution beyond 1080p. Maybe it will be 4k, maybe the mainstream will skip that and go strait to 8k or something else entirely. If you buy a 4k TV right now you will almost certainly be in the market for a new TV before 4k content is the mainstream. Movie companies aren't going to re-release all their movies at every incremental resolution. Steaming can't handle 1080p as well as Blu-Ray yet so lets focus on improving that before we go bumping up the resolution. Even the bleeding edge hardcore gamer who spends a fortune of his gaming rig probably isn't playing at 4k@60fps on Ultra, game developers certainly aren't targeting that as a primary audience. TVs content will lag behind gamers and gamers aren't even there yet.

So, now, where are the folks defending that the Xbox One so trounced the PS4 in CPU optimizations that it made up for a 50% deficit in shaders? How many games running at a lower resolution or framerate on Xbox One will it take to close the debate? http://ca.ign.com/wikis/xbox-one/PS4_vs._Xbox_One_Native_Resolutions_and_Framerates

 

All the 1080p PS4 titles are running native, not upscaled.  On the Xbox One, some are upscaled.  When it comes to image quality and game capabilities, PS4 is clearly superior...

Yes there is? In fact there are several. None of them final or agreed upon yet, but there has been talks of BRs successor since before BR even rolled out.

"None of them final or agreed upon yet"

Perhaps I was unclear. By shift I mean like the shift from DVD to Blu-Ray. Consumers actively going out and buying one in place of the other. Movie companies shifting from releasing their movies on DVD to Blu-Ray. Hardware companies and Compression working groups are ALWAYS taking about what the next thing is going to be, that's what they do. Until there are standards finalized and agreed upon, companies producing product and consumers buying it then there isn't a switch actively going on. Heck there may not be another disc based format, maybe everyone will go to streaming, maybe these companies will not be able to agree and we'll have a whole new HDDVD vs. Blu-Ray like format battle, who knows. Whatever happens it's probably going to take longer then the average life expectancy of a new flat screen so buying 4k now is a waste.

Could be, although we don't know what is needed to take advantage fully.

Well unless I'm mistaken the GameCube had fast embedded memory too. No dev actually used it for multiplatform titles only games like Metroid prime or Re 4 and such used it.

As an owner of both systems I sure hope they do eventually hit 1080p and 60 fps on the One, however I am not holding my breath on this fact based on what we are already seeing. And I am vary confident in saying as I already have that the trend we are seeing now will continue, and the PS4 will be the dominant platform from a technical specifications perspective. This seems to be pretty clear by this point in time.

It seems to me that every new generation we see the same thing that games can improve greatly from launch as the years go by.

I know that this time is a little different since both consoles are x86 system and more like a pc, but if you do believe that both will improve overtime, why then assume X1 games won't get to that point? I do agree with you that it looks pretty clear that the ps4 has the tech lead, but the question is whether developers will be able to hit the 1080p/60 levels in great numbers on the X1 as it goes along.

 

So, now, where are the folks defending that the Xbox One so trounced the PS4 in CPU optimizations that it made up for a 50% deficit in shaders? How many games running at a lower resolution or framerate on Xbox One will it take to close the debate? http://ca.ign.com/wikis/xbox-one/PS4_vs._Xbox_One_Native_Resolutions_and_Framerates

 

Some quick statistics from that table, for games for which we have data:

 

90% of games on PS4 are 1080p, versus 50% on Xbox One

67% of games on PS4 are 60fps, versus 46% on Xbox One

 

Your as bad as those you are attempting to bash honestly.

What's the point? Rub it in their faces?

You make it sound like your team won or something :laugh:

I just wish they could be right about the systems being on par and not making a difference. Everything we've seen so far has proven otherwise... :/

At some point, you just have to accept the fact that the ps4 could have the better multiplatform titles this gen as the 360 did last gen. If the ps4 is to be the new lead console, then your also likely to see poor ports and rushed ports on the X1, again like last gen.

It shouldn't change whether you like the exclusive titles that both systems offer. If you want the X1 exclusives, your still going to want an X1. Exclusives are also likely to be the titles that look the best on both systems. So, if you ended up with both systems last gen, then that will probably happen this gen as well unless you have no interest in the exclusives, etc.

All the 1080p PS4 titles are running native, not upscaled.  On the Xbox One, some are upscaled.  When it comes to image quality and game capabilities, PS4 is clearly superior...[/size]

That's incorrect. BF4 runs at 900p on the PS4. I don't know any others that are doing that, although AC4 was until they patched it. I don't think BF4 has been patched.

I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but not all ps4 titles are going to be 1080p/60. Your certainly right that more of them will be compared to the X1 at least right now. I'm not sure what you mean by 'game capabilities', but it seems clear right now that the ps4 hardware has a nice lead.

  • Like 1

Well unless I'm mistaken the GameCube had fast embedded memory too. No dev actually used it for multiplatform titles only games like Metroid prime or Re 4 and such used it.

I'm not sure why people forget their history so quickly. Just look at last gen.

How many multiplatform games either got poor ports or simply worse versions on the ps3? In some cases it was a lack of performance where a developer wanted it, but in many cases it was also the lack of interest in optimizing for the console. The 360 was the lead console for these ports and it was considered easier to develop on.

Today, we see things have flipped at least for now. The ps4 is the lead console and its considered easier to develop on. The X1 is now the one struggling in comparisons thanks to hardware issues and optimizations issues. The only question is if the rest of last gen repeats itself this gen.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!