Why do people not shut down PC's?


Recommended Posts

Off topic: I wonder, is leaving a laptop always on a good idea, since it will be trickling the battery continously?

I believe most laptops will stop charging the battery once its topped up and remain powered by the mains till enough power has drained from the battery.

1. Improved performance as regularly used apps sit in memory for fast access.

2. reduced risk from damage due to mechanical stress

3. no waiting for boot up

4. people who use apps like irc or steam can leave them running 24/7 to stay in the loop and auto updated.

 

Because I can afford not to.  Simple honest answer.

I'm still going through the other replies, but these two posts sum up my reasoning. Technology has changed so that it isn't necessary to do in order to preserve the hardware, and I don't suffer from the electricity bill, so why would I shut my system down completely? I only do it with my work machine on Fridays so that I have a longer wait on Monday before starting work... :p

Because with sleep mode I don't have to wait 30 seconds to a minute for my computer to boot then initialize the desktop environment and start all the services need which can take another minute then waiting for all my applications to start again when instead I just wake it and continue on as normal.

I always have tons of programs, documents and windows opened, and shutting down means it would take me forever to get back in the state I was in.  If I could even *remember* what I had opened.

 

I've consolidated most of my old physical machines into a single VM host that barely uses 80W even under full load.  Powering down means putting at least a dozen VMs to sleep--resuming from that is a half-hour job.  My time is far more valuable.

 

Besides, with only one physical machine left running, my power consumption has already gone way down.  Not to mention that nowadays machines are much more power-efficient than they used to be.

1) Power consumption from electronic are going down

2) Only hippies give a #### about the climate

3) Why wait for it to start back up.. I have a blown cap on my Mobo and it takes a solid 10 minutes for my PC to boot 

4) I leave my PC on 24/7 and it runs like a champ

5) Give me a good solid reason why I should shut down, taking into account points 1 - 3.

I shut mine down at night so I don't have a darn noise in my room when I'm trying to sleep plus the LED's on it... I like dead silent and dark as heck at night... That's my main reason

  • Like 3

I generally shut down my home computers when I know I'm not going to use them for long periods of time (like when I sleep). SSD's make boot up times minimal, not sure why people complain about boot times - even WD Black HDD's are good for 20-30 sec. boot times. The only devices I intentionally leave up 24/7 are my: NAS, and my work laptop - good for situations when I need to RDP into it (for on-call). 

 

It's the age old debate of shutting down your computers vs. leaving them running. With SSD's, boot times are absolutely minimal. Computers are also becoming more efficient, so it makes sense to leave them running 24/7 (cheap). Either way, it's your money, you decide what you want to do with it.  

Hello,

Pure laziness. There really isn't any other reason.

 

it is depends how you use it for... if you want to remote access, you need to leave it on...

 

Otherwise you can shut it down .. it's up to you... 

 

All you do is turn off the monitor(s)...  

Quite a few people have given reasons about servers and extremely long boot up times (30 minutes?) which seems reasonable.

 

But others have said things like "technology has improved". Can anyone really justify comments like that? Does anyone buy a technological product these days and expect it to last several years? Most products seem to deteriorate faster now than what they use to. So yes, power consumption might be next to nothing, but do people really trust the manufacturers to design equipment to last? I point people to the interesting comment about laptop batteries. If one left a laptop on 24/7, what would be the implications of that? 

 

A few people mentioned boot up times of 20-60 seconds which seem reasonable. But with Windows 8, those boot up times are much much lower. I expect when people finally upgrade (whether that is Win 8 or 9),would people still hold the same opinion? 

 

 

A few silly commends about how "green" I am and on climate change. I was just making a passing comment. Even if the power consumption is so low that it equates to 2 cents/ day (someone worked that out before), imagine if everyone switched off all appliances. In a year, that would save 1.825 billion dollars if we assume that 250 million households are in that same situation. That would increase of course for buildings etc. I know that is a relatively small number compared to the budgets within America, but nonetheless, why should we have the cynical ideology of "who cares" on the basis it makes little difference rather than the ideology "every little helps"? TL:DR just that I always believed when you finished with an appliance, you switched it off. 

 

Finally some comments on laziness and people who can afford to leave everything on. All I can say is, thanks for your honesty! :)

But others have said things like "technology has improved". Can anyone really justify comments like that? Does anyone buy a technological product these days and expect it to last several years? Most products seem to deteriorate faster now than what they use to. So yes, power consumption might be next to nothing, but do people really trust the manufacturers to design equipment to last? I point people to the interesting comment about laptop batteries. If one left a laptop on 24/7, what would be the implications of that? 

Heat, time (age), and cell wear from charging kill battery cells so you probably aren't wearing them out much by just leaving an idling laptop on. It would be different if your laptop was excessively hot though. 

Quite a few people have given reasons about servers and extremely long boot up times (30 minutes?) which seems reasonable.

 

But others have said things like "technology has improved". Can anyone really justify comments like that? Does anyone buy a technological product these days and expect it to last several years? Most products seem to deteriorate faster now than what they use to. So yes, power consumption might be next to nothing, but do people really trust the manufacturers to design equipment to last? I point people to the interesting comment about laptop batteries. If one left a laptop on 24/7, what would be the implications of that? 

 

A few people mentioned boot up times of 20-60 seconds which seem reasonable. But with Windows 8, those boot up times are much much lower. I expect when people finally upgrade (whether that is Win 8 or 9),would people still hold the same opinion? 

 

 

A few silly commends about how "green" I am and on climate change. I was just making a passing comment. Even if the power consumption is so low that it equates to 2 cents/ day (someone worked that out before), imagine if everyone switched off all appliances. In a year, that would save 1.825 billion dollars if we assume that 250 million households are in that same situation. That would increase of course for buildings etc. I know that is a relatively small number compared to the budgets within America, but nonetheless, why should we have the cynical ideology of "who cares" on the basis it makes little difference rather than the ideology "every little helps"? TL:DR just that I always believed when you finished with an appliance, you switched it off. 

 

Finally some comments on laziness and people who can afford to leave everything on. All I can say is, thanks for your honesty! :)

 

 

Heat, time (age), and cell wear from charging kill battery cells so you probably aren't wearing them out much by just leaving an idling laptop on. It would be different if your laptop was excessively hot though. 

 

I have been using my primary laptop for 10 years... no problem.

 

If you put sleep mode enabled... it should be fine... it won't get hot.

I have been using my primary laptop for 10 years... no problem.

 

If you put sleep mode enabled... it should be fine... it won't get hot.

I don't even put mine in sleep mode. I find that what kills the cells more than anything is a lot of cycling and just the battery quality. For example: both of the Dell batteries I had wore out quickly from excessive cycling (enough so that the first was replaced under warranty within a year of getting the laptop). The 3rd party battery I purchased after was much better even with excessive cycling.

Because times have changed.

 

win95.png

I remember hacking those to display anything, folks at computer lab would go nuts when they saw "your whole network has been hacked"

I have been using my primary laptop for 10 years... no problem.

 

If you put sleep mode enabled... it should be fine... it won't get hot.

Did not affect the battery?

I don't even put mine in sleep mode. I find that what kills the cells more than anything is a lot of cycling and just the battery quality. For example: both of the Dell batteries I had wore out quickly from excessive cycling (enough so that the first was replaced under warranty within a year of getting the laptop). The 3rd party battery I purchased after was much better even with excessive cycling.

 

I know what you meant but I don't care since I have several laptops....   If there is no power, I can get a replacement battery pack.. no problem.

 

I remember hacking those to display anything, folks at computer lab would go nuts when they saw "your whole network has been hacked"

 

lol.. I have done same thing...  I made my own and use the message that says "You are being watched. If you are caught, I will come after you."

 

friends and family got their paranoid look on their face while they looked around in my office for the cameras.. heheh.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!