Better NTFS Support Under Linux


Recommended Posts

Just noticed this on Slashdot:

Using the Real ntfs.sys Driver Under Linux

"A very neat hack uses the real ntfs.sys driver (obtained from your own windows XP partition and used via a wine-like layer (borrowed from ReactOS) to mount an ntfs partion with full read/write access. While not an ideal solution and certainly not free as in speech, this is an ideal stop-gap measure for many people trying out linux. I think that we'll probably see this in Knoppix pretty soon."

While write support in the kernel exists already, you can only use it on NON-system drives because of the second NTFS Journal that is present on system drives (or is it just the system partition? reguardless, I wouldn't touch my system DRIVE period with "NTFS write" under Linux). This appears to be a MUCH safer way, as it's actually using Microsoft's own driver rather than a "built from scratch" system!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/120290-better-ntfs-support-under-linux/
Share on other sites

I saw this too. Pretty interesting idea. I know Knppoix et.al. will use it eventually (maybe), but I don't really see any of the big commercial distros using it since it uses MS property ( see the Web TTF core issues). Then again, most non-US distros don't have to worry about the insane US copyright rules.

I'm going to give this a shot on my laptop. Since I haven't used the XP partition in awhile anyway, no harm done if it does get nuked! :D

i believe the ntfs ppl had thought of doing that but gave a nice list of reasons why its bad. Personally i don't care atm too much. Would be nice to write to my windows drive.

Integrating that into knoppix would be great. Especially since windows users would use it to recover fscked windows. I know ppl who still use it regarldess, but have non ntfs drives.

I don't really see why people would want to have write support for NTFS in Linux anyway. I mean, there are isolated uses where it might be useful (eg. repairing a borked Windows install), but there's already better tools for that (eg. recovery console). And if you want to share storage space for say.. MP3's or DIVX's, you can do so with FAT32 or using Linux's native filesystem and picking up Paragon's software which allows you to read/write to Linux filesystems in Windows (came free with a computer magazine for me).

Yes FAT32 is a solution (I use it personally). On the other hand I had been cursing the whole world for a year before I switched to FAT32 (just after my hdd died). And I'm sure millions of people have NTFS partitions, and before swithing to linux they do all ask: what if need to write on ntfs drive?

  BananaMan said:
...if you want to share storage space for say.. MP3's or DIVX's, you can do so with FAT32 or using Linux's native filesystem and picking up Paragon's software which allows you to read/write to Linux filesystems in Windows (came free with a computer magazine for me).

Using FAT32, if you created the partition under Windows, it is crippled as you cannot make FAT32 partitions larger than 40GB AFAIK (to force movement away from the archaic filesystem). Yes, FAT32 supports larger partitions, but you need to use Partition Magic or some other 3rd party partition manager. And you loose the security features built into other filesystems. By default, Windows will definately not create a 120GB FAT32 partition. It forces NTFS on you.

For the casual user or for the newcomer, this would be helpful in allowing them to still access and modify their files if they are on an NTFS partition. I also know enough people who prefer to use ResierFS or XFS for their installs. Paragon's software is a good solution if you are using ext2/3, but if you're using XFS or ReiserFS (which is what SuSE defaults to; don't know about others), then you're SOL.

  FBody24 said:
...I don't really see any of the big commercial distros using it since it uses MS property ( see the Web TTF core issues).

The legal thing here, that I think will help push this into being adopted more, is that ntfs.sys is already on an NTFS-based system. This takes into account that you already installed a legal Windows operating system (you did, right?). There isn't any distribution of ntfs.sys that would need to happen, with such things as the Windows Fonts (which doesn't require you to have purchased Windows software), because you alreayd have the file on your drives. And if you don't have Windows installed, then what's the point of using NTFS?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft reportedly planning to lay off thousands of employees, mostly in sales by Usama Jawad Back in May 2025, Microsoft decided to lay off 3% of its workforce, which amounted to roughly 6,000 employees. It claimed that this decision allowed it to implement better organizational changes in a "dynamic marketplace". Now, a new report claims that the Redmond tech firm is planning to lay off thousands more next month. Citing unnamed sources, Bloomberg reports that as the company continues investing heavily in its AI ventures, it is about to announce layoffs of thousands of workers as early as next month. This reduction in workforce will primarily affect sales teams, but they won't be the only ones affected. That said, the sources did mention that the timing for this announcement may change. This move, if true, won't be entirely surprising. In April 2025, Microsoft announced that it will be relying more on third-party firms to sell its software to small- and medium-sized customers. It's currently unclear how many employees will be impacted by this change, but even if the layoff percentage is in the single digits, it would still be significant as it would be impacting the professional careers of thousands. The May 2025 layoffs primarily impacted engineering and product teams. The other major round of layoffs prior to this was the decision to eliminate 10,000 jobs back in January 2023. Those represented 5% of the total workforce at that time, with numerous teams, including the one leading Mixed Reality (MR) efforts, being heavily impacted. It is interesting to note that if the timing of the announcement for layoffs is accurate, it would be soon after Microsoft closes its fiscal year at the end of June 2025. Although we'll get financial reports for the latest quarter soon after too, one has to wonder what the human cost of profit is, as Microsoft continues to report billions of dollars in revenue every quarter. Source: Bloomberg (paywall)
    • Ah .. lockout for suspicious activity. I bet they uploaded the SanDisk utility detected as malware
    • Microsoft 365 will soon disable outdated authentication protocols for file access by Usama Jawad On a fairly regular basis, Microsoft disables outdated protocols that are used to access its services. In the past few years, the company has deprecated Basic Auth in Exchange Online and cut access to Outlook for third-party apps relying on this protocol. Now, it has decided to get rid of old authentication protocols for file access across Microsoft 365 services. As reported by Bleeping Computer, Microsoft has posted a message on its Microsoft 365 Admin Center. Starting from mid-July 2025, the company will begin disabling legacy authentication protocols used to access files across Microsoft 365 and Office apps, SharePoint, and OneDrive. Essentially, applications or services which use the Relying Party Suite (RPS) or FrontPage Remote Procedure Call (FPRPC) will to perform browser-based authentication to perform open operations on Office files will no longer be able to do so. As expected, this is primarily being done to improve the cybersecurity posture of various services. Microsoft states that RPS can be brute-forced and phished with relative ease as it is fairly outdated. Similarly, FPRPC is typically used for remote web page authoring and it is susceptible to exploitation through various vulnerabilities too. As such, both of these protocols will be disabled by default starting from mid-July 2025, with the rollout of this change targeting completion by August 2025. The Redmond tech giant will update the protocol baseline by default without mandating any licensing changes for customers. In addition, once these modifications are rolled out, Microsoft 365 will require admin consent to get third-party access to files and sites. IT admins can view the guidance available here to configure admin consent workflows. Microsoft says that these changes align with the principles of its Secure Future Initiative (SFI). Earlier today, it announced the rollout of improved security defaults for Windows 365 citing the same reasons too.
    • This is how you kill your own business.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Fuzz_c earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      TIGOSS earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      slackerzz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      vivetool earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      pnajbar earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      704
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      283
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      216
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      195
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      131
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!