• 0

Pseudo code


Question

Hello, this is for my AS Computing exam

 

My teacher is fairly clueless so I was just wondering if this is correct?

 

It's about Nested Statements

 

Write your own nested statement in pseudo code to print ?Accepted? if someone is a member and

over 18, ?Not a member? if they are not a member or ?Underage? if they are not 18.

 

if person EQUALS Member

if person EQUALS >= 18

PRINT "Accepted"

ELSE

PRINT "Underage"

End if

ELSE

PRINT "not a member"

End if

 

Im mostly concerned about if this is in the right format, should the ELSE PRINT "not a member" come last? and is >= appropriate for pseudo code?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1203017-pseudo-code/
Share on other sites

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

That looks correct, with the exception that "EQUALS >=" is nonsense, either write "greater than or equal" or ">=", but not both.

 

Pseudo-code has no formal rules, just keep it consistent. For instance some of your keyword are all-caps and some aren't, that's not good. Pick a style and stick with it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1203017-pseudo-code/#findComment-596288845
Share on other sites

  • 0
  On 01/03/2014 at 16:38, Andre S. said:

That looks correct, with the exception that "EQUALS >=" is nonsense, either write "greater than or equal" or ">=", but not both.

 

Pseudo-code has no formal rules, just keep it consistent. For instance some of your keyword are all-caps and some aren't, that's not good. Pick a style and stick with it.

 

Ahh I see,

 

So it could be

 

IF person = Member

IF person >=18

PRINT "Accepted"

etc

 

Thank you!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1203017-pseudo-code/#findComment-596288857
Share on other sites

  • 0

For your exam... So are your posting this question during it??? huh.png

 

Your answer looks pretty good to me, the only thing I would change (apart from consistency of capitals) is the use of the word "EQUALS". A person is a person, a person does not equate directly to a membership status or a number. This would be better:

If person is a Member

    If age of person is greater than or equal to 18

        PRINT "Accepted"

    Else

        PRINT "Underage"

    End if

Else

    PRINT "Not a member"

End if

Rules on pseudo code are pretty lax, as long as the logic is sound and it makes sense, it really doesn't matter too much. With specific regard to use of '>=' and similar expressions, think about who will be reading the pseudo code you've written (I'm talking in general here, not specifically about the exam). If you're writing it just for yourself or for others who understand programming, it's obviously going to be fine; whereas if someone unfamiliar with programming were to need to look at it, who may perhaps be unfamiliar with the expression you are intending on using, it may be best to revert to words to avoid confusion.

 

The order of conditional checks in your logic is perfectly sound. If you were to attempt to follow the precise order of logical requirements in the question, you may end up with this:

If person is a Member

    If age of person is greater than or equal to 18

        PRINT "Accepted"

    End if

Else, if person is not a member

    PRINT "Not a member"

Else, if age of person less than 18

    PRINT "Underage"

End if

Which would be incorrect because the logic does not actually work!


  On 01/03/2014 at 16:46, Kerberonix said:

Ahh I see,

 

So it could be

 

IF person = Member

IF person >=18

PRINT "Accepted"

etc

 

Thank you!

 

No, see above!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1203017-pseudo-code/#findComment-596288859
Share on other sites

  • 0
  On 01/03/2014 at 16:49, theblazingangel said:

For your exam... So are your posting this question during it??? huh.png

 

Your answer looks pretty good to me, the only thing I would change (apart from consistency of capitals) is the use of the word "EQUALS". A person is a person, a person does not equate directly to a membership status or a number. This would be better:

If person is a Member

    If age of person is greater than or equal to 18

        PRINT "Accepted"

    Else

        PRINT "Underage"

    End if

Else

    PRINT "Not a member"

End if

Rules on pseudo code are pretty lax, as long as the logic is sound and it makes sense, it really doesn't matter too much. With specific regard to use of '>=' and similar expressions, think about who will be reading the pseudo code you've written (I'm talking in general here, not specifically about the exam). If you're writing it just for yourself or for others who understand programming, it's obviously going to be fine; whereas if someone unfamiliar with programming were to need to look at it, who may perhaps be unfamiliar with the expression you are intending on using, it may be best to revert to words to avoid confusion.

 

The order of conditional checks in your logic is perfectly sound. If you were to attempt to follow the precise order of logical requirements in the question, you may end up with this:

If person is a Member

    If age of person is greater than or equal to 18

        PRINT "Accepted"

    End if

Else, if person is not a member

    PRINT "Not a member"

Else, if age of person less than 18

    PRINT "Underage"

End if

Which would be incorrect because the logic does not actually work!

 

No, see above!

I looked at a few similar questions against the mark scheme and some of them allow the use of expressions, but some of them don't even list them... but they all include the use of words such as the ones you used. So the safe option is to write it to a standard (like you did with actually writing "greater than" etc) which everyone may be able to read, which is what I shall do from now on.

 

And my exam isn't until the end of june :p

 

Thank you!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1203017-pseudo-code/#findComment-596288919
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Linus Torvalds releases a pretty ordinary Linux 6.16-rc3 by Paul Hill Linus Torvalds, the head and founder of the Linux kernel, has announced the release of Linux 6.16-rc3. This release comes with fixes for new features that were introduced during the merge window several weeks ago, and for old features where issues have been detected or improvements need to be made. If you remember last week, Torvalds said that rc2 seemed smaller than usual, putting it down to people going on vacation. He said this week’s rc3 seems to be in the usual ballpark for this time of the cycle, so everything looks “entirely normal.” In terms of changes, this release is “dominated” by wireless networking and GPU driver updates, however, Torvalds doesn’t think that anything really huge stands out this time. While nothing stands out Torvalds urged people to carry on testing and submitting patches. This update saw improvements to the core system and architecture. There have been improvements to ARM64 KVM that improve stability and correctness of virtualizations on ARM64. There are also improvements to RISC-V KVM and Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) for Intel which expand and secure virtualization capabilities on those architectures. On the graphics front, there are fixes for the amdgpu and amdkfd drivers that fix job handling, engine resets, display corruption, and power management features. The driver used for Qualcomm’s Adreno GPUs has been updated to improve fault handling, display timing, and driver binding. The open-source Nouveau (Nvidia) driver has been updated with fixes for GSP message queue references, potential integer overflows, buffer size adjustments, and a use-after-free bug. Finally, the Intel i915 driver has been updated to address early wedge issues, memory initializations, and build errors. There are also improvements to Wi-Fi devices (ath12k and iwlwifi), sound (ALSA), power management on AMD, and file system improvements (OverlayFS, EROFS, XFS, NFS, SunRPC). Linux 6.16 is due for release at the end of July and will then be picked up by Linux distributions, which will be the first interaction most end users have with the new features in this update. The main benefit of a newer kernel is that Linux will work on newer hardware, so if you’ve had issues with Linux, be sure to try it periodically in case your hardware is now supported.
    • Technically, it should be account-bound after activating it
    • Follow this video, and a new build will feel a lot faster. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...WLAytRBid7Qryv3&index=1
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      urbanmopdubai1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Johnny Mrkvička earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      viraltui earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      serfegyed earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      645
    2. 2
      Michael Scrip
      226
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      219
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      150
    5. 5
      Xenon
      146
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!