32GB RAM being maxed out and page file going crazy on SSD; Get a dedicated HDD?


Recommended Posts

Hello,

A PC with 32GB of RAM is getting maxed out so we are upgrading to 64GB. Besides that (and right now) the Windows page file is being killed on the SSD. Besides the RAM, I was thinking of getting a HDD dedicated for the page file. Any drive 100GB would do as long as it is decent and fast (might go with a Raptor).

Good idea?

The question is what are you doing to max out 32GB RAM?

 

Putting the page file on a dedicated hard drive will help performance and save wear and tear on your SSD though

  • Like 2

The question is what are you doing to max out 32GB RAM?

 

Putting the page file on a dedicated hard drive will help performance and save wear and tear on your SSD though

I've always kept my page file on the SSD as that's the C: and is where Windows 8.1 is installed.

 

Should I move the page file to one of my secondary 7,200 RPM HDDs? :s

I've always kept my page file on the SSD as that's the C: and is where Windows 8.1 is installed.

 

Should I move the page file to one of my secondary 7,200 RPM HDDs? :s

It helps if you are maxing out your memory as it will be quicker to access on its on dedicated HDD, otherwise I would leave it be.

Why not just upgrade the RAM further (to 64GB) if your motherboard supports it? Paging really slows down performance.

 

And once again, what exactly is eating up all your RAM?

I would love to know what is maxing out your RAM as I do heavy 3D graphics and comp work in Nuke and im lucky to hit 12GB even when rendering. 
So yeah, what the hell are you running to max out 32GB exactly!?!

Hello,

The question is what are you doing to max out 32GB RAM?

Wow 32GB!

 

I have 8GB in my laptop and always use around 60% ish but that kind of use is insane for a PC? Is it running virtual machines or something?

And once again, what exactly is eating up all your RAM?

So yeah, what the hell are you running to max out 32GB exactly!?!

http://www.solidworks.com/sw/products/simulation/packages.htm

Software eats like a fat kid that loves cake.

Do you a WD2500HHTZ is good for this? Should I go for something else? Or, if budget permits it, go something enterprise-wise? (even though the SATA connection might be the bottleneck there, right)

I'd personally just buy a smallish cheap SSD and put the pagefile on there rather than a HDD. If you're paging that much, then the performance of the SSD will help - and if it's a cheap SSD which is there just for a page file, who cares if it dies relatively quickly.

With that much of RAM, is a paging file really necessary? I set a fixed size of 256 MB on systems with 4 GB and above, never had an issue.

Just did some googling based on the software you mentioned, memory will max out no matter how much you put in, especially when doing flow simulations. My advice? put in as much Ram as your mobo allows. A 4TB HD would help too for paging and would speed things up immensely if you need the sims done fast.

Hello,

LOL - Gonna have to use that.

Not mine. Heard it in a song. 

 

I'd personally just buy a smallish cheap SSD and put the pagefile on there rather than a HDD. If you're paging that much, then the performance of the SSD will help - and if it's a cheap SSD which is there just for a page file, who cares if it dies relatively quickly.

But a small cheap SSD with max out quickly and then what? Will it stop opening programs? Will it use the HDD as a SECOND page file? 

 

With that much of RAM, is a paging file really necessary? I set a fixed size of 256 MB on systems with 4 GB and above, never had an issue.

Yup. Like I said, the page file on the SSD is currently 40GB and growing... 

 

Just did some googling based on the software you mentioned, memory will max out no matter how much you put in, especially when doing flow simulations. My advice? put in as much Ram as your mobo allows. A 4TB HD would help too for paging and would speed things up immensely if you need the sims done fast.

So biggest cheapest no name HDD or or a 10000RPM? Im not leaning towards getting another SSD

Id go the no name, yes the SSD will be faster for I/O, but at the end of the day it wont matter, because your storing information to it, it will only get read when its completed the render of your sim. I only suggest a 4TB for HDD as that should be more than enough for even your most complex simulations, and using it as ure page file drive you can set that number to the size of the drive itself. So in essense, you would have a 4TB RAM drive. 

I have a similar setup for my 3D/Nuke stuff. 
32GB RAM
120GB SSD windows/programs
120GB SSD pagefile
2TB HDD data/movies/tvshows/porn 

Basically I got 152GB ram :) 

 

Hello,

Id go the no name, yes the SSD will be faster for I/O, but at the end of the day it wont matter, because your storing information to it, it will only get read when its completed the render of your sim. I only suggest a 4TB for HDD as that should be more than enough for even your most complex simulations, and using it as ure page file drive you can set that number to the size of the drive itself. So in essense, you would have a 4TB RAM drive. 

I have a similar setup for my 3D/Nuke stuff. 

32GB RAM

120GB SSD windows/programs

120GB SSD pagefile

2TB HDD data/movies/tvshows/porn 

Basically I got 152GB ram :)

But you use a SSD? First you recommend a normal 7200 HDD and you yourself use a SSD; Just in case you got confused.

I was thinking between the lowest sized 10000RPM HDD raptor drive and a regular 300GBish 7200 HDD drives. I wasnt thinking of anything huge.

Not sure what to do.

Hello,

But you use a SSD? First you recommend a normal 7200 HDD and you yourself use a SSD; Just in case you got confused.

I was thinking between the lowest sized 10000RPM HDD raptor drive and a regular 300GBish 7200 HDD drives. I wasnt thinking of anything huge.

Not sure what to do.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168221485

 

We have 4 of these in our server at work and they work admirably. We are running retail software with 3 terminal thin clients. It runs a huge customer and inventory sql database. 

But a small cheap SSD with max out quickly and then what? Will it stop opening programs? Will it use the HDD as a SECOND page file?

By small I mean a 128 or so GB one. And unless you're doing crazy stuff, i doubt you'll use 64GB ram and a 128GB page file!

Something like the M500. You can get the 120GB for about ?50, and the 240 for about ?80

Id go the no name, yes the SSD will be faster for I/O, but at the end of the day it wont matter, because your storing information to it, it will only get read when its completed the render of your sim. I only suggest a 4TB for HDD as that should be more than enough for even your most complex simulations, and using it as ure page file drive you can set that number to the size of the drive itself. So in essense, you would have a 4TB RAM drive. 

I have a similar setup for my 3D/Nuke stuff. 

32GB RAM

120GB SSD windows/programs

120GB SSD pagefile

2TB HDD data/movies/tvshows/porn 

Basically I got 152GB ram :)

 

 

 

SSD's run far slower than RAM, so unfortunately no, you don't have 152GB RAM. :P

  • Like 2

Hello,

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168221485

 

We have 4 of these in our server at work and they work admirably. We are running retail software with 3 terminal thin clients. It runs a huge customer and inventory sql database.

SAS and SATA are compatible right? Just need a adapter for the connector

Ill problably look for a no name 15K HDD.

 

 

By small I mean a 128 or so GB one. And unless you're doing crazy stuff, i doubt you'll use 64GB ram and a 128GB page file!

Something like the M500. You can get the 120GB for about ?50, and the 240 for about ?80

We are currently maxing out 32GB and have a 40GB+ page file....thats 72GB already.

I wouldnt get a brand one (more being a SSD); Id also get a no name brand for the same thing; a SSD as a page file will die. Im scared for this SSD we currently have installed!!!

 

SSD's run far slower than RAM, so unfortunately no, you don't have 152GB RAM. :p

Page file is RAM but slower. :rolleyes: We all understood what he ment.

I use the SSD for my page file as I dont hit more than about 18GB of RAM when doing my 3D stuff. I rarely, if ever, access that SSD. If for whatever reason I do however, it will be a faster read/write than using a standard HDD, and I know id never go over about 64GBs of ram even if doing 3D particle simulations. I just have it there as a 'Just in case'. 

But from what you told us you are constantly maxing out your RAM with your simulations, therefore you would require more space than a cheap SSD provides. See where Im going now? :)

With your 32GB RAM + say a 3TB HDD, your looking at about 3.25TB of RAM, although slowish RAM, but netherless, that would be more than enough for sims I would think.

The page file is not RAM, its simply a place to put pages of memory aside so that it can quickly retrieve it when it needs it. So when memory is full it dumps a chunk it doesn't require instantly to the page file and then when it needs that bit again it dumps another chunk and reads the original one back in.

How much money can you throw at the solution?

 

If you're needing a massive page file, my initial thought is that a HDD isn't the way to go if you also need performance. The read/write times on a hard drive will nuke your processing performance if you start thrashing. If you're looking to mitigate that, I'd recommend picking up a couple of 64GB SSDs and putting them in RAID 0. You'll certainly still suffer I/O blocking, but it'll be much faster than a single HDD, or even a single SSD. SSD wear shouldn't be a big issue. Many SSD's run for longer than most equivalent hard disks would before the write limit is reached.

Never used that packadge, but does it have a memory limit setting anywhere? Most high end software you can say yeah I have 128GB of RAM but you only get to use 64GB of it ever.. we have to do this a lot with SQL Servers because they like to cache anything and everything in RAM... if you set max ram you'd never hit a page file since it would keep it from getting to the point it needed it

 

software like that you should never let eat up more then system memory - 4GB (keep 4GB open for the system that apps cant access) there's an equation to estimate this number... I just picked 4GB because most OS's generally want that amount... SQL server we have something similar to 4GB base for up to 16GB of RAM, each 4GB of system ram over that give .5GB to system reserved... etc..etc.. that's not the real equation we use but it's just an example

Hello,

How much money can you throw at the solution?

Cheapest possible

 

If you're needing a massive page file, my initial thought is that a HDD isn't the way to go if you also need performance. The read/write times on a hard drive will nuke your processing performance if you start thrashing. If you're looking to mitigate that, I'd recommend picking up a couple of 64GB SSDs and putting them in RAID 0. You'll certainly still suffer I/O blocking, but it'll be much faster than a single HDD, or even a single SSD. SSD wear shouldn't be a big issue. Many SSD's run for longer than most equivalent hard disks would before the write limit is reached.

Cost, speed and space. You gotta stop somewhere. If I didnt I would obviously go with the largest SSD in RAID0. But...

A single SanDisk SSD 64 GB I can pick up for about 50? Should I go with that instead of a 300GB+ 7200 or 15000 HDD?

 

 

Never used that packadge, but does it have a memory limit setting anywhere? Most high end software you can say yeah I have 128GB of RAM but you only get to use 64GB of it ever.. we have to do this a lot with SQL Servers because they like to cache anything and everything in RAM... if you set max ram you'd never hit a page file since it would keep it from getting to the point it needed it

 

software like that you should never let eat up more then system memory - 4GB (keep 4GB open for the system that apps cant access) there's an equation to estimate this number... I just picked 4GB because most OS's generally want that amount... SQL server we have something similar to 4GB base for up to 16GB of RAM, each 4GB of system ram over that give .5GB to system reserved... etc..etc.. that's not the real equation we use but it's just an example

Why would I limit the memory? This PC is only and exclusivally used as a terminal server for this program. It does absolutely nothing else. Limiting its RAM would be waste of components/money.

I want to point out that even with 32GB and paging like crazy, performance is still awesome.

BTW, it seems my company has had second thoughts about price to RAM ratio :laugh: We are gonna upgrade it to 40GB (4*8GB (32GB, quad) + 2*4GB (8GB, dual) )

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
    • Nvidia GeForce NOW gains support for Dark Scrolls, Empulse, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final update of June for Nvidia's cloud gaming service GeForce NOW is now available, and it is touting support for six more games. The company is also drawing subscriber attention towards the summer sales kicking off across stores, so they can stock up on more cloud-supported titles. Of course, the Steam Summer Sale is the biggest promotion, which is kicking off later today. "Supported Steam games can be streamed across devices with GeForce NOW, making it easy to buy a game once, keep progress synced and pick up where the gameplay left off on PCs, Macs, handheld devices, phones, TVs and more," says the company. "In other words, the Steam Summer Sale brings the deals; GeForce NOW adds the flexibility." Don't forget that the GeForce NOW summer sale is still active as well. This limited-time offer drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. At the same time, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping the price by $70 from the original $199.99. Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Dark Scrolls (New release on Steam, available June 22) SAND: Raiders of Sophie (New release on Steam, available June 22) Deer & Boy (New release on Steam, available June 23) EMPULSE (New release on Steam, available June 24) The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales (Steam) FATAL FURY: City of the Wolves (Steam) With the June expansions coming to an end, Nvidia should be announcing its July GeForce NOW plans next week. Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
    • Davinci Resolve 21.0.1 by Razvan Serea DaVinci Resolve is the world’s only solution that combines editing, color correction, visual effects, motion graphics and audio post production all in one software tool! Its elegant, modern interface is fast to learn and easy for new users, yet powerful for professionals. DaVinci Resolve lets you work faster and at a higher quality because you don’t have to learn multiple apps or switch software for different tasks. That means you can work with camera original quality images throughout the entire process. It’s like having your own post production studio in a single app! Best of all, by learning DaVinci Resolve, you’re learning how to use the exact same tools used by Hollywood professionals! DaVinci Resolve is the only post production software designed for true collaboration. Multiple editors, assistants, colorists, VFX artists and sound designers can all work on the same project at the same time! Whether you’re an individual artist, or part of a larger collaborative team, it’s easy to see why DaVinci Resolve is the standard for high end post production and is used for finishing more Hollywood feature films, episodic television programing and TV commercials than any other software. Davinci Resolve 21.0.1 release notes: Addressed multiple DNG and Apple ProRAW color issues. Addressed issue with automatic smart bins after deleting keywords. Addressed issue with multiple linked audio in media management. Addressed multiple Resolve FX issues in photo page. Addressed issue with key shortcut to switch viewer in photo page. More consistent creation of new photo albums. Addressed color thumbnail refresh for photo transform indicator. Transcription now honors project settings language. Improved face recognition in IntelliSearch. Addressed exported bins not retaining generator and title properties. Addressed ease control display and sensitivity issues. Addressed keyframe issue when copying clips with Fusion effects. Addressed keyframe refresh for Fusion effects in the edit page. Addressed issue with 3D renders in Linux with non-English locales. Addressed Fusion viewer color issue for some RCM settings. Addressed issue with saturation limits in Fusion gradient controls. Addressed Fusion display issues with dual screen layouts. Addressed issue with non-English character inputs in Linux. Disabling MultiMaster now disables trim blanking controls. Addressed crash in some scenarios with CineFocus. Addressed lag when toggling bypass grades and Fusion effects. Addressed occasional issue with Fairlight loudness meters. Addressed data burn display of good take tag in upgraded projects. Addressed project manager scroll lag for large project libraries. Support for Sony Alpha 7R VI ARW RAW stills. Support for decoding Affinity RGB 16-bit formats. Addressed a color issue with MainConcept H.265 HDR renders. Addressed a color issue with Windows native H.265 HDR renders. RemoveMotionBlur API now uses correct encode parameters. Addressed character limit consistency in GenerateSpeech API. General performance and stability improvements. Download page: Davinci Resolve 21.0.1 | 3300 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: DaVinci Resolve Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!