32GB RAM being maxed out and page file going crazy on SSD; Get a dedicated HDD?


Recommended Posts

Hello,

A PC with 32GB of RAM is getting maxed out so we are upgrading to 64GB. Besides that (and right now) the Windows page file is being killed on the SSD. Besides the RAM, I was thinking of getting a HDD dedicated for the page file. Any drive 100GB would do as long as it is decent and fast (might go with a Raptor).

Good idea?

The question is what are you doing to max out 32GB RAM?

 

Putting the page file on a dedicated hard drive will help performance and save wear and tear on your SSD though

  • Like 2

The question is what are you doing to max out 32GB RAM?

 

Putting the page file on a dedicated hard drive will help performance and save wear and tear on your SSD though

I've always kept my page file on the SSD as that's the C: and is where Windows 8.1 is installed.

 

Should I move the page file to one of my secondary 7,200 RPM HDDs? :s

I've always kept my page file on the SSD as that's the C: and is where Windows 8.1 is installed.

 

Should I move the page file to one of my secondary 7,200 RPM HDDs? :s

It helps if you are maxing out your memory as it will be quicker to access on its on dedicated HDD, otherwise I would leave it be.

Why not just upgrade the RAM further (to 64GB) if your motherboard supports it? Paging really slows down performance.

 

And once again, what exactly is eating up all your RAM?

I would love to know what is maxing out your RAM as I do heavy 3D graphics and comp work in Nuke and im lucky to hit 12GB even when rendering. 
So yeah, what the hell are you running to max out 32GB exactly!?!

Hello,

The question is what are you doing to max out 32GB RAM?

Wow 32GB!

 

I have 8GB in my laptop and always use around 60% ish but that kind of use is insane for a PC? Is it running virtual machines or something?

And once again, what exactly is eating up all your RAM?

So yeah, what the hell are you running to max out 32GB exactly!?!

http://www.solidworks.com/sw/products/simulation/packages.htm

Software eats like a fat kid that loves cake.

Do you a WD2500HHTZ is good for this? Should I go for something else? Or, if budget permits it, go something enterprise-wise? (even though the SATA connection might be the bottleneck there, right)

I'd personally just buy a smallish cheap SSD and put the pagefile on there rather than a HDD. If you're paging that much, then the performance of the SSD will help - and if it's a cheap SSD which is there just for a page file, who cares if it dies relatively quickly.

With that much of RAM, is a paging file really necessary? I set a fixed size of 256 MB on systems with 4 GB and above, never had an issue.

Just did some googling based on the software you mentioned, memory will max out no matter how much you put in, especially when doing flow simulations. My advice? put in as much Ram as your mobo allows. A 4TB HD would help too for paging and would speed things up immensely if you need the sims done fast.

Hello,

LOL - Gonna have to use that.

Not mine. Heard it in a song. 

 

I'd personally just buy a smallish cheap SSD and put the pagefile on there rather than a HDD. If you're paging that much, then the performance of the SSD will help - and if it's a cheap SSD which is there just for a page file, who cares if it dies relatively quickly.

But a small cheap SSD with max out quickly and then what? Will it stop opening programs? Will it use the HDD as a SECOND page file? 

 

With that much of RAM, is a paging file really necessary? I set a fixed size of 256 MB on systems with 4 GB and above, never had an issue.

Yup. Like I said, the page file on the SSD is currently 40GB and growing... 

 

Just did some googling based on the software you mentioned, memory will max out no matter how much you put in, especially when doing flow simulations. My advice? put in as much Ram as your mobo allows. A 4TB HD would help too for paging and would speed things up immensely if you need the sims done fast.

So biggest cheapest no name HDD or or a 10000RPM? Im not leaning towards getting another SSD

Id go the no name, yes the SSD will be faster for I/O, but at the end of the day it wont matter, because your storing information to it, it will only get read when its completed the render of your sim. I only suggest a 4TB for HDD as that should be more than enough for even your most complex simulations, and using it as ure page file drive you can set that number to the size of the drive itself. So in essense, you would have a 4TB RAM drive. 

I have a similar setup for my 3D/Nuke stuff. 
32GB RAM
120GB SSD windows/programs
120GB SSD pagefile
2TB HDD data/movies/tvshows/porn 

Basically I got 152GB ram :) 

 

Hello,

Id go the no name, yes the SSD will be faster for I/O, but at the end of the day it wont matter, because your storing information to it, it will only get read when its completed the render of your sim. I only suggest a 4TB for HDD as that should be more than enough for even your most complex simulations, and using it as ure page file drive you can set that number to the size of the drive itself. So in essense, you would have a 4TB RAM drive. 

I have a similar setup for my 3D/Nuke stuff. 

32GB RAM

120GB SSD windows/programs

120GB SSD pagefile

2TB HDD data/movies/tvshows/porn 

Basically I got 152GB ram :)

But you use a SSD? First you recommend a normal 7200 HDD and you yourself use a SSD; Just in case you got confused.

I was thinking between the lowest sized 10000RPM HDD raptor drive and a regular 300GBish 7200 HDD drives. I wasnt thinking of anything huge.

Not sure what to do.

Hello,

But you use a SSD? First you recommend a normal 7200 HDD and you yourself use a SSD; Just in case you got confused.

I was thinking between the lowest sized 10000RPM HDD raptor drive and a regular 300GBish 7200 HDD drives. I wasnt thinking of anything huge.

Not sure what to do.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168221485

 

We have 4 of these in our server at work and they work admirably. We are running retail software with 3 terminal thin clients. It runs a huge customer and inventory sql database. 

But a small cheap SSD with max out quickly and then what? Will it stop opening programs? Will it use the HDD as a SECOND page file?

By small I mean a 128 or so GB one. And unless you're doing crazy stuff, i doubt you'll use 64GB ram and a 128GB page file!

Something like the M500. You can get the 120GB for about ?50, and the 240 for about ?80

Id go the no name, yes the SSD will be faster for I/O, but at the end of the day it wont matter, because your storing information to it, it will only get read when its completed the render of your sim. I only suggest a 4TB for HDD as that should be more than enough for even your most complex simulations, and using it as ure page file drive you can set that number to the size of the drive itself. So in essense, you would have a 4TB RAM drive. 

I have a similar setup for my 3D/Nuke stuff. 

32GB RAM

120GB SSD windows/programs

120GB SSD pagefile

2TB HDD data/movies/tvshows/porn 

Basically I got 152GB ram :)

 

 

 

SSD's run far slower than RAM, so unfortunately no, you don't have 152GB RAM. :P

  • Like 2

Hello,

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168221485

 

We have 4 of these in our server at work and they work admirably. We are running retail software with 3 terminal thin clients. It runs a huge customer and inventory sql database.

SAS and SATA are compatible right? Just need a adapter for the connector

Ill problably look for a no name 15K HDD.

 

 

By small I mean a 128 or so GB one. And unless you're doing crazy stuff, i doubt you'll use 64GB ram and a 128GB page file!

Something like the M500. You can get the 120GB for about ?50, and the 240 for about ?80

We are currently maxing out 32GB and have a 40GB+ page file....thats 72GB already.

I wouldnt get a brand one (more being a SSD); Id also get a no name brand for the same thing; a SSD as a page file will die. Im scared for this SSD we currently have installed!!!

 

SSD's run far slower than RAM, so unfortunately no, you don't have 152GB RAM. :p

Page file is RAM but slower. :rolleyes: We all understood what he ment.

I use the SSD for my page file as I dont hit more than about 18GB of RAM when doing my 3D stuff. I rarely, if ever, access that SSD. If for whatever reason I do however, it will be a faster read/write than using a standard HDD, and I know id never go over about 64GBs of ram even if doing 3D particle simulations. I just have it there as a 'Just in case'. 

But from what you told us you are constantly maxing out your RAM with your simulations, therefore you would require more space than a cheap SSD provides. See where Im going now? :)

With your 32GB RAM + say a 3TB HDD, your looking at about 3.25TB of RAM, although slowish RAM, but netherless, that would be more than enough for sims I would think.

The page file is not RAM, its simply a place to put pages of memory aside so that it can quickly retrieve it when it needs it. So when memory is full it dumps a chunk it doesn't require instantly to the page file and then when it needs that bit again it dumps another chunk and reads the original one back in.

How much money can you throw at the solution?

 

If you're needing a massive page file, my initial thought is that a HDD isn't the way to go if you also need performance. The read/write times on a hard drive will nuke your processing performance if you start thrashing. If you're looking to mitigate that, I'd recommend picking up a couple of 64GB SSDs and putting them in RAID 0. You'll certainly still suffer I/O blocking, but it'll be much faster than a single HDD, or even a single SSD. SSD wear shouldn't be a big issue. Many SSD's run for longer than most equivalent hard disks would before the write limit is reached.

Never used that packadge, but does it have a memory limit setting anywhere? Most high end software you can say yeah I have 128GB of RAM but you only get to use 64GB of it ever.. we have to do this a lot with SQL Servers because they like to cache anything and everything in RAM... if you set max ram you'd never hit a page file since it would keep it from getting to the point it needed it

 

software like that you should never let eat up more then system memory - 4GB (keep 4GB open for the system that apps cant access) there's an equation to estimate this number... I just picked 4GB because most OS's generally want that amount... SQL server we have something similar to 4GB base for up to 16GB of RAM, each 4GB of system ram over that give .5GB to system reserved... etc..etc.. that's not the real equation we use but it's just an example

Hello,

How much money can you throw at the solution?

Cheapest possible

 

If you're needing a massive page file, my initial thought is that a HDD isn't the way to go if you also need performance. The read/write times on a hard drive will nuke your processing performance if you start thrashing. If you're looking to mitigate that, I'd recommend picking up a couple of 64GB SSDs and putting them in RAID 0. You'll certainly still suffer I/O blocking, but it'll be much faster than a single HDD, or even a single SSD. SSD wear shouldn't be a big issue. Many SSD's run for longer than most equivalent hard disks would before the write limit is reached.

Cost, speed and space. You gotta stop somewhere. If I didnt I would obviously go with the largest SSD in RAID0. But...

A single SanDisk SSD 64 GB I can pick up for about 50? Should I go with that instead of a 300GB+ 7200 or 15000 HDD?

 

 

Never used that packadge, but does it have a memory limit setting anywhere? Most high end software you can say yeah I have 128GB of RAM but you only get to use 64GB of it ever.. we have to do this a lot with SQL Servers because they like to cache anything and everything in RAM... if you set max ram you'd never hit a page file since it would keep it from getting to the point it needed it

 

software like that you should never let eat up more then system memory - 4GB (keep 4GB open for the system that apps cant access) there's an equation to estimate this number... I just picked 4GB because most OS's generally want that amount... SQL server we have something similar to 4GB base for up to 16GB of RAM, each 4GB of system ram over that give .5GB to system reserved... etc..etc.. that's not the real equation we use but it's just an example

Why would I limit the memory? This PC is only and exclusivally used as a terminal server for this program. It does absolutely nothing else. Limiting its RAM would be waste of components/money.

I want to point out that even with 32GB and paging like crazy, performance is still awesome.

BTW, it seems my company has had second thoughts about price to RAM ratio :laugh: We are gonna upgrade it to 40GB (4*8GB (32GB, quad) + 2*4GB (8GB, dual) )

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
    • Windows 11 is fine, no issues on any of the machines I've run it on since release. The stricter security requirements are a good thing, sometimes the baseline needs to change and people will winge, but it is what it is. Happened with the move from 9x to NT - broke compatability Happened with XP SP2 when security started to become a serious consideration Certainly happend with Vista that brought in UAC, the concept of not running as admin (something that has been the norm in Linux/Unix from pretty much the start) and a completely new driver stack. Windows 11 will probably get looked back at as the point where even consumer and SMB IT was dragged kicking and screaming into a somewhat secure by default configuration.
    • Bluestacks has been emulating Android on Windows for fifteen years. It's janky and riddled with ads though, so WSA looked like it was going to be a huge improvement over the emulator experience. Too bad Microsoft dropped the ball on that.
    • Classic. China would be nothing without Western, Japanese, and South Korean technology.
    • The world is larger then your small viewpoint. Plenty of scientists care about this, especially those involved in space.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!