32GB RAM being maxed out and page file going crazy on SSD; Get a dedicated HDD?


Recommended Posts

what is the motherboard and how much RAM will it support? i agree w/ the others: RAM is cheap; just throw more at the problem.

 

Also, if your pagefile is that large, i'd get another SSD for it. Also, have you tried manually limiting the size?

Hello,

what is the motherboard and how much RAM will it support? i agree w/ the others: RAM is cheap; just throw more at the problem.

Mixing different RAM brands, it comes out to 304 euros to reach 64GB. That aint too cheap...

 

Also, if your pagefile is that large, i'd get another SSD for it. Also, have you tried manually limiting the size?

Its not about large, its about destroying the SSD. And if I limit the size of the page file (0 basically) then what?

Hello,

Mixing different RAM brands, it comes out to 304 euros to reach 64GB. That aint too cheap...

 

Its not about large, its about destroying the SSD. And if I limit the size of the page file (0 basically) then what?

It sounds like this is being used in a business environment. Are you using enterprise rated high endurance SSDs? If so, I don't think you'll need to be concerned about the writes... You'll have high endurance drives in a proper redundancy configuration and swap them out as soon as the warranties expire or they fail with minimal impact.

 

I would also dig into the RAM usage and potential swapping that is occurring to get a better idea of what is really occurring. Is it caching? Is it the system constantly being paged out and limiting the application RAM usage would solve the problem? Is there an upper bound? Meaning will the app just consume all of the RAM in the box and keep you in a constant paging scenario no matter how much RAM is in the box?

 

Either way, you want the page file on the fastest disk for obvious reasons. So I wouldn't move it to a HDD...

are you buying 32GB more or a completely new 64GB set? What's the RAM in there now, and what are you buying? Just curious.

 

People tend to overestimate the wear-and-tear thing w/ SSDs. It takes GBs per day for years to destroy the cells. SSDs have wear protection and whatnot to compensate.

 

 

SAS and SATA are compatible right? Just need a adapter for the connector

Ill problably look for a no name 15K HDD.

You can use SATA drives on SAS controllers without any problems but not the reverse.

Hello,

It sounds like this is being used in a business environment. Are you using enterprise rated high endurance SSDs?

No, because due to the nature of the build (overclocked) it served no purpose to the price budget to by enterprise SSDs. It would shoot the budget up way too much and nothing is even saved or stored on this SSD. The only problem is that, when used, the SSD page file is huge.

 

I would also dig into the RAM usage and potential swapping that is occurring to get a better idea of what is really occurring. Is it caching? Is it the system constantly being paged out and limiting the application RAM usage would solve the problem? Is there an upper bound? Meaning will the app just consume all of the RAM in the box and keep you in a constant paging scenario no matter how much RAM is in the box?

There is no boundary in Windows or the program. It simply maxes out when running various simulations.

 

Either way, you want the page file on the fastest disk for obvious reasons. So I wouldn't move it to a HDD...

OK then :) Ill get a short and small 64GB Sandisk SSD that I saw for 50 euros. If it gets trashed early, doesnt really matter.

 

 

are you buying 32GB more or a completely new 64GB set? What's the RAM in there now, and what are you buying? Just curious.

 

People tend to overestimate the wear-and-tear thing w/ SSDs. It takes GBs per day for years to destroy the cells. SSDs have wear protection and whatnot to compensate.

We are going to put 4 * 4GB (16GB) to bring it to 48GB. Communication was changed thruout the day but thats what is gonna be done.

 

 

You can use SATA drives on SAS controllers without any problems but not the reverse.

Understood.

Hello,

No, because due to the nature of the build (overclocked) it served no purpose to the price budget to by enterprise SSDs. It would shoot the budget up way too much and nothing is even saved or stored on this SSD. The only problem is that, when used, the SSD page file is huge.

 

There is no boundary in Windows or the program. It simply maxes out when running various simulations.

 

OK then :) Ill get a short and small 64GB Sandisk SSD that I saw for 50 euros. If it gets trashed early, doesnt really matter.

 

 

We are going to put 4 * 4GB (16GB) to bring it to 48GB. Communication was changed thruout the day but thats what is gonna be done.

 

 

Understood.

Maybe I am confused... What problem is being solved here?

 

What does overclocking have to do with what SSD you use? Also, what are you trying to actually solve? Is it just the space that the page file is using? As if it is a space issue then it appears to be an issue of right sizing your drive choice. But then I would argue to put a regular HDD in for the server and then run SSD sensitive applications from the SSD.

 

But I'm not sure I understand the core problem you're solving here. It seems like you saw the page file being large and then decided to spend money because the file is big... As if you don't care about the SSD wearing out then why not just leave it alone and let the current one wear out when it does? I hope you're not using any drive SSD or otherwise without proper backups in place to withstand a drive failure...

Hello,

Maybe I am confused... What problem is being solved here?

 

What does overclocking have to do with what SSD you use?

I mentioned it because its not worth buying less expensive but with a range of overclocking ability and then spend a lot more on a enterprise grade SSD.

 

Also, what are you trying to actually solve?

What I am trying to solve is that there is no wear-and-tear on the system SSD.

 

I hope you're not using any drive SSD or otherwise without proper backups in place to withstand a drive failure...

Drive failure is irrelevent. Nothing is stored.

I just dont want that SSD that can last 3 years, last 1 because of page file destroying it.

Im about to make the order for the Ultra Plus 64GB SSD so you just stopped me! :laugh: Any comments?

Hello,

I mentioned it because its not worth buying less expensive but with a range of overclocking ability and then spend a lot more on a enterprise grade SSD.

 

What I am trying to solve is that there is no wear-and-tear on the system SSD.

 

Drive failure is irrelevent. Nothing is stored.

I just dont want that SSD that can last 3 years, last 1 because of page file destroying it.

Im about to make the order for the Ultra Plus 64GB SSD so you just stopped me! :laugh: Any comments?

This is what I don't understand though... Why does the wear on the system SSD matter?

 

For a business environment you shouldn't be using anything past the warranty period. If you manage to wear the system SSD out from writes in 3 months then you would be able to use the warranty to replace it... It seems like you have a solution in search of a problem.

 

You should be able to handle a system drive failure...

Hello,

This is what I don't understand though... Why does the wear on the system SSD matter?

Downtime; Nothing more, nothing less.

For a business environment you shouldn't be using anything past the warranty period. If you manage to wear the system SSD out from writes in 3 months then you would be able to use the warranty to replace it... It seems like you have a solution in search of a problem.

 

You should be able to handle a system drive failure...

Lets say it does wear out in 3 months; Wouldnt buying a dedicated SSD JUST for the page file increase that wear out to a year (example) even though the page file SSD would wear out too in 3 months; The difference is that I can keep working.

Hello,

Downtime; Nothing more, nothing less.

Lets say it does wear out in 3 months; Wouldnt buying a dedicated SSD JUST for the page file increase that wear out to a year (example) even though the page file SSD would wear out too in 3 months; The difference is that I can keep working.

You still have the problem of downtime at some point in your example. It doesn't matter if it happens in 1 year or in 10 minutes... If downtime is an issue then you need to mitigate it appropriately... Adding another SSD to absorb wear doesn't mitigate against downtime. Instead you're hoping you're kicking the can down the road.

 

I would recommend you appropriately mitigate against downtime due to a drive failure and ignore the wear level of the SSD.

Hello,

You still have the problem of downtime at some point in your example. It doesn't matter if it happens in 1 year or in 10 minutes... If downtime is an issue then you need to mitigate it appropriately... Adding another SSD to absorb wear doesn't mitigate against downtime. Instead you're hoping you're kicking the can down the road.

 

I would recommend you appropriately mitigate against downtime due to a drive failure and ignore the wear level of the SSD.

Downtime? What downtime would there be?

Without a second drive - Turn off the PC, replace the drive, turn on the PC, reinstall/reimage.

With a second drive - Replace the drive.

Hello,

Downtime? What downtime would there be?

Without a second drive - Turn off the PC, replace the drive, turn on the PC, reinstall/reimage.

With a second drive - Replace the drive.

This is assuming the drive that fails is the second drive... If the system SSD fails you're still back at square one...

Hello,

This is assuming the drive that fails is the second drive... If the system SSD fails you're still back at square one...

Well, we can also assume that it is more likely that the first (system) drive does not fail before the second (page file) drive fails. Especially if the second one is a worst brand and/or worst model.

We can also assume that lighting might strike twice and everythings gets fried :laugh:

Hello,

Well, we can also assume that it is more likely that the first (system) drive does not fail before the second (page file) drive fails. Especially if the second one is a worst brand and/or worst model.

We can also assume that lighting might strike twice and everythings gets fried :laugh:

My point is simple. If your risk is downtime then you need to mitigate that risk...

 

You're shooting wild with no idea what your target is. This is a problem. You're going to make bad decisions as a result.

 

I would do some reading on how people mitigate downtime risk in computing. The most straightforward way is redundancy. It is for this reason that you'll typically see a server booting its OS from a RAID 1 volume.

Hello,

My point is simple. If your risk is downtime then you need to mitigate that risk...

 

You're shooting wild with no idea what your target is. This is a problem. You're going to make bad decisions as a result.

 

I would do some reading on how people mitigate downtime risk in computing. The most straightforward way is redundancy. It is for this reason that you'll typically see a server booting its OS from a RAID 1 volume.

Your point is basically wasting money on one machine that is used by 3-4 people, where there is NO data stored at all, that can suffer downtime (because it isnt important) but we dont want ONE component to be wasted.

You are looking way past the thread's subject, LogicalApex. If this machine was more important, I agree RAID1ing it would be a good idea. Plus, the downtime, with just one drive, would mostly affect me because I would be the one that has to reinstall and everything.

I do have to make a image of the machine ASAP.

Why would I limit the memory? This PC is only and exclusivally used as a terminal server for this program. It does absolutely nothing else. Limiting its RAM would be waste of components/money.

I want to point out that even with 32GB and paging like crazy, performance is still awesome.

BTW, it seems my company has had second thoughts about price to RAM ratio :laugh: We are gonna upgrade it to 40GB (4*8GB (32GB, quad) + 2*4GB (8GB, dual) )

I think you are missing the point of what limiting application RAM is for. I have a large SQL Server which has 128GB of RAM and houses TB's of data across Ten's of disks but we limit the SQL Server RAM software memory usage to 100 GB of RAM... You need RAM that is dedicated to the OS, once the OS runs of out free ram, you will have OS performance slow downs. This is just to guarantee that windows has enough free memory just to manage itself. This is a dedicated SQL Server, and we never have issues with speed or RAM because of thinking about limits of what can have what memory wise.. it's in no way limiting the server's usage.. it's not a waste of money because the OS still uses the RAM, that's why you have to calculate out what the OS needs vs what the software needs... which is also why high end software that does a lot of in memory caching and storage have limiters like this in place

Hello,

I think you are missing the point of what limiting application RAM is for. I have a large SQL Server which has 128GB of RAM and houses TB's of data across Ten's of disks but we limit the SQL Server RAM software memory usage to 100 GB of RAM... You need RAM that is dedicated to the OS, once the OS runs of out free ram, you will have OS performance slow downs. This is just to guarantee that windows has enough free memory just to manage itself. This is a dedicated SQL Server, and we never have issues with speed or RAM because of thinking about limits of what can have what memory wise.. it's in no way limiting the server's usage.. it's not a waste of money because the OS still uses the RAM, that's why you have to calculate out what the OS needs vs what the software needs... which is also why high end software that does a lot of in memory caching and storage have limiters like this in place

Well, then I think you are missing the point of what this PC does!

You have a large SQL server with a lot of RAM and a lot of disks that have a lot of data

I have a small overclocked PC with (compared to that) a medium amount of RAM and one disk with no data (only Windows and that program I mentioned before)

Im sorry if I dont understand you but I just dont see how your scenario compares to mine. Maybe Im missing something.

Hello,

Your point is basically wasting money on one machine that is used by 3-4 people, where there is NO data stored at all, that can suffer downtime (because it isnt important) but we dont want ONE component to be wasted.

You are looking way past the thread's subject, LogicalApex. If this machine was more important, I agree RAID1ing it would be a good idea. Plus, the downtime, with just one drive, would mostly affect me because I would be the one that has to reinstall and everything.

I do have to make a image of the machine ASAP.

If this is the case then I fail to understand why you're adding another SSD just for a page file... It seems you're wasting components and money...

riahc3, you appear to be purposefully confusing various aspects of a system's configuration in hopes that we just agree to your original question.

 

It is also clear to me that you do not understand how the various hardware components of a Windows PC actually interact with each other; and you have yet to respond with the types of memory consumption configurations the SolidWorks software provides.

 

Bottom line: You need to *reconfigure* your existing system.  The general consensus is that you do not need another disk drive.

Hello,

Well, then I think you are missing the point of what this PC does!

You have a large SQL server with a lot of RAM and a lot of disks that have a lot of data

I have a small overclocked PC with (compared to that) a medium amount of RAM and one disk with no data (only Windows and that program I mentioned before)

Im sorry if I dont understand you but I just dont see how your scenario compares to mine. Maybe Im missing something.

no, I'm not missing the point... the point is no mater what you need to dedicate some RAM to the Host OS... doesn't mater if its SQL Server or software like this. You are complaining about over paging, I'm trying to tell you how to stop it by managing your RAM, actual memory management not what windows does to dynamically manage it... if you force it to use a range of RAM it should never page out, because it will never use past that amount of RAM

Hello,

If this is the case then I fail to understand why you're adding another SSD just for a page file... It seems you're wasting components and money...

Well, then the solution would be to add more RAM. We are doing this already (not to the full extent because of costs) but as a "cost cutter" a SSD also helps, right?

 

 

riahc3, you appear to be purposefully confusing various aspects of a system's configuration in hopes that we just agree to your original question.

 

It is also clear to me that you do not understand how the various hardware components of a Windows PC actually interact with each other; and you have yet to respond with the types of memory consumption configurations the SolidWorks software provides.

 

Bottom line: You need to *reconfigure* your existing system.  The general consensus is that you do not need another disk drive.

Your post has reminded me of a essay generator.

Basically you read nothing from the thread, did no research into the software in question and read no replies. Thats what it seems to be at least.

Like I (and others mention) the program grows beyond a 32GB RAM and into a 40GB+ page file. This means it is consuming 72GB (not of raw RAM because like mentioned the RAM unloads chunk to the page file) I need to "reconfigure" my system is pretty obvious; We start with adding more RAM but because it would explode the budget, we take a cost cutting route of adding a SSD.

 

 

no, I'm not missing the point... the point is no mater what you need to dedicate some RAM to the Host OS... doesn't mater if its SQL Server or software like this. You are complaining about over paging, I'm trying to tell you how to stop it by managing your RAM, actual memory management not what windows does to dynamically manage it... if you force it to use a range of RAM it should never page out, because it will never use past that amount of RAM

OK, thats maybe what Im not understanding; Why would I say "limit yourself to 32GB"? Are you saying this to avoid the SSD paging at a cost of performance? Is that what you mean?

If so, I think 50 bucks vs limiting performance is worth it, personally. Let me see if I understood you correctly then Ill continue :)

BTW, thank you all for your advice and opinions. They help me a lot think about the problem :)

riahc3, on 06 Mar 2014 - 13:32, said:riahc3, on 06 Mar 2014 - 13:32, said:riahc3, on 06 Mar 2014 - 13:32, said:

Basically you read nothing from the thread, did no research into the software in question and read no replies. Thats what it seems to be at least.

Like I (and others mention) the program grows beyond a 32GB RAM and into a 40GB+ page file. This means it is consuming 72GB (not of raw RAM because like mentioned the RAM unloads chunk to the page file) I need to "reconfigure" my system is pretty obvious; We start with adding more RAM but because it would explode the budget, we take a cost cutting route of adding a SSD.

I actually read up on the entire 3 pages of responses before stating what I said.  Also, I'm also casually familiar with SolidWorks -- I've just never ran into the types of problem that you're describing.

 

There are parallels between SQL Server's memory management capabilities and those that (presumably exist) in SolidWorks.  Left unchecked (read: misconfigured) then the software would naturally consume as many resources as is made available to it via the OS.  Any program that hits the limits of its operating environment begins to error out or experience severe performance bottlenecks.  In the case of SolidWorks, it seems to defer those responsibilities to the OS -- hence how it consumes an ever-increasing amount of memory.  (The program does not know the difference between physical and virtual memory [page file].  It only knows that space is available.)

 

You can spend $5000 on more RAM, but SolidWorks will keep consuming as much memory as is available until it feels satisfied.

 

Your thoughts are either, "wow this program is hungry" or "wow I should really configure my SolidWorks environment properly."  I cannot speak for your business needs for SolidWorks over other CAD software, but I can speak to the idea that you must *really* dig into how SolidWorks is configured, review all of its configuration settings (both presented in the GUI and hidden in configuration files), and make sure you place a hard limit on how many resources the overall program is allowed to consume.  (You should also coordinate with SolidWorks directly if such a setting is too obscure... you may get a patch from them to fix the memory leak, or simply upgrade/downgrade to a version that operates properly within your given environment.)

 

Bottom line: Throwing more hardware at a software problem does not fix the software configuration problem.

Hello,

Well, then the solution would be to add more RAM. We are doing this already (not to the full extent because of costs) but as a "cost cutter" a SSD also helps, right?

 

 

Your post has reminded me of a essay generator.

Basically you read nothing from the thread, did no research into the software in question and read no replies. Thats what it seems to be at least.

Like I (and others mention) the program grows beyond a 32GB RAM and into a 40GB+ page file. This means it is consuming 72GB (not of raw RAM because like mentioned the RAM unloads chunk to the page file) I need to "reconfigure" my system is pretty obvious; We start with adding more RAM but because it would explode the budget, we take a cost cutting route of adding a SSD.

 

 

OK, thats maybe what Im not understanding; Why would I say "limit yourself to 32GB"? Are you saying this to avoid the SSD paging at a cost of performance? Is that what you mean?

If so, I think 50 bucks vs limiting performance is worth it, personally. Let me see if I understood you correctly then Ill continue :)

BTW, thank you all for your advice and opinions. They help me a lot think about the problem :)

any time you have to page out, you hurt performance anyways... anything that isn't direct memory access is slower, even if it is to an SSD... the way to solve the problem is either get more RAM (which by best practice you should still limit the app's memory usage, even with 1TB of RAM you should still have a MAX usage for the program just so the OS doesn't start paging out itself)... or use the amount you have now, and put the limiter in place and stop paging out excessively

Hello,

I actually read up on the entire 3 pages of responses before stating what I said.  Also, I'm also casually familiar with SolidWorks -- I've just never ran into the types of problem that you're describing.

 

There are parallels between SQL Server's memory management capabilities and those that (presumably exist) in SolidWorks.  Left unchecked (read: misconfigured) then the software would naturally consume as many resources as is made available to it via the OS.  Any program that hits the limits of its operating environment begins to error out or experience severe performance bottlenecks.  In the case of SolidWorks, it seems to defer those responsibilities to the OS -- hence how it consumes an ever-increasing amount of memory.  (The program does not know the difference between physical and virtual memory [page file].  It only knows that space is available.)

 

You can spend $5000 on more RAM, but SolidWorks will keep consuming as much memory as is available until it feels satisfied.

 

Your thoughts are either, "wow this program is hungry" or "wow I should really configure my SolidWorks environment properly."  I cannot speak for your business needs for SolidWorks over other CAD software, but I can speak to the idea that you must *really* dig into how SolidWorks is configured, review all of its configuration settings (both presented in the GUI and hidden in configuration files), and make sure you place a hard limit on how many resources the overall program is allowed to consume.  (You should also coordinate with SolidWorks directly if such a setting is too obscure... you may get a patch from them to fix the memory leak, or simply upgrade/downgrade to a version that operates properly within your given environment.)

 

Bottom line: Throwing more hardware at a software problem does not fix the software configuration problem.

Now this is a way better post! :)

I personally just do IT; I dont work with Solidworks and didnt even see it till about 6 months ago. When building this machine which was geared towards it, I read about softtweaks but since I didnt understand what my collegues need or want (and of course, I dont know or care what the program does), I went a hardware route. Maybe this would be a good time for software tweaks like you mentioned.

Well, since most of you are bent on limiting the program's RAM, I guess when we do this (upgrade the RAM) Ill go ahead and limit it. I gotta read on how to optimize it for Simulation AND also if it affects my collegues' needs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Elgato Stream Deck+ is now available at the lowest price by Taras Buria During Amazon Prime Day 2026, Elgato is offering a big discount on its Stream Deck+ accessory. This streaming and productivity accessory is now available for $141.99, thanks to a 21% discount. For those unfamiliar, the Stream Deck+ is a console-like device that features eight buttons with built-in displays. You can map these buttons to various actions and specify what each display shows. Unlike "classic" Stream Decks, the Plus model features four additional knobs for adjusting zoom, brightness, volume, microphone, and more. Above the knobs, there is a wide display that shows various values and sliders. Elgato's Stream Deck devices are highly customizable devices, and you can expand their capabilities using hundreds of plugins from the official Elgato Marketplace. You can create your own presets or use pre-made profiles to save time when configuring the device for specific apps. In the box, you get the Stream Deck+ itself, a USB Type-C to Type-C cable, and a user manual. The Stream Deck+ is a single-cable device, and all you need to set it up is to connect it to your computer and install the official Elgato app. Elgato Stream Deck+ - $141.99 | 21% off for Prime Members Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Can you give an example of when you would want to use Rufus over the other or vice versa? Just wondering which is the "best".
    • Oh no...the wallet is already screaming. So many games and so little time. Being old and responsible is awful!
    • LibreWolf 152.0.2-1 by Razvan Serea LibreWolf is an independent “fork” of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy security and user freedom. It is the community run successor to LibreFox. LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. LibreWolf features: Latest Firefox — LibreWolf is compiled directly from the latest build of Firefox Stable. You will have the the latest features, and security updates. Independent Build — LibreWolf uses a build independent of Firefox and has its own settings, profile folder and installation path. As a result, it can be installed alongside Firefox or any other browser. No phoning home — Embedded server links and other calling home functions are removed. In other words, minimal background connections by default. User settings updates Extensions firewall: limit internet access for extensions. Multi-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac/and soon Android) Community-Driven Dark theme (classic and advanced) LibreWolf privacy features: Delete cookies and website data on close. Include only privacy respecting search engines like DuckDuckGo and Searx. Include uBlockOrigin with custom default filter lists, and Tracking Protection in strict mode, to block trackers and ads. Strip tracking elements from URLs, both natively and through uBO. Enable dFPI, also known as Total Cookie Protection. Enable RFP which is part of the Tor Uplift project. RFP is considered the best in class anti-fingerprinting solution, and its goal is to make users look the same and cover as many metrics as possible, in an effort to block fingerprinting techniques. Always display user language as en-US to websites, in order to protect the language used in the browser and in the OS. Disable WebGL, as it is a strong fingerprinting vector. Prevent access to the location services of the OS, and use Mozilla's location API instead of Google's API. Limit ICE candidates generation to a single interface when sharing video or audio during a videoconference. Force DNS and WebRTC inside the proxy, when one is being used. Trim cross-origin referrers, so that they don't include the full URI. Disable link prefetching and speculative connections. Disable disk cache and clear temporary files on close. Disable form autofill. Disable search and form history...and more. Download: LibreWolf 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: LibreWolf Home Page | Addons | Screenshot | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hands on with iFlyTek AINote 2 E-Ink tablet: insanely thin and smart by Taras Buria During Amazon Prime Day 2026, iFlyTek is offering its E-Ink tablets with big discounts. The AINOTE 2 is now available at 20% off, allowing you to save quite a lot on one of the thinnest E-Ink tablets out there. I was offered a chance to look at the device, so here are my impressions. The AINOTE 2 is a large 10.65-inch E-Ink tablet that strikes you the moment you take it out of the box. It is extremely thin. At just 4.2 mm, this tablet is at the edge of what is possible for a device with a USB Type-C port. It is also very light, which makes it comfortable and enjoyable during long reading sessions. The tablet has a gold metal chassis with the front and back made of plastic. The back also features four rubber feet that prevent it from sliding around your desk when writing. Besides a USB Type-C port and an LED indicator, there are two buttons mounted on the top edge: a power button with a built-in fingerprint scanner and a dedicated AI button. I would say the fingerprint scanner is quite mid. Given that iFlyTek positions the device as a digital notebook, it makes sense to have a biometric scanner to protect sensitive information. However, it is not the fastest fingerprint reader, and sometimes it fails to recognize my finger. I assume that is due to the tablet's insane thinness. A dedicated AI button is an interesting choice, especially in the middle of the top edge. I can see this button being useful for those who heavily rely on AI and use it frequently, but I cannot help but think its placement is impractical. Having it on one of the longer sides would make so much more sense. The AINOTE 2 is a very pretty device. Gold finish with thin chassis and nearly symmetrical front bezels create a fantastic combination, and iFlyTek cleverly hides the front chin with a section that looks like an extension of the screen, housing two touch-capacitive buttons: one for AI and one for quick notes. This section can also scroll pages when you swipe from the middle to the left or right. It is a cool idea, and very handy when you need to scroll tens of pages at once. AINOTE 2's elegant look extends from its exterior to its software. The user interface is very clean and not cluttered with an abundance of buttons. The tablet prioritizes the note-taking experience, and when you unlock it, it defaults to the list of all notes and folders. Additionally, there is a separate "Schedule" section with your calendar, tasks, memos, and other productivity features. You can connect your Outlook or Google account or use a local calendar. The tablet has quite a lot of AI features powered by OpenAI's GPT-5 and Google's Gemini 3. Besides a standard app with all your chats, you can invoke AI by pressing its dedicated button and dictating your request. It is not limited to just chats. It works with the built-in calendar, and you can tell it to create events, tasks, notes, and more. Additionally, AI features are integrated into the built-in notepad, allowing you to summarize notes, ask questions about your notes, and more. The tablet can OCR handwritten text in different languages (about 120 languages, which is very impressive), and it surprised me with very good accuracy. Voice note transcription is also available, including a "multiplayer" mode where the tablet detects each speaker. Unfortunately, the AINOTE 2 has no built-in speakers (even though it somehow makes a tapping noise when you flip pages using the Quick Bar), so the only way to listen to something is to connect a Bluetooth speaker or headphones. However, there are four front-facing mics for dictation, voice notes, AI chats, and more. Unfortunately, certain features require a Pro subscription that costs $5.99/mo or $59.99/year. Those include offline voice transcription, access to better AI models, the ability to edit notes on a PC or mobile app, and extended service coverage similar to Apple Care. It is a bummer to see yet another app, especially in a device that costs $649, but at least they give a free 90-day trial so that you can see if the benefits justify the price. As for the reader, it supports PDF, EPUB, TXT, MOBI, AZW3, DOC(X), XLS(X), PPT(X), JPEG, JPG, and PNG. The app is quite customizable, with features like text contrast/boldness/size adjustments, margins and spacing customization, and the ability to load custom fonts. Plus, you can annotate books with the stylus, add text notes, and use AI to work with them. Just keep in mind that most AI features require an active internet connection. Like with other E-Ink tablets with Android inside, you can load any other reader you want from the Google Play Store or a third-party source. Despite its hefty price tag of $629 or $519 by the time of publishing this article during Prime Day 2026, the AINOTE 2 has quite modest hardware inside. There is only 4 GB of RAM and about 42GB of storage. It is powered by the RockChip RK3576 processor with 8 cores at 2.2 GHz. Given that the tablet runs Android 14 and has Google Play, you can install Android apps, but do not expect much from this thing performance-wise. As for the battery, there is a 4,000 Li-Ion battery, which, on full charge, lasted me for about one week of active daily use of reading and note-taking. The screen has a resolution of 1920x2560 pixels, which equals 300 PPI, a perfect spot for a sharp, nice-to-read display. It supports EMR styluses that do not require charging, and I have to say that the note-taking experience on this tablet is fantastic. Stylus lag is nearly imperceivable, creating a very natural, paper-like feel. The stylus comes in the box (including two extra nibs), and it features an extra button for various actions and an eraser on top. It magnetically attaches to the tablet and stays safely secured. The stylus has a very nice coarse texture, and thanks to using Wacom tech, you can swap it for any other EMR pen if you wish. The AINOTE 2 has no front light, and because of that, the display sits very close to the screen surface, reducing the distance between the stylus tip/your finger and the display to a minimum. No front light is certainly an inconvenience in certain scenarios, but the screen makes up for that with a seriously impressive paper-like feel and writing experience. In dark conditions, you will have to find a lamp, but the good thing is that the screen has a solid anti-glare surface that diffuses light. The display has two modes: Crisp and Fast. Crisp ensures the image stays, well, crisp and sharp, while Fast speeds up refresh rate and response by toning down display resolution and making everything a bit more jagged. In my testing, I only used Fast mode when browsing the web for a much faster render time. The iFlyTek AINOTE is an impressive device, but it's not flawless. A few things disappointed me during a week of using it. Software localization has a bunch of not necessarily broken, but certainly awkward, machine-translated English. System navigation is not good, as there is no universal "Home" gesture. To go to the main page, you have to swipe up and then press the Home button from the multi-tasking window. There are many gestures for various actions, such as display cleanup, screenshot, undo/redo, but no back/forward or Home gestures. I really hate that the tablet won't let me update its software without creating an iFlyTek account first. Finally, privacy could be a concern for some, as most tablets' features require an active internet connection, an iFlyTek account, and sharing data when using AI. If you can overlook its quirks, some of which could be addressed with software updates (I received two with massive changelogs over a single week), and accept a $519 price tag (with a discount), you will be happy with the AINOTE 2. However, if you do not need that many AI features in an E-Ink reader or you want something a bit more affordable, you'd better look at cheaper competitors from BOOX or Amazon, such as the BOOX Go 10.3 Gen 2 or the Kindle Scribe, which is currently 24% off during Prime Day sales. Buy iFlyTek AINOTE 2 on Amazon - $519 | 20% off with Prime What I liked What I disliked Very impressive hardware Beautiful design Fantastic display with an EMR stylus Supports offline voice transcription Easy-to-use software Clever, useful, and well-made AI features A fingerprint scanner Very expensive Some features require a subscription Poor system navigation Mandates a user account No speakers Privacy could be a concern Note: iFlyTek provided the review unit without any editorial input or review guidance. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      416
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      132
    4. 4
      Xenon
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!