Is boycotting a company pointless?


Recommended Posts

I ask that question because I really hate Comcast. The compaNY is a monopoly In the internet service in my area. They are now enforcing 300 GB caps and will charge $10 per 50 GB. This could not be a problem if I have choose to jump to a different company to provide cable internet but that's the problem. I can't, because they have a monopoly on cable in my area and not going to jump to ATT DSL which cap too.

I would love to boycott Comcast but I'm one person and find it pointless to do so will only hurt me and Comcast would not give a damn.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1204791-is-boycotting-a-company-pointless/
Share on other sites

No, not pointless.

 

In most (almost all) cases it accomplished little to nothing. Although, every so often, it turns into something bigger, far out of your control and actual results are achieved.

 

Believe it or not, your opinion matters.

No, boycotting a company isn't pointless. Of course, how companies act in monopoly markets is very different from how they act in competitive markets, but the basics are the same. They want your money...

 

Even a monopolist has to ensure that he is actually serving some of the needs of the customers to ensure that they return. Comcast is test marketing the new broadband cap pricing in your area for a reason. They want to see how people in your area react to these prices. If most people go "boycotting/cancelling my service is pointless" then the message that Comcast will conclude is "our customers are not sensitive to metered pricing" and they will do this more...

 

Your decision not to patronize them matters... Just remembering that is important as people today seem to have the attitude that you should just lay down and take whatever corporate bosses tell you to take.

  • Like 2

The only thing that would make Comcast pay attention is a long term boycott, where they lost money for months, and then you'd have to outlast them, and it's just not going to happen. Most people would rather bitch and moan while they over pay for ###### high speed service with data caps, than say get a great deal for great service over dial-up/dsl/whatever.

 

Some will even start threads on forums asking if it would do any good to boycott Comcast, while in the same post admitting they won't change providers and will contine to pay since they have the best option available to them.

 

Are you really going to ask others to do what you won't? Then I guess you have you answer...right?

Boycotting certainly isn't pointless. I boycott numerous companies for ethical reasons, like SodaStream because it operates in the illegally occupied West Bank. If other consumers do the same it can send a powerful message; if not then you're at least depriving them of revenue that they would use to further exploit the market. However, if you really care about such matters you should look to take further action - sharing it on forums is a start (as you have done), signing petitions, writing to local politicians, writing to the company to explain why you are boycotting them (otherwise they won't know), etc.

 

You can't expect your boycott of a company to change things overnight but just know that it does have an impact.

Boycotting in your case will be pointless. There is no competition in your area, so unless you can get hundreds or thousands of people to disconnect their internet from that company they won't give a ######.

 

Companies, especially in monopoly situations, act like right ######. 

The trick is to not be the only one boycotting. Make noise about it. Get others involved too like family and friends. Find others that agree with whatever stance you're taking, and band together. For a boycott to work well it needs multiple people working together towards the same goal. Think of it like a union of consumers going on strike. If you can cost a company money, they will notice, and take actions.

 

Doing it alone might make you feel better although nothing will come of it.

My old English teacher has been boycotting Coca Cola for years. I don't think they notice  :rolleyes:

I wouldn't be too sure. At the end of the day a boycott ensures that the company receives less money than it otherwise would have, which is something that businesses certainly do notice. If someone is paying $100 a year to Comcast and they decide to boycott that's $100 less they receive - if ten people do that's $1,000; one hundred and that's $10,000; one thousand and that's $100,000. As you can see the figures quickly add up.

 

Boycotting in your case will be pointless. There is no competition in your area, so unless you can get hundreds or thousands of people to disconnect their internet from that company they won't give a ####.

 

Companies, especially in monopoly situations, act like right ######. 

That's no reason not to boycott, it just means that one should not stop simply at a boycott. In fact by not boycotting the company it is actually encouraging the very behaviour they detest.

I ask that question because I really hate Comcast. The compaNY is a monopoly In the internet service in my area. They are now enforcing 300 GB caps and will charge $10 per 50 GB. This could not be a problem if I have choose to jump to a different company to provide cable internet but that's the problem. I can't, because they have a monopoly on cable in my area and not going to jump to ATT DSL which cap too.

I would love to boycott Comcast but I'm one person and find it pointless to do so will only hurt me and Comcast would not give a damn.

Get more people onboard with the boycotting Comcast.  I hate them too.  I have wish Comcast would get in trouble sometimes.  They are a big monopoly for sure.  I am stuck with them for the simple fact that I do not want to loose my email alias.  I never use the email service but I hate to change address or alias.

 

It is not pointless if you can recruit a lot of people to support the idea.  Comcast will change.

I don't boycott something because I think me abstaining from the company will make them change their ways. I stay away from companies because I don't like their ethics or product - I don't care if it makes a difference or not.

  • Like 3

This is what I would do:

 

1) The first challenge is to get like-minded people on board. Spread your message through social networks, local community centres, shopping malls, your neighbourhood bus stops, use flyers, start a Facebook group, etc. The premise is straightforward: more people = more power. You need to build a critical mass.

 

2) Once you've done that, once your group has grown to 20, 50, 100+ people, you should prepare a "class action" message, have all the participants sign it, and have it sent to:

 

a) your city council;

b) your elected representatives (at municipal, state, and federal levels);

c) Comcast's top management;

d) Comcast's board of directors;

e) Federal Trade Commission;

f) consumer protection groups;

g) local media outlets.

 

The more people join your initiative, the more chances you'll have that someone will have some background in law or public relations to help you write the complaint in a proper manner and cite appropriate anti-monopoly and consumer protection laws, and then the group synergy will take you from there.

 

Cheers and good luck!

  • Like 2

Boycotting corporations only works when there is organization and planning involved to relay the message. Simply refusing to buy a product tells them absolutely nothing (except that their profits were down for the month/quarter if a big quantity of people boycott).

 

They aren't worried about money, however, every company is worried about PR...always!

The problem with a Boycott has several points.

 

If you do not get enough people to Boycott, they will notice. Whereas if you have plenty, the Business will notice and the media will give you attention that might help your cause.

However at the same time your Boycotting might cause an issue in the business that they just pass on to the existing customers causing problems for them (such as higher rates due to membership number drops)

 

I know how you feel Locally there is only 1 internet service provider. Time Warner Cable. We cannot even get DSL from anyone so the only options are Time Warner, Dialup or if you don't really need the internet and you have a lot of disposable income you can get Satellite internet. They recently changed everyones rates that was not on a promotional contract from $46 a month for 15Mb internet to $91 for the same service. and that is for Internet only. No television service.

Point of fact, if you have two available options for internet service, then Comcast doesn't have a monopoly.

 

In regards to the question, yes boycotting a company is pointless. It accomplishes nothing. The company won't care if it loses a single potential customer. If you could organize a sizable number of people and boycott something, that may accomplish something. But most of the time even that amounts to nothing.

 

A better idea would be to get the local new channels involved or ask the government to look into the situation. But even those are long shots.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!