Recommended Posts

Schmoove:

Beautiful work as always.

Allows me to have redhat bluecurve again,without having to use redhat 9,which was just way to darn slow on my old box.Personally i like slackware the best of the linux distros,but must admit that redhat did a beautiful job with bluecurve.

Anyways thanks for the great effort and time you put into your theme's,the quality really shows!

Schmoove is it ok if I show off my screenshots now? ;)

Prefer the other start menu though. In any case, the theme is kickass </discussion>

Yeah post it if you want. I don't mind.

Personally I am not happy with the startmenu either. It worked quite well for Ximian, but doesn't really do it for Bluecurve it seems. So don't be surprised if I try something completely different in a next release.

Anyways, thanks people for the kind words. Glad you all like it!!!

Wonderful theme... Ximian has now been "retired"...

Yes pretty much. Don't want to brag, but the current version of Ximian is (in my opinion) possibly the best it is gonna get. I haven't noticed bugs (apart from things that are caused by msstyle restrictions) or whatsoever in the theme and it looks damn close to the real thing. I could make more colors, but I don't think that would make me or anyone else happier. I think it is fine this way.... time to move on.

Time to make a 'flawless' Bluecurve port, which is my aim with this msstyle.

Observe:

http://www.tokartta.co.uk/screenshots/gradientfade.jpg

Great job on everything else though :)

Ah I see what you mean. I am sorry but that is one of those things that is impossible in the msstyle format.

I can do that, but I have to enlarge the used bitmaps. The thing is that if you make those to large you will get massive resizing problems. On small windows it will compress the whole stuff to fit and everything will be out of proportions.... too bad.... ain't gonna work.

But I agree, it would look nicer.

I'm completely uneducated in the ways of Stylebuilder (as will become evident), but maybe you could get the stripes on a transparent image, and then make it so that they fade out in different directions over a (say, 650px) distance. Then (And this is where the high chance of impossibility comes in), you could make the titlebar 'base' the gradient in the central area of the pic I posted, and 'layer' the two stripe images (one fades to transparent to the left, the other to the right) on top - Then you could set it so they 'stick' to the leftmost and rightmost areas of the titlebar. (an example, off the top of my head, would be Olive Dynamine's stripe - Its always located X px away from the rightmost edge of the titlebar). It would kind of work :blink:

Yeah. I've never used Stylebuilder in my life. Does it show? :$

Anyway. If thats not possible in the msstyles format, maybe it could be done for WB? This theme is one I'm willing to install WB for :)

I'm completely uneducated in the ways of Stylebuilder (as will become evident), but maybe you could get the stripes on a transparent image, and then make it so that they fade out in different directions over a (say, 650px) distance. Then (And this is where the high chance of impossibility comes in), you could make the titlebar 'base' the gradient in the central area of the pic I posted, and 'layer' the two stripe images (one fades to transparent to the left, the other to the right) on top - Then you could set it so they 'stick' to the leftmost and rightmost areas of the titlebar. (an example, off the top of my head, would be Olive Dynamine's stripe - Its always located X px away from the rightmost edge of the titlebar). It would kind of work :blink:

Yeah. I've never used Stylebuilder in my life. Does it show? :$

Anyway. If thats not possible in the msstyles format, maybe it could be done for WB? This theme is one I'm willing to install WB for :)

Nice idea... but ain't gonna work. The msstyle format does not support layers :no:

With that gradient thing, it only appears behind the text which is a problem, as I tried to do a similar thing with a mac os 8.6 theme I was working on, however you cant stretch the outside parts, only the middle. In which case you'll get bugger all of the dark blue area, but loads of blurred section.

Heres the start menu I was talkin about, oh and 'some' of you may notice siRC v4.0 in the taskbar, just incase your interested ;)

Perhaps offer this start menu in a substyle?

post-36-1070581958.png

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!