Recommended Posts

Hello, basically I have a situation where a VBScript performs a few against queries a mapped drive. It works perfectly as an interactive sessions (such as my user account). However, I do not want it to require an interactive logon, I want it to run as a service account, or something similar, so that it does not require my user input.

 

Here is the layout:

 

1x FreeNAS server with a network share named 'Share1'

1x Windows Server 2008 R2 with a mapped Z:\ drive connecting to \\FreeNAS\Share1. I log onto this Windows Server and run a vbscript that performs queries against the Z:\ mapped drive.

 

Can this be performed without an interactive logon?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1205419-mapped-drives-and-service-accounts/
Share on other sites

Where you can run into an issue is if this location your running the script from has other sessions open to this freenas, lets say billy is logged into the box where the script runs and has a connection to this freenas\share1 -- you can not create another session to freenas from the same location with different credentials.

 

Its quite possible to create the session using whatever creds you want in your script to access the resource -- but if that source has other sessions open to that server your most likely going to have issues.  You normally can not have multiple sessions to the same server from the same location with different creds.

Where you can run into an issue is if this location your running the script from has other sessions open to this freenas, lets say billy is logged into the box where the script runs and has a connection to this freenas\share1 -- you can not create another session to freenas from the same location with different credentials.

 

Its quite possible to create the session using whatever creds you want in your script to access the resource -- but if that source has other sessions open to that server your most likely going to have issues.  You normally can not have multiple sessions to the same server from the same location with different creds.

Thanks for your reply. The script would only be ran once a day to query the free space remaining on the drive, so there isn't an issue with different credentials. However, I do not wish a user to be logged in at all, just having it run as a service account. However I do not think that service accounts can map z:\freenas\share1, as it isn't interactive.

run it as a scheduled task, you won't neet to be logged in with anyone, it will just run.  You can schedule it to run once a month, once a week, once a day, once every minute...alternate months, weeks, days, hours, minutes, etc.  I would think that would be better for you than run as a service. 

run it as a scheduled task, you won't neet to be logged in with anyone, it will just run.  You can schedule it to run once a month, once a week, once a day, once every minute...alternate months, weeks, days, hours, minutes, etc.  I would think that would be better for you than run as a service. 

But can I map a Z:\ drive as a scheduled task without anybody logged on?

Why would you not simply do what you need to do with the unc path vs mapped drives. Drive mapping is for user ease..vbscript should not care between user drive mapping and actual path.

Unforutunately I don't know how to do that. All my attempts of using the UNC share have shown the CIFS share as having 0 bytes free. (The same as browsing to the UNC path and selecting properties). However, when it is mapped, Windows knows how large and how much is used of the drive as it acts as a volume, rather than a share. I do not know how to get round this. :(

You can use powershell instead, and make a small script to query space after mounting it.

 

use a scheduled job like sc302 described.

 

Set the job to run as whoever has access to mount.

New-PSDrive ?Name ?<free driveletter>? ?PSProvider FileSystem ?Root ?\\<nas name>\<sharename>?

Get-Volume <driveletter> | out-file <path to logfile> -append

Remove-PSDrive <Driveletter>

 

make sure the account you are running the job as have the rights to do what you need.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!