Recommended Posts

I just got my Xbox One today and love it so far. I have my DirecTV passing through it. The only problems I have are with audio. Everything on my av receiver shows as PCM and doesn't even sound as good as my 360 did. I do have HDMI audio set to 7.1 but TV and games only do PCM. Also, voice commands like mute or volume up don't work. It tells me I gave to set it up in TV settings but I don't see anything about that and I already gave my Tv, DirecTV box, and Pioneer receiver set up. It would just be cool if I could control sound with voice commands. Also is MS not supporting Dolby Digital yet or something?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1205831-xbox-one-audio-question/
Share on other sites

Yes, all 3 devices are there. DirecTV, Pioneer VSX 53, and Panasonic TV. Everything seems to be in stereo and I have no control of the receiver with Kinect. The system was automatically set up for 7.1 surround during setup. It even played its tones in all speakers. Playing Forza 5 sounded like stereo. Playing the latest Forza on my 360 had bone-shattering surround sound. You could hear car sounds all around you. It seems that maybe there's a bug in the One with playing digital surround?

You actually have to change it to Bitstream to get true DTS or Dolby Digital. I just had to do this earlier this week myself and it was driving me nuts as I also had it to 7.1 but was not getting true surround sound (my receiver has an orange light when I am getting true surround). Changing it to Bitstream fixed it.

 

As far as your Kinect issues are concerned, you do not control Kinect through your receiver, it has it's own mic array on Kinect itself. So something is not configured properly there.

I noticed Bitstream was greyed out and I can't even select it. And I am talking about controlling my receiver with Kinect, not the other way around.

That may be your problem, as Larry pointed out you need to select bitstream to see your pioneer show DD or DTS.  I would go through the TV setup again to be sure you selected the right options.  You should be able to use voice commands to mute and volume up/down.

Well, I input Pioneer, then chose VSX53 from their list so I figured it would just work. I get sound, just no surround and I can't enable bitstream. I tried last night to delete the receiver and re-add it and it didn't change anything.I should just re-run the whole TV setup again?

Well, I input Pioneer, then chose VSX53 from their list so I figured it would just work. I get sound, just no surround and I can't enable bitstream. I tried last night to delete the receiver and re-add it and it didn't change anything.I should just re-run the whole TV setup again?

and you have the HDMI out going directly to the receiver?  try the whole TV setup again just to be sure you didnt miss anything

 

 

edit - also, dont forget, if you do choose PCM (uncompressed 5.1 or 7.1) you should still be getting surround sound as your receiver would not have to do the converting (hope this makes sense)

Yes, I have the xbox going right to the receiver and then output to my TV. I didn't choose PCM, I don't see that option anywhere. It just says HDMI 7.1. There is an option for bitstream which is greyed out and I can't select it. My 360 never said PCM, it always had Dolby Digital on the display and I had full surround. I don;t get nearly as good sound now.

PCM just means that the Xbox One has already decoded the signal and your receiver plays it as it is received. When your receiver actually says Dolby Digital, or DTS or whatever it means the receiver is receiving an encoded signal of the specified type and it is doing the decoding.

 

Which ever one you are seeing, you should still be receiving surround sound if the signal in question has surround sound information in the stream.

I just found this on the xbox forums.  As much as I like seeing DD or DTS on my receiver.. I think I am going to switch back to 5.1 uncompressed

 

The Xbox does auto-detect the signal, it has too.  The Xbox then has to decode everything into PCM so that it can mix the audio as necessary, it never just passes on the signal.  After the audio has been mixed it simply sends out the audio as PCM if that's what's selected or it will compress it into Dolby or DTS if that option is selected.

If your Xbox is directly connected to your receiver with HDMI, PCM is always the best option.  If your audio has to go over an optical or coaxial cable at some point before it gets to your receiver, Dolby or DTS would be the best choice.

The real problem here is that the Xbox will always output a 5.1 signal if that is what is selected, even if the source audio is stereo.  This leaves the center and rears blank with everything coming out of the fronts.  Your audio receiver is then unable to matrix the audio into 5.1, because it is already getting a 5.1 signal.  If the Xbox switched to stereo when it was only getting a stereo input, that would enable your receiver to matrix stereo into 5.1.

The only issue with this is what happens if say, you're watching stereo content on Netflix and then snap TV with a surround signal.  It's then going to have to either switch to 5.1 anyway or output the TV in stereo.  I think this is probably why the Xbox is currently locked into exactly what the user selects, instead of adjusting the number of channels output based on the source.

I just found this on the xbox forums. As much as I like seeing DD or DTS on my receiver.. I think I am going to switch back to 5.1 uncompressed

The Xbox does auto-detect the signal, it has too. The Xbox then has to decode everything into PCM so that it can mix the audio as necessary, it never just passes on the signal. After the audio has been mixed it simply sends out the audio as PCM if that's what's selected or it will compress it into Dolby or DTS if that option is selected.

If your Xbox is directly connected to your receiver with HDMI, PCM is always the best option. If your audio has to go over an optical or coaxial cable at some point before it gets to your receiver, Dolby or DTS would be the best choice.

The real problem here is that the Xbox will always output a 5.1 signal if that is what is selected, even if the source audio is stereo. This leaves the center and rears blank with everything coming out of the fronts. Your audio receiver is then unable to matrix the audio into 5.1, because it is already getting a 5.1 signal. If the Xbox switched to stereo when it was only getting a stereo input, that would enable your receiver to matrix stereo into 5.1.

The only issue with this is what happens if say, you're watching stereo content on Netflix and then snap TV with a surround signal. It's then going to have to either switch to 5.1 anyway or output the TV in stereo. I think this is probably why the Xbox is currently locked into exactly what the user selects, instead of adjusting the number of channels output based on the source.

Thanks for this. I was just about topmost that I changed from 7.1 uncompressed to bitstream and now I can choose DTS or DD. But from what you're saying, I should leave it at 7.1 and not worry about the PCM on the display? That only leaves me with why won't voice commands control my receiver?

Edit I saw that there was a 2nd VSX53 model listed with characters in parentheses. I selected that one and now I can volume control my tv.

Thanks for this. I was just about topmost that I changed from 7.1 uncompressed to bitstream and now I can choose DTS or DD. But from what you're saying, I should leave it at 7.1 and not worry about the PCM on the display? That only leaves me with why won't voice commands control my receiver?

Edit I saw that there was a 2nd VSX53 model listed with characters in parentheses. I selected that one and now I can volume control my tv.

Great, glad it all worked. And yes, as boring as it looks on your reciever, PCM should be your best bet based on the post I got on the xbox forums. But as anyone would tell you, go with what sounds best for you

Great, glad it all worked. And yes, as boring as it looks on your reciever, PCM should be your best bet based on the post I got on the xbox forums. But as anyone would tell you, go with what sounds best for you

I marked your post as best answer. PCM is really fine now. I played Forza 5 last night and noticed hearing cars behind me as I passed theme surround is in fact working.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!