• 0

Javascript to auto scale webpage


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You want fit to width kind of thing?

If you can convert back this bookmarklet present in mozillazine thread:

http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1980839

 

Main thread: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1939895

  • 0

What about CSS3 responsive web design?

No JavaScript required, just uses CSS

 

Add

<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">

to the header, and then in the CSS file,

@media screen and (max-width: 320px) {

}

Or can always use Bootstrap 3.0, which uses responsive web design as well

  • 0

CSS3 responsive is not what he needs in this case I think he wants it to work like a img element that gets bigger and smaller proportionally   :p

$(document).ready(function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("body").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%"
}

This might work, crazy code though.

  • 0

So, like example not my site here, but similar issue - http://www.ci.mcminnville.or.us/

 

That site, if you are on a widescreen monitor, it's a fixed width size. If you press CTRL+ x 4 in your browser (I am on 2560x1440) it is then full screen, without as much empty space on each of the sides.

 

I'd like something like this to happen automatically depending on the users browser window size. without losing the formatting of the content.

body { zoom: 1.5; }

kind of works, in the HTML, but not in the CSS file, and I don't want to apply it to each and every html file.

  • 0
  On 22/03/2014 at 20:10, xendrome said:

So, like example not my site here, but similar issue - http://www.ci.mcminnville.or.us/

 

That site, if you are on a widescreen monitor, it's a fixed width size. If you press CTRL+ x 4 in your browser (I am on 2560x1440) it is then full screen, without as much empty space on each of the sides.

 

I'd like something like this to happen automatically depending on the users browser window size. without losing the formatting of the content.

body { zoom: 1.5; }

kind of works, in the HTML, but not in the CSS file, and I don't want to apply it to each and every html file.

Tried my code?

 

I tested following code myself on that site and it works:

$(document).ready(function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("#wrapper").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%"
}
$(window).on('resize', function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("#wrapper").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%"
});
  • 0
  On 22/03/2014 at 20:12, Seahorsepip said:

 

Tried my code?

 

I tested following code myself on that site and it works:

$(document).ready(function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("#wrapper").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%"
}
$(window).on('resize', function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("#wrapper").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%"
});

 

Where do I apply that into? Does that fall between <script></script> tags in the html?

 

BTW I did try 

html {
    zoom: 0.8; /* Old IE only */
    -moz-transform: scale(0.8);
    -webkit-transform: scale(0.8);
    transform: scale(0.8);
}

But that actually cut off like 20% of the top and I couldn't scroll up.

  • 0
  On 22/03/2014 at 20:19, xendrome said:

Where do I apply that into?

 

BTW I did try 

html {
    zoom: 0.8; /* Old IE only */
    -moz-transform: scale(0.8);
    -webkit-transform: scale(0.8);
    transform: scale(0.8);
}

But that actually cut off like 20% of the top and I couldn't scroll up.

Make sure that you use the correct element in the code I gave, it could be body but also #wrapper depending on what is the fixed width css element container.

 

Just put it in a file called something.js

and add these 2 lines to your header in html:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.10.2/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="something.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
  • 0

Hmm not seeing any change in the formatting. I have

 

zoom.js in /scripts

$(document).ready(function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("#body").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%"
}
$(window).on('resize', function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("#body").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%"
});

And in index.html in the <head> section

<script src="/ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.10.2/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="/scripts/zoom.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
  • 0
  On 22/03/2014 at 20:28, xendrome said:

 

Hmm not seeing any change in the formatting. I have

 

zoom.js in /scripts

$(document).ready(function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("#body").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%"
}
$(window).on('resize', function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("#body").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%"
});

And in index.html in the <head> section

<script src="/ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.10.2/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="/scripts/zoom.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

Try just body instead of #body

  • 0
  On 22/03/2014 at 21:02, xendrome said:

No go, I do see this when I F12 and look at resourced - https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/111413/error.png

weird that's very odd lemme check

  • 0

Seems I typed } instead of }); for document ready...    try:

$(document).ready(function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("body").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%";
});
$(window).on('resize', function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("body").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%";
}); 

Tell me if it worked ^^

  • 0
  On 22/03/2014 at 21:09, Seahorsepip said:

 

Seems I typed } instead of }); for document ready...    try:

$(document).ready(function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("body").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%";
});
$(window).on('resize', function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("body").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%";
});

Same result. Check your PM also :)

  • 0
  On 22/03/2014 at 21:11, xendrome said:

Same result. Check your PM also :)

You made a mistake with jquery in <head>

<script src="/ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.10.2/jquery.min.js"></script>

should be:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.10.2/jquery.min.js"></script>

// means for http://

 

And js in your case:

$(document).ready(function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("body table tbody").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%";
});
$(window).on('resize', function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("body table tbody").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%";
});
  • 0
  On 22/03/2014 at 21:15, Seahorsepip said:

You made a mistake with jquery in <head>

<script src="/ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.10.2/jquery.min.js"></script>

should be:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.10.2/jquery.min.js"></script>

// means for http://

 

I downloaded it locally, the version - jquery-1.11.0.min.js and pointed to it in the <head> if that will work ok? also put that in PM just FYI

  • 0
  On 22/03/2014 at 21:15, Seahorsepip said:

And js in your case:

$(document).ready(function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("body table tbody").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%";
});
$(window).on('resize', function(){
	zoom = $(window).width()/$("body table tbody").width()*100;
	document.body.style.zoom = zoom+"%";
});

 

Ok this is working, Chrome, it's edge to edge, but can you load the live site now in IE 11, it's pushing the content to the far right. And BTW I just scaled it down to *75 instead of *100

 

Edit: Also IE8 same issue.

  • 0
  On 22/03/2014 at 21:21, xendrome said:

Ok this is working, Chrome, it's edge to edge, but can you load the live site now in IE 11, it's pushing the content to the far right. And BTW I just scaled it down to *75 instead of *100

Yeah IE is a acting like a bad boy again...

Fix:

 

css:

body {
	overflow-x: hidden;
}

additional js file called iefix.js

function detectIE() {
	var ua = window.navigator.userAgent;
	var msie = ua.indexOf('MSIE ');
	var trident = ua.indexOf('Trident/');
	if (msie > 0) {
		return parseInt(ua.substring(msie + 5, ua.indexOf('.', msie)), 10);
	}
	if (trident > 0) {
		var rv = ua.indexOf('rv:');
		return parseInt(ua.substring(rv + 3, ua.indexOf('.', rv)), 10);
	}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
	if(detectIE()){
		fix = $(window).width()/$("body table tbody").width()*75/2;
		$("body").css("margin-left","-"+fix+"%");
	}
});
$(window).on('resize', function(){
	if(detectIE()){
		fix = $(window).width()/$("body table tbody").width()*75/2;
		$("body").css("margin-left","-"+fix+"%");
	}
});

Let's see if that works

 

Edit: Changed px to % in code

Edit2: added "-"+

Edit3: changed ,, to , just a typo

 

Should work now(just tested).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yeah, I totally get your point, which is possible it could happen. I just hope there is a few people around him who are similar to where if they took over things would run pretty much the same. if not, then yeah, it could start to decline rapidly etc. but I figure something that's been around for a longer period of time with a decent backing, and probably more users than most Linux distro's (which I would 'imagine' Mint is one of the more used Linux desktop distro's by volume of people who use it), is less likely to just disappear. but like you said, nothing is guaranteed. but I do think you are probably right in that Clem is probably the core of what keeps Mint, Mint. I like how it tends to stay pretty much the same with some slight tweaks here and there (but is largely the same) instead of that crap some people go for with change for the sake of change trying to create a overly fancy interface and other unnecessary stuff etc. I also feel Mint keeps a nice balance of things out-of-the-box where it's not too bloated, nor too striped down. p.s. but I see Mint as a better Ubuntu basically. but I get your point like if it was more of a really serious choice of needing a 'safe bet' to use long term, then yeah something like official Ubuntu would be one of the better choices for sure given what you said with it being backed by an actual company which makes it a safer bet than Mint which is smaller and 'could' potentially be more fragile.
    • It’s in development so hopefully it’s improved upon before release.
    • For the 10th iteration they could have bothered with some design changes rather than just carrying over the 9's
    • So this requires hardware to be setup in the area you want to listen to music in? And it requires hardware for each user? So useless for me when I'm out walking my dog? Or when I'm at the gym and want to listen to my podcasts rather than the music the gym is broadcasting? Heck, will it even work in my own home and allow me to walk around from room to room, or even within a room? Yeah, these won't be replacing headphones anytime soon.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      leoniDAM earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Ian_ earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Ian_ earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      MacDaddyAz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Explorer
      cekicen went up a rank
      Explorer
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      211
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      200
    4. 4
      Xenon
      147
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      122
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!