The return of the Start menu in future Windows 8.1 update: Thoughts?


Recommended Posts

As long as the full-screen Metro interface still applies on tablet then I'm happy with this. I liked the metro interface but with the ability to window apps and include them more into the desktop environment is something I'm not going to turn my nose upon. Just MS, please update those f*****g icons.

I guess I don't understand the point of the ModernUI.

 

Are developers supposed to create Modern versions of their programs?

 

Apparently that's not happening yet (if at all) and people are still using their old programs (from the desktop)

 

And they still want to interact with their old programs the way they've done for years (on the desktop with a familiar Start Menu)

 

That's why I was saying people didn't ask for this change.

 

I'm still on Windows 7... so all my programs are traditional desktop programs.  

 

I never said "boy I wish there was a new way to interact with my computer. Even if I still use a keyboard and mouse... I wish everything looked and worked differently."

 

I don't think anyone said that. That's why it was such a shock when it happened.

 

I'd been wanting a new way to interact with my computer since 1995. I'd always hated the Menu. The best element for me of 8 is not the improved touchscreen support, not the new added program style, it's the lack of Start Menu.

 

So yeah, some people had been wanting things to look and work differently, and were frustrated when every version of Windows was just the same regurgitated design with a fresh coat of paint.

 

The option of a Start Menu is nice for those that wanted it, but for those of us that loathe it, it had better remain an option.

 

I'm going to hold off on updating U1 until I find out if all the "enhancements" can be disabled. I don't want to have to use a Menu again, and I don't want Modern turned into just another variation of the desktop. Let it be its own animal, rather than a desktop clone.

I guess I don't understand the point of the ModernUI.

 

Are developers supposed to create Modern versions of their programs?

 

Apparently that's not happening yet (if at all) and people are still using their old programs (from the desktop)

 

And they still want to interact with their old programs the way they've done for years (on the desktop with a familiar Start Menu)

 

That's why I was saying people didn't ask for this change.

 

I'm still on Windows 7... so all my programs are traditional desktop programs.  

 

I never said "boy I wish there was a new way to interact with my computer. Even if I still use a keyboard and mouse... I wish everything looked and worked differently."

 

I don't think anyone said that. That's why it was such a shock when it happened.

Why can't developers create ModernUI versions of their programs?  If they can create versions of their software for Android and iOS, why NOT ModernUI?  Amazon created a ModernUI version of the Kindle reader application; I faulted it because it is feature-incomplete compared to the versions for other OSes - not because there isn't one.

 

I came to Windows 8 FROM Windows 7; the only desktop programs I didn't bring with me were those mooted by features now in the OS proper.  Every other application and game made the trip, and works as well as, if not better than, in Windows 7.

 

Therein lies the difference - pointing-device-centric users were the ones in favor.  Suddenly, with Windows 8, they weren't.  The pointing-device is not the primary means of interaction with Windows 8 - it has equal favor with both touch AND keyboard.

 

Keyboard-centric users migrated with little or no issues whatever - it's the pointing-device-centric users that are screaming.  I specifically said that they WOULD be screaming, too - however, I had no idea how loud the screams would get.

Not necessary for me as I'm used to Modern apps and the Start Screen. But I know a few areas where they are superfluous or cumbersome, so I like that the option will be available (which it should have been from the get go as it was too big a change for some).

What I'm happy about is the native windowed ModernUI app support, that's just great!

What I am waiting to see is if Microsoft can truly blend the modern experience and traditional experience in a seemless way. Similar to how Apple does launchpad, mission control and spaces. They are getting close, to that though

What I am waiting to see is if Microsoft can truly blend the modern experience and traditional experience in a seemless way. Similar to how Apple does launchpad, mission control and spaces. They are getting close, to that though

Not really - they refused to take the next logical step with any of them (at least on portable hardware, such as the MacBook Air/Pro) - why no touch-screen MacBooks, let alone iMacs?

 

Any of it - in fact, all of it - can only gain usability merely by adding touch-screen hardware (as an option, not necessarily a requirement); however, Apple has refused to budge - why?

 

In that respect, Microsoft's hardware partners - especially in terms of WINDOWS hardware partners - are far ahead of Apple (matching the hardware to the OS capabilities).

Nobody was asking for the change to Modern or Metro. So that was definitely NOT a necessary change :)

 

If you came from Windows 7 or earlier... ALL of your programs were traditional desktop programs.  And the machine you're using is also a traditional desktop or laptop.  

 

So it's only natural to have a meh attitude (or even hate) Microsoft's new focus on Metro and touch-based apps.

 

In a recent video... Windows VP Joe Belfiore said the following:

 

"Windows 8 was a new design for Windows that was created to enable awesome new touch-based tablets and PCs"

 

And then in the very next sentence he says:

 

"we know that many Windows 8 and 8.1 users are still using mouse and keyboard... or don't have a touchscreen at all"

 

Well... no #### sherlock.  What kind of research did you do?  Didn't you know that there are a billion Windows PCs out in the world that don't have a touchscreen?  So why change the UI at all?

 

At least all your old traditional Windows software will still work.  But you gotta wonder what they were thinking.

 

Judging by the way they are putting back old features... their plan didn't work out too well.

Michael - the point I am trying to make is that ALL change there HAS been as far as Windows goes - going all the way back to Windows 95 itself - has been fought against.  If the change-hostile in Windows had their way, we would be celebrating the third decade of Program Manager.  All too many Windows users are HAPPY with "meh" - while a lot of the remainder feel basically helpless, if not powerless.

And can it be set as the boundary between the two halves of Windows, like the Screen currently is?

I remember using it on Win7, so I dunno if it's been updated for Win8. Hell, I don't even remember the name of the program or where I found it...

 

Google of course isn't turning up anything useful... Although you can use the original PROGMAN.EXE files on Win7. And most likely 8.

I remember using it on Win7, so I dunno if it's been updated for Win8. Hell, I don't even remember the name of the program or where I found it...

 

Google of course isn't turning up anything useful... Although you can use the original PROGMAN.EXE files on Win7. And most likely 8.

 

The point I was trying to make, is that Program Manager, as it was in 3.x, isn't well-suited for 8.x. It's desktop only, and Windows isn't purely desktop UI anymore. I use some Modern apps, and don't want to have to drop into the desktop just to launch a program. The Screen, OTOH, I see as the boundary between the two designs, since you can easily launch either desktop or Modern programs from it.

 

Nonetheless, if we have to have a purely desktop-oriented launcher, I'd rather have Progman than the textmaze

Michael - the point I am trying to make is that ALL change there HAS been as far as Windows goes - going all the way back to Windows 95 itself - has been fought against.  If the change-hostile in Windows had their way, we would be celebrating the third decade of Program Manager.  All too many Windows users are HAPPY with "meh" - while a lot of the remainder feel basically helpless, if not powerless.

Yeah... I know all changes are fought against and hated.  It just seems like Windows 8 was more hated than all the rest.

 

Do you think people will come to accept the Windows 8 style eventually?  If so... then Microsoft should have ignored their dissenters and stayed the course.  But they're not.

 

Microsoft had this grand vision and new interface for Windows 8... but now they are returning features to please people who are happy with the "old" style.

 

That's why I was wondering why they made such huge changes at all... if they end up having to reverse them. This obviously didn't go as planned.  

 

Windows 8 came with no "boot to desktop" functionality.  Then Windows 8.1 brought it back.  Surprise... people have a lot of desktop software that they just want to get to with minimal fuss.

 

Then people still were missing other things... and Update 1 fixed some of those problems.

 

Now... the rumor is that something resembling the traditional Start Menu will be coming back as well.

 

So again... why did Microsoft make all these big changes... if they're gonna have to put it back the way it used to be?

 

Microsoft has a tough job.  They want to innovate and prepare for exciting new computing paradigms in the future.  I get that.

 

But... they've also got a billion existing users that they have to keep happy as well.

 

You're right... people hated Windows 95 and they wanted their old Windows 3.1 back.  Microsoft didn't give them that though.

 

Now look at all the things Microsoft is putting back into Windows 8 and other fixes... is this an admission that Microsoft screwed up?

Yeah... I know all changes are fought against and hated.  It just seems like Windows 8 was more hated than all the rest.

 

Search in the Start menu, the search indexer, and UAC were absolutely hated when first introduced in Vista.

Horsepuckey.

 

The issue with the Start menu is pointing devices in general - if not mice in particular.

 

horsepuckey yourself

 

the start menu and mouse/keyboard are the ideal way to drive a computer that is actually used to do productive work.

 

Anyone who thinks the metro interface is good, obviously does nothing more than browse information and consume media (and use it like a toy, which is basically what metro is).

There is no way it can be used in a productive way for business purposes or by (power) users who need to get things done.

Michael - the point I am trying to make is that ALL change there HAS been as far as Windows goes - going all the way back to Windows 95 itself - has been fought against.

 

Rubbish, change has only been fought when its a backwards step, and Microsoft has done it twice now, because they didn't listen to their customers.

 

Vista was a massive fail, as was Windows 8.

 

The sooner they completely dump metro, and bring out Windows 9 with full desktop/mouse/keyboard support, as it is in Windows 7, the sooner I'll be buying my next version of Windows.

No way I'm wasting any money on Windows 8.

 UAC were absolutely hated when first introduced

 

And still is today, despite it being pretty much neutered, due to Microsoft not listening to its customers, and making windows harder to use.

At least there was always the option to totally disable it, which is what I've done in every version of windows since it was released.

Vista was a massive fail, as was Windows 8.

 

The sooner they completely dump metro, and bring out Windows 9 with full desktop/mouse/keyboard support, as it is in Windows 7 . . .

Slightly off-topic, but how can you bash Windows Vista in one paragraph and praise Windows 7 in the next? Windows Vista introduced most of the features that Windows users are currently clamoring for (such as Windows Aero, Windows 7-style Start menu, etc.) Doesn't Vista also offer full support for the desktop paradigm, mouse, and keyboard?

 

And still is today, despite it being pretty much neutered, due to Microsoft not listening to its customers, and making windows harder to use.

At least there was always the option to totally disable it, which is what I've done in every version of windows since it was released.

Edit: Microsoft didn't listen to customers when modifying UAC in Windows 7 . . .? I thought the consensus at the time was that the feature was too annoying or intrusive?

horsepuckey yourself

 

the start menu and mouse/keyboard are the ideal way to drive a computer that is actually used to do productive work.

 

Anyone who thinks the metro interface is good, obviously does nothing more than browse information and consume media (and use it like a toy, which is basically what metro is).

There is no way it can be used in a productive way for business purposes or by (power) users who need to get things done.

 

These exact same arguments were made AGAINST the start menu when it was introduced in 1995, by people who swore by the Windows 3.1 Program Manager, calling anyone who liked the Start Menu "kiddies" etc, and saying "professionals" were "more productive" with the program manager.

 

Plenty of people are able to get work done using the Start Screen, saying otherwise is nonsense, It's just a program launcher. Me launching Office from the Start Screen or the Start Menu doesn't make a lick of difference. 

 

Every feature will be complained about by a certain group of people, and the ones who complain about it are always more vocal than the ones who dont mind it. 

  • Like 2

Nobody was asking for the change to Modern or Metro. So that was definitely NOT a necessary change :)

If you came from Windows 7 or earlier... ALL of your programs were traditional desktop programs. And the machine you're using is also a traditional desktop or laptop.

So it's only natural to have a meh attitude (or even hate) Microsoft's new focus on Metro and touch-based apps.

In a recent video... Windows VP Joe Belfiore said the following:

"Windows 8 was a new design for Windows that was created to enable awesome new touch-based tablets and PCs"

And then in the very next sentence he says:

"we know that many Windows 8 and 8.1 users are still using mouse and keyboard... or don't have a touchscreen at all"

Well... no #### sherlock. What kind of research did you do? Didn't you know that there are a billion Windows PCs out in the world that don't have a touchscreen? So why change the UI at all?

At least all your old traditional Windows software will still work. But you gotta wonder what they were thinking.

Judging by the way they are putting back old features... their plan didn't work out too well.

Nobody asked for the Ribbon, either. So what? Nobody has asked for any change, but we still get it regardless.

Now look at all the things Microsoft is putting back into Windows 8 and other fixes... is this an admission that Microsoft screwed up?

hundreds of millions of modern apps are being downloaded in an app store that's one and a half years young. adding features and options to aid in the transition is not screwing up.

What's wrong with searching? It's not like you have to sit there and type the EXACT application executable name anymore. Type in a few characters, click the icon that appears, and be on your way.

The Search function would be more useful if it had better autocorrect/suggest functionality. 

 

I don't have this problem but I've seen people type the names of programs (and files, etc) wrong, and it the search function is not particularly intelligent - the correct program/file might not show up at all, instead all you get are the internet search results which are not particularly helpful...

Nobody asked for the Ribbon, either. So what? Nobody has asked for any change, but we still get it regardless.

That's a good point.  Microsoft knew the ribbon would be better than digging around through sub-menus. And they've kept the Ribbon... despite the hate.

 

I'm guessing they also thought the Start Screen would be better than digging through the old Start Menu.  They even got rid of the start button just so you'd forget about it.

 

But here we are... first the return of a button... and now rumors of a start menu.

 

People didn't ask for the change... but it doesn't matter because many of these changes are being reversed.

These exact same arguments were made AGAINST the start menu when it was introduced in 1995, by people who swore by the Windows 3.1 Program Manager, calling anyone who liked the Start Menu "kiddies" etc, and saying "professionals" were "more productive" with the program manager.

 

Plenty of people are able to get work done using the Start Screen, saying otherwise is nonsense, It's just a program launcher. Me launching Office from the Start Screen or the Start Menu doesn't make a lick of difference. 

 

Every feature will be complained about by a certain group of people, and the ones who complain about it are always more vocal than the ones who dont mind it. 

Take it one step farther... Back when Windows was first released, "GUIs are for kids. Real men don't use mice."

 

And I'm sure when computers were first being invented, purists were talking about how much more productive they would be on typewriters.

 

All these arguments are nothing new. And I find that I am just as productive on Win8 as I have been on any previous version of Windows. And I do "real things" like research papers, Illustrator usage, etc.

adding features and options to aid in the transition is not screwing up.

They're adding some features and options that they took away in the first place.

 

That tells me that Microsoft didn't do enough research on how people actually use their computers.

 

I'm sure there were many meetings like this in Redmond:  "Let's take this feature away... nobody will miss it..."

 

oops... 

 

If you have something in one version of Windows... and then you take it way for the next version of Windows... then you put it back in the following version of Windows.... isn't that considered screwing up?  :)

 

Maybe "screwing up" is too harsh of a term... but you get the idea.

Take it one step farther... Back when Windows was first released, "GUIs are for kids. Real men don't use mice."

 

And I'm sure when computers were first being invented, purists were talking about how much more productive they would be on typewriters.

 

All these arguments are nothing new. And I find that I am just as productive on Win8 as I have been on any previous version of Windows. And I do "real things" like research papers, Illustrator usage, etc.

 

Im hoping this new Start menu lets me choose how wide it is, one thing that bothered me about the old Start menu was you could only make it taller, couldn't take advantage of my horizontal screen real estate, the thing people have most of.

Good...hopefully it comes with a "legacy" option.  I absolutely hate Metro and the start screen.  One other option I would like to see added is the ability to see text clearly on dark themes.  One of my other major gripes.

 

 

post-21852-0-86533000-1396659303.jpg

Im hoping this new Start menu lets me choose how wide it is, one thing that bothered me about the old Start menu was you could only make it taller, couldn't take advantage of my horizontal screen real estate, the thing people have most of.

This. The old Windows XP era Start Menu wasn't scalable at all. It was never updated to take advantage of bigger monitors and resolutions. Just one of the many issues with it.

Good...hopefully it comes with a "legacy" option.  I absolutely hate Metro and the start screen.  One other option I would like to see added is the ability to see text clearly on dark themes.  One of my other major gripes.

Yes, this is very annoying for me. This wasn't an issue on Vista/7, no idea why the text won't just automatically go white if you have black window chrome. It's a shame, too... I *want* to use black window chrome, but I can't, for this very reason.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!