The return of the Start menu in future Windows 8.1 update: Thoughts?


Recommended Posts

I don't like it, but this is what happens when you let crazy in the hen house, an overreaction in the other direction.

 

Start Menu, no surprise at all on that one.  Just disappointment.  This should have been the Win8 version, with Win8.2+ stepping us down to the 8.1 implementation, and 9 giving us something truly better.  I still think Start makes more sense for 'modern on the desktop' than the windowed silliness they are showing.  Yuck!

 

First they tainted the Desktop to win the casuals and failed, now they try to win the pseudo-technical by perverting Modern.

 

###### futuristic hipsters

###### entry Help Desk fiddlers

It's sounding like the menu they showed is just a quick concept, odds are it'll look different when it actually comes out. 

I'm rather curious how it will turn out. I really hope they do a good job

Too little, too late imho. Absolutely nothing will save win8 in the minds of most people. And frankly, the inclusion of live tiles in the start menu suggests to me that some a ms are desperately clinging to an idea rejected en mass by the masses. I submit that nobody(or hardly anybody) who is currently using a start menu replacement(think 'classic shell' et al) will choose to use this new offering from ms.

horsepuckey yourself

 

the start menu and mouse/keyboard are the ideal way to drive a computer that is actually used to do productive work.

 

Anyone who thinks the metro interface is good, obviously does nothing more than browse information and consume media (and use it like a toy, which is basically what metro is).

There is no way it can be used in a productive way for business purposes or by (power) users who need to get things done.

And you just put the mouse before the keyboard - which is why I said what I said.

 

I put the keyboard before the mouse - not the other way around.  There are lots of folks (and pretty necessary ones) that do the same thing - most of us work technical support (helpdesk, network administrators, etc.).  It tends to be the oldest of us (who came into compuuting before Windows - in my case, before the PC) that are still keyboard-driven.  For nearly twenty years, the keyboard has been basically treated, for the most part, as a second-class cittizen as far as desktop maneuvering - instead, the pointing device had primacy.  For a keyboard-driven user, of how much use is a pointing-device-centered UI?  Very little to none.  (In fact, Windows 95 - the original one - would complain if it couldn't detect a pointing device.)

 

ModernUI did a big reset to the Windows UI.  Yes - touch support was improved; however, the roadblock for keyboard users that was the Start menu was banished.

KIeyboard users had been gotten out from under the bus.

 

I'm not anti-pointing-device - or pro-touch, for that matter.  If anything, I'm pro-keyboard, and since we're talking a graphical UI, I want to be just as able to maneuver around the OS using a keyboard primarily - if not exclusively.  Even Apple has gotten tied into pointing devices, likely due to the arrival of not-exactly-standard keyboards into the hardware side of OS X.  If you compare a typical Apple keyboard (a good example is the Pro Keyboard, which has been standard fare on desktops since the iMac with iSight) with a keyboard for PCs/Windows users, you WILL see a few different keys that are on one but not the other.  Worse, there is no one-to-one-mapping even possible of the different keys - an example is the Windows key of the Microsoft Wireless Keyboard 6000 V.3.  While a Mac - any Mac with USB, in fact - can use it, those unique-to-Apple keys are missing, and can't be remapped to their Windows/PC equivalents without hacks.

 

No - OS X is, if anything, even more pointing-device-driven than Windows pre-8 was.  (My post in the Soapbox "Are you Married to your Mouse?" was NOT about Windows in particular.)

 

I understand why the pointing-device-centered started screaming - in fact, I predicted there WOULD be screaming.  The gravy train of kissing up had just been messily derailed after fifteen years.  (That was why I made reference - in an earlier thread - to the Civil Rights Act in the United States; the CRA was intended to stake racial discrimination through the heart of American society - nothing less.  ModernUI did the same - at least in my opinion - for Windows users.  Nobody was favored - every type of user was seated at the table.  You didn't have to be pointing-device-centric to use the OS.  Hence my comment about civil rights (as in equality) coming to Windows.)

 

Yes - I am basically comparing pointing-device-centric users to segregationalists.  However, walk a mile in our shoes (not the touch-centric, but the keyboard-centric).  And it's quite easy to do.

 

Disconnect your pointing device of choice and try to use Windows (whatever version you use) without it for two days.

 

How long will you last?

Not really - they refused to take the next logical step with any of them (at least on portable hardware, such as the MacBook Air/Pro) - why no touch-screen MacBooks, let alone iMacs?

 

Any of it - in fact, all of it - can only gain usability merely by adding touch-screen hardware (as an option, not necessarily a requirement); however, Apple has refused to budge - why?

 

In that respect, Microsoft's hardware partners - especially in terms of WINDOWS hardware partners - are far ahead of Apple (matching the hardware to the OS capabilities).

 

Um maybe because I do not want a messy screen when I am doing PHOTOGRAPHY work.  I have used touch screen for about 5 minutes.  I stick to keyboard and mouse.  Keep that touch screen out of my macs.

Too little, too late imho. Absolutely nothing will save win8 in the minds of most people. And frankly, the inclusion of live tiles in the start menu suggests to me that some a ms are desperately clinging to an idea rejected en mass by the masses. I submit that nobody(or hardly anybody) who is currently using a start menu replacement(think 'classic shell' et al) will choose to use this new offering from ms.

Not sure what you're getting at. The masses haven't rejected Metro at all, they're just slow at learning it.  

Um maybe because I do not want a messy screen when I am doing PHOTOGRAPHY work.  I have used touch screen for about 5 minutes.  I stick to keyboard and mouse.  Keep that touch screen out of my macs.

Will you listen to yourself?

 

I never - as in ever - said that touch-screens should be a requirement.

 

I simply broached the idea of touch-screens as an option - and not even a mandatory one.

 

It's not a requirement with Windows - why would, or even should, it be a requirement on Apple hardware?

 

Just give users a choice.  Let the marketplace decide.

It needs to be there to allow people to transition to the idea of Modern UI. Not including it as an option in the first release of windows 8 was a big mistake.

Lots of users (including some that have no touch support whatever - including me) transitioned just fine.  The resistance is coming form the pointing-device-centric - the same folks that have been catered to since the Start menu's introduction.

This. The old Windows XP era Start Menu wasn't scalable at all. It was never updated to take advantage of bigger monitors and resolutions. Just one of the many issues with it.

 

You do not get bigger monitors to scale things.  You get bigger monitors to fit more items on the screen.  Why would you get a 27" monitor at 2560x1440 if everything is still full screen?  I got a 27" monitor so I can have more items on the screen at once.

 

 

Will you listen to yourself?

 

I never - as in ever - said that touch-screens should be a requirement.

 

I simply broached the idea of touch-screens as an option - and not even a mandatory one.

 

It's not a requirement with Windows - why would, or even should, it be a requirement on Apple hardware?

 

Just give users a choice.  Let the marketplace decide.

Lots of users (including some that have no touch support whatever - including me) transitioned just fine.  The resistance is coming form the pointing-device-centric - the same folks that have been catered to since the Start menu's introduction.

 
Have you known Apple to give choices?  They would not release a Macbook Pro and have a minor option to have a touch screen.  It would require a new display panel and probably new case design.
 
Apple's options are internal components.  What if Apple releases a 17" laptop but it only has touch screen?  I do not want a touch screen, but I would like a 17" display.....

You do not get bigger monitors to scale things.  You get bigger monitors to fit more items on the screen.  Why would you get a 27" monitor at 2560x1440 if everything is still full screen?  I got a 27" monitor so I can have more items on the screen at once.

Good news then, the Start Screen on a 27 inch screen can fit more items than the start screen on my tablet, so your point is...?

Good news then, the Start Screen on a 27 inch screen can fit more items than the start screen on my tablet, so your point is...?

 

Um.  The photo app is still full screen when viewing pictures....  Music app is still full screen.... App store is still full screen....

 

I did not get a bigger monitor to run one thing at full screen.  I do not care if I get to see more of my songs, or more apps on the screen.  I do NOT want the application itself to occupy the full screen.  

Um.  The photo app is still full screen when viewing pictures....  Music app is still full screen.... App store is still full screen....

 

I did not get a bigger monitor to run one thing at full screen.  I do not care if I get to see more of my songs, or more apps on the screen.  I do NOT want the application itself to occupy the full screen.  

Nobody did. Most of these annoyances will be gone and forgotten with the release of 9.... 8 will become a distant memory quickly assigned to the dustbin of history, regardless of any face-saving measures ms pulls out at this time.

 

And keep in mind, that all this could have been avoided had the poindexters at ms central simply given users a choice. Seriously, if a tiny little free app like Classic Shell could so very easily fix 8, you simply cannot say the ms couldn't have done it themselves.... thus saving us a couple years of nonsense. 

Um.  The photo app is still full screen when viewing pictures....  Music app is still full screen.... App store is still full screen....

 

I did not get a bigger monitor to run one thing at full screen.  I do not care if I get to see more of my songs, or more apps on the screen.  I do NOT want the application itself to occupy the full screen.  

... So? Snap them to the side. They make great side apps. What's wrong with viewing photos fullscreen? Windows has had fullscreen for years. Why is it suddenly a bad thing?

... So? Snap them to the side. They make great side apps. What's wrong with viewing photos fullscreen? Windows has had fullscreen for years. Why is it suddenly a bad thing?

 

Maybe because I do not have 2560x1440 sized photos and they are either blown up and horrible looking, or just way way too much wasted space around the photo.

 

Back on topic, I hope the start menu is customizable to remove the modern stuff on the right side.  Similarly, I do not want the start menu taking up useless space on my screen.

Not sure what you're getting at. The masses haven't rejected Metro at all, they're just slow at learning it.  

 

I got a call to help setup a guys new Windows 8 PC. He got the computer from a store in Sioux City called Dakota PC warehouse. They were telling him that Everyone doesn't like Windows 8. When ever they would sell a machine with windows 8 a few days later they would bring the computer back.  Telling them how much they hate windows 8. The guy was even annoyed that some how his new computer got Windows 8. He said I went there and told them "I do NOT want Windows 8 ... I want windows 7"

 

That's what he was getting at. Then again maybe your right. Maybe the masses haven't rejected windows 8, maybe it's just Iowa.

J

I got a call to help setup a guys new Windows 8 PC. He got the computer from a store in Sioux City called Dakota PC warehouse. They were telling him that Everyone doesn't like Windows 8. When ever they would sell a machine with windows 8 a few days later they would bring the computer back. Telling them how much they hate windows 8. The guy was even annoyed that some how his new computer got Windows 8. He said I went there and told them "I do NOT want Windows 8 ... I want windows 7"

That's what he was getting at. Then again maybe your right. Maybe the masses haven't rejected windows 8, maybe it's just Iowa.

You tell the same stories everyday. If "everyone" hated Windows 8, then it would have 0 market share. Nobody would have upgraded to it, and Windows 7 would still be increasing ten fold. But that's not happening.

I hear daily that people hate Windows 7 too, so does that mean that Microsoft should revert to XP?

J

You tell the same stories everyday.

 

He is right though.  I run into people every day that say they either hate Windows 8 or heard it is very very very horrible.  They are shocked when I say I prefer it over 7.

 

MS made a massive mistake with 8 though.  They learned nothing from Vista.  And I preferred Vista over XP too :p

 

But don't forget, nearly all the new computers these days from stores (where the general public buys their computers) come with 8.  They usually do not know about downgrade rights and go back to the store asking what they can do.

JYou tell the same stories everyday. If "everyone" hated Windows 8, then it would have 0 market share. Nobody would have upgraded to it, and Windows 7 would still be increasing ten fold. But that's not happening.

I hear daily that people hate Windows 7 too, so does that mean that Microsoft should revert to XP?

 

If there was a mass disease that was killing everyone, and there was only one cure that you could buy and it came in only one flavor, dog poop. Does that mean everyone likes the taste of dog poop? :D

 

The dog poop flavor market share would be quite large.

 

-------

 

A lot of those upgrade were probably also bought when the amount was $40. Hell even I bought 3 copies. I would spend $40. I just would never spend $80.

 

I really don't see the average user running out and upgrading their windows 7 to windows 8.

  • Like 3

If there was a mass disease that was killing everyone, and there was only one cure that you could buy and it came in only one flavor, dog poop. Does that mean everyone likes the taste of dog poop? :D

 

The dog poop flavor market share would be quite large.

Do you actually have this notion that people would die if they didn't upgrade to Windows 8?

JYou tell the same stories everyday. If "everyone" hated Windows 8, then it would have 0 market share. Nobody would have upgraded to it, and Windows 7 would still be increasing ten fold. But that's not happening.

I hear daily that people hate Windows 7 too, so does that mean that Microsoft should revert to XP?

 

Do you honestly believe EVERYONE who grabbed the Win 8 $15 upgrade still has it installed? Do you believe no one EVER downgraded a Win 8 computer to Win 7?

 

How would you track the number of people who grabbed a cheap copy and then removed it after testing it? How do you track the number of Win 8 computers that downgraded to Win 7?

 

If there wasn't push back against Win8, do you really think Microsoft would be backtracking?

 

One more thing, a market share of any size does not reflect how liked or disliked anything is. You think everyone who bought a new computer realized they could down grade, or that they didn't install some third party software to make the product usable for them?

  • Like 4

Do you honestly believe EVERYONE who grabbed the Win 8 $15 upgrade still has it installed? Do you believe no one EVER downgraded a Win 8 computer to Win 7?

 

How would you track the number of people who grabbed a cheap copy and then removed it after testing it? How do you track the number of Win 8 computers that downgraded to Win 7?

 

If there wasn't push back against Win8, do you really think Microsoft would be backtracking?

 

One more thing, a market share of any size does not reflect how liked or disliked anything is. You think everyone who bought a new computer realized they could down grade, or that they didn't install some third party software to make the product usable for them?

And yet you insist that pushing back makes any sense.

 

Pushback comes when an idea does not fit what a user wants - even if the user is not making that decision for a sensible reason.

 

How much pushback was there against DX11-only gaming - that it took, literally, the release of Windows 8 to halt?

 

How much pushback has there been against x64-only gaming, despite x64 being the majority bitness of Windows?

 

Lazarus Long said it best in "Time Enough for Love" - "Yes - everyone has an opinion - no matter how silly."

 

You do not get bigger monitors to scale things.  You get bigger monitors to fit more items on the screen.  Why would you get a 27" monitor at 2560x1440 if everything is still full screen?  I got a 27" monitor so I can have more items on the screen at once.

 

 

 
Have you known Apple to give choices?  They would not release a Macbook Pro and have a minor option to have a touch screen.  It would require a new display panel and probably new case design.
 
Apple's options are internal components.  What if Apple releases a 17" laptop but it only has touch screen?  I do not want a touch screen, but I would like a 17" display.....

 

In other words, you basically want Microsoft to stay in the land of "meh", and are perfectly willing to do the same to Apple.

 

I'm talking about a choice in display features - say 17" with OR without a touch-screen.  (Or the same in any other screen size.)

 

It's not as if they don't make touch-screens that large.

And yet you insist that pushing back makes any sense.

 

Pushback comes when an idea does not fit what a user wants - even if the user is not making that decision for a sensible reason.

 

How much pushback was there against DX11-only gaming - that it took, literally, the release of Windows 8 to halt?

 

How much pushback has there been against x64-only gaming, despite x64 being the majority bitness of Windows?

 

Lazarus Long said it best in "Time Enough for Love" - "Yes - everyone has an opinion - no matter how silly."

 

Didn't Microsft ask for feedback? See, I'm not PUSHING back, I'm offering my opinion and giving them feedback. What they do with it is up to them, use it, wipe their backside or ignore it, it's up to them.

 

As a desktop user metro does nothing to improve MY experience, for reasons that are my own. I don't use my tablet, phone or desktop in the same way and I do NOT want - the same experience across all devices.

 

I never knew their was a push back against x64 or DX11, so I cannot offer an opinion. However, I will point out that neither of them changed the look and or feel of Windows.

 

I think  Ellen Glasgow said it better - ?All change is not growth, as all movement is not forward.? or maybe, Winston Churchill - ?There is nothing wrong with change, if it is in the right direction.?

  • Like 1

Didn't Microsft ask for feedback? See, I'm not PUSHING back, I'm offering my opinion and giving them feedback. What they do with it is up to them, use it, wipe their backside or ignore it, it's up to them.

That's the part I don't understand. Microsoft said that Windows 8 was the most tested OS before release. Something to the tune of billion hours across over a hundred countries. They should have known there and then that many users simply did not like Metro. While working in the IT industry for the last few years, only complaint I got against windows 8 was about the look. No one ever complained about the price.

I have managed to turn dozens, if not hundreds of people away from Windows 8. People have simple asked for my opinion and I told them why they should just stick with their Windows 7 machines for now.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!