The return of the Start menu in future Windows 8.1 update: Thoughts?


Recommended Posts

That's the part I don't understand. Microsoft said that Windows 8 was the most tested OS before release. Something to the tune of billion hours across over a hundred countries. They should have known there and then that many users simply did not like Metro. While working in the IT industry for the last few years, only complaint I got against windows 8 was about the look. No one ever complained about the price.

I have managed to turn dozens, if not hundreds of people away from Windows 8. People have simple asked for my opinion and I told them why they should just stick with their Windows 7 machines for now.

I'm sure they were well aware that many disliked Metro. But either more people liked it than disliked it, or Microsoft decided to go ahead and make a change anyway.

 

To me, it's somewhat reminiscent of when the original iMac had no floppy drive. People thought Apple were crazy, because everyone used floppies at the time. But in the long run, it was probably the right move for Apple. I realize it's not a 1:1 analogy here, but I think Microsoft realized that touch interfaces are only going to get bigger, so the time was right to bring in Metro. How well they implemented that vision is of course a matter of debate.

One other attitude I am picking up (on the part of the critics of ModernUI) is a bit of antitouch attitude in general - they don't want touch-screen hardware, support, or anything else in Windows.  I have referred to it, time and again, as modal absolutism.  While the cost of implementing it is approaching zero, they still want no part of it - even if it could simplify things for them in certain situations.

 

I'm not talking about those that don't want to use a touch interface themselves - I am talking about those that don't want even the rudimentary touch support that Windows 7 had.

 

The closest thing I have seen to that (outside of computing) is anti-growth NIMBYism; suimmed up, that sort of attitude is "I have got mine - nobody else can have theirs."

No thankyou, I treat the startscreen like a fully expanded start menu, and it's a lot quicker that way.

 

The new update with close buttons in metro apps and their integration into the taskbar is quite enough for me.

 

The start menu is a relic of the past.  The start screen is a smart upgrade and the only people that have issue with it are those with low brain functionality.

 

BUT!

 

if this calms down the ignorant whinging, it may be a good thing :)

 

smh.

  • Like 4

One other attitude I am picking up (on the part of the critics of ModernUI) is a bit of antitouch attitude in general - they don't want touch-screen hardware, support, or anything else in Windows.  I have referred to it, time and again, as modal absolutism.  While the cost of implementing it is approaching zero, they still want no part of it - even if it could simplify things for them in certain situations.

 

I'm not talking about those that don't want to use a touch interface themselves - I am talking about those that don't want even the rudimentary touch support that Windows 7 had.

 

The closest thing I have seen to that (outside of computing) is anti-growth NIMBYism; suimmed up, that sort of attitude is "I have got mine - nobody else can have theirs."

 

I just don't think there are that many people that are anit-touch. I think most were upset at the removal of keyboard-mouse centric options on the desktop that they deem more efficient and effective. For many things I agree. I have one system administrator with a 27" touchscreen, he uses it almost exclusively when standing, but when sitting, uses M&K. Touch is great, where appropriate. Many felt/feel that when in a situation where M&K is the preferred/Superior solution, MS took that option away or made it too cumbersome to bother with.

 

Just take a look at the context sensitive menus. Clearly superior, nothing in the modern UI could replace that in its current state. Going all the way to top or bottom of screen for something you can do in-place with a right click just makes sense. That's why MS made the 2-mouse button standard and part of why Windows has been a superior computing environment to Mac OS'. Even now on Mac OS there is no consistent implementation from OS to apps.

 

Having said that, I wish they would have kept the Modern look for the context menus. Popping up old looking context menus over the Modern elements just doesn't look good. But it's a case of function over style. Maybe style will come back with update 2.

I'm sure they were well aware that many disliked Metro. But either more people liked it than disliked it, or Microsoft decided to go ahead and make a change anyway.

 

To me, it's somewhat reminiscent of when the original iMac had no floppy drive. People thought Apple were crazy, because everyone used floppies at the time. But in the long run, it was probably the right move for Apple. I realize it's not a 1:1 analogy here, but I think Microsoft realized that touch interfaces are only going to get bigger, so the time was right to bring in Metro. How well they implemented that vision is of course a matter of debate.

 

To me that's the funniest part about all of this, MS invited people to test this OS, yet I wonder how many users over the age of 30 actually tested it? The type of people most attracted to alpha/beta/test projects are the ones who want to be on the cutting edge.

 

Microsoft is in a very tough position, they have to provide the future (touch and portability) AND keep their current user base (workstations), but thinking that you can cram both into a single user expierence seems foolish. Does anyone want edit HD movies on their tablet? Does anyone want to work with spread sheets on their phone? Does anyone want to have a full screen app on a 27 inch monitor?

I haven't seen the final product yet so I'm not sure what to think, is the new start menu coming as early as update 1 in a few days?

 

No, a new menu and floating windowed store apps are coming in a future update.  At this point the guess is it'll be in the fall.

I just don't think there are that many people that are anit-touch. I think most were upset at the removal of keyboard-mouse centric options on the desktop that they deem more efficient and effective. For many things I agree. I have one system administrator with a 27" touchscreen, he uses it almost exclusively when standing, but when sitting, uses M&K. Touch is great, where appropriate. Many felt/feel that when in a situation where M&K is the preferred/Superior solution, MS took that option away or made it too cumbersome to bother with.

 

Just take a look at the context sensitive menus. Clearly superior, nothing in the modern UI could replace that in its current state. Going all the way to top or bottom of screen for something you can do in-place with a right click just makes sense. That's why MS made the 2-mouse button standard and part of why Windows has been a superior computing environment to Mac OS'. Even now on Mac OS there is no consistent implementation from OS to apps.

 

Having said that, I wish they would have kept the Modern look for the context menus. Popping up old looking context menus over the Modern elements just doesn't look good. But it's a case of function over style. Maybe style will come back with update 2.

MorganX, the keyboard-centric users have, by and large, adjusted far faster than even the touch-screen users that came from Windows 7 - it is the pointing-device-centered that are screaming.

 

"Mouse and keyboard" is precisely how they see things - the mouse/pointing device comes before, and is more important than, the keyboard.

 

I predicted that there would indeed BE screaming from the pointing-device centric for that very reason - however, even I had no idea how many folks realized they were utterly lost at sea without the Start menu.

 

I'm not a touch-screen user; while I could purchase one, I have no desire to, as they still have NOT reached utter price parity with standard desktop displays yet.  (They are getting closer, though.)

 

But I'm not pointing-device-driven. either.  Instead, I am keyboard-centric, and thus come in for a great deal of scorn from the "power mousers" - a lot of whom are doubtless close to half my age.

No, a new menu and floating windowed store apps are coming in a future update.  At this point the guess is it'll be in the fall.

 

Look forward to this, I just don't think touch on  a desktop is practical, not to mention that it's pretty horrible having swipe prints all over my phone screen, let alone an expensive monitor

Look forward to this, I just don't think touch on  a desktop is practical, not to mention that it's pretty horrible having swipe prints all over my phone screen, let alone an expensive monitor

Touch enables better input - Instead of a 1x1px x/y plot point, I have 10 fingers which can be utilized for input.

To me that's the funniest part about all of this, MS invited people to test this OS, yet I wonder how many users over the age of 30 actually tested it? The type of people most attracted to alpha/beta/test projects are the ones who want to be on the cutting edge.

 

Microsoft is in a very tough position, they have to provide the future (touch and portability) AND keep their current user base (workstations), but thinking that you can cram both into a single user expierence seems foolish. Does anyone want edit HD movies on their tablet? Does anyone want to work with spread sheets on their phone? Does anyone want to have a full screen app on a 27 inch monitor?

If you need windowed support, run a desktop application - they haven't gone anywhere.  (Where desktop and ModernUI versions of the same application exist - such as VLC - I run the desktop version most of the time BECAUSE of windowed-view support; however, if a snapped view or even a full-screen view works best, depending on the situation, then I can use a ModernUI application.  It's still "horses for courses" - ModernUI is merely additional horses.)

 

And why couldn't there be, at some point, a ModernUI HD video editing application?  Consider the Surface Pro 2 (Microsoft) or Venue Pro 11 (Dell) - both come with current-generation Intel Core i5 CPUs as standard fare, along with Windows 8.1 Pro.  In short, the horsepower is definitely there - the ONLY thing lacking with either is screen size.  You can do the core editing in 720p and upscale - you don't necessarily HAVE to do all the scutwork in 1080p; not even Adobe Premiere asks you to do that.

 

There are always different ways of doing things - assuming that there is only one way is just that - an assumption, and is all too often a MIS-assumption.

JYou tell the same stories everyday. If "everyone" hated Windows 8, then it would have 0 market share.

 

 

As a matter of fact windows 8.x marketshare is only showing very minuscule growth so far this year, it's going nowhere in the charts.

Look forward to this, I just don't think touch on  a desktop is practical, not to mention that it's pretty horrible having swipe prints all over my phone screen, let alone an expensive monitor

 

What does touch have to do with the Start Menu? Touch has never been a requirement on 8 - I'm using 8 just fine with a monitor I got back in 2008, which obviously doesn't have touch.

 

Why do people act like their mice have been stolen just because touch support has been improved. I don't think MS ever expected people to give up their mice. It's just another input option, not a mandatory replacement.

I'm not sure what planet you are on but windows 8.x has completely failed at the retail level.

Order_66 - if you are looking at OEM sales, then desktops AS A WHOLE - regardless of what OS is on them - have completely failed at the retail level.

 

Tablets and slates are selling.  AIOs are selling (even touch-screen AIOs).  Notebooks and Ultrabooks (and their derivatives) are also selling - even those with Windows 8 and 8.1.

 

What is NOT selling are traditional desktops, by and large, and especially to businesses.  Even the BYOPC market is taking it on the chin.

 

The business desktop market by and large underwrites the consumer desktop market - and both started declining before the Windows 8 Developer Preview, and have not really recovered since. (Look at the sales numbers JUST from HP, Dell and Lenovo.)

 

Refurbs are selling - however, they are not purchased in big-box retail, are they?  (Amazon sells plenty of refurbs - so do MicrCenter, Fry's - even TigerDirect..  However, none of them are big-box retailers.)

 

Mobile and portable sells - desktop, not so much.

Not sure what you're getting at. The masses haven't rejected Metro at all, they're just slow at learning it.  

 

Not sure where you came up with that obviously flawed analogy, the masses have completely rejected metro and everything it stands for.

What does touch have to do with the Start Menu? Touch has never been a requirement on 8 - I'm using 8 just fine with a monitor I got back in 2008, which obviously doesn't have touch.

 

Why do people act like their mice have been stolen just because touch support has been improved. I don't think MS ever expected people to give up their mice. It's just another input option, not a mandatory replacement.

 

Touch has nothing to do with the Start menu - despite that some of the WinKey shortcuts interacted with it, the keyboard itself has even less to do with it.

 

The Start menu was, to put it bluntly, designed primarily for pointing-device-centric interaction - which even Microsoft has made plain in several Microsoft Press books on Windows from 9x to 7.

 

Hence all the screaming from those same pointing-device-centric users - most of whom would deny being such - until the Start menu went away.

Not sure where you came up with that obviously flawed analogy, the masses have completely rejected metro and everything it stands for.

Where? Metro has been deployed across all of Microsoft's products. Yet, I see no mass rebellion or exodus to other platforms or services.

Where? Metro has been deployed across all of Microsoft's products. Yet, I see no mass rebellion or exodus to other platforms or services.

 

And yet at the retail level nobody is buying it as marketshare statistics clearly show.

  • Like 1

And yet at the retail level nobody is buying it as marketshare statistics clearly show.

Order_66 - if you are looking at OEM desktop sales (which is likely the case), then the lack of sales in that space has little to nothing to do with what OS is on that hardware.

OEM desktop sales - merely since the launch of Windows 7 and that initial spate of buying - have been terrible.

 

There is also a very good reason FOR said sales being terrible - what are the hardware requirements merely since Vista's launch for Windows?

 

Since Vista, hardware requirements for the current Windows have stayed flat.  Not merely comparatively flat - but absolutely flat.  Consider that I am running Windows 8.1 Pro with Media Center on Vista-era hardware.

 

A lot of folks have not moved hardware-wise because the software they are running didn't change - therefore, why purchase new hardware?  (How often have you in particular been pointing that out?  Note that I did NOT disagree with that statement in the least.)

 

If anything, folks are even more reluctant to change their OS - especially if said change is potentially disruptive. Nothing I have said was dismissive of the disruption factor that Windows 8, or 8.1, represents - I said specifically that this was the biggest UI change since the Start menu - and it was primarily due to said menu being axed.  Be honest, Order_66 - did you think there were THAT many people - even here on Neowin - that are pointing-device-centric users?

 

You are trying really hard to make a connection between two widely-disconnected events; because desktop sales have not recovered, Windows 8 is at fault.

 

Desktop sale were terrible before Windows 8 even launched - yet PC hardware is still selling; it just by and large is not desktops of the traditional sort.

And at the enterprise level 99% of clients are opting for Windows 7.

Lower training expenses - especially if doing a required/forced migration from XP; even I get that much.

 

Nobody - least of all myself, DotMatrix, or DConnell - said that the ModernUI would not be disruptive; in fact, all three of us made that quite plain in our posts back to the Windows 8 Developer Preview.

However, it is apparent that all three of us severely underestimated the number of pointing-device-centric users on Neowin.

If you need windowed support, run a desktop application - they haven't gone anywhere.  (Where desktop and ModernUI versions of the same application exist - such as VLC - I run the desktop version most of the time BECAUSE of windowed-view support; however, if a snapped view or even a full-screen view works best, depending on the situation, then I can use a ModernUI application.  It's still "horses for courses" - ModernUI is merely additional horses.)

 

And why couldn't there be, at some point, a ModernUI HD video editing application?  Consider the Surface Pro 2 (Microsoft) or Venue Pro 11 (Dell) - both come with current-generation Intel Core i5 CPUs as standard fare, along with Windows 8.1 Pro.  In short, the horsepower is definitely there - the ONLY thing lacking with either is screen size.  You can do the core editing in 720p and upscale - you don't necessarily HAVE to do all the scutwork in 1080p; not even Adobe Premiere asks you to do that.

 

There are always different ways of doing things - assuming that there is only one way is just that - an assumption, and is all too often a MIS-assumption.

 

I never said, assumed or even implied their was only one way to do anything, I merely pointed out there are many less than ideal ways of doing anything, and that the - same experience across all devices - is stupid. The devices are not used the same way, nor should they be. I've re-read my post and am shaking my head how you came to this conclusion, maybe a MIS-assumption, on your part?

 

Lower training expenses - especially if doing a required/forced migration from XP; even I get that much.

 

Nobody - least of all myself, DotMatrix, or DConnell - said that the ModernUI would not be disruptive; in fact, all three of us made that quite plain in our posts back to the Windows 8 Developer Preview.

However, it is apparent that all three of us severely underestimated the number of pointing-device-centric users on Neowin.

 

It's not just Neowin, people everywhere have mixed opinions of Metro and that doesn't make them pointing-device-centric users. I am a touch based user on my tablet and phone, but hate the idea of touch on the desktop. I propbably use touch more than a mouse, so again another MIS-assumption on your part? Maybe you should stop trying to find neat little catagories to place us in or finding labels for us, and accept that people don't like Metro for their own reasons. Maybe, we are simply tired of features being removed from Win 7, because they didn't fit with Win 8's Metro?

Where? Metro has been deployed across all of Microsoft's products. Yet, I see no mass rebellion or exodus to other platforms or services.

Sure you do.

 

How is Windows 8 marketshare doing?  Windows Phone?  Surface? 

 

How about Android?  iOS?

 

 

I don't see a surge of people adopting Metro at all.  So if people aren't coming to the platform, but you don't see masses leaving either, what would you glean from that?  Stagnant market numbers are not a sign of success.

 

 

I'd say people made their decisions before Windows 8 came out and have seen no reason to change them.  Rebellion by non-adoption.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Passkeys: Think of them like a broken heart necklace. Imagine one of those heart necklaces that breaks into two matching pieces. One person keeps one half, and the other person keeps the other half. With passkeys, the website has one half, and you have the other half. If the website gets hacked and someone steals its half, that stolen piece is useless by itself. It cannot unlock your account without your matching half. This particular heart necklace is one of a kind, there is only one in existence. Your half of the necklace has to be stored somewhere. It might be stored on your phone, tablet, computer, security key, or a password manager that can sync it between all your devices. A security key is a small physical device that you keep with you, kind of like a house key, car key, or flash drive. I would not usually recommend a security key as the first option for the average person. For most people, it is easier to use their phone, computer, or a password manager that can sync passkeys between their devices. A security key is more like a spare key you keep in a safe place, just in case you lose access to your other devices or your password manager. Some security keys plug into your computer. Some plug into your phone or tablet. Some do not plug in at all and instead get tapped against your device. The idea is simple: a security key can hold another passkey for the same website. Think of it like creating a second one-of-a-kind heart necklace for the same account. One necklace could be paired with your password manager, while another necklace could be paired with your security key. That means the website has more than one matching half on file. One half matches the passkey in your password manager. Another half matches the passkey stored on your security key. So, if you lose access to your phone, computer, or password manager, you would still be able to log in using the passkey stored on your security key. Think of it like keeping an extra special necklace piece on a tiny keychain, stored somewhere safe. The website still has the matching half for that security key, but your half is safely stored inside the little key. A passkey does not automatically exist on every device you own. It lives wherever you save it. If your half is stored on one device, then that device is the one that has the matching piece. For example, if you create the passkey on your Windows computer and it is only saved to that computer, your iPhone does not automatically have that same half. If you create it on your iPhone and it only stays on that iPhone, your Android phone does not automatically have it either. That is where password managers come in. A password manager can act like a protected jewelry box for your passkeys. Instead of your half of the necklace being locked to only one device, the password manager can securely sync that half to your other approved devices. For example, Apple Passwords and iCloud Keychain can sync passkeys between your Apple devices. Google Password Manager can sync passkeys with your Google account. But password managers such as 1Password and Bitwarden can sync passkeys between everything, your phones, tablets and computers. Now, you might ask: “What happens if I lose access to the device that has my passkey?” That depends on where your passkey was saved and what recovery options the website gives you. If your passkey was synced through a password manager, you may be able to sign in from another device that has access to that same password manager. For example, if your passkey is saved in iCloud Keychain, Google Password Manager, 1Password, or Bitwarden, another approved device may still have access to it. If your passkey was saved only on one phone, computer, or security key, and you lose that device, then you may not have your half of the necklace anymore. In that case, you would usually need to use the website’s backup login or account recovery options. A lot of websites that support passkeys still let you fall back to your regular password. So if you lose access to your passkey, the site may still let you log in with your password, a code sent to your email, a text message, a recovery code, or some other account recovery process. That is convenient, but it is also important to understand: if the website still allows password login, then your password still matters. Passkeys are safer than passwords, but if your account still has a password as a backup, you should still use a strong, unique password and turn on two-factor authentication if the website offers it. This is why it is a good idea to have more than one safe way back into important accounts. For example, you might keep your passkey in a syncing password manager, add a second trusted device, save recovery codes somewhere safe, or set up a backup security key. A passkey is very secure, but just like a real key, you need a backup plan in case you lose access to it. Now, you might ask: “What stops a hacker from copying my half of the necklace?” That’s the important part: your half is protected. It is not something you type in, and it is not something the website gets to keep. Think of your half as being locked inside a tiny safe on your phone, computer, security key, or password manager. That safe only opens when you approve it with your fingerprint, face, PIN, or device password. When you log in, the website does not need to see your half. It only needs proof that your half matches its half. Your actual half is not handed over to the website. This is different from a password. With a password, you type the secret into the website. If you type it into a fake website, the hacker now has it. With a passkey, you are not typing your secret into the website. Your device is proving you have the matching half without giving the half away. That also helps protect you from fake websites. If someone makes a fake login page that looks like the real site, your device can tell it is not the real match. It will not use your passkey there. Now, could someone use your passkey if they stole your device, got into your password manager, or somehow unlocked the safe that holds your half? Yes, that is why your device password, PIN, fingerprint, face unlock, and password manager security still matter. But a hacker cannot just steal your passkey from the website or trick you into typing it into a fake page like they can with a password. That is why passkeys are safer than passwords. The two matching pieces have to come together, like two lovebirds who were once separated and are finally reunited.
    • Newegg offers insane combo deal on Amazon Prime Day 2026 that beats Steam Machine by Sayan Sen Building a PC is undoubtedly difficult nowadays but with this epic combo deal, Newegg is trying to make it as easy for you as it is possible. If you are making a new one or even upgrading an old system to a new Windows 11 device, this combo bundle is truly unmissable as you get AMD's Ryzen 9800X3D, a compatible X870 motherboard, a 240mm AIO liquid cooler and finally a Samsung 990 PRO SSD all for under $1000 (purchase link under the specs table down below). This should beat out the newly launched Steam Machine from Valve in terms of performance and performance per dollar especially if you are willing to set Linux up on it. Essentially with this combo you will get the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-core 3D V cache CPU, Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD, the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI ATX Motherboard, and finally the Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240. Thanks to that massive vertically stacked L3 cache, the X3D desktop processors, including the 9800X3D, also come with the benefit of not needing fast memory. Even DDR5-5600 should be plenty for it. The technical specifications of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D are given in the table below: Specification Value Architecture Zen 5 Cores / Threads 8 / 16 Base Clock 4.7 GHz Max Boost Clock Up to 5.2 GHz L1 Cache 640 KB L2 Cache 8 MB L3 Cache 96 MB Total Cache 104 MB CPU Core Process TSMC 4nm FinFET I/O Die Process TSMC 6nm FinFET Socket AM5 Default TDP 120W Max Temperature (Tjmax) 95°C Thermal Solution Not included Memory Type DDR5 Max Capacity 256 GB Memory Speeds 2x1R: DDR5-5600 2x2R: DDR5-5600 4x1R: DDR5-3600 4x2R: DDR5-3600 PCIe Version PCIe 5.0 PCIe Lanes (Total/Usable) 28 / 24 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) 4 USB 2.0 1 Graphics Cores 2 CU RDNA 2 Frequency 2200 MHz DisplayPort over USB-C Yes Overclocking Unlocked Up next we have the tech specs for the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI Motherboard: Specification Value Chipset AMD X870 CPU Support AMD Ryzen 9000 / 8000 / 7000 Series Desktop Processors Socket AM5 Memory Slots 4 × DDR5 UDIMM Maximum Memory Capacity 256GB Memory Support DDR5 8400–5600 MT/s (OC), DDR5 5600–4800 MT/s (JEDEC) Integrated Graphics Outputs 1 × HDMI 2.1 FRL (up to 8K 60Hz) 2 × USB4 Type-C with DisplayPort 1.4 HBR3 (up to 4K 60Hz) Expansion Slots PCI_E1: PCIe 5.0 x16 (CPU) PCI_E2: PCIe 3.0 x1 (Chipset) PCI_E3: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset) Audio Realtek ALC4080 Codec 7.1-Channel USB High Performance Audio Supports up to 32-bit/384kHz playback on front panel S/PDIF output M.2 Slots 4 × M.2 M2_1: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 22110/2280) M2_2: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 2280/2260) M2_3: PCIe 4.0 x2 (Chipset, 2280/2260) M2_4: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset, 2280/2260) SATA Ports 4 × SATA 6Gb/s RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 for M.2 NVMe storage devices Rear USB Ports 4 × USB 2.0 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 2 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 2 × USB4 40Gbps Type-C Front USB Headers 4 × USB 2.0 4 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 20Gbps Type-C LAN Realtek 8126-CG 5G LAN Wireless Wi-Fi 7 (M.2 Key-E module pre-installed) Supports 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz bands Up to 5.8Gbps Supports 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4, MLO, 4KQAM Internal Power Connectors 1 × 24-pin ATX Power 2 × CPU Power Connectors 1 × PCIe 8-pin Power Connector Fan Headers 1 × CPU Fan 1 × Combo Fan (Pump/System) 6 × System Fan RGB Headers 3 × Addressable V2 RGB (JARGB_V2) 1 × RGB LED (JRGB) Other Internal Headers 1 × EZ Conn-header 2 × Front Panel Headers 1 × Chassis Intrusion 1 × Front Audio 1 × TPM 2.0 Header Debug Features 4 × EZ Debug LEDs 1 × EZ Digit Debug LED Rear I/O Ports Clear CMOS Button Flash BIOS Button HDMI 2 × USB 40Gbps Type-C 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 4 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 4 × USB 2.0 5G LAN Port Wi-Fi/Bluetooth Antenna Connectors Audio Connectors Form Factor ATX The Samsung 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification Value Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC DRAM Cache 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,200 TBW MTBF 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink No Get the combo deal at this link: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Samsung 990 PRO 2TB, MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI motherboard, Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240: $784.99 + $25 off with promo code FTTF77: $759.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) Good to know This Newegg deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I heard from a lot of people that driver support for the latest games when RDNA first came out (Radeon 5000 series) was pretty bad, but if you didn't buy the card on day one, or were not trying to play the latest titles, then you were isolated from that issue. Other than that, it's been good and only getting better.
    • Meta launches new AI glasses in 26 styles and Muse Spark multimodal capabilties by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta today announced a new line of Meta Glasses in partnership with EssilorLuxottica. The new AI glasses build on the company’s existing smart glasses portfolio, which is sold under the Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta brands. The new Meta Glasses start at just $299, are compatible with prescription lenses, and will be available in 26 styles across different colors, lenses, and frames. At launch, Meta Glasses will be available in three frame styles. The Meta Adventurer features a clean rectangular design and comes in Standard and Large sizes. The Meta Fury is a bolder frame for users who want a stronger look. Meta Glasses by Kylie is a slim oval frame designed in collaboration with Kylie Jenner. Similar to existing Meta AI Glasses, the new Meta Glasses include a dedicated action button that can be used to quickly access Meta AI or launch a favorite feature. They also feature open-ear speakers for calls, music, and more. Meta has also included a multi-mic array with wind noise reduction for calls and messaging. Users can capture photos and videos hands-free using voice commands. Meta claims more than eight hours of battery life, while the portable charging case can provide up to 40 additional hours. As expected, Meta Glasses come pre-loaded with Meta AI powered by Muse Spark from day one. Muse Spark is the first model from Meta Superintelligence Labs with improved multimodal capabilities. The same Meta AI upgrade is also now available on existing Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta Glasses in the US and Canada via an update. With the Muse Spark-powered AI assistant, Meta AI in the new glasses can provide smarter answers, understand what the user is seeing, and help with daily tasks such as calendar management and navigation. Meta also announced an upcoming feature called the dynamic photo feature, which captures multiple frames and recommends the best one. Pedestrian navigation is also coming soon to these glasses. Meta is also adding support for 14 new live translation languages, including Japanese, Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, and Korean. The new Meta Glasses are available starting today through Meta.com, Best Buy, Amazon, LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut, and select retailers.
    • is that a personal preference? whether it is or isn't, i get where you're coming from. i try to get and use fully open sourced applications whenever i can but there are instances where i find a superior product that is closed sourced. in these cases i do my best to learn about the company, who operates it, their background, parent and sub structure etc. to some extent, depending on "the smell test". i really believe that Syncback is really and truly something great. even if you don't use it, it's always worth a recommendation to someone else, especially if that someone else is not very computer literate. for someone of your calibre you, you'll manage just fine with Syncthing, no doubt about it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      166
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!