The return of the Start menu in future Windows 8.1 update: Thoughts?


Recommended Posts

yeah, just like the start menu is never coming back either.

 

Don't you ever get tired of posting the same BS over and over again?

The Start Menu is Metro based, The Start Screen still exists on Xbox, Windows 8, and Windows Phone. Not to mention, Microsoft's universal apps are all Metro based, so tell me, why do you think Metro is going away?

yeah, just like the start menu is never coming back either.

 

Don't you ever get tired of posting the same BS over and over again? People hate metro, people hate the start menu. Whatever... It's going around in infinite circles.

 

Yeah you'd think after two years of being wrong about absolutely everything they would give it a rest.

From what I can see here I think I'll stick with StartIsBack, and it seems I've heard this start menu is coming back song and dance before...

I prefer a clean desktop, and an uncluttered taskbar, at log on. Hell, I prefer a desktop at log on, and that is what I have, running 8.1.

Choice is good, to an extent.

Metro isn't going anywhere.

 

Yes, I know it was a joke... heh heh too bad...

 

The Start Menu is Metro based, The Start Screen still exists on Xbox, Windows 8, and Windows Phone. Not to mention, Microsoft's universal apps are all Metro based, so tell me, why do you think Metro is going away?

 

Nobody thinks metro is going away, I don't care what they do with it as long as they stop gimping the desktop.

I'm really not making any assumption.

 

Metro has not taken off...anywhere and customers have shown this by buying other things. 

If they are buying tablets and smartphones, why is it necessarily rejection of ModernUI?  Could it be that they are rejecting a traditional tower for reasons of price?

 

A tablet (an 8.1 tablet - not an RT tablet) has either price parity or actually costs LESS than a traditional tower PC; not to mention, merely in traditional retail, is more often available than a traditional tower.  (hhgregg, for example, doesn't sell traditional tower PCs at all.  Even Best Buy - the Urbane Gorilla of big-box retail - is selling fewer traditional towers than they did even two years ago; the same is true of eight-hundred-pound-gorilla Wal-Mart.  Basically, traditional tower sales are down, and tablet/slate/non-traditional PC sales, of all sorts, are up.  The traditional desktop formfactor is under siege by mobile/portable hardware - the OS has nothing to do with it at all.)

 

Also, traditional towers are not portable - except MAYBE in the "luggable" sense. Demand is for portability - and NOT in the luggable sense.  Hence portable PCs - in every screen size from seventeen inches down - are seling, and in droves. Touch is more common in the portable formfactors than in desktops - even AIOs, despite adopting touch, are still dwarfed in terms of sales by portables. And that is common features, where the only differences are portability and price - and yet you are trying to say that neither has anything to do with what gets sold?  Note that none of this has anything to do with the OS on the hardware at all.

  • Like 2

Because that's when the Win 8 hate started, to discount that overlooks the problem many have with it. It also shows how long people have been asking for the things that MS removed.

 

Funny, most of the people wanted just that - options, that's all I ask for, the option to continue using my desktop pretty much the same way I did in Win 7. I don't care if Windows is on any other platform, I use an Android tablet and IOS phone, because I liked their experiences on the platform I chose them on. Windows can be on as many form factors as Microsoft wants, but why does the UI have to be changed for the platform it's already on? They already had a great system - Aero, looked good, worked well and people LIKED it, why crap all over that with Win 8?

 

Don't worry I'm sure Stardock will make a replacement app if Microsoft removes Metro (or parts that you want)...

 

 

Funny, when I choose to, I can use the desktop in Win 8 exactly as I did in Win 7, with no add-ons, no limitations. I just have options beyond the traditional desktop (UI). And a much improved program launcher tying the halves of the OS together.

 

And I'm not talking about tablets here - I'm referring to having 2 different UIs and program styles to choose from, on my stationary computers.

 

Why do so many of the anti-8 crowd, when they talk of options, then immediately start talking about limiting those options to just what they prefer?

 

 

And I'm sure Stardock could come up with a $5 tool to replace half the OS . Because an entire operating environment and a little menu are totally the same thing . . .  :rolleyes: What I'd like them to do is a wrapper to let me run desktop programs in the Modern environment.

Nobody thinks metro is going away, I don't care what they do with it as long as they stop gimping the desktop.

 

How is Microsoft gimping the desktop? Especially now that the menu is coming back? Personally, I think returning the menu is gimping the OS, but a long as it remains optional, I can just leave it disabled and not have to deal with it.

Funny, when I choose to, I can use the desktop in Win 8 exactly as I did in Win 7, with no add-ons, no limitations. I just have options beyond the traditional desktop (UI). And a much improved program launcher tying the halves of the OS together.

 

And I'm not talking about tablets here - I'm referring to having 2 different UIs and program styles to choose from, on my stationary computers.

 

Why do so many of the anti-8 crowd, when they talk of options, then immediately start talking about limiting those options to just what they prefer?

 

 

And I'm sure Stardock could come up with a $5 tool to replace half the OS . Because an entire operating environment and a little menu are totally the same thing . . .  :rolleyes: What I'd like them to do is a wrapper to let me run desktop programs in the Modern environment.

 

How is Microsoft gimping the desktop? Especially now that the menu is coming back? Personally, I think returning the menu is gimping the OS, but a long as it remains optional, I can just leave it disabled and not have to deal with it.

 

Where did you get a copy of Win 8 with an actual working Start Menu like the one in Windows 7? Oh, yeah, you don't so you can use Win 8 EXACTLY like Win 7.

 

Ok, please stop lumpng me in with the anti-8 crowd, I have stated many many many many many times and I'll state it again... for the RECORD. - I am glad there are users who like/love/enjoy Metro and the more CHOICES Win 8 has the  better.

 

Please stop with the drama - I said "Microsoft removes Metro (or parts that you want)...", just like you know the topic of this thread, the way they removed the Start Menu from the desktop. Did Stardock remake the entire desktop or "an entire operating enviroment"?

 

Microsoft gimped the desktop by making me use something that looked like a bad tablet UI, stop with the "now that" because there wouldn't be a RETURN of anything if people were happy with Metro. They ripped out Aero and replaced it with a bad Litestep theme, they removed the ability to change the FONT, and people couldn't even figure out how to turn the damn thing off. You know when Microsoft removes something from Metro, that you find very useful, and want it back, then maybe, just maybe you will understand how I feel about Win 8. They removed/hid previous functionality for no reason, or maybe you know a reason to remove the ability to change the font?

 

Too bad, we can't leave Metro disabled and have a Win 7 styled desktop...

Where did you get a copy of Win 8 with an actual working Start Menu like the one in Windows 7? Oh, yeah, you don't so you can use Win 8 EXACTLY like Win 7.

 

Ok, please stop lumpng me in with the anti-8 crowd, I have stated many many many many many times and I'll state it again... for the RECORD. - I am glad there are users who like/love/enjoy Metro and the more CHOICES Win 8 has the  better.

 

Please stop with the drama - I said "Microsoft removes Metro (or parts that you want)...", just like you know the topic of this thread, the way they removed the Start Menu from the desktop. Did Stardock remake the entire desktop or "an entire operating enviroment"?

 

Microsoft gimped the desktop by making me use something that looked like a bad tablet UI, stop with the "now that" because there wouldn't be a RETURN of anything if people were happy with Metro. They ripped out Aero and replaced it with a bad Litestep theme, they removed the ability to change the FONT, and people couldn't even figure out how to turn the damn thing off. You know when Microsoft removes something from Metro, that you find very useful, and want it back, then maybe, just maybe you will understand how I feel about Win 8. They removed/hid previous functionality for no reason, or maybe you know a reason to remove the ability to change the font?

 

Too bad, we can't leave Metro disabled and have a Win 7 styled desktop...

 

On the desktop, I can hit the Win key, and type what I want to launch. That's exactly how I used the desktop in Windows 7. I avoided the Menu like the plague. Or I have the choice of an actual usable program launcher in the form of the Screen.

 

So no, I don't think replacing the Menu with another launcher gimped the desktop at all. Rather it was improved by the replacement of a cumbersome, outdated feature. IMO Microsoft finally fixed their mistake from 1995.

 

And the latest update is actually adding stuff to Modern that I don't want or need. I'm holding off on updating until I'm sure the faux-desktop stuff can be disabled. A close box and taskbar have no place in Modern. I guess you could say I'm losing the cleanness of Modern in this update.

On the desktop, I can hit the Win key, and type what I want to launch. That's exactly how I used the desktop in Windows 7. I avoided the Menu like the plague. Or I have the choice of an actual usable program launcher in the form of the Screen.

 

So no, I don't think replacing the Menu with another launcher gimped the desktop at all. Rather it was improved by the replacement of a cumbersome, outdated feature. IMO Microsoft finally fixed their mistake from 1995.

 

And the latest update is actually adding stuff to Modern that I don't want or need. I'm holding off on updating until I'm sure the faux-desktop stuff can be disabled. A close box and taskbar have no place in Modern. I guess you could say I'm losing the cleanness of Modern in this update.

 

Guess we'll just have to agree to disagree, because I think the start screen gimped the desktop. Don't worry they are "fixing" Win 8 as we speak.

 

Too bad the new update mandatory if you wish to recieve future updates... so much for choice.

 

Too bad the new update mandatory if you wish to recieve future updates... so much for choice.

 

On that we can agree. Why does it have to be either-or?

The update being mandatory is because of the API changes they've made, it's needed, specially for universal apps and a unified app store coming later.

 

Lots of you are going back and forth rehashing the same arguments, in the end it doesn't matter because here's the choice everyone wanted.    Use the new menu, or don't, or load up some old 3rd party menu still if you feel like it, it matters little at this point.  The desktop was never going away, it wasn't even depreciated, some make it sound like they gutted things out of the desktop which never happened.   Metro is also here to stay, or in this case WINRT, store apps are becoming part of the desktop and to that end I expect more changes to the desktop to support them while also brining WINRT features to older Win32 WPF apps, like contracts.

 

Don't be surprised if after we get the new menu they then work on a new taskbar as well.  Also if they stick to the trend of sharing things between Windows and WP, when they bring over the Action Center that the old systray gets the boot as well.   I also expect to see the charms in the new menu as well, from the little concept glimpse at the BUILD keynote they did they weren't there but I have a feeling they will be in the final version.  Or if not in the menu then some way to bring them up next to the app window and not in the corner. 

 

Either way, nothing is going away, and the two things are coming closer together now.

  • Like 1

Updated this afternoon. Nothing really changed initially, other than the close minimize bar in Modern apps. Works well, well done. Pinning Modern Apps, genius. Shoulda been there day one. I see no need to add taskbar over modern, or run modern in Windows, but it's definitely better though I'd like a more modern look to the right-click context menus on the start screen.

Updated this afternoon. Nothing really changed initially, other than the close minimize bar in Modern apps. Works well, well done. Pinning Modern Apps, genius. Shoulda been there day one. I see no need to add taskbar over modern, or run modern in Windows, but it's definitely better though I'd like a more modern look to the right-click context menus on the start screen.

 

 

Odd thing about the right click on the start screen is that it's like a half-way done metro style menu.  They removed the dividing line between the item text, and where the check mark would go, and they also changed the highlight style to a flat, strokeless grey, instead of the blue, outlined box on the desktop.

 

I agree with you, I wouldn't mind them going all the way in the next update.

... So? Snap them to the side. They make great side apps. What's wrong with viewing photos fullscreen? Windows has had fullscreen for years. Why is it suddenly a bad thing?

 

i don't know if you are multi-tasking like others most others do. This is probably why you like Metro.

On the desktop, I can hit the Win key, and type what I want to launch.

why would you WANT to have the extra hassle of typing what you are looking for though... why not just click it?

i don't know if you are multi-tasking like others most others do. This is probably why you like Metro.

My multi-tasking has always been around fullscreen, or "snapped" windows. I can't stand to have a mess of oddly sized open windows just floating around everywhere, making a mess of things. It takes too much time to click through that. When Windows 7 introduced better snapping abilities, I was thrilled. Windows 8 (and Metro) are no different. Just like in Windows 7, I can drag an app to the sides of the screen to snap them in place.

why would you WANT to have the extra hassle of typing what you are looking for though... why not just click it?

 

If it were a case of simply clicking an item, that would be one thing, but the menu required drilling down to find anything not in the most frequently used or pinned programs. I hate having to dig through multiple submenus. It's easier and faster to type. I like the screen because it eliminates the drilldown - it really is "just click it".

On my Sons Windows v8.1 P.C. I installed classic shell and downloaded a heap of start orbs so he could choose his start button.

 

Now he aint bothered now that Windows in the future will add a decent start button.

If it were a case of simply clicking an item, that would be one thing, but the menu required drilling down to find anything not in the most frequently used or pinned programs. I hate having to dig through multiple submenus. It's easier and faster to type. I like the screen because it eliminates the drilldown - it really is "just click it".

for me, typing out what you are looking for me seems like more work. For me, its "I see it, I click it" 

If it were a case of simply clicking an item, that would be one thing, but the menu required drilling down to find anything not in the most frequently used or pinned programs. I hate having to dig through multiple submenus. It's easier and faster to type. I like the screen because it eliminates the drilldown - it really is "just click it".

 

That is great.  Keep with the Metro / typing to launch applications.  Not sure why you and Dot Matrix have a hard time understanding and are trying to convince others that Metro is so much better and that WE should use it.  No thank you, I'd much rather have the Start Menu / QuickLaunch bar to run programs instead of being thrown into a full screen program launcher.  

 

Also, the argument that the Start Menu is legacy and has passed its usefulness is such hogwash...it is JUST a program launcher...that is it and that is all it should be.  Did I mention I love the QuickLaunch bar?  Even after almost 15 years it beats the Start Menu and Start Screen at launching programs.  I don't like pinning because it takes either holding the shift button or right clicking to run multiple instances.

 

Below is my simple Windows 7 method of launching programs.  Desktop has two icons, Computer and Recycle Bin.  Simplistic and it works for me.

post-21852-0-10537200-1397394552.jpg

If it were a case of simply clicking an item, that would be one thing, but the menu required drilling down to find anything not in the most frequently used or pinned programs. I hate having to dig through multiple submenus. It's easier and faster to type. I like the screen because it eliminates the drilldown - it really is "just click it".

This, x1000000000000000000000000000000000

That is great. Keep with the Metro / typing to launch applications. Not sure why you and Dot Matrix have a hard time understanding and are trying to convince others that Metro is so much better and that WE should use it. No thank you, I'd much rather have the Start Menu / QuickLaunch bar to run programs instead of being thrown into a full screen program launcher.

Also, the argument that the Start Menu is legacy and has passed its usefulness is such hogwash...it is JUST a program launcher...that is it and that is all it should be. Did I mention I love the QuickLaunch bar? Even after almost 15 years it beats the Start Menu and Start Screen at launching programs. I don't like pinning because it takes either holding the shift button or right clicking to run multiple instances.

Below is my simple Windows 7 method of launching programs. Desktop has two icons, Computer and Recycle Bin. Simplistic and it works for me.

It may just be a launcher, but it's a horribly designed launcher. The biggest issue with it (and the desktop in general), is that it just doesn't scale well at all. It's incredibly hard to see those icons, and the user is dependent on reading line after line in order to locate the folder they need, thanks to the vanilla folders all having the same icon. Taskbar pinning is great, but it's no savior either, as I find myself easily able to mis-click on those icons, wasting time as I now have to wait for the application to launch before closing it. The same applies for the quicklaunch bar. I'm personally glad that was removed from Windows 7. It was great to pin "show desktop" there, and that was about it.

FYI, You can open new instances of applications by simply clicking the middle mouse wheel.

That is great.  Keep with the Metro / typing to launch applications.  Not sure why you and Dot Matrix have a hard time understanding and are trying to convince others that Metro is so much better and that WE should use it.  No thank you, I'd much rather have the Start Menu / QuickLaunch bar to run programs instead of being thrown into a full screen program launcher.  

 

Also, the argument that the Start Menu is legacy and has passed its usefulness is such hogwash...it is JUST a program launcher...that is it and that is all it should be.  Did I mention I love the QuickLaunch bar?  Even after almost 15 years it beats the Start Menu and Start Screen at launching programs.  I don't like pinning because it takes either holding the shift button or right clicking to run multiple instances.

 

Below is my simple Windows 7 method of launching programs.  Desktop has two icons, Computer and Recycle Bin.  Simplistic and it works for me.

 

You can also middle click for multiple instances of pinned items on the taskbar.  Of course that's if you're using a mouse.  I don't know if you might be using a laptop touch pad or something.

 

The argument about the Start Menu being legacy has to do with how it's set up as a bunch of folders that has to be drilled down into and something heavily mouse oriented, not that it's basic function as "just" a program launcher is somehow "legacy".  The Start Screen is still basically a program launcher too.

 

Come to think of it, even the Windows 7 menu that you're talking about is already more than "just" a program launcher.  It's a place to access recently used items, link to folders, link to places on the desktop, shutdown/restart the computer, access your user profile, search for things...

You can also middle click for multiple instances of pinned items on the taskbar.  Of course that's if you're using a mouse.  I don't know if you might be using a laptop touch pad or something.

 

Yea, the problem with that is that on my mouse, the middle button (I'm assuming you're talking about the wheel) causes it to go from no-resistance to a "clicky" spin and vice versa (where I prefer the "clicky")...if you know what I mean?

 

Anyway, never did like the whole pinning applications except on my HTPC..and that is just because the icons are bigger and I really do not launch multiple instances of applications on it.

Yea, the problem with that is that on my mouse, the middle button (I'm assuming you're talking about the wheel) causes it to go from no-resistance to a "clicky" spin and vice versa (where I prefer the "clicky")...if you know what I mean?

 

Anyway, never did like the whole pinning applications except on my HTPC..and that is just because the icons are bigger and I really do not launch multiple instances of applications on it.

O_o
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • DVD only? What kind of self-respecting optical disk backup/ripping tool doesn't support Blu-ray these days? I burned all my DVDs like 15+ years ago...
    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!