Recommended Posts

thank you windowsX, you did not RIP anything. the version like that isn't even out yet so yeah... anyways, heres my verdict.

andy, ur a homo. u ripped his work, plain to the eye. try to make ur OWN theme newb, copying ppls exact things isn't very sportsman like, although this isn't a COMPETITION for christ sake ppl!!!

windowsX has all the right in the world to make the theme, andy can copy his theme to make his OWN mockup as long as he doesn't release it to the public saying that he is to credit.

windowsX, the credit goes to you. END OF STORY!

Shud i call this my own theme ?

Shud i release it ?

It is more different than WindowsX's Theme as compared to AndyLogo's

:blink:

Come On guyz...God gave u a brain..Use it

You hit the head till nails :D

Didn't I tell you guys I'll leave this stupid thing? Go for it you the brainless ppl who never read my reply.

This is the theme i based this Aero theme off of( i made this over six months ago)

http://screenshots.haque.net/screenshots/v...enshot-3465.jpg

Let me tell you how he work.

1) Extract my resources with StyleBuilder

2) Open my themes

3) Copy some of my resources to his theme

4) check theme property to suite it with his theme (like turn off word in keynote and and start button contentmargins in slate for example)

5) Modify his own theme after he has ripped some of my work like his rendition toolbar based on my idea and start button

6) Test it with my shellstyle

7) Make a screenshot and post it here

Correct? :shifty:

I'm really leaving now.

decided by whom? nobody cept himself can actually proves it's a rip.

personally i think arguing over this---without any proof---is very sad. remember windows x used to compite with alan whatever. that's just sad. i am not against to windows x but really, it's just sad. i feel sorry for him

Let me tell you how he work.

1) Extract my resources with StyleBuilder

2) Open my themes

3) Copy some of my resources to his theme

4) check theme property to suite it with his theme (like turn off word in keynote and and start button contentmargins in slate for example)

5) Modify his own theme after he has ripped some of my work like his rendition toolbar based on my idea and start button

6) Test it with my shellstyle

7) Make a screenshot and post it here

Correct? :shifty:

I'm really leaving now.

buddy, you need to stop. it's ridiculous. you can't even prove it. :no:

i'd stop using your theme just because of this post

Didn't I tell you I'll stop this? I know that this can't prove anything even he really ripped or not but I feel so bad with this so I want to say something for this. And I believe that every themer wouldn't feel OK for his work was ripped or something like that without permission. So I want to clear my mind up from this situation. I'm sorry for my post as I told you before that there's no one who wanna see this kind of reply. I won't care of this anymore. Really!

For Alan, it's his misunderstanding that he think I stole his idea. Now it was cleared with my witness thread to prove him that I planned it since March.

What a sad thread. There's valid arguments to support both sides of the argument (basically, rip or no rip) - but certaintly no proof that Andy's ripped Windows X's work, so why are some assuming the worst in him? Guilty until proven innocent?

And I believe that every themer wouldn't feel OK for his work was ripped or something like that without permission.

I hear ya, I really do (I've had my work ripped before). But there's no proof, and it's a strong possibility that he HASN'T ripped your work. So until there's evidence or a solid argument to the contrary, your posts are nothing more than unfounded attacks.

That's my opinion, anyway. I'm not trying to take sides, btw.

Whats happened to you guys,really??

I do not like intervening in people affairs, however I will in the odd chance that this might change your attitudes.

Myself, y_notm, and another member of this board, all made .net/longhorn/blackcomb themes for WindowsXP around 2 years ago

1. When themes first because possible

2. When the first mock up shots of Longhorn were posted over the net.

Now there were 3 of us, making themes off the same mock up pics, and the exact same resources.

We didnt run around spamming the boards about whos copying who, hell we near released them at the same times, we made out own additions to it, and we kept updating and improving our theme to outdo the others. It was friendly fun, competition that resulted in a golden age of themeing. Back then those were the 3 most downloaded themes for quite some months.

Even uptil the first proper alpha shots of Longhorn, there were dozens upon dozens of themes based off Longhorn, and the EXACT resources we used to create our themes, and still did you see us running around detracting from threads about it. No.

The fact is with this whole Longhorn theme, some authors seem hell bent on having the definitive Aero or PDC or Keynote theme, that will be like the definitve Watercolour theme by Binary. We that will never happen again. Binaries theme is the definitive watercolour theme because at the time, there were not enough authors around to have several authors working on the one same theme.

I mean WindowsX you were almost on the right path, go! go and update your themes, out do the other guy, without being nasty about it, theres always more thaty can be done to improve a theme or TFP, Binaries watercolour wasnt complete and a close as possible replication on the first or second releases. It took him well over a year to refine it to the level he did.

My point is, this happens, hell I created a HTML version of MCE, and the Whistler 2250 Active desktop. Then Xero came along and with the help of some russian guy, made it in Flash etc, but at the end of the day I created the first HTML, and I wasnt happy that he stole my thunder, but the fact is both versions had their good and bad points, and quite frankly his release pushed me on to update my HTML releases time and time again.

Again, as people have pointed out, no one owns this theme, its out in the wind, so just do your different versions, and push yourselves on to better them.

Because quite frankly both WindowsX and ANDYs again have good and bad points, and they each have their own followings. So lets keep these threads what they are about.

@ WindowsX

I don't know what the big deal is, they don't look even similar. Maybe its just me but the colour is completely different, caption buttons are different, startbutton is different, my caption bars have a slate/plex gradient effect not flat like yours, my startpanel has a screwy black line around the user pic(yours doesn't), taskband program highlights are completely different, and my captions and taskbar are way thinner.

@ GOJI_GKing2000

Thanks for the suggestions

Cheers

yes its different, but thats a moded rip

same think as i would rip neowin site then add some gradient effects, change color and everyone will think ive chaged the world !!

dude if i was you i would admit that i used some ideas then ask windows x for permission and im sure he would be happy to give it to you, he is a great guy. :rolleyes:

I like how it looks.

Windows X : I really like you transformation pack and I am using it currently. I love your work.

ANDYLOGO : I really like what you have done. The black line you have around the display picture I find actually looks better. It gives it sort of a 'shadowed' look which what I like.

Back At Windows X : I feel bad if he stole your work cause I really enjoy your stuff.

I'm not going to take sides on this whole 'stolen, not stolen' cause really I like them both.

I hate to weigh in on this argument but im afraid im going to have to agree with the whole ask for permission thing.

I still ask for permission even when the images are barely recognizable anymore just as a matter of courtesy.

I happen to know first hand that WindowsX and myself put a lot of creative thought and effort into our keynote style startmenus.

I am also more than happy to give permission to people who want to mod or use my work and I am quite sure WindowsX would be too,

The important thing is that you actually ask before you make a public spectacle of it ..

ANDYLOGO you have great skills but in the future get your permissions taken care of before you post these [WIP] topics and we will all have an easier time getting along :)

thats my long winded two cents :

:p

ANDYLOGO: im friends with windows=x but i tried to not take sides because i liked your version of it, hell i would like to help you beta it but oh well

my only advice to you is maybe talk to windowx aobut this and maybe you two could end up making a(n) Uber-Theme by both of you...i would LOVE to see that

anyway just try to settle the difference and understand the main reason he gets mad....hes still in school and this is probably his favorite thing to do, meaning he loves it....i dunno that really didnt make sense..... anyway post some more screen shots damnit and lets see how ur theme is doing now

AND CAN YOU ANSWER MY QUESTION???: are you using Glass2k? :)

Windows X ... you said you were leaving, GO!

This is a good theme, it's not a rip. Of course they will look similar, they are trying to copy the same thing!

The Shell is the same, but ANDYLOGO already said it wasn't going to be included.

This is a bunch of crap, a perfectly good thread ruined.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!